This Sage Trac query for tickets whose summary contains "sagetex":
https://trac.sagemath.org/query?order=id&desc=1&summary=~sagetex
reveals in particular this ticket:
- Sage Trac ticket 32887: update sagetex to version 3.6
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32887
where a discussion on what sh
please test the new update:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30342
On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 4:10:56 AM UTC Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Dear sagetex users,
>
> please test
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27024
>
> Thanks,
> Dima
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
I used circuitikz with sage and it's fine ?
Can you detailed what you mean with tikz ?
I can't use sagetex, so I will try pythontex
Le lundi 3 juillet 2017 11:00:38 UTC+2, Oguz Kurt a écrit :
>
> Hi:
>
> I typed a single page of basic math randomly. While doing so, I used
> sagetex for randomiza
First, thank you for you reply.
Okay, I deleted the code before the DE and now it compiles as expected. The
original file is long, so I am not sure where the troubles begin. Well, I
guess I have some work ahead of me if I am going to find the place where
the error originates.
On Wednesday, J
Hi Ron,
It's difficult for me to assume the result you guessed, without a full
complete example of tex file displaying the error (try to shorten your tex
file and post it, next time).
I tried next tex content in new file in cloud project without any issue or
error from the pdf previewer...
As
I have a ~50 page tutorial on using Sage/SageTeX with TeXShop. It is a
living document so please consider making constructive comments.
http://devio.us/~bannon/sage/
If Drake and Stein are listening . . . Sage and SageTeX need to be further
promoted by doing a Coursera course. Please do a Cours
I've posted a ~50 page guide to using SageTex with TeXShop. It is a living
document, so I welcome comments.
http://devio.us/~bannon/sage/
Sage is a great product, but SageTeX is what makes Sage a must have
product. I just wish Stein and Drake would get together and do a Coursera
course to real
OK so my command line in TeXMaker is "/usr/local/bin/sage" %.sagetex.sage
I have made a simlink (sudo ln -s ...) from the sage exec in the Sage app
folder : /Applications/Sage-6.1.1.app/Contents/Resources/sage/
and I placed it in my /usr/local/bin folder.
The previous simlink was actually point
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 at 01:52PM -0700, sder...@gmail.com wrote:
> It worked! So now I know what to do: point to the right sage exec in the
> sage app folder lol! There are 2 and my simlink was pointing to the wrong
> one.
I'm glad to hear you have it working!
I'd like to include some documentati
It worked! So now I know what to do: point to the right sage exec in the
sage app folder lol! There are 2 and my simlink was pointing to the wrong
one.
Now texmaker does the job and I don't get the "??" anymore.
Thanks a lot!
Samuel
Le mardi 18 mars 2014 21:44:23 UTC+1, kcrisman a écrit :
>
>
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 1:17:12 PM UTC-4, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> Sorry for the delay in replying...
>
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 at 08:20AM -0700, sde...@gmail.com wrote:
> > For the second method... I have been using TeXMaker
> > for quite a while and I really like the GUI so... I don't know what
I am gonna give you a headache hahaha
New error :
Process started
2014-03-18 21:35:24.278 Sage[1091:507] No Info.plist file in application
bundle or no NSPrincipalClass in the Info.plist file, exiting
Process exited with error(s)
I looked it up on the internet and apparently I can't use a
Sorry for the delay in replying...
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 at 08:20AM -0700, sder...@gmail.com wrote:
> For the second method... I have been using TeXMaker
> for quite a while and I really like the GUI so... I don't know what to do.
> Should I switch to TeXShop only when I compile with sagetex ?
Yo
I had already created an alias in my /usr/local/bin/ folder using the ln
command so there should be no PATH related issues right? I'm asking because
I'm no expert at this, I've only used Ubuntu for a little while and most of
my work is done in TeXMaker so I don't usually fiddle with my Terminal
>
> Anyways, if the first method didn't work, isn't there some kind of deeper
> problem ?
>
>
> If the first method didn’t work, then it seems there is some bigger
> problem. Perhaps you could include a transcript of what you did together
> with your sample file.
>
Yeah, at this point I think
On Mar 13, 2014, at 9:20 AM, sder...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have tried the first method and it still created the files in my home
folder which is weird. For the second method... I have been using TeXMaker
for quite a while and I really like the GUI so... I don't know what to do.
Should I switch to
Hi, I have tried the first method and it still created the files in my home
folder which is weird. For the second method... I have been using TeXMaker
for quite a while and I really like the GUI so... I don't know what to do.
