On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Jim.George wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm new to the list and need some help please.
>
> I've been happily using Spamassassin for several months under
> Cygwin (Linux under Win2K), and previously under Linux itself. So with
> this confidence in the package I thought
Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> use Mail::Header;
>
> foreach my $message (@files) {
> open(FILE, "<$dir/$message") or next;
What is the significance of the * preceding file_handle? Or is it
something being handed into a function? Does it just hand each file
in...
> my $header =
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have worked out a painstaking way that will work (at least in my
> tests so far), but wanted to see a better way with some of that
> obfuscated but powerfull code perl is famous for.
Does it _have_ to be obfuscated?
> #!/usr/local/bin/perl -w
> #
If this is OT, someone holler, it does apply to spamassassin
directly but is actually more perl questions.
Theo posted an answer[1] to this query already, but it largely flew
over my thick skull. (Sorry Theo).
See this message for the above reference[1]:
From: Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Friday 14 June 2002 06:45 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Some quick answers (then I'm going home to sleep)
Sleep. Sleep is good. ;-)
> The Outlook contacts import-to-whitelist feature is almost certainly
> going to make it into 1.0, as will some toolbar buttons for
> "Spam/Not Spam" which user
A message slipped past SA on debian.org and on my system :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/debian-user-200206/msg02363.html
The funniest part of the message is that it is spam from a windows
programmer (spamware author) asking looking for permanent employment.
Like he'll find it by spa
Dial-a-FAQ by Matt Cline :)
Some quick answers (then I'm going home to sleep)
Matthew Cline wrote:
MC> I'm an editor at the Open Directory Project, so I'll submit the DeerSoft URL
MC> to the appropriate category. To do that, I need to know if SpamAssasin Pro
MC> is shareware or just normal pr
On Friday 14 June 2002 06:27 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Matthew Cline wrote:
>
> MC> On Friday 14 June 2002 05:49 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> MC>
> MC> > Viking: spam song
> MC> > Dentist: Tooth hurty
> MC>
> MC> Spam hurts your teeth?
>
> Think about it.
Right, as Phydeaux pointed out:
> No, t
I'm an editor at the Open Directory Project, so I'll submit the DeerSoft URL
to the appropriate category. To do that, I need to know if SpamAssasin Pro
is shareware or just normal proprietary software.
Also, there's a bunch of sites under
http://dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Abuse/Spam/ that sh
Ok, I think I've fixed the MANIFEST problems now, so if you already grabbed 2.30
and it failed for you, try again now and you should be OK.
C
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las V
You're missing that the MANIFEST was screwed up in the original tarball I
uploaded. *sigh*
I think I've now finally fixed it, aftger only 4 attempts. I'll push out a new
annoucement.
C
Kevin O'Brien wrote:
KO> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:06:52 -0700
KO> From: Kevin O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matthew Cline wrote:
MC> On Friday 14 June 2002 05:49 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote:
MC>
MC> > Viking: spam song
MC> > Dentist: Tooth hurty
MC>
MC> Spam hurts your teeth?
Think about it.
C
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application
I keep getting the following when I try to run make:
/usr/local/bin/perl fixpath.pl spamassassin.raw spamassassin
chmod 755 spamassassin
mkdir -p doc
make: *** No rule to make target `spamd/spamc.pod', needed by `doc/.made'.
Stop
Here's the contents of spamd/:
debian-rc-script.sh README.spamd
On Friday 14 June 2002 05:49 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Viking: spam song
> Dentist: Tooth hurty
Spam hurts your teeth?
--
Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but set him on
fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
ICQ: 132152059
At 05:36 PM 6/14/2002 -0700, Matthew Cline wrote:
>> SpamAssassin 2.30 (Viking dentist l'orange) Released!
>> ---
>
>Viking dentist a l'orange? OK, I guess you incoprorated my "Vikings singing
>the Spam song" into the name, plus the "
Matthew Cline wrote:
MC> On Friday 14 June 2002 04:46 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote:
MC>
MC> > Ok, 2.30 is now official.
MC>
MC> > SpamAssassin 2.30 (Viking dentist l'orange) Released!
MC> > ---
Viking: spam song
Dentist: Tooth hurty
a l
On Friday 14 June 2002 04:46 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Ok, 2.30 is now official.
> SpamAssassin 2.30 (Viking dentist l'orange) Released!
