> -Original Message-
> From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 September 2003 15:21
> To: Tony Hoyle; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS
>
>
> header NO_RDNS Received=~ /unknown/
> describe NO_RDNS Sending MTA has no reverse DNS
> score
Hi,
I had an idea for a test which i don't think exists, at least not in the
current test list available on the website. Some hosts found in Received:
headers are not registered in DNSes (often there are workstations) and we
end up with a header like
Received: from 154.15.53.105 (unknown[154.15.5
When building the RPM from the tarball, how do I set the CONTACT_ADDRESS? I
suppose ideally the spec file should allow one to pass in a %define on the
rpmbuild command line to set that.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Abigail Marshall wrote:
>
> CW> Ok, I re-learned most of it :/
> CW> Does anyone have an idea why it can happen that
> CW> this database loses its content?
>
> I don't know but I have the same problem. It seems to
> happen when my bayes_toks file reaches about 5k.
>
> I run a
"Mike Loiterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Be careful! I just upgraded to 2.60rc4 and my
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf got blown away.
>
> Not sure if this is just me or not.
How did you upgrade and overwrite it? "make install" ?
Can you try and see if it happens again? I can't repro
See http://www.bbspot.com/News/2003/08/assassin.html
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have added a .cf files to disable osirusoft, and set rbl_timeout and
razor_timeout to 5 seconds.
I start spamd with the following:
971 ?R 0:11 /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/spamd -a -u pop3 -p 1783 -i
65.161.2.7 -A 65.161.2.30,65.161.2.16,65.161.2.14
Sep 11 19:02:19 spam0 spamd[1986]:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:32:47PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Anybody running spamc from procmail with sendmail is vulnerable to having
> their server overloaded because of uncontrolled concurancy of local
> deliveries - despite the options mentioned above, sendmail just doesn't
> have adequa
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:42:38 -0400 Theo Van Dinter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:38:47PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Hrm. I'm wondering what that's gonna do to the Bayes_* scores for those
tokens?
if it's only 1 message, not a lot. I always learn on error
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 07:59:42PM -0600, Ken Gordon wrote:
> Any idea why not? Is there something wrong with the rule? Does rc4 want
> local.cf to be somewhere else?
when you run with -D, where does it say it's looking for the site-wide
configs?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"War should be th
Yes. It appears my 2.60 rules are in /opt/perl/share/spamassassin/ and
that /usr/share/spamassassin has an old ruleset in it. I could make
links from /usr/share/spamassassin, but is there another way? That
strikes me as a short term solution.
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Matt
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:33:26AM -0400, Scott Kopel wrote:
> what do the 4 different scores mean? and how does one use them?
RTFM Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf, look for "score". :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
It's, uh, pseudo code. Yeah, that's the ticket...
[...]
And "unicode" is pseudo cod
Has anyone written a script that run sa-learn through an IMAP folder?
Yes. Try this one:
$ cat trainbayes
# !/bin/bash
sa-learn --no-rebuild --ham --dir /home/mail/amavis/maildir/.ham/cur/
sa-learn --no-rebuild --spam --dir /home/mail/amavis/maildir/.spam/cur/
sa-learn --rebuild
If the IMAP serve
forget that last message, i have no idea why it
sent it twice, nor why it took a day later to send the second one.
apologies.
:-)
- Original Message -
From:
Alan
Fullmer
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:01
PM
Subject: [SAtalk] u
My /usr/local/spamassassin/local.cf contains a rule to add 25 points to
mail to a particular address, since that address (which lands in my
mailbox for some historical reason) only gets spam. Here is the rule
(with the offending address disguised):
header ToCc_ABCD_AGT ToCc =~ /[EMAIL
Hi,
I'm using spamassassin with mailscanner and I have a problem, which I posted
on the MailScanner mailing list, but couldn't be answered. Please just tell me if i'm
off topic.