Should I switch to TeXShop only when I compile with sagetex ?
Anyways
First to Ivan and Dan - see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13261 for one
place where this can be dealt with.
Is http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11755 or
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13247 possibly relevant? I've
opened http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15932 for this issue.
I have no idea
I have no idea how to fix this
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sa
On Mar 12, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 at 10:04AM -0700, sder...@gmail.com wrote:
Well the only problem is that I... don't use a script haha! I double click
on the sage file and a terminal window pops up and sage starts to process
the file. I get a few lines telling m
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 at 10:04AM -0700, sder...@gmail.com wrote:
> Well the only problem is that I... don't use a script haha! I double click
> on the sage file and a terminal window pops up and sage starts to process
> the file. I get a few lines telling me it's working on the file and then
> som
Well the only problem is that I... don't use a script haha! I double click
on the sage file and a terminal window pops up and sage starts to process
the file. I get a few lines telling me it's working on the file and then
some files are created in my Home directory :
E2.sobj
example.sagetex.scm
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 at 07:26AM -0700, sder...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thank you for your time.
>
> A bunch of files are created :
> example_doctest.sage
> example.aux
> example.log
> example.out
> example.pdf
> example.sagetex.sage
Okay, so example.sagetex.sage is created. That leads me to think that
Thank you for your time.
A bunch of files are created :
example_doctest.sage
example.aux
example.log
example.out
example.pdf
example.sagetex.sage
Le vendredi 6 février 2009 13:50:33 UTC+1, Samuel DM a écrit :
>
> Hello,
> I have a couple of problems trying to use sagetex. I am basically
> tryin
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 at 09:08AM -0700, sder...@gmail.com wrote:
> kpsewhich answered :
>
> sdermon-macbook:~ sdermon$ kpsewhich sagetex.sty
>
> /usr/local/texlive/2013/../texmf-local/tex/latex/local/sagetex/sagetex.sty
Okay, that looks good. So the problem is example.sagetex.sage doesn't
exist. W
>
> Could there be some kind of authorization that I haven't set up correctly?
> Like a chmod or something like that ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an em
kpsewhich answered :
sdermon-macbook:~ sdermon$ kpsewhich sagetex.sty
/usr/local/texlive/2013/../texmf-local/tex/latex/local/sagetex/sagetex.sty
So it should work !
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this grou
Hi, kpsewhich gives me the sagetex file I have in my texmf tree, the one I
grabbed from the sage app.
Le vendredi 6 février 2009 13:50:33 UTC+1, Samuel DM a écrit :
>
> Hello,
> I have a couple of problems trying to use sagetex. I am basically
> trying to compile the example.tex file in the lat
On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 at 07:14AM -0700, sder...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sage commandline 6
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/Users/sdermon/Documents/popo/example.sagetex.py", line 367, in
>
> _st_.endofdoc()
> File
> "/Applications/Sage-6.1.1.app/Contents/Resources/sage/local/lib/py
Hi, it's been a really long time since my previous post.
I had given up trying to use sagetex (I actually had completely forgotten about
it). But then recently, I rediscovered it and decided I should try to use it
again.
I am still having issues with the example file, so I'll copy paste the err
I just updated my way of replacing the dot with a comma.
Just after the "\ begin{document}", I insert this:
\begin{sagesilent}
# Pour adapter la sortie LaTeX de sage aux conventions francaises.
def numprint(x):
x = latex(x)
x = str(x)
x = x.replace('.', ',\!').replace('\\times'
I justed changed the script and now Sagetex is running perfectly. I can't
thank you enough for your hint.
Thanks so much!
Philipp
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
On 9 March 2013 18:53, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 at 06:06PM +, John Cremona wrote:
>> Thanks, I have that file too: so the only error is in the
>> documentation which gives the wrong path to the file.
>
> This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14264 .
Correction:
Thanks Dan. Now I have a harder (I suspect) question...
I have quite a long Sage script which does a complicated computation I
have been working on with a student of mine (in case anyone is
interested it computes explicit models for three modular curves of
level 13, all of genus 3!). In my norma
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 at 06:06PM +, John Cremona wrote:
> Thanks, I have that file too: so the only error is in the
> documentation which gives the wrong path to the file.
This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14264 .
Dan
--
--- Dan Drake
- http://math.pugetsound.edu/~ddr
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 at 06:06PM +, John Cremona wrote:
> I did not think that the Sage source distribution included pdf files,
> but it appears that I was wrong.
