Hi all,
Running SA 2.50 on BSDI 4.x, Perl 5.8.0,
delivering to local mailbox files via Postfix + Procmail. Everything
works as advertised -- kudos to the SA coders!! :-) :-)
I have one minor problem. Using a
site-wide config, I have some entries in my local.cf which specify users who
h
"Andrew Joakimsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When forwarding a non-spam message with UebiMiau webmail, Spam Assasin
> thinks it's spam! Anyone have any similar issues or know what I could
> do to fix this?
Well, that messages *does* trigger a lot of spam rules -- it contains a
lot of formatti
When forwarding a non-spam message with UebiMiau webmail, Spam Assasin
thinks it's spam! Anyone have any similar issues or know what I could do to
fix this?
Also it seems that SA breaks HTML in email when the message is Spam, is that
how it should be or just a slight bug or the result of editing
> um... Is this the SpamAssassin list?
yes it is.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL se
>
> Depending on how old your version of MIME::Base64 is, herein may lie your
> problem.
>
> - Mark
Thanks for the information I will check what version.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning y
Let the mass-checking begin!
The mass-check results are used as input for the genetic algorithm (GA)
that generates SpamAssassin rule scores. Basically, the people who have
both an email corpus and the capability to run mass-check submit their
mass-check data to the SA developers and one of them
Bob Apthorpe said:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Andrew Allison wrote:
>
> > My Web host uses SpamAssassin to filter e-mail, but quite a bit gets
> > through. I've looked at the FAQs and don't find a mechanism for a Windows
> > (2000) user to submit the offending e-mails for inclusion in the filtering.
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Andrew Allison wrote:
> My Web host uses SpamAssassin to filter e-mail, but quite a bit gets
> through. I've looked at the FAQs and don't find a mechanism for a Windows
> (2000) user to submit the offending e-mails for inclusion in the filtering.
> Is there one?
No. Very
I am running Redhat8 qmailscanner1.15 and spamassassin2.43. I currently
have the spamd called from a redhat-init script and it starts a single
process. My question is because of the qmail config I am able to start
as many as 10 qmail-scanner sessions but only see the one spamd should I
see more?.
Appears that it was the auto-whitelist...
Thanks
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 15:05, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Are you using the AWL? (ie: spamassassin -a)
>
> Did the DNSBL hits change? (ie: if you happened to be running these checks
> and one of the IPs got removed from a DNSBL that would change the scor
Are you using the AWL? (ie: spamassassin -a)
Did the DNSBL hits change? (ie: if you happened to be running these checks
and one of the IPs got removed from a DNSBL that would change the score)
Are you using Razor/pyzor/dcc? (if the email happened to be
revoked/removed/ or timed out of listing i
My Web host uses SpamAssassin to filter e-mail, but quite a bit gets
through. I've looked at the FAQs and don't find a mechanism for a Windows
(2000) user to submit the offending e-mails for inclusion in the filtering.
Is there one?
---
This
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:10:42PM -0600, George Kasica wrote:
> I'm running SA here version 2.11 using the spamd option started as:
you need to upgrade.
> my question is thisWhich ones is spamd reading (any or all or ??)
spamd is like spamassassin, except it's a daemon. So it reads the
con
Hello:
I'm running SA here version 2.11 using the spamd option started as:
/usr/local/bin/spamd -F 0
I've got my local.cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin and a large
collection of configs in /usr/local/share/spamassassin
10_misc.cf
20_body_tests.cf
20_head_tests.cf
25_body_tests_pl.cf
25_head_te
I am doing some testing on Redhat8 perl 5.8 and SpamAssassin2.43
I sent the same message to myself approx 30 times and after the first
4-5 messages sent the SA score started dropping until it dropped to 3.8
below the required hits limit of 5. Any one else seen this ?
--
Ron Culler
--
Ok, I have written my custom rules and assigned it a 0 value in my local.cf.
Now I need to know what entries to use in my SQL table for me to give (just
me) a higher value than 0 for that rule. The rule name is
PORNOGRAPHIC_TERMS. I can't use user preference files because out SA is
spread across
um... Is this the SpamAssassin list?
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:27:26AM +, Dave S wrote:
> I am getting various error from the CPAN install which stops the thing
> from building & hence I still have no Spam Filtering HELP!!
