To clarify the answer to Georg's question, to you want reviewers to read the output html and report on anything which looks wrong, or to read the patch (where the markup used is something which would need a reference to be provided).
I am happier to do the former (say for sage,schemes.* in #4926). But I guess that we will all have to learn the new markup at some point (soon) anyway. John 2009/1/3 Georg S. Weber <georgswe...@googlemail.com>: > > Drop-dead gorgeous! > > OK, I think I got the idea. I do have other things to do, but I have > the feeling that I just can't resist reading that output and give a > review or two. > > ;-)) > > Cheers, > gsw > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
