On Jan 3, 6:44 am, "John Cremona" <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote:
HI,
> To clarify the answer to Georg's question, to you want reviewers to
> read the output html and report on anything which looks wrong, or to
> read the patch (where the markup used is something which would need a
> reference to be provided).
In a perfect world: both, but reading the patch is IMHO more important
than looking at the resulting documentation.
> I am happier to do the former (say for sage,schemes.* in #4926). But
> I guess that we will all have to learn the new markup at some point
> (soon) anyway.
Mike has some patch for the documentation that adds explanations on
how to write the new docstrings, but as far as I can see it is not in
trac yet. While talking to him in IRC last night he mentioned that the
remaining non-ref manual documentation are two more tickets or so, so
hopefully those will be up soon, too.
> John
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