Hi,
I installed Spamassassin 2.55, changed the
"Use SpamAssassin = no"
for
"
Use SpamAssassin = ye
Hi,
i am sorry for my re-posting, but i did not receive any answers.
i have several email addresses without a homedir, so i wanted to solve
this with the sql api. as i understand, the only way that a user can
customize (and learn spam) his filter, is with the php frontend (which i
do not found, t
Hello folks,
I newly installed SA v 2.52-1 on my Linux RH 8 with CommuniGate Pro mailer on it.
I set only the system wide configuration (file local.cf is located in
/etc/mail/spamassassin and it contains the following lines:
- -
# SpamAssassin config file for version 2.5x
# generated by http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Still trying to track down the cause of this problem (SA Skipping
certain messages). I did a little investigation and eneded up having
to reboot my server because things got so screwed up. First I an
spamc from procmail with ' -t 120'. That may ha
Hi list, i would like to warn about the overwriting of the local.cf file when
you do a make install. Hopefully i have a backup of the file :).
Regards,
German Staltari
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
ht
Some FAQs:
1. No parameters are needed. The $1 and $2 variables are field variables
for awk.
2. This script is more of a "typing saver" rather than a piece of
code. Hence,
3. The path to your spam-or-ham file is hardcoded. I have one script for
ham and one for spam. Also,
4. I am too lazy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm getting this error when I do an sa-learn --spam
Insecure dependency in glob while running with -T switch at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator
.pm line 621.
- --
Mike Loiterman
gra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I'm getting a growing number of messages that appear to have been
> skipped by SA.
>
> I've mailed the list about this several times, but have yet to
> receive answer. One other person noticed this, but he never
> responded to my inquiry either
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Be careful! I just upgraded to 2.60rc4 and my
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf got blown away.
Not sure if this is just me or not.
- --
Mike Loiterman
grantADLER
Tel: 630-302-4944
Fax: 773-868-0071
Email: [EMAIL PROTECT
Well, just to add one more post to this thread. I contacted Joe Brennan at
Columbia. He let me know how he performs this check and said it would be ok
to share with the list. Please don't ask me questions about this as he uses
Mimedefang and Sendmail, both of which I do not use.
Cudos to Joe fo
At 01:07 PM 9/11/2003 -0400, Alicia Forsythe wrote:
I just cought an FP where the SUBJ_HAS_SPACES rule gave 3.5 points. My
local.cf has no reference to this rule, but I did find it in
50_scores.cf: SUBJ_HAS_SPACES 2.425 2.026 1.101 2.329
I think you're looking in the wrong place. That message was
Going forward, would it be possible to have a configuration option that
allows you to take Bayes scores into account when autolearning?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:49 AM
To: Larry Rosenman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I attach a perl file that may help you identify where scores come from.
Isolate the offending email (with SA markup)
and run the email message into the perl program:
perl perltest
It will print the tests, scores and total score.
It will attempt to look in /usr/share/spamassassin and
/etc/mail/spam
For implementing a major new feature of MailScanner, I need to have 2
SpamAssassin objects which have completely different directories for rules,
user_prefs, etc.
1 is going to do spam checking (as now),
the other is going to have content checking rules added as an entirely
custom set of *.cf f
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Carlo Wood wrote:
> Ok, I re-learned most of it :/
> Does anyone have an idea why it can happen that
> this database loses its content?
>
> When running the same mail again with debugging
> turned on, I see the following:
>
> debug: bayes token 'HX-Qmail-Scanner-1.16:header'
Ich werde ab 12.09.2003 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
13.09.2003.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht(en) nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
mfg
I will answer after returning to the office.
Regards
Wolfgang Fuertbauer
---
This sf.net email i
On Friday 12 September 2003 07:38 CET Matt Thoene wrote:
> Hi...just upgraded from rc3 to rc4 and am now seeing this in the logs...
>
> razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in
> connect while running setuid at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/IO/Socket.pm line 108,
Hi there.
I thought I'd give RC4 a try just to make sure things are going to
work for me.
