Re: [sage-support] Re: Question related to Sagemath permission on Github

https://docs.github.com/en/organizations/managing-organization-settings/setting-permissions-for-deleting-or-transferring-repositories On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 18:57, Nils Bruin wrote: > On Sunday 21 January 2024 at 04:25:42 UTC-8 Juan Grados wrote: > > To protect the repo from arbitrary deletion,

[sage-support] Re: Question related to Sagemath permission on Github

On Sunday 21 January 2024 at 04:25:42 UTC-8 Juan Grados wrote: To protect the repo from arbitrary deletion, I need to know if Github allows adding a rule to avoid a repository being deleted by a single person. If you encourage a workflow with forks and pull requests then everybody will have t

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about cysignals installation

On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 10:22 AM Nils Bruin wrote: > > I think it was written elsewhere that cysignals has not been ported to cython > 3.0.0 yet. In fact, sage as a whole hasn't been upgraded to compile with > cython 3.0.0 yet. This part of Sage - cysignals+cypari2 - is not in a good shape. Cyp

[sage-support] Re: Question about cysignals installation

I think it was written elsewhere that cysignals has not been ported to cython 3.0.0 yet. In fact, sage as a whole hasn't been upgraded to compile with cython 3.0.0 yet. On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 06:57:05 UTC-7 JC wrote: > Dear Sage developers, > > I'm trying to install the cysignals 1.11.

[sage-support] Re: Question about cysignals installation

I am observing extremely similar error messages, perhaps identical, on OpenSUSE Tumbleweed linux in Python 3.11.4, also attempting to install cysignals-1.11.2. As with the original post, the first seemingly substantive error message is ``` Error compiling Cython file: ---

[sage-support] Re: Question about solving polynomial system over RR in sage

solve is a function working on symbolic expressions. Polynomials on RR as defined in your example, are *not* symbolic expressions. The set of operations applicable to them is different. And, BTW, symbolic expressions do have a *method* solve (not to be confused with the *function* solve), but

[sage-support] Re: Question about a deprecation warning

On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 3:31:15 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote: > Does IPython have a preparser? > I suspected Sage's preparser. I was wrong. You are right: (even out of Sage) Hera:~$ PYTHONWARNINGS=always ipython Python 3.8.3 (default, May 27 2020, 20:54:22) Type 'copyright', 'credits'

[sage-support] Re: Question about a deprecation warning

Does IPython have a preparser? On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 11:43:36 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu wrote: > > Because of the preparser? > > On Thursday, July 2, 2020 at 9:19:58 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 4:39:12 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On

[sage-support] Re: Question about a deprecation warning

Because of the preparser? On Thursday, July 2, 2020 at 9:19:58 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 4:39:12 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 2:22:49 PM UTC-7, Antonio Rojas wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> El miércoles, 1 de julio de

[sage-support] Re: Question about a deprecation warning

On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 4:39:12 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 2:22:49 PM UTC-7, Antonio Rojas wrote: >> >> >> >> El miércoles, 1 de julio de 2020, 21:06:43 (UTC+2), John H Palmieri >> escribió: >>> >>> >>> Why so many deprecation warnings? I think t

[sage-support] Re: Question about a deprecation warning

On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 2:22:49 PM UTC-7, Antonio Rojas wrote: > > > > El miércoles, 1 de julio de 2020, 21:06:43 (UTC+2), John H Palmieri > escribió: >> >> >> Why so many deprecation warnings? I think they're coming from plain >> Python; why doesn't Python print the warnings? >> >> >> >

[sage-support] Re: Question about a deprecation warning

El miércoles, 1 de julio de 2020, 21:06:43 (UTC+2), John H Palmieri escribió: > > > Why so many deprecation warnings? I think they're coming from plain > Python; why doesn't Python print the warnings? > > > Because python ignores deprecation warnings, https://docs.python.org/3/library/warning

[sage-support] Re: Question regarding piecewise.py in Sage

Romain: The best way to get an answer is to send your questions to sage-support, ccd here. I don't know the answer to your question off the top of my head, but can you tell me what the "last modified" date is on the piecewise.py module you're looking at? David J On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, 11:47 AM Romai

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about upgrading.