SageTeX includes PDFs of the documentation because we don't want to
assume a working TeX distribution is present. (Although if you do
Thanks, I have that file too: so the only error is in the
documentation which gives the wrong path to the file.
The pdf I have in my 5.7 build from source was part of the
distribution, it seems, since it has a datestamp of Jan 15 while I
made that build in February, and had not built any pdf docs.
2013-03-09 16:41, John Cremona skrev:
According to the online documentation at
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/sagetex.html the
documentation for sagetex is in
SAGE_ROOT/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/sagetex/sagetexpackage.pdf but
in my installation of Sage-5.7 that files does not exist
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 at 07:50PM -0800, Nathan Carter wrote:
> Aha! After investigating a bunch, it turns out that I haven't updated my
> texlive install since the dawn of time,
That's pretty common with TeX installations, and it's a source of many
headaches with SageTeX!
> and a sagetex.sty comes
After upgrading to TeX live 2012, running latex on my example file now
pulls in the sagetex.sty from the symlinked folder, and everything works as
expected, both from the command line and inside TeXShop. Thank you!
On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:50:42 PM UTC-5, Nathan Carter wrote:
>
>
>
> Tha
That's very strange. You have Sage 5.3, so you should have a pretty
> recent version of SageTeX, but as far as I can tell, the openout problem
> can only arise if you're using a really, really old version of SageTeX.
>
>
Aha! After investigating a bunch, it turns out that I haven't updated my
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 at 07:05AM -0800, Nathan Carter wrote:
>6. Whether I run with the TeXShop engine (which indeed runs sage on the
>.sage file) or do it manually (just LaTeX the file within TeXShop, then
> run
>sage from Terminal myself) I get the same error as the original poster,
On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:05:09 AM UTC-5, Nathan Carter wrote:
>
>
> I am having similar problems to the original poster, but the suggestion
> that worked for him did not work for me. To be specific, I have this setup:
>
>1. Sage app for Mac in /Applications/Sage-5.3-OSX-64bit-10.6.ap
I am having similar problems to the original poster, but the suggestion
that worked for him did not work for me. To be specific, I have this setup:
1. Sage app for Mac in /Applications/Sage-5.3-OSX-64bit-10.6.app/.
2. Created symlink ~/Library/texmf/tex/sage_generic ->
/Applications/
@Dan, thanks a lot! That solves my problem.
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 1:05:49 PM UTC-8, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 at 10:55AM -0800, pong wrote:
> > Hi Dan my intention is to generate tests using sagetex and sage. So I
> will
> > have something like
> >
> > m = 'undefined'
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 at 10:55AM -0800, pong wrote:
> Hi Dan my intention is to generate tests using sagetex and sage. So I will
> have something like
>
> m = 'undefined' if denom==0 else (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
>
> .
>
> then print out m at some point. So $\sage{m}$ does not work is denom==0
> but \s
Hi Dan my intention is to generate tests using sagetex and sage. So I will
have something like
m = 'undefined' if denom==0 else (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
.
then print out m at some point. So $\sage{m}$ does not work is denom==0 but
\sagestr{m} doesn't seem to work if denom<>0.
Any suggestion?
On S
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 at 02:45AM -0800, pong wrote:
> I am having the same trouble as John. Would you expand a little bit on your
> solution:
>
> for example
> $\sage{'Hello'}$
> causes an error. Where should I put the 'r' as suggested in your post (I
> think stands for raw string)? I tried severa
I am having the same trouble as John. Would you expand a little bit on your
solution:
for example
$\sage{'Hello'}$
causes an error. Where should I put the 'r' as suggested in your post (I
think stands for raw string)? I tried several combination but nothing seems
to work.
Btw, 'text' in sage ta
Your output looks different than mine when this happens, but I think it's
the same:
there is still a Python text parser operating on your strings before Latex
can get to them.
\nabla will give you \n "newline", \tau will give you \t, etc.
if you type an r before the quotes surrounding the str
On 13 June 2012 04:26, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 6/12/12 6:13 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 at 02:49PM +0100, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>>> The second machine I tried (which I will not have access to until I go
>>> home) had only just been upgraded to ubuntu 12.04, so it is surprising
On 6/12/12 6:13 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 at 02:49PM +0100, John Cremona wrote:
The second machine I tried (which I will not have access to until I go
home) had only just been upgraded to ubuntu 12.04, so it is surprising
that it's using an old texlive version.