Everything seems to be working properly, with the exception of
learning with sa-learn. Dumping the database/magic, etc. works fine,
but calling "sa-learn --spam" results in the following error:
> Insecu
Quoting "Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Saturday 06 September 2003 03:26 CET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# spamassassin --version
> > SpamAssassin version 2.60-rc3-mss2
> >
> > Perl version:
> > 5.006001
> >[...]
> > That is odd, because:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Steven,
Friday, September 12, 2003, 6:11:10 AM, you wrote:
SWO> that I can just add?
1. Spamassassin did a good job of stopping Sobig.F without
any extra rules, as it apparently ran afoul of other
recipes.
2. SobigF expired on September 10th. There may be a few
errant worms floating aroun
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 05:38:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This might be an issue of scale.
Might be. How many simultaneous spamc processes do you usually have at any
given time?
> I'm probibly 800 messages every few minutes.
Do you also use any RBLs to reject anything at the SMTP s
I'm filtering email addressed to alias users and mailman lists on my
machine, and today I'm finding that my own email to these lists is
getting a huge score from the auto-whitelist. I've had to do:
spamassassin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure I understand what's going on here.
Spamassassin 2.60-
abmc> I am starting over, and need to "clear" or "untrain" the database of
abmc> whatever incorrect info it has in it, but the sa-learn man page doesn't seem
abmc> to have a specific option for clearing all information and starting over,
abmc> other than the expiration. Is "sa-learn --rebuild --for
On Friday 12 September 2003 04:02 pm, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
> I installed 2.60 rc4 over 2.55 which had not been used. This is the
> result:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ Command
> 26711 omega13 15 0 27324 23m 13m R 30.3 13.2 1:22.34 spamd
> 26559 omega
I installed 2.60 rc4 over 2.55 which had not been used. This is the result:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ Command
26711 omega13 15 0 27324 23m 13m R 30.3 13.2 1:22.34 spamd
26559 omega13 18 0 26624 17m 7972 R 30.0 9.6 9:23.79 spamd
The only changes
I have several aliases on my machine that are not users on the machine,
and so when procmail calls spamd it's user nobody.
Maybe I should not have done this, but I created /.spamassassin owned
by nobody, so spamd could write bayes tokens and user_prefs to be shared
by those aliases.
I'm getting t
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:09:02 -0400 (EDT)
"Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. Let be be more clearerer.
>
> What I'm looking for is a set of recipes for rejecting the Sobig:F
> virus based on the text that appears in the Subject line.
Are you quite happy to accept all other viruses
I've suggested this myself; run all of the negative score tests first, then
the positive ones, and stop when you hit threshold. I'm told there are
architectural reasons why this can't currently be done.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve
T
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 12:07 PM -0600 Lucas Albers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could someone post an updated redhat spec file for rc4?
ln -s Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.tar.gz Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.gz
rpmbuild -ta Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.gz
(The spec file in the tarball isn't expe
Hi, this is the 3rd time I try to get help.
I'm running successfully SpamAssassin (spamd) on a freeBSD VPS.
However when I try to train SpamAssassin with sa-learn I get the following error:Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CmdLearn.pm in @INC
I should also mention I had to patch spamd with the fol
This might be an issue of scale.
I'm probibly 800 messages every few minutes. A couple of thouasnd e-mail
acconts forwarded via spamc.
Is the script you ran available for download?
Jim writes:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 09:42:02PM -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
New machine... dual 1.2Ghz AMD CP
Steven W. Orr wrote on Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:11:10 -0400 (EDT):
> that I can just add?
>
Lots at www.exit0.us !
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:39:18PM +0200, Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
> So may be something like this hit us too...
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Scott Lambert wrote:
> > If spamc can't connect to spamd, (all slots full on the spamd server),
> > it just passes the message through. If
Fred wrote:
>> See this page:
>> http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
Frank Pineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sweet. Exactly what I needed. Thanks.
You can also read Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf (look for the string
"check_rbl") and read the examples in the 20_dnsbl_tests.cf file that
ship
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 05:09:02PM -0400, Steven W. Orr is rumored to have said:
>
> What I'm looking for is a set of recipes for rejecting the Sobig:F virus
> based on the text that appears in the Subject line.