Le 13/01/2017 à 11:09, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > IMHO you should be able to finish build by (repeatedly) running make. > (It would in the end give you working Sage, although make will report an > error in the end) > > Just in case, coxeter3 installs in 7.5 just fine for me (on a gentoo > linux bo

[sage-support] Re: Question about upgrading.

IMHO you should be able to finish build by (repeatedly) running make. (It would in the end give you working Sage, although make will report an error in the end) Just in case, coxeter3 installs in 7.5 just fine for me (on a gentoo linux box) On Friday, January 13, 2017 at 8:40:10 AM UTC, tdumont

[sage-support] Re: question about sage installed from PPA

Hi Gabriel On 10 January 2017 at 02:07, gabriel minian wrote: > Dear Jan, > > I am using Kubuntu 16.10 (64 bits) and I have recently installed the Sage > package from PPA. > It works fine but when I try to install the GAP SmallGroups Library (using > "sage -i database_gap") I get an error messag

[sage-support] Re: Question regarding normalization of modular symbols.

Chris, Thank you for your comments, they are very helpful! On my computations, I am considering elliptic curves with rank 1. So, the value of the modular symbol [0] is zero, and we cannot normalise using the value of the L function at 1. I need the correct normalization because I am working on

[sage-support] Re: Question regarding normalization of modular symbols.

Most of the normalisation of modular symbols was introduced by me so let me comment. There are currently two ways of computing modular symbols, one using eclib and the other the native sage implementation. Both are only correct up to a scaling factor. That is because their main use was as gene

[sage-support] Re: Question mark failed on Sage toplevel

You're welcome Francois Bienvenue Francois. Maybe you can "complete" the thread...no worry... Volker or William will fix that later ...:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving ema

[sage-support] Re: Question mark failed on Sage toplevel

Dominique gave the right hint because the folder in the env variable didn't exist: sage: env SAGE_DOC '/usr/share/doc/sage' The problem is solved by installing the package 'community/sagemath-doc 6.7-1' (on Manjaro Linux) and we can check: $ ls /usr/share/doc/sage/ ca/ common/ de/ en/ fr/

[sage-support] Re: Question mark failed on Sage toplevel

This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18642 On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 12:11:52 AM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > You have a file named "conf.py" in the current working directory. A > workaround is to start Sage in a different directory. > > > > On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 3:01:52 PM UTC+2,

[sage-support] Re: Question mark failed on Sage toplevel

You have a file named "conf.py" in the current working directory. A workaround is to start Sage in a different directory. On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 3:01:52 PM UTC+2, François Colas wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'm facing an error with the question mark after any kind of function. > Here is

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question mark failed on Sage toplevel

Hi François, This is definitely a bug in SageMathCloud, which might be related to a bug in Sage itself (not sure). Can you open a ticket at https://github.com/sagemathinc/smc/issues William On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Dominique Laurain wrote: > Bonsoir Francois, > > Je ne peux rien dir

[sage-support] Re: Question mark failed on Sage toplevel

Bonsoir Francois, Je ne peux rien dire de certain pour une version sagemath installé en local (car je n'ai rien sur mon PC)...mais sur le cloud de SAGE cela fonctionne. URL site web : https://cloud.sagemath.com Dans un projet ouvrir un "terminal" puis exécuter les commandes en fin de ce post L

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about subs in PolynomialSequence

thanks! 2014-08-31 6:26 GMT-03:00 Dima Pasechnik : > On 2014-08-31, Juan Grados wrote: > > Dears members, > > > > I'm trying to use subs method in PolynomialSequence, but when I doing > that > > I get the same PolynomialSequence. For example in code below my > polynomial > > sequence PS has onl

[sage-support] Re: Question about subs in PolynomialSequence

On 2014-08-31, Juan Grados wrote: > Dears members, > > I'm trying to use subs method in PolynomialSequence, but when I doing that > I get the same PolynomialSequence. For example in code below my polynomial > sequence PS has only one polynomial (P) ... I'm trying to use subs but I > get the same p

