Hi again,
After a bit more investigation, it really does seem to be a problem with
my SpamAssassin installation. I ran a spam mail through spamassassin
from the command line like this: 'spamassassin -D < msg1.txt'. Here's
what looked weird:
> debug: is spam? score=5.567 required=5
tests=HTML_FONT
Bill Polhemus wrote:
This one got through. Can we figure out how and why?
With just the body of the message and no headers, probably not. That
really not enough to work with.
---
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conf
At 01:21 PM 10/17/03 +0200, Håkon Nilsen \(Exinet AS\) wrote:
Bayes tages it worth 5.4 points. My limit is 5. How does Byes tag it this
much? What should I do to solve the issue? Raise the limit to 7.5 or
something would probably help on this one, but not all. A whitelist service
is already created
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 11:30:19AM -0500, Jeff Funk wrote:
> We were having issues with SA slowing to a crawl and messages backing up
> in the queue so I decided to try cgpsa and see if the problem would go
> away. After getting it set up yesterday, everything performed perfectly
> for about 16 ho
On 17-Oct-2003 23:44, Robert Leonard III wrote:
I'm seeing the test in my results now.. not seeing what score is applied
though.. seems as if it is not scoring, but simply acknowledging the test..
is there a tag I can put in my local.cf file that will force the awl score
to display? Something alon
Anyone have any information on infinite-monkeys on how to contact them regarding
getting removed from their systems?
When I enable IM in my MailScanner setup for SpamAssassin, all outgoing mail
from my servers gets kicked into la-la land - I scan all outgoing Email -
because it's matching on Infin
Bill Polhemus writes:
> I have wanted to set up a "spam trap" for some time. First, I created an
> account, called "spamtest," on my system. Then, I went to Usenet and posted
> a ton of "test" messages to every newsgroup I could think of (mostly the
> pr0n ones) where the address would be harveste
Okay, someone already responded that it is
“SMRSH” that’s the culprit. So I got to learn a bit more
about how smrsh operates. Seems as though it will only allow Sendmail to run a
very few shell commands, and only those programs that are explicitly in the
/etc/smrsh subdirectory.
The typ
For anyone interested, I've just posted some patches against SA 2.60
to add support for SortMonster's MessageSniffer product (another spam
detecting tool).
By combining these tools, all of those "4.9 point" FN's get whacked
pretty effectively.
I'm debating adding a rule to subtract 3.0 points if
I have wanted to set up a “spam trap” for some
time. First, I created an account, called “spamtest,” on my system.
Then, I went to Usenet and posted a ton of “test” messages to every
newsgroup I could think of (mostly the pr0n ones) where the address would be
harvested, and tried using the
I'm seeing the test in my results now.. not seeing what score is applied
though.. seems as if it is not scoring, but simply acknowledging the test..
is there a tag I can put in my local.cf file that will force the awl score
to display? Something along the lines of:
add_header all AWL _AWL_
??
T
This one got through. Can we figure out how and why?
Notice purposeful misspellings as obfuscations.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Begin Included Message-
16121g11n4m06a8a53594548b10126vx
291uqs7rz3xo63jl8w5ie14f3q3c3770The stoicism which
she
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Diego Puppin wrote:
> is it possible to add the spamassassin "hits" score to the spam mails,
> so that I can sort my spam box and find the "spammest" emails?
> I would like to have my spam emails tagged as:
> **SPAM** (score) Subject
> so I can sort and find which has 30 hits a
Dominik Ruf writes:
> * Lewis Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-17 22:41]:
> > I see messages receiving points for FAKE_HELO_AOL yet when I look in the
> > logs the SMTP server that sent the message is indeed listed in as an ip
> > address as an AOL mail server. I think that the helo name is inc
Dear Colin,
Thanks for your reply.
I've used SA with MIME defang for a while now, and it hasn't gotten me into
any trouble before. SA has acutally been quite amazing! It's filtrating most
mails as spam, and I'm satisfied with it this far.
But when I added this domain, it cought WAY too much. I'v
Welcome to SourceForge... Happens all the time with their lists.
Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
Moderately Off Topic:
Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in a timely fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to 45 minutes for my message to appear. By the time
* Lewis Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-17 22:41]:
> I see messages receiving points for FAKE_HELO_AOL yet when I look in the
> logs the SMTP server that sent the message is indeed listed in as an ip
> address as an AOL mail server. I think that the helo name is incorrect but
> I doubt that aol
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:54:46PM -0600, Dave Bartmess wrote:
> Thanks... makes sense... Maybe that should be in the FAQ, though, cause
> I couldn't find any information anywhere on it..
Instead of an FAQ, we just put the info in the actual documentation:
bayes_path /path/to/file (default
(I'm new to spamassassin). I continue to get this error message from
spamassassin, but it appears to be working according to the sample
tests. Is this having any effect on the operation of spamassassin I'm
not aware of? (see below)
spamassassin --lint
Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method
S
I see messages receiving points for FAKE_HELO_AOL yet when I look in the
logs the SMTP server that sent the message is indeed listed in as an ip
address as an AOL mail server. I think that the helo name is incorrect but
I doubt that aol is going to fix this. How can I fix this to where it
works cor
Thanks... makes sense... Maybe that should be in the FAQ, though, cause
I couldn't find any information anywhere on it..
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 13:12, Tom Meunier wrote:
> That's right. It seems weird, doesn't it? But basically, that setting
> tells SA that the filenames are /usr/local/share/baye
In my local.cf, I've got
# Enable the Bayes system
use_bayes 1
bayes_path /usr/local/share/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0666
But it seems to put the bayes_journal, etc in /usr/local/share instead.
How is this supposed to look? I don't want to open up the
/usr/local/sh
That's right. It seems weird, doesn't it? But basically, that setting
tells SA that the filenames are /usr/local/share/bayes_*
To achieve what you think it should be, you'd want to do bayes_path
/usr/local/share/bayes/bayes - funny as that sounds.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL P
I too have seen these, Use the following rule, it works for me:
header __FVGT_h_XNUMBER0 ALL =~ /x-transfer-number/
header __FVGT_h_XNUMBER1 ALL =~ /X-transfer-number/
header __FVGT_h_XNUMBER2 ALL =~ /X-TRANSFER-NUMBER/
header __FVGT_h_XSTAMP0 ALL =~ /x-transfer-stamp/
header __FVGT_h_XSTAMP1
At 01:29 PM 10/17/03 -0400, Jon Fraley wrote:
>From looking at some posts, it looks like Mailscanner just looks for a
score from SA. Does this mean that the message does not get re-written
as an attachment with the report if it is spam? Or does Mailscanner do
this? I can not find exactly how it
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
[...]
>
> The partiuclar message you were testing against is a common virus email..
> SA isn't designed to catch viruses, and has no rules to catch this one.. if
> you really want to catch them, search in the archives of this list for SWEN
> and you sh
I am looking at a possilbe Mailscanner installation. We already use SA
2.60 and are extremely pleased with the results.
>From looking at some posts, it looks like Mailscanner just looks for a
score from SA. Does this mean that the message does not get re-written
as an attachment with the repor
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:36:30PM -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
> > ... I ran out of space in the file system while doing an
> > sa-learn, and that was that.
>
> I got rid of that by creating a cronjob which does
> the sa-learn often enough to let the
Jeffrey Schilperoord Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:54 PM
> How do i setup spamasassin to delete all mail tagged as spam? Or move it
to a > dir?
SA simply tags an email, doesn't dispose of it. Check out the bottom of the
howto at:
http://www.peregrinehw.com/downloads/SpamAssassin/INSTALL
You
Well, it happened again, my Bayes files got trashed. I ran out of space in
the file system while doing an sa-learn, and that was that.
Then I wiped out the Bayes files, and started over, and I got an unlock
error.
Now I'm into my second attempt at rebuilding. There has to be an easier
way than
I was not complaining and I did not perceive anyone else to be either. I
perceived the original question as just that, a question. Call it baseline
if you will. Today, for me at least, the queue is about a half hour.
Nothing more, nothing less.
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Mat
I noticed on:
http://au.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
That..
use_dcc ( 0 | 1 ) (default: 1)
Whether to use DCC, if it is available.
But it's not defined whether 0 or 1 is ON? I'm
assuming 1 is ON, but I'm concerned I may be wrong.
This is also true of:
use_pyzor ( 0
Thanks for the header iteration Dan but I was *not* complaining. If I want
a speedy response I do what Matt does which is to include the author as well
as the list when sending.
