Hello folks,
if you have been reading this list and have not heard about the fact
that the ReST transition is coming in Sage 3.3 you must have been not
paying attention :)
Mike Hansen has been working tirelessly for a while on a giant patch
set (as below noted 282 thousand lines of diff, about 8
On 3 Jan., 08:32, mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
Hi Michael,
I had found, downloaded, build and (long-)tested the 3.2.3.rc0 when it
was still named "final".
Already rock-stable on MacBook Intel Core2Duo with Mac OS X 10.4
Hi,
What is a reviewer of the "sphinxification" tickets #4902 - #4927
to do?
Read only for textual correctness, or do I have to sphinxify it and
check the result?
I could the former, but do not yet know how to do the latter --- did I
miss something in the wiki, e.g. on http://wiki.sagemath.org/Sp
Hi,
sorry for the Off-Topic "BTW" question, I moved it to the correct
thread.
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Georg S. Weber
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What is a reviewer of the "sphinxification" tickets #4902 - #4927
> to do?
> Read only for textual correctness, or do I have to sphinxify it and
> check the result?
It's the former rather than the latter. It's to check fo
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Georg S. Weber
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What is a reviewer of the "sphinxification" tickets #4902 - #4927
>> to do?
>> Read only for textual correctness, or do I have to sphinxify it and
>> check th
Drop-dead gorgeous!
OK, I think I got the idea. I do have other things to do, but I have
the feeling that I just can't resist reading that output and give a
review or two.
;-))
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@goog
Thanks very much for this info.
This is very interesting. At first, I was wondering how this could be
possible, as surely reduce would have lots of contributors. The history
suggests that Hearn kept the copyright and allowed others the source code
if they contributed (basically giving them reduce
Hi, I've got a crash report, which might be a blocker for 3.2.3:
In the course of building and installing 3.2.3.final, an empty file "/
Users/georgweber/.sage/init.sage" was created (I remember having seen
the corresponding output line).
Now trying to start (the older version) Sage 3.2.2, IPytho
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
[...]
>
> You can download the sources from
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.3/
>
> or upgrade to this release via
>
> ./sage -upgrade
> http://sage.
To clarify the answer to Georg's question, to you want reviewers to
read the output html and report on anything which looks wrong, or to
read the patch (where the markup used is something which would need a
reference to be provided).
I am happier to do the former (say for sage,schemes.* in #4926)
We have previously discussed (about 1 year ago) the possibility of
implementing a Sage interface for reduce and providing it as an
optional package like FriCAS, but this did not seem to generate much
interest at the time.
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/faa5479477132cab
Reduce is a
I'm not sure why it didn't occur to me earlier, but it would be nice
to have a portable projector at the joint meetings if anyone can bring
one. Alternatively, if anyone who is driving to the meetings can
bring a decent sized flatscreen (i.e. bigger than a typical laptop
screen) that would be ter
On Jan 3, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Bill Page wrote:
>
> We have previously discussed (about 1 year ago) the possibility of
> implementing a Sage interface for reduce and providing it as an
> optional package like FriCAS, but this did not seem to generate much
> interest at the time.
>
> http://groups.
On Jan 3, 8:48 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
> I'm certainly interested in trying things out, but my knowledge of
> Reduce
> is only what I've glimpsed in the documentation yesterday (so basically
> none) and it has been a long time since I've written any Lisp (nearly
> 20 years).
>
> Cheers,
>
> T
On Jan 3, 5:47 am, "Georg S. Weber"
wrote:
Hi,
> Hi, I've got a crash report, which might be a blocker for 3.2.3:
Nope, this is not an issue with 3.2.3, but 3.2.2. And this was done on
purpose to catch exactly this issue since it has slipped by us in
releases twice already.
> In the course
On Jan 3, 6:14 am, Jaap Spies wrote:
> On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
> --
> All tests passed!
>
> Jaap
Thanks Jaap, this is pretty much what was expected.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
On Jan 3, 6:44 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
HI,
> To clarify the answer to Georg's question, to you want reviewers to
> read the output html and report on anything which looks wrong, or to
> read the patch (where the markup used is something which would need a
> reference to be provided).