[sage-support] Re: Question About Finite Field propertie in polynomial ring

Hello, Let be the field > q = 2 > K. = GF(q^n) > and the Polynomial Ring > PR = PolynomialRing(K,"X") > Let be a random monomial of PR for example > P = t*X^(q^a). > Is there any method in sage to reduce X degree of polynomial P, such that > equivalent polynomial is t*X^(q^b) where b = mod(P.degr

[sage-support] Re: Question about ortogonal subspaces

On 2014-07-16, Juan Grados wrote: > Dears members, > > I trying to solve the next problem. Let be the chain of subspaces > J1 \subset J2 \subset J3 \subset J4 over the finite field GF(3), where > dim(J1) = 2, dim(J2) = 4, dim(J3) = 6 and dim(J4)=8. I want extract the > basis vector of the subspace

[sage-support] Re: question about hg (newbie)

On Monday, May 12, 2014 4:52:42 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On 2014-05-12, J.A. Ketch > wrote: > > thank you all for the answers > > the version of my sage is : Sage Version 6.1.1, Release Date: > 2014-02-04, > > so I can not use hg. Some sites for the development refers to hg and not

[sage-support] Re: question about hg (newbie)

On 2014-05-12, J.A. Ketch wrote: > thank you all for the answers > the version of my sage is : Sage Version 6.1.1, Release Date: 2014-02-04, > so I can not use hg. Some sites for the development refers to hg and not to > git. For instance > http://combinat.sagemath.org/doc/thematic_tutorials/tut

[sage-support] Re: question - SAGE

On Friday, June 21, 2013 6:43:29 PM UTC+2, William stein wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Savin Diana > > Date: Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:46 AM > Subject: question - SAGE > To: "wst...@uw.edu " > > > > Dear Professor William Stein, > > I am Savin Diana and I work at O

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about "sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"

Well, i dont know if i did it right, but i did export MAKE="make -j2" make build i did it cause i read the sage documentation about compiling from source, and i saw that in the MAKE varible we can define the number of jobs by means of the option -j# it took about 7 hours to compile from source

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about "sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"

On Sunday, 29 July 2012 02:18:26 UTC+8, Daniel M. wrote: > > Then i could compile the source as > > export MAKE="make build -j2" > $MAKE > > right? > I'd rather do export MAKE="make -j2" $MAKE build AFAIK, make options must come before targets (i.e. "build") > > El jueves, 26 de julio de 20

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about "sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"

Then i could compile the source as export MAKE="make build -j2" $MAKE right? El jueves, 26 de julio de 2012 23:30:54 UTC-5, Dima Pasechnik escribió: > > > > On Friday, 27 July 2012 05:20:52 UTC+8, Daniel M. wrote: >> >> Compile sage from source in mi netbook would take soo many time. the last >

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about "sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"

On Friday, 27 July 2012 05:20:52 UTC+8, Daniel M. wrote: > > Compile sage from source in mi netbook would take soo many time. the last > time i did it took about 6 hours, but unpacking a precomplied binary... its > a matter of some minutes. > well, leave it overnight... If you have a dual-cor

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about "sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"

Compile sage from source in mi netbook would take soo many time. the last time i did it took about 6 hours, but unpacking a precomplied binary... its a matter of some minutes. El jueves, 26 de julio de 2012 00:25:47 UTC-5, Dima Pasechnik escribió: > > > > On Thursday, 26 July 2012 08:35:03 UTC+8

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about "sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"

On Thursday, 26 July 2012 08:35:03 UTC+8, Daniel M. wrote: > > > >I ask again: which 5.0.1 prebuilt package are you referring to? > > An old downloaded package that i obtained from * > http://sagemath.c3sl.ufpr.br/linux/64bit/index.html* > the last package that worked last week was * > 5.0.