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Wilder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:36:30PM -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
> ... I ran out of space in the file system while doing an
> sa-learn, and that was that.
I got rid of that by creating a cronjob which does
the sa-learn often enough to let the journal grow
only for a while. So it no more flooded the d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that the problem lies somewhere else, though. As I wrote in a
previous mail, 'spamassassin -t < testmail' tags all mails as 'Probably
mail' even though the hits don't even reach 1 (req 5)!
spamassassin -t outputs the standard report regardless of whether an item
ha
Matthew McGehrin Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:40 PM
> I think you are expecting too much from a 'Free' List Server.
Just to set the record straight, It wasn't my intent to complain... only see
if others had the same issues. If other people feel stupid because of
redundant posting, well than
Because I installed SpamAssassin through cpan, does that mean I have all
that is included in spamassassin-tools-2.60-1.i386.rpm ?
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:01 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamassass
I think you are expecting too much from a 'Free' List Server.
I would think delivery times up to an hour are expected. My messages arrive
in 15 to 20 minutes. I'm on some security lists that the delay is closer to
2 hours.
-- Matthew
- Original Message -
From: "Colin A. Bartlett" <[EMAIL
How do i setup spamasassin to delete all mail
tagged as spam? Or move it to a dir?
greetings Jeffrey
Schilperoord
We were having issues with
SA slowing to a crawl and messages backing up in the queue so I decided to try cgpsa
and see if the problem would go away. After getting it set up yesterday,
everything performed perfectly for about 16 hours and 55000 messages. Then,
all of a sudden, at around 9
I see the same thing. In fact my messages hardly make it to the list.
- Original Message -
From: "Colin A. Bartlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] slow list
> Moderately Off Topic:
>
> Does anyone else have trouble g
I restarted Spamd with the following..
spamd -d -x -a
And I don't see any indication that the AWL is being either created or
used... does the --lint -D output indicate the presence of the AWL database?
should the /auto-whitelist directory I created contain any files?
Thanks!
- Orig
At 03:10 PM 10/16/2003, Daniel M. Drucker wrote:
I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as
I can tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect.
I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this problem...
Dan.. Are you using an internal mailserver wi
OK... Hmmm Wish that'd been highlighted in the changes...
I'll try that, and let you know
Thanks, Matt!
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 09:55, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 11:22 AM 10/17/2003, Dave Bartmess wrote:
> >I put this on the command line, and immediately after restarting spamd,
> >it gave me the fo
We were having issues with SA slowing to a crawl and messages backing up
in the queue so I decided to try cgpsa and see if the problem would go
away. After getting it set up yesterday, everything performed perfectly
for about 16 hours and 55000 messages. Then, all of a sudden, at around
9am CDT,
At 11:22 AM 10/17/2003, Dave Bartmess wrote:
I put this on the command line, and immediately after restarting spamd,
it gave me the following messages in /var/log/mail/errors:
Oct 13 21:45:46 Dingo spamc[5596]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at
127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#3 of 3): Connection refused
Ah
Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd be lucky to see the post in a half hour.
>From the Received headers on my copy, edited down to
what pertains to this question:
> Received: from sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net
> by mail.ssc.com
> Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
abo
At 12:07 PM 10/13/2003, Robert Leonard III wrote:
Anybody have any advice on what to set these thresholds at?
Currently I run SA's Spam Threshold at 5.5, the default Bayes numbers are .1
for HAM, and 12 for SPAM.. I put mine to 1.0 for HAM and 6.5 for SPAM.. is
that reasonable?
That depends a bit
At 04:36 AM 10/5/2003, Hendrik wrote:
First Question: Why does SA prints out "autolean=no" when the
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf says:
# Enable Bayes auto-learning
auto_learn 1
the "autolearn=no" means it didn't auto-learn THIS message because it
didn't score high or low enough t
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:37:53AM -0400, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> Moderately Off Topic:
>
> Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in a timely
> fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to 45 minutes for my
> message to appear. By the time my reply shows
Hi Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin updates
>
>
> > rpmbuild -ta Mail-Spamassassin-2.60.tar.gz
>
> Thanks for that tip. Running it produced:
>
> per
I'd be lucky to see the post in a half hour.
