[SAtalk] Help with 2.31 install

I am currently running SA 2.0 on a RH 6.0 machine quite successfully thanks to help from some folks on this list... When attempting to install 2.31, I get the following running make: /usr/bin/pod2man: bad option in paragraph 95 of spamproxy/spamproxyd: ``-o'' should be [CB]<-o> /usr/bin/pod2ma

Re: [SAtalk] anyone seen cloudmark.com?

Duncan Findlay wrote: > Yep, it's razor. Vipul is the other (or another) co-founder. I read the article at coudmark. I never really considered the lawsuit aspect. The Razor voting concept would indeed seem to sidestep that issue. And I'd think individual SA users like myself would be immune to

Re: [SAtalk] anyone seen cloudmark.com?

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:10:46PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Hi, all -- > > Has anyone yet seen cloudmark.com and their SpamNet approach? To wit > > Cloudmark, an anti-spam company co-founded by Napster founder Jordan > Ritter has announced a clever new anti-spam tool called SpamNet which >

[SAtalk] anyone seen cloudmark.com?

Hi, all -- Has anyone yet seen cloudmark.com and their SpamNet approach? To wit Cloudmark, an anti-spam company co-founded by Napster founder Jordan Ritter has announced a clever new anti-spam tool called SpamNet which filters unsolicited email messages base on users' voting in an Inter

[SAtalk] Building Debian packages from CVS

As of now, spamassassin packages can be built from CVS. To do so, you need perl (>=5.6.0-16), debhelper (>>4.0.0), devscripts, dpkg-dev (these are all very common among developers) To generate the changelog (which is read for version numbers, etc) run debian/build.pl (from the top level directory

Re: [SAtalk] Detecting spam tagged mail on a 2nd pass.

>It's been requested that if a message has been detected as SPAM already, >that it would be nice to have a ALREADY_ASSASSINATED rule that could >be used by the procmail delivery to process these messages seperately. Sounds to be a problem of configuring your Mail Delivery Agent (procmail or other

Re: [SAtalk] Debugging switch

> /usr/bin/spamd -d -D -F 1 AFAIR, -d and -D are incompatible, with -D and no -d, spamd runs in foreground and logs information on screen. Olivier --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/

Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

> I've -HUP'ped spamd every time local.cf has been modified. But just > for grins I killed it completely and restarted it. It came up for a > short while then died. Odd, I thought. I restarted it again with > the same result. So figuring it was time to upgrade to the latest > version, I d

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie question - script for resubmit and add to whitelist

In your message regarding RE: [SAtalk] Newbie question - script for resubmit and add to whitelist dated Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:57:33 -0500, Smart, Dan said that ... >SD- I copy all message headers as a log to a MBOX mailbox using the Procmail >SD- :0chi: command. The 'c' command copies rather tha

[SAtalk] Happy Honeymoon to all!

Ok folks, This is probably the last time I'll check list mail before I head out tonight. Have fun while I'm gone, keep up the good work, don't let the bedbugs bite, etc. See you all in 2 weeks. C --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.Th

Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:14:34PM -0700, Michelle Brownsworth wrote: > I've -HUP'ped spamd every time local.cf has been modified. But just > for grins I killed it completely and restarted it. It came up for a > short while then died. Odd, I thought. I restarted it again with > the same res

Re: [SAtalk] custom subject rule

On Thursday 20 June 2002 10:41 am, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 10:31:34AM -0700, Steve Thomas wrote: > > I've added a couple of custom rules to our local.cf for industry-specific > > terms. So far I've set up one rule for the subject and one for the body > > for each 'keyword

[SAtalk] Re: SA in a windows server...

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:43:50PM -0700, Kevin Gagel wrote: | Question 1: | Am I correct about the NoMailAudit.pm wanting to utilize the | directory of the intended recipient? If you don't specify -P, yes. If you specify -P, no. This is intentional. The solution is to specify -P. (IMO the l

[SAtalk] Re: spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:14:34PM -0700, Michelle Brownsworth wrote: | >On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 02:34 PM, M. Brownsworth wrote: | > | >>I'm running spamd 2.20 as root on a FreeBSD 4.5 server, with | >>system-wide filtering. It seems to be disregarding anything in | >>/etc/mail/spamassa

RE: [SAtalk] New porn rule

Sorry, I did say my experience of Perl - especially regexps - is very limited :( Thanks for pointing it out to me, I'll remove that rule from my own configuration. Daz > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:spamassassin- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matthew Cline >

Re: [SAtalk] New porn rule

On Thursday 20 June 2002 07:28 am, Darren Coleman wrote: > body PORN_15 > /\b(?:horse?s|snake?s|eel?s|dog(?:gy)?s)[ -]?fuck(?:ing)|cum[ -]?shot?s|bl > ow[ -]?job?s/i > describe PORN_15Uses words and phrases which indicate porn > (15) That would match any message with "horses"

[SAtalk] fetchmail and the "From" field as applies to auto-whitelisting

> But forwarding the same message to my self gives this in the procmail log > file when the spamassassin -D option is used: > > debug: using "/home/jvarsoke/etc/spamassassin/rules" for site rules dir > debug: using "/home/jvarsoke/.spamassassin" for user state dir > debug: using "/home/jvarsoke/.s

[SAtalk] Newbie Q: get all zero scores?

