[Please limit your line length to <=70 chars/line]
On 2003-01-15 22:42:07 -, Stephane wrote:
> exists today disappears ? With opensource you cannot have a
> contractual engagement to provide support or updates, nor can
> you really know the roadmap for a product and what is planned
> for futur
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:32:01 -0600
SpamTalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both Imail and Exchange have LDAP capabilities and Sendmail (Amazon just
> shipped me the 3rd edition Bat book that covers v8.12) seems to have LDAP
> lookup. I think Exim might also have the capability.
Exactly. It's an MTA
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 06:26:13PM +0100, Maxime Ritter wrote:
> What I also figured out is that Outlook is unable to send a HTML mail
> without plain text. That's why I wrote this rule :
Not true at all.
Outlook (via Exchange - pretty standard [the standard?!?! ;-)]) can have
it's Internet Mail
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 18:24, Michael Andreasen wrote:
> Exim & Spamassassin... I'm almost there, but ...
>
> I have both these applications working to the point that spam is being
> detected and marked as such in the mail header. However, I'm not sure
> how to get exim to drop these email, and the
On 15 Jan 2003 22:42:07 -
"Stephane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The goal for us is to tag emails (X-Spam-Flag) in a first step
> and let the Notes client put tagged msgs into a separate folder (only saves
> time, bandwidth and storage are still used).
I think there might be a problem with
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 18:32, SpamTalk wrote:
> I think Exim might also have the capability.
I believe it does have this capability. I've been meaning to test it
out.
> What I would like to see is the ability of the gateway to use LDAP to
> validate the recipient exists so that messages for non-ex
This discussion could go on infinitum, but the bottom line is that there are
plenty of "real" and significant companies that pre-maturely release
"un-baked" products, do not release patches in the timely manner, and
abandon products that large portions of their user base were perfectly happy
with i
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:13:26PM -0600, Jeremy Turner wrote:
> Easy enough. I have my settings to not clobber HTML emails, and put
> reports in the header. I use an MTA-level subject rewrite so that
> emails within a certain spam range get classified as 'Yellow' or 'Red'.
> Therefore, a spam
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:42:07PM -, Stephane wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Amongst the answers to my previous post ("has a large company implemented SA") there
>was a very good idea on success stories with SA... It is true that most of the people
>on the net who would say they were happy with
Exim & Spamassassin... I'm almost there, but ...
I have both these applications working to the point that spam is being detected and marked as such in the mail header. However, I'm not sure how to get exim to drop these email, and then send an email to the sender informing them they *may* have spa
Discussion of gateways in the "success stories" thread got me thinking.
We are very much in the pilot stage with SA. We forward through a RH7.3
hardened with Bastille from an external Imail 7.1 server and a fire walled
Exchange 5.5 server.
Both Imail and Exchange have LDAP capabilities and Sendmail
I use this:
# This is a reformulation of standard test VERY_SUSP_RECIPS
header SimilarToNames ToCc =~ /\b([a-z][a-z])[^@,<>\(\)
]{0,20}(@[-a-z0-9_\.]{2,4}).{0,80}?(?:\1[^@,<>\(\) ]{0,20}\2.{0,80}?){2,}/is
describeSimilarToNames To: and Cc: contain similar
use
Replies within:
Stephane wrote:
Hello again,
Amongst the answers to my previous post ("has a large company implemented SA") there was a very good idea on success stories with SA... It is true that most of the people on the net who would say they were happy with SA and that it worked well fo
> Our infrastructure would look like:
> Internet-->[SA]-->[Mailsweeper]-->[SMTP/Lotus Notes
> gateway]-->Lotus Notes Mail reader on Client PC
Our is:
Internet-->[postfix gateway]-->[SA+amavisd-new]-->[Exchange]
20k-30k emails a day, not a huge site.
In order to tag mail flowing through, I use
Stephane,
On 15 Jan 2003, Stephane wrote:
> I think most companies are afraid of implementing opensource software as
> a component for an important service such as email. I think that
> generally even though people know email has not been designed to be a
> 100% reliable protocol they still make
We do internet <-> [SA/virus scanner gateway] <-> [sendmail server] <->
[exchange server]
Some clients on the sendmail server, some on the exchange server. SA
works great for us, 300 employees, 5000 messages a day to/from the
internet (33-45% spam)
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: Ste
At 02:10 PM 01/15/2003, you wrote:
i am a user of spamassassin and would like to have spamassassin send a
response to the spammer and the recivere of the spam when it recives spam.
please help
We need to have a SA drinking game - SpamAssassin will not do the above.