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Colin A. Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] slow list
>
>
> Moderately Off Topic:
>
> Does anyone else have trouble
[ Modified the subject, as I originally forgot a topic. ]
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 17:19, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 08:53 AM 10/17/2003, guenther wrote:
>
> >I just wondered about redirecting mail to learn as Spam, as mentioned in
> >FAQ 5.1.
> >
> >This will add extra headers (especially Received he
Yevgeniy Miretskiy wrote:
On [10/17/03 09:54], Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
Diego Puppin Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:55 AM
is it possible to add the spamassassin "hits" score to the spam mails,
so that I can sort my spam box and find the "spammest" emails?
Yep, it's in the Docs at
On [10/17/03 09:54], Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> Diego Puppin Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:55 AM
>
> > is it possible to add the spamassassin "hits" score to the spam mails,
> > so that I can sort my spam box and find the "spammest" emails?
>
> Yep, it's in the Docs at:
> http://au.spamassassi
At 10:37 AM 10/17/2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in a timely
fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to 45 minutes for my
message to appear. By the time my reply shows up, 3 other people have
replied and I look like a d
Out of curiosity, what method do you use to feed your email into
SpamAssassin? Do you use a milter with Sendmail, procmail, et al.?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Daniel M. Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk]
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:37:53AM -0400, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in
> a timely fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to
> 45 minutes for my message to appear. By the time my reply shows up,
> 3 other people have r
Great, which files do I need to copy?
--Mike
From: Patrick Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 10/17/2003 10:03 AM
To: Mike Carlson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New Box
Assuming you've got all the Perl modules installed on the new box,
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 09:46, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Well, as someone else on SA-talk pointed out, you were incorrectly
> specifying parameters.
>
> spamd -d -c -a -m5 -H -u root
>
> Is not going to be parsed the way you think.
>
> Drop the -H.. it's absolutely invalid to tell snort that the hom
At 08:53 AM 10/17/2003, guenther wrote:
I just wondered about redirecting mail to learn as Spam, as mentioned in
FAQ 5.1.
This will add extra headers (especially Received headers).
Won't these headers poison the Bayesian database?
This varies a lot from mail client to mail client. With some mail cl
Everything in /etc/mail/spamassassin, and all the files from wherever
your Bayes stuff is stored. I'll admit I'm a bit fuzzy on how to pull
off the AWL transfer -- maybe someone else could pipe in on that.
This is, of course, assuming you've installed SA on the new box, and
weren't planning on
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael W.Cocke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] CPAN or RPM's?
--snip--
> And, to bring this post back toward the stated subject, I was never
> able to successfully install S
Grasshopper hangs head in shame for not testing spamc standalone first.
Changed qmail-scanner-queue.pl to remove -c on options line for spamc launch
and ALL works as expected.
Many Many Thanks to all
Michael Balamuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jason Staudenmayer [mailto:[E
Assuming you've got all the Perl modules installed on the new box, and
the same version of the Berkeley DB libs, a direct copy should work fine.
Mike Carlson wrote:
After a hugely successful test of spamassassin, I now need to move it to a bigger badder production box. Can I just copy file from
After a hugely successful test of spamassassin, I now need to move it to a
bigger badder production box. Can I just copy file from the old system to the
new system so that I don't have to retrain it or start the AWL/Bayes stuff
over again? If so, what files do I need to copy so that I don't have to
Moderately Off Topic:
Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in a timely
fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to 45 minutes for my
message to appear. By the time my reply shows up, 3 other people have
replied and I look like a dufus for posting redundant
Our site has just received a spam with approx 19kb of headers of the form
shown at the end.
The message gets marked as spam but the MUA (tested outlook and Eudora)
fails to filter based on the mark (presumably it gives up scaning the
headers before reaching my spam flag at the end). Clearly s
Håkon Nilsen (Exinet AS) Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:39 AM
> So how can this happen over night without any interference?
> PS: It even tags the mails that are whitelisted as spam, with -100.0
> hits
Can you paste in the tests that it matched so that we can see the scoring of
each?
cheer
Yes, that's what I'm doing. But it's not very intelligent in the long run,
and I can't spend my whole day on whitelisting domains and email
addresses...