Filenames would be better. I wrote a rule a couple of weeks ago for the filenames fo
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> doh. sorry about that. I was confusing always_add_headers with
> always_add_report. :(
I had to re-read the options about 3 times for each version myself. :-)
The old options are rather confusing. The new methods are much better
and easier to gro
Steve,
Something like this:
header _VBOUNCE_h_sobigf Subject =~ /(?:Re\: Details|Re\: Approved|Re\:
Re\: My details|Re\: Thank you\!|Re\: That movie|Re\: Wicked
screensaver|Re\: Your application|Thank you\!|Your details)/
body _VBOUNCE_b_sobigf /(?:See the attached file for details|Please see the
Spamassassin is a spam blocker not a virus checker. You want a virus
checker such as antivir, see http/www.antivir.de. This is free for
personal use.
Nigel
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:11:10 -0400 (EDT)
"Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that I can just add?
>
> TIA
>
> --
> -Time flies
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 09:11:10 -0400 "Steven W. Orr"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that I can just add?
TIA
add a virus scanner.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboa
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Scott Lambert wrote:
> Spamd running with -m parameter?
Um, I have no idea. I can check.
>
> If spamc can't connect to spamd, (all slots full on the spamd server),
> it just passes the message through. If spamd dies while running under
> something like D
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 10:00:02AM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote:
> >> always_add_headers doesn't affect X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status.
> >> They're both added by default to all messages, unless your configuration
> >> disables them.
doh. sorry about that. I was confusing always_add_headers with
alw
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:49:59AM -0500, Henrik Schmiediche wrote:
> Has something PATH wise changed on rc4? I installed rc4 and suddenly SA
> cannot find "dccproc" and "pyzor" which are installed in my
> mail/spam/virus bin directory. Creating link(s) in /usr/local/bin to
> dccproc & pyzor fixed
Jim wrote:
>>> Upgraded from rc2, and now the X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status headers do
>>> not get added unless I set this variable to 1.
>>>
>>> In all previous versions I've used, the reverse was true.
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> always_add_headers doesn't affect X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Nougen Canada Inc.
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_QM90VpaqliA7JXtz7mI5dw)"
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b)
Gecko/20030901 Thun
Ich werde ab 12.09.2003 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
13.09.2003.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht(en) nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
mfg
I will answer after returning to the office.
Regards
Wolfgang Fuertbauer
---
This sf.net email i
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:38:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I installed amavisd-new and spamassassin from FreeBSD ports.
> Are these the files I'm looking for:
>
> /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_msgcount
> /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
> /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
On Friday, Sep 12th 2003 at 15:49 -0500, quoth Larry Rosenman:
=>--On Friday, September 12, 2003 09:11:10 -0400 "Steven W. Orr"
=><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
=>
=>> that I can just add?
=>>
=>> TIA
=>
=>add a virus scanner.
=>
=>LER
Ok. Let be be more clearerer.
What I'm looking for is a set of
Can you create a bug for this and add it to SpamAssassin Bugzilla at
bugzilla.spamassassin.org?
After you create the bug, please attach the translations using the
"create an attachment" link. (Do not cut and paste.)
Thanks.
Daniel
---
This s
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Scott Rothgaber is rumored to have said:
>
> If performance is an issue, how about an option like...
>
> HIT_AND_RUN 1
>
> ...that would cause spamd to stop processing once your threshhold had
> been met? IOW why keep scanning text once the message has
Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:34:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > other than the expiration. Is "sa-learn --rebuild
> --force-expire" the option
> > I'm looking for to clean it entirely?
>
> Delete the db files.
I installed amavisd-new an
what do the 4 different scores mean? and how does one use them?
HTML_MESSAGE 0.160 0.001 0.100 0.100
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 2.25 0 1.50
Scott Kopel
English Department, FSU
Mail Code 1580
850 644 6177
---
This sf.net email is sponso
Sorry for jumping in.