You'll need a procmail filter
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 16:42, Stephane wrote:
> Our infrastructure would look like:
> Internet-->[SA]-->[Mailsweeper]-->[SMTP/Lotus Notes gateway]-->Lotus
> Notes Mail reader on Client PC
> Each bracketed text is a separate server, so SA would be a dedicated
> relay, with no local mailboxes, just a
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 16:10, David Gladstone wrote:
> i am a user of spamassassin and would like to have spamassassin send a
> response to the spammer and the recivere of the spam when it recives spam.
> please help
1. SpamAssassin doesn't actually do the sending of emails. This is
handled by yo
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:10:15PM -0500, David Gladstone wrote:
> i am a user of spamassassin and would like to have spamassassin send a
> response to the spammer and the recivere of the spam when it recives spam.
> please help
> -dave
That is a Bad Idea. Since the To: and From: fields mean lite
both
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Olivier M. wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:10:15PM -0500, David Gladstone wrote:
> > i am a user of spamassassin and would like to have spamassassin send a
> > response to the spammer and the recivere of the spam when it recives spam.
>
> and to which address would y
Hello again,
Amongst the answers to my previous post ("has a large company implemented SA") there
was a very good idea on success stories with SA... It is true that most of the people
on the net who would say they were happy with SA and that it worked well for them are
using it for their privat
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:10:15PM -0500, David Gladstone wrote:
> i am a user of spamassassin and would like to have spamassassin send a
> response to the spammer and the recivere of the spam when it recives spam.
and to which address would you send the response ? The reply-to and from:
addresse
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:37:00AM -0500, Christopher Van Oosterhout wrote:
> I guess the bottom line is ... if I want to add some spam phrases, how do I
> determine the number that I should assign to it. I know it is a somewhat
Warning: spam phrases are not in 2.50, so if you plan on upgrading
i am a user of spamassassin and would like to have spamassassin send a
response to the spammer and the recivere of the spam when it recives spam.
please help
-dave
---
David Gladstone
Data Center Manager
Automated Financial Systems
(212) 771-1927
cell: (718) 930-37
Ok! guys I figured it out
I did a spamd -L -S -i 0.0.0.0 -x -D -u mail
and the following error message was returned
fatal: Can't create /tmp/spamassassin-24759 at /usr/bin/spamd line 209.
the permissions on /tmp was
drwxrwx--t
---
This SF.NET e
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 21:22, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:43:35PM -0500, Robert J. Accettura wrote:
> > Spammers tend to use both HTML/TEXT since it still serves it's purpose
> > as spam regardless of the client used. The exception being the ones
> > that use really bad s
Hi All.
I'm running SA 2.43 and I can't get DCC to run. It hangs spamd in the same
spot everytime. I have the dcc path set, and debug says it finds dccprc. I
think I've narrowed the trouble down to DNS.pm. cdcc 'info' works. I've
included a code snippet.
# use a temp file here -- open2()
Hi All.
I'm running SA 2.43 and I can't get DCC to run. I think I've narrowed the
___
All emails incoming and outgoing from SBS Forestry Inc.
are scanned by Kaspersky Antivirus.
---
This SF
sabat said:
> Since the 2.50 release is impending, can someone on the inside briefly
> explain where the new Bayesian stuff stores what it "learns," and how
> would this affect those of us running multiple mail servers? I notice
> Theo mentioned something about the developers mulling over using
Hi everyone.
I just subscribed to this list because I couldn't find any information
on Google for the issue I am having. I hope someone here can help.
I have been running the following system for about 6 months:
PIII 700
1 GB RAM - 30820 free
Qmail 1.0.3
Qmail-scanner-1.13
Spamassassin-2.31 as
If someone could explain a way to allow it to learn with Win XP
(ActivePerl) and pop3proxy, I would appreciate it.
sabat wrote:
Since the 2.50 release is impending, can someone on the inside briefly
explain where the new Bayesian stuff stores what it "learns," and how
would this affe
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 06:25:16PM +, Chris Willard wrote:
> Is there a Perl expression that I can use that would count if the
> number of "chris@" is greater than a given value (e.g. 3)?
