On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:56:59PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > While this state doesn't seem to usually impair SA's ability to process > mail, it will overflow the process table eventually. I've been unable > to figure out what makes them multiply like this. Is this > spamass-milter flakiness that we've been incorrectly attributing to > spamc?
I've stopped messing with the spamassassin milter lately, as the newest versions of mimedefang (when used with mimedefang-multiplexor) gives the same benefits as spamc/spamd (client/server, but with the extra advantage that it keeps a certain number of servers running (like apache, for example) so it doesn't have to fork when the message comes it). Plus, you can do virus scanning and other functions all at the same time. Heck, it'll even add the SA report as a seperate text/html part on the message! Now, if I can just get mimedefang to write the spam to a mailbox rather than just tagging it and keeping procmail writing the spam to the file where it goes to die. Dan. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