Debian (and henc
One more thing: I get latex errors if I do \sage{s} where s is a string.
Here latex(s) will put \verb| before the string and | after it, but
whatever the result, latex cannot parse it. I was using this to get the
label of an elliptic curve E into my latex: E.label() is a string.
! Missing }
Is there a way that *every* printed number (and not only the ones that one
uses "replace" ou "locale.format" ) have a comma as a separator for
decimals?
I ask this because I can't make the ticks of my graphics to print in this
format.
Thanks.
BTW, there's a ticket on this:
http://trac.sagemath
On 4/3/12 9:16 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 10:14:01 PM UTC-4, Jason Grout wrote:
On 4/3/12 8:35 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, March 30, 2012 9:45:21 PM UTC-4, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 at 11:24AM -0700, Tom Judson wrote:
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 10:14:01 PM UTC-4, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> On 4/3/12 8:35 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Friday, March 30, 2012 9:45:21 PM UTC-4, Dan Drake wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 at 11:24AM -0700, Tom Judson wrote:
> > > I have a question about sagetex. Is it pos
On 4/3/12 8:35 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Friday, March 30, 2012 9:45:21 PM UTC-4, Dan Drake wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 at 11:24AM -0700, Tom Judson wrote:
> I have a question about sagetex. Is it possible to run sagetex if
you are
> using a remote server as opposed to a local co
On 3/30/12 1:24 PM, Tom Judson wrote:
I have a question about sagetex. Is it possible to run sagetex if you
are using a remote server as opposed to a local copy of sage. I run
sagetex locally on my Mac, but I have a graduate student who would like
to use sagetex on a PC. She is currently doing al
On 12/3/11 9:24 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 at 09:16AM -0800, Mark wrote:
I'm trying to represent Sage non-native elements in a LaTeX document
using SageTeX. Sage generates the representation without complaint,
but the result does not compile properly on the second LaTeX step
(LaTe
Kile was using the sagetex.sty that came with TeXLive. I removed the
old version, and now sagetex is running with no problems.
Thanks for your help.
On Oct 5, 7:02 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 at 10:15AM -0700, David Hren wrote:
> > Error in Sage code on line 8 of HWK7.tex! Tr
On 23 nov, 02:07, Dan Drake wrote:
> my guess is that
> something strange is happening with Tex / XeTeX.
>
> Dan
I found it is not specific to XeTeX, as the same issue arises when
using LaTeX.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
I failed to get this to work last time I tried, so gave up. Maybe I
will try again.
Thanks,
John
On Nov 19, 3:14 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 at 02:53PM -0700, John Cremona wrote:
> > Thanks to both for the advice. The minimal tex file from Jason works
> > fine. I do have all t
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 at 02:53PM -0700, John Cremona wrote:
> Thanks to both for the advice. The minimal tex file from Jason works
> fine. I do have all those additional texlive packages installed, but
> they are 2007 versions -- my ubuntu is 2008, something like version
> 10.08, which seems to be
On 10/30/10 4:53 PM, John Cremona wrote:
Thanks to both for the advice. The minimal tex file from Jason works
fine. I do have all those additional texlive packages installed, but
they are 2007 versions -- my ubuntu is 2008, something like version
10.08, which seems to be the problem. (And I do
Thanks to both for the advice. The minimal tex file from Jason works
fine. I do have all those additional texlive packages installed, but
they are 2007 versions -- my ubuntu is 2008, something like version
10.08, which seems to be the problem. (And I don't much want to
upgrade the whole distribu
Hmm, actually, to generate the output embedding the plots made with
sageplot, you need to do:
pdflatex test.tex
sage test.sagetex.sage
pdflatex test.tex
That's why I usually use makefiles to ease the process.
Maxim
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups
Jason is right,
Looking at the example.tex included with sagetex, the following lines
in the preamble lists the dependencies:
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{tkz-berge}
\usepackage{sagetex}
If using the Ubuntu texlive latex distribution, you need to make sure
to install the texlive-latex-extra
On 10/30/10 12:31 PM, John Cremona wrote:
Can someone tell me what more I need to do to use sagetex?