Actually 9 entries (the first, plus 8 others). You could use a similar
RE to the SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS one.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 7:47:04 PM, you wrote:
TVD> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:20:36PM +, Chris Willard wrote:
>> There is very little text in the messages so they are missed by
>> spamassassin. Is there a rule that I can use to spot when messages are
>> addressed like this?
TVD> You me
Since the 2.50 release is impending, can someone on the inside briefly
explain where the new Bayesian stuff stores what it "learns," and how
would this affect those of us running multiple mail servers? I notice
Theo mentioned something about the developers mulling over using a
database -- any
Thanks Matt,
I am not sure if I just do not understand your response ... or if I did not
make the question clear enough. I am specifically interested in the role
of the file 40_spam_phrases (snippet below).
My question is: how does the numbers 38220 or 35710 associated with
specific phrases
Thanks Matt,
I am not sure if I just do not understand your response ... or if I did not
make the question clear enough. I am specifically interested in the role
of the file 40_spam_phrases (snippet below).
My question is: how does the numbers 38220 or 35710 associated with
specific phrases
On 13.01.2003 9:00 Uhr, Nick Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anyone is using spamassassin with CommuniGate Pro together would someone
> please send me some configuration files or some a howto on getting them to
> work. If they go in more than one place zip them in the file structure in the
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:17:25PM -0800, JP Kelly wrote:
> I am runningv2.43 and I am looking forward to upgrading to 2.5.
> I am running it on OS X with exim.
> I would like to upgrade via CPAN.
> What is the likelihood of the upgrade breaking my configuration?
> How different is 2.5 from 2.43.
The "value" is assigned by the same mass-check process that all the rules
are scored by. There is absolutely no simple relationship between the two,
and the score is the result of analysis of real patterns existing in real
email.
I'm going to gloss over some details of the mass-check and GA pro
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:31:38PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> btw: what happens if an incoming mail already contains typical SA
> tags, either because the outgoing message was scanned by SA or a
> spammer forges those headers? Does SA add its own (double headers),
> does it replace these heade
Greetings All,
I am new to SpamAssassin and hope that this question was not recently asked
or covered by obvious documentation. If in fact there is documentation (I
searched but did not yet find) to cover this, please point me to it).
I am trying to find the relationship between the "value" a
Martin Radford wrote on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:04:37 + (GMT):
> FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
>
btw: what happens if an incoming mail already contains typical SA
tags, either because the outgoing message was scanned by SA or a
spammer forges those headers? Does SA add its own (double headers),
does it r
Greetings All,
I am new to SpamAssassin and hope that this question was not recently asked
or covered by obvious documentation. If in fact there is documentation (I
searched but did not yet find) to cover this, please point me to it).
I am trying to find the relationship between the "value" a
In case sf.net CVS is still down for anonymous use, I've tarballed
the *new* CORPORA_SUBMIT_VERSION_2_5_0_CHECK1 tag, here:
http://spamassassin.taint.org/devel/special/SUBMIT_2_5_0_CHECK1.tar.gz
use this if you can't get through to anon CVS.
--j.
Robert J. Accettura wrote on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:38:39 -0500:
> Problem is, outside this techie world, life isn't like that.
>
Well, but life is like that most spam is HTML (either only or
text+HTML) and most legitimate mail is NOT HTML. I've not seen any
proof against that yet. As Theo states
At 22:20 14/01/2003, you wrote:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 19:13:26, you wrote:
I would be interested in knowing if there is a similar large company (>
5000 mailboxes) having successfully implemented spamassassin in order to
share the experience -- we had a successful pilot running and would l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:09:10 +0100
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] two subject lines...
>>>
>>>I have a strange behavior with sendmail 8.12.3 spamassassin 4.43 and
>>>spamassassin-milter 0.1.2
The problem is solved with the
Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:43:47 PST
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] two subject lines...
>At 06:58 AM 1/14/2003, you wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I have a strange behavior with sendmail 8.12.3 spamassassin 4.43 and
>>spamassassin-milter 0.1.2
>>I have configured spamassassin wi
49 matches
Mail list logo