After reading about Razor and spamassassin on /. I set up procmail and spamassassin 2.20 (the only rpm available). Procmail seems to work fine. But spamassassin (through .forward) seems to give everything a score of 0. The command line test of spamassasin works fine: $spamassassin -t < spam.t

[SAtalk] SA in a windows server...

I've been having trouble getting sa to be useful. I've tried the batch file that gets generated but if I don't use -P it just hangs and does nothing. I've tried the .pl instead and ran it from there with the same result. I've traced the problem to the setting for the mail spool directory. It seems

Re: [SAtalk] 2.31 released

> > Thanks for releasing the update to 2.31. Is there an ETA on RPM > > availability? > > > ftp://ftp.kluge.net/pub/felicity/SRPMS/spamassassin-2.31-1.src.rpm ... > I usually suggest people rebuild from the SRPM since there may be > different versions of perl involved and such. Is there ever

Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

>On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 02:34 PM, M. Brownsworth wrote: > >>I'm running spamd 2.20 as root on a FreeBSD 4.5 server, with >>system-wide filtering. It seems to be disregarding anything in >>/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Yesterday, I added my address as >>"all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [SAtalk] 2.31 released

> Thanks for releasing the update to 2.31. Is there an ETA on RPM > availability? > I've built one that you're free to use. ftp://ftp.kluge.net/pub/felicity/RPMS/spamassassin-2.31-1.i386.rpm The SRPM is ftp://ftp.kluge.net/pub/felicity/SRPMS/spamassassin-2.31-1.src.rpm ... I usually su

Re: [SAtalk] Default MySQL Settings for users

> sorry I didn't read your question thoroughly > > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf will be the defaults > > but I see you wanted to preload the database with entries if none exists > > Here's an possible idea in ConfSourceSQL.pm > > my @row; > my $text; > my $sql; > $sql = >

Re: [SAtalk] 2.31 released

Craig, Thanks for releasing the update to 2.31. Is there an ETA on RPM availability? Have a great trip! Having just experienced our honeymoon in April, my wife and I are still glowing! :-) --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGee

Re: [SAtalk] spamd ignoring local.cf

On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 02:34 PM, M. Brownsworth wrote: > I'm running spamd 2.20 as root on a FreeBSD 4.5 server, with > system-wide filtering. It seems to be disregarding anything in > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Yesterday, I added my address as > "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SAtalk] Razor, SA in Slashdot article, Yahoo! News

It also depends on the people. Some people definitely prefer easy-to-intall-and-configure worriless time-limited shareware to have-to-be-a-unix-sysadmin free (as in beer) software. Which is why we think DeerSoft can thrive by putting a lot of work into the free (beer and speech) SpamAssassin pro

Re: [SAtalk] Razor, SA in Slashdot article, Yahoo! News

Matthew Cline wrote: MC> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/06/19/1335210&mode=thread&tid=111 MC> http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/cn/20020619/tc_cn/937300&printer=1 MC> MC> CmdrTaco says that SA catches over a hundred spam a day for him; pretty good MC> publicity. The Razor for

[SAtalk] spamd ignoring local.cf

I'm running spamd 2.20 as root on a FreeBSD 4.5 server, with system-wide filtering. It seems to be disregarding anything in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Yesterday, I added my address as "all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]," but spamd/procmail then subsequently filtered and intercepted numerou

Re: [SAtalk] Detecting spam tagged mail on a 2nd pass.