In a
2009/1/3 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 6:44 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
>
> HI,
>
>> To clarify the answer to Georg's question, to you want reviewers to
>> read the output html and report on anything which looks wrong, or to
>> read the patch (where the markup used is something which would need a
>>
On Jan 3, 9:11 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
> 2009/1/3 mabshoff :
>
Hi John,
>
> > On Jan 3, 6:44 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
>
> > HI,
>
> >> To clarify the answer to Georg's question, to you want reviewers to
> >> read the output html and report on anything which looks wrong, or to
> >> read th
Built fine and all tests pass on my 32-bit ubuntu laptop. In
particular, Atlas built fine and quickly for the first time ever on
this machine (at least, once I realized that setting SAGE_ATLAS_LIB to
the empty string was not the same as unsetting it).
John
2009/1/3 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Jan 3,
A different but related point: where is it decided which source files
are converted into documentation and which are not? For example, in
the hyperelliptic curves section there are several files with almost
nothing in them; while in the elliptic curves section there's nothing
from files ell_poi
On Jan 3, 9:34 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
Hi John,
> A different but related point: where is it decided which source files
> are converted into documentation and which are not? For example, in
> the hyperelliptic curves section there are several files with almost
> nothing in them; while in
Bill Page wrote:
> We have previously discussed (about 1 year ago) the possibility of
> implementing a Sage interface for reduce and providing it as an
> optional package like FriCAS, but this did not seem to generate much
> interest at the time.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/
On Jan 3, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> It seems that you have more experience with Reduce than most of us
> here.
> How would you generally compare Maxima and Reduce in calculus
> functionality, specifically integration? Can you interface with
> Reduce
> on a library
Tim Lahey wrote:
>
> On Jan 3, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> Bill,
>>
>> It seems that you have more experience with Reduce than most of us
>> here.
>> How would you generally compare Maxima and Reduce in calculus
>> functionality, specifically integration? Can you interface wit
Jason Grout wrote:
> Bill Page wrote:
>> We have previously discussed (about 1 year ago) the possibility of
>> implementing a Sage interface for reduce and providing it as an
>> optional package like FriCAS, but this did not seem to generate much
>> interest at the time.
>>
>> http://groups.google
2009/1/3 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 9:34 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> A different but related point: where is it decided which source files
>> are converted into documentation and which are not? For example, in
>> the hyperelliptic curves section there are several files with al
On Jan 3, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> I found at least one answer. CCL apparently was designed with
> interfacing with C in mind. That's a great thing.
I wonder if CCL can compile Maxima and if so, how well Maxima
runs on it.
Cheers,
Tim.
--~--~-~--~~~
On Jan 3, 10:00 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
> 2009/1/3 mabshoff :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 3, 9:34 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
>
> >> A different but related point: where is it decided which source files
> >> are converted into documentation and which are not? For example, in
> >> the
On Jan 3, 10:05 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Hi,
> > I found at least one answer. CCL apparently was designed with
> > interfacing with C in mind. That's a great thing.
Yes, but you can run Maxima on top of ecl, but the issue with asksign
for examp
2009/1/3 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 10:00 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
>> 2009/1/3 mabshoff :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 3, 9:34 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
>>
>> > Hi John,
>>
>> >> A different but related point: where is it decided which source files
>> >> are converted into documentation and wh
On Jan 3, 10:32 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
> 2009/1/3 mabshoff :
> > Well, so far only the files in the documentation have been converted,
> > but I am sure those additional files will also be converted by Mike
> > once the big rush for 3.3 is over. He did mention at some point that
> > maybe
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> +1
>
> Mike: How does next Thursday sound for you? That way we could announce
> it in the next 24 hours so that people can start planning things if
> they want to attend.
That sounds good.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~--
Hello folks,
after a little quiet time since November the first Bug Day of 2009
will take place on
January 8th, 2009
All the usual rules apply - see http://wiki.sagemath.org/bug17 for
details.
The main goal of that bug day will be to convert still unconverted
files in the Sage library to Re
mabshoff wrote:
> Yes, but you can run Maxima on top of ecl, but the issue with asksign
> for example does not go away. I asked Robert Dodier about it at Dev1
> and he seemed reluctant about this possibility.
