Thanks for all the help; much appreciated.
Yep, Theo, we're running spamd; will check the
logs (/var/log/messages and /var/log/maillog?)
soonest.
Yep, I know doing the pipe to /dev/null might not
be the best way to handle this, but we are 1) setting
the score to relatively high number (18 right
I did it from the root account and got:
debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules
dirdebug: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules dirdebug: using
"/root/.spamassassin" for user state dirdebug: using
"/root/.spamassassin/user_prefs" for user prefs file
However, I am runn
> :0
> * ! ? test -f $HOME/.nospamcheck
>
> :0fw
> | spamassassin -P
>
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> /dev/null
Hummm, if I understand well procmail receips, what you do is:
if $HOME/.nospamcheck exists, then
empty here, do nothing
for all messages, filter through SA
if the message is fl
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 18:28, Ron Carter wrote:
> :0
> * ! ? test -f $HOME/.nospamcheck
>
> :0fw
> | spamassassin -P
>
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> /dev/null
Theo gave you one workable answer, but you probably meant to do was:
:0
* ! ? test -f $HOME/.nospamcheck
{
:0fw
| spamassassin -P
:0
Hi,
This is a completely unrelated topic, but is there a mailing list for
sendmail?
Olivier
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:40:01PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > :0
> > * ! ? test -f $HOME/.nospamcheck
> >
> > :0fw
> > | spamassassin -P
>
> of course, you don't do anything to check the output of the previous command. Try
>
> ":0fwe" instead.
Actually, you're testing if the file _does
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:33:05PM -0600, Ron Carter wrote:
> The process just doesn't run (no scoring, etc.)
Are you running spamd? What do the logs say?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Marketting Professional's Motto: "We're not screwing the customers,
all we're doing is holding them down wh
Hi Skip Montanaro, you wrote:
> the hits. Unfortunately, I don't have any ebay.com addresses (or glob
> patterns involving ebay.com) in my user_prefs file. I am running SA in the
You don't have it in user_prefs, but in the global 60_whitelist.cf:
whitelist_from *@ebay.com
whitelist_from
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:28:24PM -0600, Ron Carter wrote:
> This is the first of two problems we are having in
> the implementation of spamassassin system-wide.
>
> We want to give users the ability to "opt-out" of
> the spamassassin processm but the following:
>
> :0
> * ! ? test -f $HOME/.no
The 2nd of 2 problems; this works:
:0fw
| spamassassin -P
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/dev/null
This doesn't:
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/dev/null
This (obviously?) doesn't either:
:0fw
| spamc
...
The process just doesn't run (no scoring, etc.)
Ron
_
Howdy all...
This is the first of two problems we are having in
the implementation of spamassassin system-wide.
We want to give users the ability to "opt-out" of
the spamassassin processm but the following:
:0
* ! ? test -f $HOME/.nospamcheck
:0fw
| spamassassin -P
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 06:22:03AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> >Soem very huge Mails (about 2 MB) coming in, will be investigated by spamc
> >(2.20), which is breaking after a few seconds because mail is too big (>
> >25k). But then, the spamass-milter timout in sendmail works after 12
> >minut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Craig R. Hughes uttered the following:
> There have been reports of this happening when DCC checking is turned
> on by some users. It could be that when DCC times out, spamd dies and
> spamc just passes through the message. I t
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:56:59PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> While this state doesn't seem to usually impair SA's ability to process
> mail, it will overflow the process table eventually. I've been unable
> to figure out what makes them multiply like this. Is this
> spamass-milter flakines
Hello everyone,
Daniel Rogers posted a patch a week or so back to spamc that helped
with the problem of spamc dying while reading in messages from spamass-
milter. I'd thought the patch worked perfectly, when three days later I
had no hung spamc/d processes. I haven't checked in perhaps
>Soem very huge Mails (about 2 MB) coming in, will be investigated by spamc
>(2.20), which is breaking after a few seconds because mail is too big (>
>25k). But then, the spamass-milter timout in sendmail works after 12
>minutes (!) and the mail seems not be be delivered, so the sender tries it
>a
Yes, it can go into the local.cf file, and should work there. Can you run
spamassassin -D -t < msg > msg.out
That should dump some diagnostic info to stderr -- could you do that and see if
you notice anything odd like it's reading config files from the wrong place or
something?
C
Dave Strickle
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:52 PM
> To: Dallas Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RAV Support
>
>
> > Yes, I know how RAV with qmail works. But I'm trying to
> avoid this as I
> > need qmail-s
> Yes, I know how RAV with qmail works. But I'm trying to avoid this as I
> need qmail-scanner for what I am trying to do here (ie SpamAssassin
> globally).
I also run spamassassin globally via procmail. I've never played with
qmail-scanner but procmail may be an option in case there's somethi
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:40 PM
> To: Dallas Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RAV Support
>
>
> > some debugging problems where viruses that are found do not
> get logged to
> > quarantine.
> some debugging problems where viruses that are found do not get logged to
> quarantine.log. this is just what I've found from testing for the last
> hour. i'd really like to give RAV a try.. has anyone else tried it?
I'm using rav-qmail with spamassassin without issue. SA and RAV don't know
I've been using SA for a few weeks and like it pretty well. It gives me
some occasional false +ives, but not a huge number.
I got a false -ive today that has me scratching my head though. Here are
the headers:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cali-2.pobox.com (cali-2.pob
Actually, we aren't using any user_pref files - just the
system local.cf mentioned below. Can the spam_level_stars be put into that
local.cf file? If not, is there a system-wide file that it needs to go
into?