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about "sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"

>I ask again: which 5.0.1 prebuilt package are you referring to? An old downloaded package that i obtained from * http://sagemath.c3sl.ufpr.br/linux/64bit/index.html* the last package that worked last week was * 5.0.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_10.04.3_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.lzma*. I hope that this i

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about "sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"

On 2012-07-25 17:53, Daniel M. wrote: > Many thanks!, it seems that the only option i've by now it's use the > 5.0.1 prebuilt package that i found in my files. I ask again: which 5.0.1 prebuilt package are you referring to? > I'm goint to ask, but i really think that it's not possible: i wonder if

[sage-support] Re: Question about "sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"

Many thanks!, it seems that the only option i've by now it's use the 5.0.1 prebuilt package that i found in my files. I'm goint to ask, but i really think that it's not possible: i wonder if there is a way to compile the source on mi desktop and then move it to my netbook, both are almost the

[sage-support] Re: Question about "sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"

Ubuntu 8 is really old (they now have version 12). It will expect you to run libc 2.7, IMHO. http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/libc6 On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 20:54:45 UTC+8, Daniel M. wrote: > > Any one knows if "* > sage-5.1-linux-64bit-ubuntu_8.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz*

[sage-support] Re: question concerning SAGE

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Jörn Steuding wrote: > Dear Prof. Stein, > > I have question concerning SAGE: when I try to compute the generators of > Gamma_0(3) (for example) and I use the command > >   Gamma0(3).generators(algorithm="todd-coxeter") > > I receive > >   Traceback (click to the l

[sage-support] Re: Question about plot

On 3/3/12 12:50 PM, juaninf wrote: Dears members I need axes_labels in vertical and horizontal form in side sideways od axis, how make this?. example http://www.personal.psu.edu/egp11/Eric_Paterson/Blog/Entries/2009/11/18_Open-Source_alternatives_for_MATLAB_in_teaching_and_research_files/ericPlo

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about plot

I fix this, thanks by your time 2012/2/24 Juan Grados > Yes in console terminal, when i make this > > p1 = plot(spline(pattersonCpb), > (__builtin__.max(pattersonCpb)[0],__builtin__.min(pattersonCpb)[0]))+points(pattersonCpb) > show(p1) > the plot work fine, but when i make this load a extern fi

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about plot

Yes in console terminal, when i make this p1 = plot(spline(pattersonCpb), (__builtin__.max(pattersonCpb)[0],__builtin__.min(pattersonCpb)[0]))+points(pattersonCpb) show(p1) the plot work fine, but when i make this load a extern file *.sage only i get the points. 2012/2/24 Jason Grout > On 2/2

[sage-support] Re: Question about plot

On 2/24/12 2:36 PM, Juan Grados wrote: Jason Grout idea is good for me, but I need empiler several "plots", i after use show(plot1+plot2+...). How do this?. Exactly like you said. Make each plot: plot1=plot(spline(pts), (0,5)) ... and then do show(plot1+plot2+...) Jason -- To post to thi

[sage-support] Re: Question about plot

On 2/23/12 9:39 PM, Juan Grados wrote: I need smooth line, (interpolation the points), line(vec) plot line without smoth Maybe the spline command would be useful to you? sage: v=[(1,2),(3,4),(6,6),(4,3)] sage: plot(spline(v), (1,6))+points(v) There isn't a smoothing option in list_plot---you

[sage-support] Re: Question about UniqueFactory

If you look in the source code slightly before where the class UniqueFactory is defined you will see the following: from sage_object cimport SageObject cdef sage_version from sage.version import version as sage_version sage_version = sage_version.split('.') for i in range(len(sage_version)):

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about rdtsc()

thanks 2012/2/19 Oleksandr Kazymyrov > Dear Juaninf, > > You can call "rdtsc" in SAGE (Accessing C Functions in Separate > Files) > or function "%time". > > Best regards, > Oleksandr > > -- > To post to this group, send email to sage-suppor

[sage-support] Re: Question about download SAGE

Hi uncompressed binaries are available here: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/buildbot/binaries/sage/ Harald -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, vis