Best regards,
Haakon Nilsen
- Original Message -
From: "Amnon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Håkon Nilsen (Exinet AS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Colin A. Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should probably start by retraining Bayes with the Hams that
> were false positives. You'll need to save the messages to your
> server and then run sa-learn --ham on them. You could also use
> user_prefs files or database to set much lower Bayes s
Diego Puppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to have my spam emails tagged as:
>
> **SPAM** (score) Subject
Look at the "tagging" section in the Conf documentation. I use
subject_tag *SPAM(_HITS_)*
The score even has a leading 0, so I can sort by subject and
look more carefully at
Dear Tom,
Thanks for your reply.
I've done this now, and I'm thankfull for your information. I trained it
with many mails, so I hope it will help.
I think that the problem lies somewhere else, though. As I wrote in a
previous mail, 'spamassassin -t < testmail' tags all mails as 'Probably
mail' e
Hi all, (this might be quite long)
I use RH9, spamass-milter, SA 2.60, sendmail and fetchmail as a front
end server for my Win2000/Exchange network. The principal reason for
placing a linux box at the edge of the network was to filter all
incoming mail with Spamassassin. It works very well (thou
Diego Puppin Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:55 AM
> is it possible to add the spamassassin "hits" score to the spam mails,
> so that I can sort my spam box and find the "spammest" emails?
Yep, it's in the Docs at:
http://au.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
Add a line to local.c
On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the
> -notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells
> SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match. As a
I wasn't even aware that thi
I apologize for not giving more detail. Being new to this list, I wasn't
sure how much "stuff" people want to see on an initial question. We are
running qmail with qmail-scanner 1.20rc3 (latest?) with qmail-scanner now
running under its own uid of qscand. qmail-scanner is launched via
qmail-queu
Håkon Nilsen Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 7:21 AM
> Bayes tages it worth 5.4 points. My limit is 5. How does Byes tag it this
> much? What should I do to solve the issue? Raise the limit to 7.5 or
> something would probably help on this one, but not all. A whitelist
service
> is already created,
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:33:09 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Jeff Lasman wrote:
>> They announced the phase out at least a year ago; perhaps longer.
>
>I just spoke to Red Hat, and none of their front line people could name a
>date, though they 'guessed' that it must have been later
YES you can
subject_tag '[SA Says: _HITS_] SPAM'
-Original Message-
From: Diego Puppin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] adding SPAM hits score to headers
Dear all,
is it possible to add the spamassassin
Yes:
**SPAM** _HITS_
-Jim
Jim Upwood
System Administrator
Bond, Schoeneck, and King
Syracuse, NY
-Original Message-
From: Diego Puppin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] adding SPAM hits score to headers
Dear all
Dear all,
is it possible to add the spamassassin "hits" score to the spam mails,
so that I can sort my spam box and find the "spammest" emails?
I would like to have my spam emails tagged as:
**SPAM** (score) Subject
so I can sort and find which has 30 hits and which has only 5.5, and
manage the
"whitelist_to" maybe
- Original Message -
From: "Håkon Nilsen (Exinet AS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 7:21 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] LOTS of mail being tagged wrong
> Hi,
>
> This is a cross-message for MIMEdefang an
> rpmbuild -ta Mail-Spamassassin-2.60.tar.gz
Thanks for that tip. Running it produced:
perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-1.i386.rpm
spamassassin-tools-2.60-1.i386.rpm
spamassassin-2.60-1.i386.rpm
What does perl-Mai do? I assume all three need to be installed?
--
I just wondered about redirecting mail to learn as Spam, as mentioned in
FAQ 5.1.
This will add extra headers (especially Received headers).
Won't these headers poison the Bayesian database?
btw: I upgraded to 2.60 yesterday and even spoiled SA with Razor and DCC
(well, Pyzor cowardly refuses to
Hi,
This is a cross-message for MIMEdefang and SpamAssassin mailing lists.
System: RH 7.3, Sendmail 8.12.10, SA 2.60, MIMEdefang 2.37
I just added new domain relaying through my mailserver. The users are ship
brokers, and receive a _lot_ of mail from around the world. The problem is
that lots an
Train Bayes with sa-learn --ham using a sizable representative sample of the shipping
company's "known good" email.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Håkon Nilsen (Exinet AS)
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 6:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL P
Thanks Sergio
I've got it working fine now for my virtual domains. Justing testing and fine
tuning now.
--
Regards
Diye Wariebi
Quoting Sergio Pires Albuquerque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin 2.60 with Linux and E
88 matches
Mail list logo