> Explain this Recipe if you would: > > |:0E > |* !Subject: BOUNCE.*:.*taboo header: /^X-Spam-Flag: YES/i > |{ > | INCLUDERC=$HOME/.procmail.d/spamassassin > | INCLUDERC=$HOME/.procmail.d/spam > |} > > Are the : you show here really the pipe | symbol meaning 'or'? > I assume BOUNCE is to a

Re: [SAtalk] RE: Spamassassin-talk digest, Vol 1 #489 - 38 msgs

On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 11:32 AM, Carsten Erickson wrote: > I installed 2.3 yesterday, and it seems to be working ok, however I > notice a > few spams slipping through that have no spamassassin headers at all > like it > didn't even run on them. Any thoughts? For the record, we've had

[SAtalk] RE: Spamassassin-talk digest, Vol 1 #489 - 38 msgs

Hi, I installed 2.3 yesterday, and it seems to be working ok, however I notice a few spams slipping through that have no spamassassin headers at all like it didn't even run on them. Any thoughts? -Carsten Erickson --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek

[SAtalk] IETF mailing lists trigger PARTIAL_RFC_2369

It didn't get tagged as spam, but I'm concerned that the test is not as accurate as may have been hoped. List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=USER_A

Re: [SAtalk] Undefined subroutine &main::pod2usage called at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 59.

On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:49:27 EDT, David Flanigan said: >Jim: > > I see the same thing (I also installed through CPAN), but only when I envoke >SA with an improper command line option, or with a -h or --help: It's a small bug in spamassassin 2.30; fixed in 2.31, or you can edit the installed spa

RE: [SAtalk] adding white_list and logging headers

|-Original Message- |From: Chris Lott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:16 PM |I am using spamd and postfix... two quick questions: | |1) Do I need to restart spamd or postfix after making changes to the |local.cf? Yes. I do a postfix stop, then restart spamd

Re: [SAtalk] Undefined subroutine &main::pod2usage called at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 59.

I just installed 2.31 from the website that was just released and the problem is gone. Must be a but in 2.30 Jim - Original Message - From: "David Flanigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:49 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Undef

Re: [SAtalk] Undefined subroutine &main::pod2usage called at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 59.

Jim: I see the same thing (I also installed through CPAN), but only when I envoke SA with an improper command line option, or with a -h or --help: [root@dflx etc]# spamassassin -h SpamAssassin version 2.30 Undefined subroutine &main::pod2usage called at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 59. -- Kind

[SAtalk] Debugging switch

If spamd is started with the -D switch, i.e.: /usr/bin/spamd -d -D -F 1 ...where will the debugging info be written -- to the syslog, console, message headers, or a file somewhere? .\\ichelle - Michelle Brownsworth System Administrator PrimeLogic Corporation http://www.p

[SAtalk] 2.31 released

Ok, enough bugfixes and scorefixes to 2.30 are in, and it looks to be in good enough shape that I've packaged it up and released it. This is really a service release to get something a little better than 2.30 out, since I'm heading off tonight for my 2 week carribean honeymoon. First week, no te

Re: [SAtalk] custom subject rule

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 10:31:34AM -0700, Steve Thomas wrote: > I apologize if this has been covered previously - I couldn't find any way to > search the archives at Geocrawler. > > I've added a couple of custom rules to our local.cf for industry-specific > terms. So far I've set up one rule for

[SAtalk] Undefined subroutine &main::pod2usage called at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 59.

Undefined subroutine &main::pod2usage called at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 59. When running compiling the new version from CPAN and running spamassassin -h I get the above error. Jim Scott Infoconex Online Services http://www.infoconex.com

[SAtalk] custom subject rule

I apologize if this has been covered previously - I couldn't find any way to search the archives at Geocrawler. I've added a couple of custom rules to our local.cf for industry-specific terms. So far I've set up one rule for the subject and one for the body for each 'keyword'. They work just fine

RE: [SAtalk] Evite using www.evite.com again

Also, the message that came in from Evite had a score of 12.3 so the EVITE rule score of -5.0 wouldn't help too much. =) -Original Message- From: Kevin O'Brien Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Evite using www.evite.com again Just thought I'

[SAtalk] Procmail on the Gateway

Well, I finally got Spamassassin running using procmail on a gateway device. Just in case anyone else wants a link to the config file, here it is: http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-on-gateway.txt (Thank god for google) Maybe this could find it's way into the SA website? -Jason -

[SAtalk] Evite using www.evite.com again

Just thought I'd let you guys know that Evite isn't using evite.citysearch.com URL's anymore. They've gone back to www.evite.com. You may want to update the body tests accordingly. Kevin O'Brien Systems/Network Administrator E! Online, Inc. 323.692.4742 323.692.4700 fax ---

[SAtalk] Logging with Spamassassin?

Spamassassin is just the greatest. Now that I have it up and running (and report to Razor), I have one questions I cannot seem to solve. Is there a way to enable logging with Spamassassin? Nothing complex (ie complete headers), just a simple one line (ie syslog style) log letting me know

[SAtalk] adding white_list and logging headers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am using spamd and postfix... two quick questions: 1) Do I need to restart spamd or postfix after making changes to the local.cf? 2) Is there any way to log the messages that are tagged as spam? Most of y users are Outlook users and the messages t