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about download SAGE

thanks! 2012/2/14 emil > > > On Feb 14, 6:57 pm, Juan Grados wrote: > > I dont permissions for this in my server > > Well, if there is no better solution (like asking sysadmin, or > somebody uploads other package ) you could build lzma (or successor xz- > utils) locally > http://tukaani.or

[sage-support] Re: Question about download SAGE

On Feb 14, 6:57 pm, Juan Grados wrote: > I dont permissions for this in my server Well, if there is no better solution (like asking sysadmin, or somebody uploads other package ) you could build lzma (or successor xz- utils) locally http://tukaani.org/lzma/ -- To post to this group, send

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about download SAGE

I dont permissions for this in my server 2012/2/14 emil > > > On Feb 14, 5:21 pm, juaninf wrote: > > Hi everybody > > > > Please I want download the SAGE math for fedora-32bits, but i need the > > file with extension *.tar not tar.lzmaa, because my tar program no > > have support fot this

[sage-support] Re: Question about download SAGE

On Feb 14, 5:21 pm, juaninf wrote: > Hi everybody > > Please I want download the SAGE math for fedora-32bits, but i need the > file with extension *.tar not tar.lzmaa, because my tar program no > have support fot this extension, ...   > http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/sage/linux/32bit/index.html. > You kn

[sage-support] Re: Question about cycles per second in SAGE

On Feb 13, 8:05 pm, juaninf wrote: > thanks by your attention Volker, ... but this command return the > "cycles per second" measure? If your processor is running at 2 GHz, it means it's doing 2 * 10^9 cycles per second. If sage is the only job that is using significant computing resources, then y

[sage-support] Re: Question about cycles per second in SAGE

thanks by your attention Volker, ... but this command return the "cycles per second" measure? On 14 fev, 01:52, Volker Braun wrote: > You probably want wall time spent on executing a statement. This is best > measured with timeit: > > sage: timeit('1+1') > 625 loops, best of 3: 552 ns per loop -

[sage-support] Re: Question about cycles per second in SAGE

You probably want wall time spent on executing a statement. This is best measured with timeit: sage: timeit('1+1') 625 loops, best of 3: 552 ns per loop -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@

[sage-support] Re: Question about scoping

OK, but that only explains why it injects things into a scope. Why does it inject them into the *global* scope, and not the local scope? Or is this not possible? -Keshav Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net ! -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To un

[sage-support] Re: Question about scoping

On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:06:25 PM UTC+8, luisfe wrote: > On Jan 16, 5:53 pm, Ed Scheinerman > wrote: > > I'm confused by the fact that variables defined inside functions can > > "leak out" and become global variables. Here's what I've noticed. > > The problem is twith the function var.

[sage-support] Re: Question about scoping

On Jan 16, 5:53 pm, Ed Scheinerman wrote: > I'm confused by the fact that variables defined inside functions can > "leak out" and become global variables. Here's what I've noticed. The problem is twith the function var. According to its documentation: (var?) "The new variable is both returned

[sage-support] Re: Question about minimal polynomial to build GF

> sage: > F.=GF(2^8,name='x',modulus=z^8+z^4+z^3+z^2+1,check_irreducible=False) > sage: F > Finite Field in x of size 2^8 > sage: F.polynomial() > x^8 + x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + 1 > > Andrzej Chrzeszczyk In this case sage does not complaint, but check_irreducible is not intended for this use, but to avoi

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about minimal polynomial to build GF

... thanks, by your attention, I am reading a documentation to Implement Galois Field in other place, ... and declare in C this static unsigned prim_poly[MAX_EXT_DEG + 1] = {◦1 , ◦3 , /∗ not used ∗/ ◦7 , ◦13 , ◦23 , ◦45 , ◦103 , ◦203 , ◦435 , ◦1041 , ◦2011 , ◦4005 , ◦10123 , ◦20033 , ◦42103 , ◦10

[sage-support] Re: Question about minimal polynomial to build GF

On Dec 12, 1:08 am, achrzesz wrote: > On Dec 12, 12:47 am, achrzesz wrote: > > > > > On Dec 12, 12:41 am, Juan Grados wrote: > > > > but when I put this polynomial  x^8+x^7+x^4+x^3+x+1 I get ValueError: > > > finite field modulus must be irreducible but it is not > > > > 2011/12/11 achrzesz >