>
> t/basic_lintUse of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method
> Time::HiRes::time() is
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:01:21PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> # Some new RBLs to go check
> header RCVD_IN_RFCP eval:check_rbl('rfcp', 'postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org.')
As far as I can see, 'check_rbl' looks for IP addresses in the RBL lists.
But for {postmaster,abuse,dsn}.rfc-ignoran
Nick Marino wrote on Mon, 13 Jan 2003 02:00:04 -0600:
> Better be careful what you ask for here brian or you would be
> accused of not wanting to do the work yourself.
>
Stop this NOW! (And also change your OE settings to NOT answer in the
original content-type.)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin,
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bob Apthorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] My posting
You may be barking up the wrong tree. :) Perl works with modules. One of
those packages is:
MIM
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:51:41 -0500:
> debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_DSBL ==> got hit
>
I checked this again. Yeah, it shows, but only if there is a hit.
When I did my first debug tests all of them didn't show such a line
(because there were no hits).
Kai
Assassin wrote on Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:54:19 -0800 (PST):
> How do I get
> SA to check all emails and then allow virtusertable (sendmail) to forward
> the email? Is this possible?
>
You have to use a sendmail-milter which talks to spamd, then the spam
filtering happens before delivery. We current
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 01:22, Brian York wrote:
> Subject: [expert] Spamassassin + CommuniGate Pro config
>
> If anyone is using spamassassin with CommuniGate Pro together would someone
> please send me some configuration files or some a howto on getting them to
> work. If they go in more than on
> Are you sure the mail messages aren't mangled before they get to SA? If
> you're using procmail, you can copy the messages into a folder before
> they hit SA so you can compare the two.
Yes I am sure they are not mangles before SA gets ahold of them I have
done many tests to make sure that
I agree.
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: email quoting (was: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email. This
is directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> As I am a new member of the list, I am h
Hello,
I'm trying to install spamassassin 2.43 on a Redhat Linux 7.3 mail gateway
using Qmail 1.03 patched and Qmail-scanner 1.15.
I always get this result :
13/01/2003 13:43:04:7212: SA: run /usr/bin/spamc -c -f <
/var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/ENTERPRISE10424617844247212
13/01/2003 13:43:04
Hi Everyone
I've been running Spamassassin successfully for some time but after a
recent server outage it has stopped working. All other services on my
server are OK so I decided it probably needed a rebuild which I started
from CPAN.
I am getting various error from the CPAN install which s
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tony L. Svanstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] My posting
>
> You could have sent that message to me personally about the top
> posting
Nick Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-13 01:49:25 -0600]:
> From: "Bob Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hello Nick
> > I am sending this in the hopes that it will be taken constructively
> > and not as an attempt at abuse. Perhaps these references will be of
> > use. Shrug. Conversational quot
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:58:24 -0600
"Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dam Swedes always gotta be starting something!
And with this remark I regret I ever bothered replying to your message.
I guess we can now officualy consider you a racist idiot who we should
ignore for the remainder of e
Hi,
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:17:18 -0600
"Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok I looked back and I have to agree it is hard to understand what is going
> on when doing the top posting thing.
>
> So for that I appologize. But when someone is learning and trying to
> understand new things pl
As I am a new member of the list, I am hoping that flamewars such as this are
not par for the course, or I will have to consider unsubscribing.
Please drop it now or take it offline. I think this horse has been beat
enough. Thanks.
--Russell
On Monday 13 January 2003 1:49 am, Nick Marino wro
*plink*
That's the sound of your idiot behavior causing me (and I suspect quite
a few others) to add you to my killfile. Nice way to make yourself known
to a list btw.
Blatant stupidity and rudeness is bad enough. Crude racist remarks are a
different kind of offensive behavior altogether.
Don
If anyone is using spamassassin with CommuniGate Pro
together would someone please send me some configuration
files or some a howto on getting them to work. If they go in
more than one place zip them in the file structure in the place were they should
go.
Better be careful what you ask for
- Original Message -
From: "Tony L. Svanstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:50 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] My posting
what ever.
You read what ever you wanted to into my post just so you would have
somet
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:22 AM
Subject: email quoting (was: [SAtalk] Spamassasin corupting email. This is
directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Hello Nick
> I am sending this in the hopes
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:17:18 -0600
"Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So for that I appologize. But when someone is learning and trying to
> understand new things please don't be so rude when you respond to them you
> are more than likely to get a rude response back.
You haven't told anyo
38 matches
Mail list logo