> ---
Viking dentist a l'orange? OK, I guess you incoprorated my "Vikings singing
the Spam s
Shit. There was supposed to be all sorts of stuff in the MANIFEST which is
missing for some reason. Basically, pretty much everything from the base
directory -- including spamassassin.raw, Makefile.PL and a bunch of other stuff.
I'm working on it. ETA: real soon.
C
Brian May wrote:
BM> Was t
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 04:46:56PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Ok, 2.30 is now official.
>
> SpamAssassin 2.30 (Viking dentist l'orange) Released!
> ---
>
Minor problem. It doesn't contain Makefile.PL. (Or at least mine
didn't. We
Was there supposed to be a Makefile.PL is the tar.gz file?
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:48 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] [SA-announce] Deersoft Emerges to Combat Spam
Press Release
SOURCE: Deersoft, I
Press Release
SOURCE: Deersoft, Inc.
Deersoft Emerges to Combat Spam
PALO ALTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 12, 2002--Spam, unwanted and offensive
email, is an overwhelming problem that many see getting worse every day. Spam
not only wastes individuals' valuable time and attention every time t
Ok, 2.30 is now official.
SpamAssassin 2.30 (Viking dentist l'orange) Released!
---
Here's the super-brief summary of the major changes from 2.20:
* Rule Fixes/Updates/Additions
* Bugfixes/Typofixes
* Speed improvements
* New options
Not fully judged that way yet -- still about 5 minutes until 2.30 is released!
C
Duncan Findlay wrote:
DF> On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 06:11:41PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
DF> > On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Simon Lyall wrote:
DF> >
DF> > Does the latest release of spamassassin support Razor v2 now?
DF>
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 12:26:23PM -0700, Jeff Campbell wrote:
> Are there any similar web hosts or ISPs currently using SpamAssassin in
> a production environment? Smaller but still significantly sized web
> hosts or ISPs? I personally would really like to see us provide this to
> our customer
Hi folks,
I'm new to the list and need some help please.
I've been happily using Spamassassin for several months under
Cygwin (Linux under Win2K), and previously under Linux itself. So with
this confidence in the package I thought I'd improve things by linking in
the database op
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 06:11:41PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Simon Lyall wrote:
>
> Does the latest release of spamassassin support Razor v2 now?
>
No. Integration was judged to be too unstable for us to release razor
v2 support. I believe razor1 modules are still incl
On Friday 14 June 2002 04:17 am, Bill Becker wrote:
> We may need expanded rules to handle obfuscation. The following
> javascript decodes into another obfuscation javasscript. I didn't have
> time to persue it further (what the sender is counting on i suppose)...
[snip]
> ...the body part of
Craig R Hughes writes:
> 2.30 coming Real Real Real Soon now! I'm just working through some
> last second packaging issues.
Please create a 2.3 branch before you release 2.30!
It will make it much easier for us to release a 2.31 (maintenance
release with critical fixes) if we can do it from th
2.30 coming Real Real Real Soon now! I'm just working through some last second
packaging issues.
C
Matt Sergeant wrote:
MS> Daniel Quinlan wrote:
MS> > Michael Moncur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS> >
MS> >
MS> >>I think the problem is simple: We have a SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS rule for 8-bit
MS> >>
Is there any performance data available on large or high-volume SA
installations?
Any tuning recommendations for installing SA in such environments?
Any commercial alternatives that might perform better?
Thanks for any info! Off-list replies are fine.
/// Rob
_
Hi,
I have spamd in background and spamass-milt+sendmail.
All user preferences are stored in pgsql DBMS. The
problem is that each time spamd checking message it
takes preferences of user root for ANY e-mail
message. I'm running spamd under root account with
switches -a -x -q -D
Does anybody kno
Sean Rima wrote:
SR> Actually RAM has always been a problem for me because it is not that
SR> cheapo here, it pees me off when people say that they can get a strip
SR> for $20 when I would be looking at 150+ :(
Plus 17.5% VAT no doubt ;)
C
_
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:17:52PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> In SpamAssassin.pm I see:
>
> # Let's not make this required -- Marc
> #eval { require Time::HiRes };
> #Time::HiRes->import( qw(time) ) unless $@;
> # Unfortunately, the above doesn't work, please FIXME
> use Time::HiRes qw ( time
I'm trying to use SA with the NoMailAudit module in place of
Mail::Audit, and am discovering that NMA doesn't have some of
the basic MA methods. For example, if I have:
my $mail = Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit->new();
if ($mail->to =~ /mysql\@lists/) {
...