[sage-support] Re: Question about minimal polynomial to build GF

On Dec 12, 12:47 am, achrzesz wrote: > On Dec 12, 12:41 am, Juan Grados wrote: > > > > > but when I put this polynomial  x^8+x^7+x^4+x^3+x+1 I get ValueError: > > finite field modulus must be irreducible but it is not > > > 2011/12/11 achrzesz > > > > On Dec 12, 12:10 am, juaninf wrote: > > >

[sage-support] Re: Question about minimal polynomial to build GF

On Dec 12, 12:41 am, Juan Grados wrote: > but when I put this polynomial  x^8+x^7+x^4+x^3+x+1 I get ValueError: > finite field modulus must be irreducible but it is not > > 2011/12/11 achrzesz > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 12:10 am, juaninf wrote: > > > Hi everybody > > > > I want choose different

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about minimal polynomial to build GF

but when I put this polynomial x^8+x^7+x^4+x^3+x+1 I get ValueError: finite field modulus must be irreducible but it is not 2011/12/11 achrzesz > > > On Dec 12, 12:10 am, juaninf wrote: > > Hi everybody > > > > I want choose different minimal polynomial to build a Galois Field > > 2^m, how? >

[sage-support] Re: Question about minimal polynomial to build GF

On Dec 12, 12:31 am, achrzesz wrote: > On Dec 12, 12:10 am, juaninf wrote: > > > > > Hi everybody > > > I want choose different minimal polynomial to build a Galois Field > > 2^m, how? > > > For example: m = 8 > > > sageF.=GF(2^8) > > sage:print a.minpoly() > > I get ... > > x^8 + x^4 + x^3 + x

[sage-support] Re: Question about minimal polynomial to build GF

On Dec 12, 12:10 am, juaninf wrote: > Hi everybody > > I want choose different minimal polynomial to build a Galois Field > 2^m, how? > > For example: m = 8 > > sageF.=GF(2^8) > sage:print a.minpoly() > I get ... > x^8 + x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + 1 > but I want now other polynomial for example > x^8+x^7

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about MPI in SAGE

Dear Maarten sorry 2011/10/16 Maarten Derickx > Dear Juan Grados, > > I don't think people have forgotten it, but merely not answering since you > are asking in the wrong place. This is the sage mailinglist not the mpi4py one > and the problems you are experiencing are problems with getting mpi

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about MPI in SAGE

Dear Juan Grados, I don't think people have forgotten it, but merely not answering since you are asking in the wrong place. This is the sage mailinglist not the mpi4py one and the problems you are experiencing are problems with getting mpi4py working and not sage. Also your large amount of me

[sage-support] Re: Question about Groener Basis

Hi Juan, On 13 Okt., 07:08, juaninf wrote: > I want implement a efficient linear solve system over GF(2) (and too > parallel if this is posible), i reading this article, but i dont > understand > > http://ask.sagemath.org/question/467/solve-large-system-of-linear-equ... It very much depends on w

[sage-support] Re: Question about Kernel Matrix

On 10/11/11 5:27 PM, juaninf wrote: Hi everyone I want know if exist a parallel implementation to kernels of matrices with openmpi in sage I'm pretty sure that nothing in Sage uses openmpi by default (and probably not at all). We don't include any mpi packages in the default Sage. Thanks,

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about MPI in SAGE

please dont forget 2011/10/5 Juan Grados > I maked this thread > http://groups.google.com/group/mpi4py/browse_thread/thread/2e08c06f271c3069 > now I get this error > > > ImportError: > /home/juaninf/Escritorio/juaninf/Programas/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mpi4py/MPI.so: > undefined sy

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about Convert Polynomial

thanks, fix my problem 2011/10/9 Maarten Derickx > In sage the types are not that important (it is just an implementation > detail), but the parent of an object is since that says what the > mathematical meaning of an object is. Try: > > q=p.parent()(q) > > -- > To post to this group, send email