If performance is an issue, how about an option like...
HIT_AND_RUN 1
...that would cause spamd to stop processing once your threshhold had
been met? IOW why keep scanning text once the message has been
identified as spam? I'm sure that I'm missing something here but I'd
Hello,
Has something PATH wise changed on rc4? I installed rc4 and suddenly SA
cannot find "dccproc" and "pyzor" which are installed in my
mail/spam/virus bin directory. Creating link(s) in /usr/local/bin to
dccproc & pyzor fixed the problem and SA can then find the programs, but
I do not un
At 9/12/03 08:26 AM , Scott Rothgaber wrote:
Covington, Chris wrote:
I've noticed that Columbia University has an SA rule for no reverse DNS:
Have you used this technique before? For me, it was an incessant pain in
the ass. You will be bombarded with complaints. The very reason that I'm
using SA
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:34:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> other than the expiration. Is "sa-learn --rebuild --force-expire" the option
> I'm looking for to clean it entirely?
Delete the db files.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Given enough time and money, Microsoft will eventually 'i
Just FYI, AOL is doing reverse DNS and won't accept incoming email if
they don't approve of the sending IP address.. as in, they won't
accept messages from my domain because I use dyndns and not a static
IP. I wonder how long that stupid idea will last?
Mike-
Mornings: Evolution in action. O
I think the odds are against it being either of these 2 programs, but
I'm losing what's left of my mind Mailman won't send any
mail No error messages, logs look ok, and it doesn't LOOK like
mimedefang or spamassassin has anything to do with the problem... but
I figured I'd ask. Any wei
At 10:33 11/09/2003, Richard I. Kirkcaldy wrote:
Hi,
I'm using exiscan with spamd, and recently it's stopped
working. I've been trying to get dcc working with spamassassin, but gave
up - so I'm assuming that's what has caused it.
Nope that's not it. I'm running Exim 4.22 and SpamAssassin
--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:29:08 -0400 Theo Van Dinter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 08:40:54AM -0600, Ken Gordon wrote:
I just noticed the following in a spamassassin report. I thought 2.60
(which I think I am running) didn't use this test. Am I wrong? Should I
b
> -Original Message-
> From: John Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files
>
>
> Please forgive me if this is already answered in the list
> archives. But, if
>
Thanks for the help! That's exactly what I needed to do.
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Lopez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "AWShirley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Trying to install DB_File from CPAN
> It is lookong for /usr/local/Ber
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:34:12AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> RC3 had them removed to the best of my knowledge.
You're right. I can never keep track of what changes between releases. ;)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"You can start by removing your clothes.
Not without flowers and dinner.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 07:30:42AM -0700, Creede Lambard wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 06:08:42AM -0400, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> >
> > BSDi 4.3 handling the spamd, being called from a Slackware 8.1 box with
> > spamc and I see the same thing in 2.60-rc3. Not often mind you, I get
> > about
that I can just add?
TIA
--
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have -
-happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ
-Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all-
-individuals! What if this weren't a hy
So may be something like this hit us too...
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Scott Lambert wrote:
> If spamc can't connect to spamd, (all slots full on the spamd server),
> it just passes the message through. If spamd dies while running under
> something like DJB's daemontools, one to se
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, AWShirley wrote:
> I'm trying to install DB_File from CPAN so I can use Bayes, but the
> install fails. I get these error messages:
> version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directory
You need Berkley DB -- http://www.sleepycat.com/download/index.shtml if you
like to build f
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 06:36:27PM +0100, TUNC ERESEN wrote:
> Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendmail[14913]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket:
> daemon MTA: cannot bind: Address already in use
> Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendmail[14913]: daemon MTA: problem creating SMTP socket
> Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendma
2.60rc4 scored it 6.0 for me
On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 11:17 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
pts rule name description
--
--
0.8 TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL To: repeats address as real name
0.1 HTML_MESSAGE
> "MT" == Matt Thoene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MT> Hi...just upgraded from rc3 to rc4 and am now seeing this in the logs...