The sagetex documention just talks about making sagetex.sty availaible
to latex, which I have done. But then when I tried to use pdflatex on
example.tex it complained about not having a package
That works! I had followed the "more permanent instructions"
previously, but somehow the wrong version still ended up in the right
place. Anyway, it works now, even the automatic compiling in
TeXShop. The only thing that is still acting funny is when I compile
the example that came with SageTeX,
No problem! Just wanted to make sure I wasn't forgotten. :)
On Aug 2, 9:32 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> Hi Katie,
>
> Sorry for the slow replies. I'm traveling and have not been keeping
> super current on email.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 at 09:06AM -0700, Katie Johnson wrote:
> > Does anyone know ho
Hi Katie,
Sorry for the slow replies. I'm traveling and have not been keeping
super current on email.
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 at 09:06AM -0700, Katie Johnson wrote:
> Does anyone know how to fix this?
>
> On Jul 28, 2:50 pm, Katie Johnson wrote:
> > I used Dan's minimal example. I copied his code
Does anyone know how to fix this?
On Jul 28, 2:50 pm, Katie Johnson wrote:
> I used Dan's minimal example. I copied his code into a file, ran it
> in TexShop and got no errors, but did get a warning:
>
> ***
> *
I used Dan's minimal example. I copied his code into a file, ran it
in TexShop and got no errors, but did get a warning:
**
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009)
\write18 e
On 27 čnc, 23:45, Katie Johnson wrote:
> The problem comes from when I try to add the simple command $
> \sage{2+2}$ to the beginning of the document (right after \maketitle,
> for example). Then I get a very strange error:
>
> ! Missing \endgroup inserted.
>
> \endgroup
> l.417
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Ra wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I have looked into my problem further, and it seems that the latex
> command is at fault. As you see, only when I multiply the fraction by
> -2 (or anything other than -1), do I get a negative fraction back from
> the latex command.
>
> Any
Hi again,
I have looked into my problem further, and it seems that the latex
command is at fault. As you see, only when I multiply the fraction by
-2 (or anything other than -1), do I get a negative fraction back from
the latex command.
Any ideas? Bug report? SAGE seems a very useful tool but if
On Thu, 06 May 2010 at 10:51AM -0700, Oscar wrote:
> I tried export PATH=/Applications/sage/:$PATH in Terminal and got
> this:
>
> export: Command not found.
>
> I'm running Mac OS 10.5.8.
Hrm, are you using bash or tcsh for your shell? That should work in
bash. I don't know how to export environ
I tried export PATH=/Applications/sage/:$PATH in Terminal and got
this:
export: Command not found.
I'm running Mac OS 10.5.8.
Oscar Chavez
On May 5, 7:54 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 05 May 2010 at 07:38AM -0600, jrodri1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Thanks!!! I got that working. But, I stumbled
I agree. Ideally, sagetex would work with the numprint package and the
different language packages for babel,so that users of sagetex and
those packages wouldn't need to do anything different. Or, as I think
you imply, an option within sagetex.
Oscar
On Mar 23, 7:34 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue
If the locale is properly set, we can get this information from
sage: locale.localeconv()['decimal_point']
'.'
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
On 24 mar, 07:00, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> And note the difference between $12,13212$ and $12{,}13212$ - the
> first one has incorrect spacing in TeX!
Hi Robert,
You are right, but there is no difference between $12{,}345$, $
\numprint{12,345}$ and $\DecimalMathComma 12,345$
If you don't have
On 23 mar, 20:34, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> \begin{sagesilent}
> def numprint(x):
> return x.str().replace('.', ',')
> \end{sagesilent}
>
> and then use \sage{numprint(x)}, which is a bit nicer.
Hi,
Thanks for your suggestion. But,
- this function change the number of significant figures
- \s
On 24 bře, 01:34, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 at 07:25AM -0700, iDan wrote:
> > Hi,
> > In french, we use comma as decimal separator. How can I convert the
> > result of the instruction \sage{} (from sagetex package) ?
>
> Hrm, unfortunately, I don't think this is possible right now.
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 at 01:34PM +, Colombel Bruno wrote:
> I'm trying to use sagetex to put 3d-surfaces in latex document :
>
> \begin{sageblock}
> var('u,v')
> h= lambda u,v: u^2 + 2*v^2
> f=plot3d(h, (u,-1,1), (v,-1,1))
> f.show()
> \end{sageblock}
>
> \sageplot[][pn
geplot function doesn't work here ...
The file plot-0.png and plot-0.eps are not created ...
Same problem with implicit3dplot, ...