[sage-support] Re: Question about Convert Polynomial

In sage the types are not that important (it is just an implementation detail), but the parent of an object is since that says what the mathematical meaning of an object is. Try: q=p.parent()(q) -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this grou

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about MPI in SAGE

I maked this thread http://groups.google.com/group/mpi4py/browse_thread/thread/2e08c06f271c3069 now I get this error ImportError: /home/juaninf/Escritorio/juaninf/Programas/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mpi4py/MPI.so: undefined symbol: _PyByteArray_empty_string 2011/10/3 Juan Grados >

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about Plot

thanks, Jason, John, I've already done with your help 2011/10/4 Jason Grout > On 10/4/11 5:28 PM, juaninf wrote: > >> Hi everyone >> >> I am have 4 vectors, and I want plot 2 graphics in the same place, >> >> vector1 vs vector2 color = red >> vector3 vs vector4 color = yelow >> > > You might fin

[sage-support] Re: Question about Plot

On 10/4/11 5:28 PM, juaninf wrote: Hi everyone I am have 4 vectors, and I want plot 2 graphics in the same place, vector1 vs vector2 color = red vector3 vs vector4 color = yelow You might find the various linear algebra tutorials helpful. Here is one I use in my linear algebra class, for ex

[sage-support] Re: Question about Plot

On Tuesday, October 4, 2011 3:28:59 PM UTC-7, juaninf wrote: > > Hi everyone > > I am have 4 vectors, and I want plot 2 graphics in the same place, > > vector1 vs vector2 color = red > vector3 vs vector4 color = yelow > > I'm not quite sure what you mean by plotting one vector against another.

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about MPI in SAGE

... 2011/10/2 Juan Grados > My openmpi > > openmpi 1.4.1-3 > > > 2011/10/2 Volker Braun > >> On Sunday, October 2, 2011 4:25:54 PM UTC+2, juaninf wrote: >>> >>> My MPI version is 0.6, >> >> >> I guess thats not OpenMPI, then? >> >> >>> -- >> To post to this group, send email to sage-support@g

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about MPI in SAGE

My openmpi openmpi 1.4.1-3 2011/10/2 Volker Braun > On Sunday, October 2, 2011 4:25:54 PM UTC+2, juaninf wrote: >> >> My MPI version is 0.6, > > > I guess thats not OpenMPI, then? > > >> -- > To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group,

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about MPI in SAGE

On Sunday, October 2, 2011 4:25:54 PM UTC+2, juaninf wrote: > > My MPI version is 0.6, I guess thats not OpenMPI, then? > -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about MPI in SAGE

My MPI version is 0.6, Ubuntu version Ubuntu 11.04 Sage version 4.7.1 2011/10/2 Volker Braun > I'd guess lt_dlexit is a symbol that libtool defines that has something to > do with getting out of a dynamic library. Seems like the mpi4py package > misses some linker flags. You should post some in

[sage-support] Re: Question about MPI in SAGE

I'd guess lt_dlexit is a symbol that libtool defines that has something to do with getting out of a dynamic library. Seems like the mpi4py package misses some linker flags. You should post some info about your setup (which mpi, os, versions...) -- To post to this group, send email to sage-supp

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about congruence

I found this method in polynomial_element.pyx file thanks 2011/9/30 Juan Grados > Hi David, > > Yes already, but I want build other new, because I need make modification > in EEA (add other stop parade), but I first that my "EEA Algorithm" work > fine ... > > thanks > > > 2011/9/30 David Joyn

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about congruence

Hi David, Yes already, but I want build other new, because I need make modification in EEA (add other stop parade), but I first that my "EEA Algorithm" work fine ... thanks 2011/9/30 David Joyner > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:11 AM, juaninf wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I want implement a

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about congruence

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:11 AM, juaninf wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I want implement a extend Euclidean Algorithm ( to solve a(x) It's already in Sage. Type xgcd? for further details. > congruence b(x)R(x) mod (g(x))), (egcd > function), but this give wrong results, below my egcd, please hel