I get 'Can't locate object m
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:36:06PM -0400, Weidong Wang wrote:
> Hi, I just installed spamassassin, as it looks very promising.
>
> One thing I noticed is that checking a mail (the sample-spam.txt one, 4K)
> one takes over 1 minute. At first I thought it is razor, as I noticed during
> "make test"
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> This all looks really quite interesting. Though I wonder if the load of
> all the extra work now being down will kill them... (especially without
> the server being released/available).
Are they intending to release the server at all? I was intending to
At 06/14/2002 11:26, Jeff Campbell wrote:
>Mainly, our worries fall into the realm of load.
>Are there any similar web hosts or ISPs currently using SpamAssassin in
>a production environment? Smaller but still significantly sized web
>hosts or ISPs?
We handle about 1/2 million incoming mail
Hello,
I'm looking into the feasibility of offering SpamAssassin support to the
customers of a mid sized web hosting operation (~15,000 customers). We
all use it internally - and there is little question as to its
effectiveness in dealing with the problem - but there is concern that
running i
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 01:18:52PM -0500, matthew ward wrote:
> i'm using the spamass milter.
Is the milter actually called "spamass" ?
Would someone ask the author if he/she'd consider using SA or SpamAssassin.
Spam_ASS_ just doesn't sound like a great abbreviation...
Marc
--
"A mouse is a d
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 08:31:17AM -0500, Saul Guttman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have Exim with SA running at SMTP time. I am testing this to see if I
Since there's lots of mail here already, you're probably better off using
the sa-exim list
http://lists.merlins.org/lists/listinfo/sa-exim
so that we
At 10:59 AM 12/06/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>You can drop it in the ftp space, I didn't even think about that :-)
Your php/mysql interface is now accessible at ftp.ftn.org - anonymous mode
and will be immediately visible when you ftp there.
-----
Alec
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:14:54PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> | >Subject: ??
> ^^
> It's not a valid message. No RFC allows 8bit characters in message
> headers. Recent postfix snapshots have a strict_7bit_headers option
> to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Matt Sergeant told this:
>>>Actually, you can get a 128MB EDO stick for about $20 -- comparable
>>>to DRAM. So just eat at home tonight instead of going out, and buy
>>>yourself some extra memory. Those wonderful Koreans and T
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:15:58PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:03:54PM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:40:17PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> >
> > > I think I'm also going to add an option to just stall the SMTP
> > > connection and never retur
i'm using the spamass milter.
but i'm using it on a step-through (relay-in) sendmail system,
NOT on the system that receives email for local delivery.
is there any way to utilise the spamd methodology when i don't
have procmail involved (at this relay level)?
--
/"\
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 03:22:03PM +0200, Mark De Moor wrote:
> Hi,
> I'am trying to install SpamAssassin on my HP-UX 11i (11.11) with
> gcc 3.02, sendmail 8.12.4 and get the following error:
>
> gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -D_HPUX_SOURCE -L/lib/pa1.1
> -DUINT32_MAX_BROKEN -mpa-risc-1
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 07:17:45AM -0400, Bill Becker wrote:
|
| We may need expanded rules to handle obfuscation. The following
| javascript decodes into another obfuscation javasscript. I didn't have
| time to persue it further (what the sender is counting on i suppose)...
|
|
| Subscribe f
Hi,
I couldn't find any information about how the spamphrase are working in
the archives so here is my question:
I am running spamassassin throught mimedefang for a whole site. But i
never get a score or even a hit for any of the spamphrases in my
configuration file. I am wondering what is going
Hi,
I'am trying to install SpamAssassin on my HP-UX 11i (11.11) with
gcc 3.02, sendmail 8.12.4 and get the following error:
gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -D_HPUX_SOURCE -L/lib/pa1.1
-DUINT32_MAX_BROKEN -mpa-risc-1-1 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing
-I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_
On 13 Jun 2002 the voices made Daniel Quinlan write:
> It might be as simple as hitting "f".
Personally I just hit reply and then let the user sort it out; he could try a
no-reply-to(ish) header, set reply-to himself or simply deal with the
duplicates like I do (procmail).
It isn't the replye
We may need expanded rules to handle obfuscation. The following
javascript decodes into another obfuscation javasscript. I didn't have
time to persue it further (what the sender is counting on i suppose)...
Subscribe for Daily Amateurs for FREE!!!