If anybody knows what to do
--- En date de : Mer 3.3.10, Adrián a écrit :
De: Adrián
Objet: [sage-support] Re: Sagetex issue
À: "sage-support&quo
Thanks, that's just what I needed, just the load instruction. I
finally got
it to work somehow.
Although it seems kind of weird that I get an error message after
I load the .sage file in the console, it always ends saying
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'sagetex_practice.sage'
but i
On 02/23/2010 02:18 PM, Dana Ernst wrote:
Is the newest version of sagetex included in Sage 4.3.2? Also, what is the
newest version of sagetex? It's not listed here:
It's now a standard spkg:
http://sagemath.org/packages/standard/
Looks like the version is 2.2.3.
Jason
--
To post to t
Using "solve(x^2-5*x-24, x)" did fix my problem, thank you. I should
have checked that.
Oscar
On Feb 15, 7:11 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 at 08:21AM -0800, Oscar wrote:
> > Back to square 1:
>
> > I added a few more lines of code and then it stopped working. Plots
> > are OK, but
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 at 08:21AM -0800, Oscar wrote:
> Back to square 1:
>
> I added a few more lines of code and then it stopped working. Plots
> are OK, but Sage seems not to be calculating. I checked the
> generated .sage file, and now it says what it should say, I think:
> _st_.inline(0, latex(2
The .tex file is at:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3709792/example1.tex
And the generated .sage file:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3709792/example1.sage
Oscar
On Feb 15, 10:21 am, Oscar wrote:
> Back to square 1:
>
> I added a few more lines of code and then it stopped working. Plots
> are OK, but Sage
Back to square 1:
I added a few more lines of code and then it stopped working. Plots
are OK, but Sage seems not to be calculating. I checked the
generated .sage file, and now it says what it should say, I think:
_st_.inline(0, latex(2^100))
I didn't do anything different, except add more lines o
SUCESS!! Thank you very much. I had already changed the sagetex.sty
file in my texmf. It had the one that comes with TeXLive, and I put
there the one that comes with Sage, since I noticed it was more
recent. That didn't seem to help, but I just did what you recommend
(sudo gzip sagetex.sty and then
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 at 12:26PM -0800, Oscar wrote:
> The story gets more complicated: I commented out the \sage{2^100}
> calculation, and without that, it runs fine.
The reason is a change in sagetex.sty. Right now, your system is using
sagetex.sty from TeXLive (look for
"/usr/local/texlive/2009/t
The story gets more complicated: I commented out the \sage{2^100}
calculation, and without that, it runs fine.
This seems to have no problems:
%!TEX TS-program = sage
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{sagetex}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
This is an example
I did change the drop-down menu so that it says 'sage'. I did
'kpsewhich sagetex.sty' and this is what I got:
Cnidus:~ oscar$ kpsewhich sagetex.sty
/Users/oscar/Library/texmf/tex/sagetex.sty
The whole console text is at
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3709792/sagetex_example_console.txt
You'll see that
> I don't know how far Dan's
> ideas are, but there is one immediate hack i can suggest you: Just
> create PDF files for each chapter and then stick them together using a
> PDF-merge tool.
With Ubuntu :
apt-get install pdftk
pdftk *.pdf cat output combined.pdf
Laurent
--
To post to this group
one can just use pdfpages in (pdf) LaTeX:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{pdfpages}
\begin{document}
\includepdf[pages=-]{bla}
\includepdf[pages=-]{foo}
\end{document}
creates a pdf document consisting of bla.pdf followed by foo.pdf
2009/12/2 Marshall Hampton :
> I use pyPdf to glue pdfs tog
I use pyPdf to glue pdfs together, its nice if you already like python
and want to automate such tasks:
http://pybrary.net/pyPdf/
-Marshall
On Dec 1, 5:11 pm, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Dec 1, 8:44 pm, Eric Drechsel wrote:
>
> > 1. Is it possible to have a master document that includes a bunc
Hi Harald, thanks for the suggestion, I had thought of that too. It
seems like a viable route. Each subdocument ends up on its own set of
pages, but I guess that's the case when using \include too.
-- Eric
On Dec 1, 3:11 pm, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Dec 1, 8:44 pm, Eric Drechsel wrote:
>
> >
On Dec 1, 3:30 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>
>
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 at 11:44AM -0800, Eric Drechsel wrote:
> > I'm experimenting with a homework workflow using sagetex. I'd like to
> > make efficient use of resources, which seems to be a (the?) major
> > deficiency with sagetex, especiall
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