[sage-support] Re: Question about congruence

Hi everybody, I want implement a extend Euclidean Algorithm ( to solve a(x) congruence b(x)R(x) mod (g(x))), (egcd function), but this give wrong results, below my egcd, please help me to fix ... I am testing with inverse multiplicative from output of xgcd def egcd(p1,p2): if p2 == PR(0):

[sage-support] Re: Question about congruence

in the paper that I reading say use Euclides Algorithm, but I dont know how On 29 sep, 07:29, juaninf wrote: > g(x) is prime polynomial > > On 29 sep, 07:28, juaninf wrote: > > > > > > > > > How do a(x) congruence b(x)R(x) mod (g(x)) in sage? > > > thanks by your answers -- To post to this gro

[sage-support] Re: Question about congruence

g(x) is prime polynomial On 29 sep, 07:28, juaninf wrote: > How do a(x) congruence b(x)R(x) mod (g(x)) in sage? > > thanks by your answers -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.c

[sage-support] Re: question about radical

Hi Pong, On 17 Aug., 09:20, pong wrote: > Hum... > > [radical(k) for k in [1..30]] produces the expected list however > > [radical(k) for k in range(1,31)] rises an error > > AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'factor' That's no surprise, because "range" is Python and thus produces Py

[sage-support] Re: question on integration of piecewise related function

See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1773 for where this particular issue is being tracked. -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at

[sage-support] Re: question on integration of piecewise related function

On Aug 15, 10:00 am, David Joyner wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:56 AM, linouc wrote: > > Hello, Sage groups, I have a problem, please see the example below, I > > wonder anyone can help me solve this problem: > > > f = Piecewise([[(0,pi/2),-1],[(pi/2,pi),2]]) > > a=pi*integrate(f,x,0,pi) >

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about integral bases of modular forms in sage

> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:17 AM, max flander wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> I'm not sure if you remember me, I was at the Sage days in Leiden last year. >> >> I was hoping you could help me with a question. I need to compute Z bases of >> weight 2 cusp forms. I've noticed that the modular forms you get

[sage-support] Re: Question about integral bases of modular forms in sage

I don't know the answer (I was not involved at all in implementing any of this in Sage), though I suspect that the answer is "yes", so I am copying sage-support in case someone else knows. John On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:17 AM, max flander wrote: > Hi John, > > I'm not sure if you remember me, I w

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question on Sage math - loading modules

I should have stated, this below was posted to sci.math.symbolic http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math.symbolic/browse_thread/thread/1622538c471acba4/bdd157ee61540ca5?hl=en#bdd157ee61540ca5 On 15 October 2010 22:11, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On Oct 12, 9:15 pm, Jürgen Will wrote: >> Hallo,

[sage-support] Re: Question on Sage math - loading modules

On Oct 12, 9:15 pm, Jürgen Will wrote: > Hallo, > > how can I load a module like symmetrica into Sage? > ? symmetrica works, symmetrica ? works, and help(symmetrica) works. > > Thanks. You would be far better asking on the sage-support mailing list. Just join at http://groups.google.com/group/sa

[sage-support] Re: Question about polynomial rings and their fraction fields

Wow, I had never heard of inject_on() until now. Amazing! It looks as if it has been in Sage for a long time, since its docstring says "Add code ... and send William Stein a patch"! John On Sep 26, 2:16 am, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:51 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > >> This

Re: [sage-support] Re: Question about polynomial rings and their fraction fields

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:51 AM, kcrisman wrote: > >> This is the only possibility, because the "var('x')" command executed >> by default at startup did the assignment >> >> x = SR('x') >> >> and you haven't bound x to any other object. Once you execute >> >> x = b.0 >> >> [ or one of its implici

[sage-support] Re: Question about polynomial rings and their fraction fields

> This is the only possibility, because the "var('x')" command executed > by default at startup did the assignment > > x = SR('x') > > and you haven't bound x to any other object. Once you execute > > x = b.0 > > [ or one of its implicit forms like b.=PolynomialRing(ZZ,'x')] then > x is no longer

  1   2   3   >