Thanks for the tips,
- Dave
Dave Strickler CEODWS - "The GroupWise Integration
has anyone tested this in 1.12? it seems very very buggy to me. global variable name
doesnt not match what is in rav_scanner function. scanner array name is rav, while
function name is rav_scanner (hence it is not called).
some debugging problems where viruses that are found do not get logge
Dave Strickler wrote:
DS> Perhaps I don't understand the precedent of the setup files. If the only
DS> file I altered from the distribution was /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
DS> , wouldn't that take precedent over other default files?
Yes, except for user_prefs, since spam_level_stars is a use
There have been reports of this happening when DCC checking is turned on by some
users. It could be that when DCC times out, spamd dies and spamc just passes
through the message. I think I saw a bugzilla ticket about it. I'll take a
look and see if I can figure it out.
C
Dave Strickler wro
5. Who is iMAS?
Hi,
beside of the problem, I already mentioned here (without getting any
help),
I encountered today a real big problem:
Soem very huge Mails (about 2 MB) coming in, will be investigated by spamc
(2.20), which is breaking after a few seconds because mail is too big (>
25k). But then, the sp
Perhaps I don't understand the precedent of the setup files.
If the only file I altered from the distribution was
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf , wouldn't that take precedent over other
default files?
It certainly worked for changing other params in
SA...
- Dave
Dave Strickler CEODWS
We are running a few thousand emails through SA each day,
and find 1-5 per day are being 'skipped'. While they run though the SendMail
box, SA doesn't touch the headers.
Before I go digging through the logs, etc, has anyone seen
this before?
Thanks,
Dave
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> I was going to mutter about how I get all these weird travel spams because
> brasslantern.com is a bed-and-breakfast
It's been pointed out to me that I forgot to mention that I own the domain
brasslantern.com -- I was not implying that I got any spam
I'm trying to run SA on my e-mail gateway for 8500 users. Running the
spamd/spamc combo, it works great for 75 users. However, trying to turn
it on for all the users, the scan times climb up to 20 - 40 seconds,
even for messages smaller than 1k. Spamd was started with 'spamd -dS'.
I'm calling
Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is this nonsense? They added headers to track abuse? This is abuse!
>
> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
> please include it with any abuse report
> X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - crompton.com
Nah. My guess is that since Spa
What is this nonsense? They added headers to track abuse? This is abuse!
Doug
-- Forwarded message --
Received: from host5-server.com ([66.78.20.220])
by marconi.crompton.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id g4EAoXG12000
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 May 2002 06:
I was going to mutter about how I get all these weird travel spams because
brasslantern.com is a bed-and-breakfast [*], and then I noticed that this
message came through the zsh mailing list.
Misc. interesting things about it:
X-Mailer: Perl Powered Socket Mailer
"The following message is a p
I'm getting a lot of similar messages slipping through SAs fingers
lately that are similar to this one and I would like to figure out
something to do about them sooner than later.
Primarily what I'm wondering is what is
IMAS Messaging Application Server
IMAS? I've not previously noticed messa
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
>
> BTW: My Yahoo Groups and MSN groups are now up to a score of -7. I'm sure
> that's letting some spam through but with over 5000 users I can't be sure
> that they are NOT subscribing to some of these racier web/mail groups. :-/
> body GROUPS_YAHOO_1 /Y
Hi,
the idea behind spam assassin is indeed great, the problem is that after
about 3 minutes the server load goes to:
mail:/var/log/qmail# uptime
18:15:06 up 6 days, 21:40, 3 users, load average: 15.22, 8.96, 7.77
I have an exchange with paying for one, from that point of view is
fine.
So,
Words by Andrew Kohlsmith [Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:11:40PM -0400]:
> > 18:15:06 up 6 days, 21:40, 3 users, load average: 15.22, 8.96, 7.77
> > The server in question is a dual Pentium III 500 Mhz, 512 Mb Ram,
> > /var/qmail/queue is a UW SCSIII and the storage is a Mylex, raid 5.
>
> How much
Words by rODbegbie [Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:42:01PM -0400]:
> Jose Celestino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the idea behind spam assassin is indeed great, the problem is that after
> > about 3 minutes the server load goes to:
> >
> > mail:/var/log/qmail# uptime
> > 18:15:06 up 6 days, 21:40, 3
> Any chance of you contributing these rules? This is something I've got
> on my todo list, which you could really help me shorten ;-)
Of course. I'm not particularly happy with the LOCAL_ISP rule since it's far
too specific, but whitelisting them is far too "risky." Same with INCIID and
M&M.
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 08:32:48AM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> > The one available from the sourceforge.net/projects/spamassassin page?
It
> > asks me for a userid & password. I don't mind helping you out with a
> > survey, but I'm not going through the rigmarole of creating yet another
> >
If I use spamc instead of spamassassin I get this:
spamd[6030]: bad protocol: header error: (closed before headers)
:0fw
| /usr/local/bin/spamassassin
/usr/local/bin/spamd -u smmsp -a -d -x
This doesn't work
:0fw
| /usr/local/bin/spamc -s 10
So it looks like spamc isn't getting the me
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
>
> My modified scores for SA2.20 right now are as follows:
> score INCIID_MSG-10
> score M_AND_M_MEATS -10
> score FROM_AND_TO_SAME 0.00
> score SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.90
> score LOCAL_ISP
44 matches
Mail list logo