MT> razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in
MT> connect while running setuid at
MT> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux/IO/Socket.pm lin
Hello,
Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendmail[14913]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket:
daemon MTA: cannot bind: Address already in use
Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendmail[14913]: daemon MTA: problem creating SMTP socket
Sep 12 18:29:35 ns1 sendmail[14913]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket:
daem
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:07:35PM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote:
> I am upgrading from rc3 to rc4 and I'm using the same spec file that I
> used to compile rc3 to compile rc4. I updated it to point to the new
> package, so it unzips correctly.
You can't do that. Need to update the spec file.
> Have
Larry Gilson wrote:
> I think that you will want to lower the score to maybe 1.0. There are
> a lot of legitimate mail servers that do not have a reverse lookup.
Like my own personal server at work. :/ For whatever reason, reverse
lookups on the IP block it's on don't resolve from outside. I t
Hi,
Here's a copy of one I just got with no mark up
doing cat file | spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't add any markup
either.
A spamassassin -t does mark it up though.
Regards,
Rick
--- Begin Message ---
fdifjhbbzv ltd xehvqs s lwrqtgrwyf
ynjl
eaq
ey
dsvhv
djbqou nzwur
jholq j cjg
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:44:10PM -0500, AWShirley wrote:
> I'm trying to install DB_File from CPAN so I can use Bayes, but the install fails.
> I get these error messages:
> Can anyone tell me what I'm missing on my system? I'm running Mandrake 9.1
Do you have the db* RPMs installed? ala db3
Sweet. Exactly what I needed. Thanks.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
> See this page:
> http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
>
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
I am upgrading from rc3 to rc4 and I'm using the same spec file that I
used to compile rc3 to compile rc4. I updated it to point to the new
package, so it unzips correctly.
Have any of these variables changes(they must have...)?
from rc3 to rc4?
INST_PREFIX
INST_SITELIB
INST_SYSCONFDIR
DEF
I'm trying to install DB_File from CPAN so I can
use Bayes, but the install fails. I get these error messages:
version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or
directorymake: *** [version.o] Error 1 /usr/bin/make -- NOT
OKRunning make test Can't test without successful makeRunning
make install
See this page:
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Frank Pineau wrote:
> Is there any way to make SA check other RBL's? Ever since the demise
> of Osirusoft, I've been using my own RBL zone file on my DNS server,
> but I'd like to
Greetings!
After not throroughly reading the documentation, I trained the Bayes
database incorrectly, and the autolearn function also learned a LOT of
incorrect spam/ham classifications (resulting in "penis enlargements" coming
through as ham, Bugtraq getting marked as spam, etc).
I am starting o
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Creede Lambard spaketh thusly:
-}Oh good, maybe I'm not alone in this. :)
Oh no you are not. ;> I am currently chasing the same problem.
We are running SA 2.55 site-wide and are seeing tons of these. Most go
though fine however some do not. I can watch in the logs as th
Covington, Chris wrote:
I've noticed that Columbia University has an SA rule for no reverse DNS:
Have you used this technique before? For me, it was an incessant pain in
the ass. You will be bombarded with complaints. The very reason that I'm
using SA is that host-based blocking, with the except
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:38:47PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Hrm. I'm wondering what that's gonna do to the Bayes_* scores for those
> tokens?
if it's only 1 message, not a lot. I always learn on error though.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"You can't run sausage backwards through a meat
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:00:35AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:46:57AM +, Jim wrote:
> > Upgraded from rc2, and now the X-Spam-Level and X-Spam-Status headers do
> > not get added unless I set this variable to 1.
> >
> > In all previous versions I've used, the re
check the wiki at www.exit0.us fred rules have been working great. Much
better then mine. Actually I use them both ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Kh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spell check email
Is there any way to make SA check other RBL's? Ever since the demise of
Osirusoft, I've been using my own RBL zone file on my DNS server, but I'd
like to have SA check it as well.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