Hmm, what is "this possibility" ? I don't understand.
Robert Dodier
--~--~-~-
On Jan 3, 11:27 am, Robert Dodier wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
Hi Robert,
> > Yes, but you can run Maxima on top of ecl, but the issue with asksign
> > for example does not go away. I asked Robert Dodier about it at Dev1
> > and he seemed reluctant about this possibility.
>
> Hmm, what is "this p
On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:31 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 11:27 am, Robert Dodier wrote:
>> mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
>>> Yes, but you can run Maxima on top of ecl, but the issue with
>>> asksign
>>> for example does not go away. I asked Robert Dodier about it at Dev1
>>> and he se
On Jan 3, 11:35 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:31 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> > I meant embedding Maxima into a library extensions via ecl. You stated
> > to the best of my recollection that this would be troublesome due to
> > asksign since there would be the need on occasion by the
On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Given a choice between Pan-Axiom, Maxima and Reduce for the role of
> symbolic calculus in Sage these days I personally would pick FriCAS
> over the other choices. But since all of the above do not solve the
> fundamental problem of using pexpect I
On Jan 3, 11:48 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Tim,
> > Given a choice between Pan-Axiom, Maxima and Reduce for the role of
> > symbolic calculus in Sage these days I personally would pick FriCAS
> > over the other choices. But since all of the above do
On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:55 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 11:48 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
>> On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
>>> Given a choice between Pan-Axiom, Maxima and Reduce for the role of
>>> symbolic calculus in Sage these days I personally would pick FriCAS
>
Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Mike: How does next Thursday sound for you? That way we could announce
>> it in the next 24 hours so that people can start planning things if
>> they want to attend.
>
> That sounds good.
>
Keep in mi
On Jan 3, 12:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Mike Hansen wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> >> +1
>
> >> Mike: How does next Thursday sound for you? That way we could announce
> >> it in the next 24 hours so that people can start planning things if
> >> they
I wonder if the AMS will let us use a projector from one of the rooms?
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM, mhampton wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why it didn't occur to me earlier, but it would be nice
> to have a portable projector at the joint meetings if anyone can bring
> one. Alternatively, if any
Arthur,
Thank you very much for replying and thanks also to Tony Hearn for
releasing REDUCE as open source. I believe this is a very positive
development for all people interested in computer algebra and I fully
expect it also to be a significant benefit to the REDUCE project. At
the very least,
On 3 Jan., 17:56, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 3, 5:47 am, "Georg S. Weber"
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Hi, I've got a crash report, which might be a blocker for 3.2.3:
>
> Nope, this is not an issue with 3.2.3, but 3.2.2. And this was done on
> purpose to catch exactly this issue since it has slipped
Probably not, especially for the entire meeting. It looks like I
won't be able to obtain one before leaving, unfortunately.
-Marshall
On Jan 3, 2:33 pm, "David Joyner" wrote:
> I wonder if the AMS will let us use a projector from one of the rooms?
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM, mhampton
Hi,
I have been cleaning up the wiki of Spam and unfortunately on occasion
I am removing content that isn't spam, i.e. I removed the art page.
But fortunately none of the content is lost, so please let me know if
anything is missing and I will restore it. The deactivated content
isn't deleted, so
mabshoff wrote:
> I would do all the work, but before I go off and do things I figured
> it would be worth it to request feedback. When those two pages are
> done I would then delete the other five pages and as things are
> incorporated into the to be written spkgs I would then also delete
> most
On Jan 3, 3:26 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> > I would do all the work, but before I go off and do things I figured
> > it would be worth it to request feedback. When those two pages are
> > done I would then delete the other five pages and as things are
> > incorporated into the t
So who is planning on be at the Joint Meetings? There are lots of names
listed on the AMS Joint Meetings wiki pages at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/ams-sage
http://wiki.sagemath.org/maa-sage
http://wiki.sagemath.org/amsbooth09
but we know that at least some of these names are out of date (i.e.,
52 matches
Mail list logo
