Sorry, I did say my experience of Perl - especially regexps - is very limited :(
Thanks for pointing it out to me, I'll remove that rule from my own configuration. Daz > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:spamassassin- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matthew Cline > Sent: 21 June 2002 00:10 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New porn rule > > On Thursday 20 June 2002 07:28 am, Darren Coleman wrote: > > body PORN_15 > > /\b(?:horse?s|snake?s|eel?s|dog(?:gy)?s)[ -]?fuck(?:ing)|cum[ - > ]?shot?s|bl > > ow[ -]?job?s/i > > describe PORN_15 Uses words and phrases which indicate > porn > > (15) > > That would match any message with "horses" or "snakes" in it, and PORN_9 > already matches "cum-shot", although "blow job" should be added to one of > the > existing porn rules. A rule to detect animal words near sex words would > be > good, though. > > -- > Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but set him on > fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. > > ICQ: 132152059 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
