Re: Info vs. Man (Was Re: basename()?)

2000-08-21 Thread Matt Fahrner
Frankly I prefer "man" because it is concise and to the point. Yes, we need extended documentation, but often it's a major pain to dig through "info" and "/usr/doc" pages to find the information you're looking for. Everytime I run into a (mostly) empty man that points me to these I just lapse into

Re: Is RedHat Linux's worst ennemy?

2000-08-21 Thread Matt Fahrner
> GUIs aren't a silver bullet, and you _can_ make CLIs discoverable But the average user, and certainly my dad, doesn't want to have to discover anything. They want the thing to work by pushing a button. They want something at least as easy to use as the VCR, and the "buttons" paradigm of Win

Re: info-documentation (was: Re: basename()?)

2000-08-21 Thread Matt Fahrner
Alan Shutko wrote: > I just can't resist mentioning that info.el has been around since > 1985, and the standalone info has been around since 1987. Touche! ;-) I still think there's too many re-implimentations out there (even if this isn't one of them). After a while everyone keeps rewriting thi

Re: Is RedHat Linux's worst ennemy?

2000-08-21 Thread Matt Fahrner
"Frank Schmuck, CFO" wrote: > > > However, I cannot in good faith deny that Windows is more > > user-friendly right now. > Truth is Linux is a great system once it is set up by someone who knows > how to do it and if you have the right equipment. Can you imaging > needing to recompile Win2000 so

Re: basename()?

2000-08-23 Thread Matt Fahrner
Jean Francois Martinez wrote: > Please reread this slowly three times: "Info pages are supposed to be > read with Emacs not with info". > > It has been told several times in this thread but you keep bashing > info. Is that to imply then that when they say use the "info" pages, not "man" pages th

Re: basename()?

2000-08-23 Thread Matt Fahrner
Lets kill this thread. Both sides have been beat to death and things are starting to get unfriendly out there. Ugh. Matt Fahrner Burlington Coat Factory begin:vcard n:Fahrner;Matt tel;pager:(603) 639-4142 tel;cell:(603) 381-3206 tel;fax:(603) 443-6190 tel;work:(603) 448-4100 xt 5150 x-mozilla

Re: Urgent ! denial of Service Attack

2000-09-07 Thread Matt Fahrner
One thing I can't find a good document on is *how* these denial of service programs (the binaries) got onto the Linux boxes in the first place. Were they installed through the "rpc.statd" hole? Is it IRC buffer overflow issue (it doesn't sound like it)? How did the trojan horses get onto the syste

Re: Urgent ! denial of Service Attack

2000-09-07 Thread Matt Fahrner
hundreds of holes you may have overlooked. > > Best thing to do, is double-check you have the most recent copies of > anything outwards facing, and any and all security patches. > > -Jesse > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Fahrner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > S

rlogin problem with multi-home'd hosts and 7.0

2000-10-11 Thread Matt Fahrner
quick but it definitely looks like a bug... - Matt -- --------- Matt Fahrner2 South Park St. Manager of Networking Willis House Burlington Coat Factory Ware

Re: /etc/hosts and resolving IPs for multi-homed boxes

2000-10-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
roblem that is starting to hit me in the face too much to > ignore any longer... > > Many thanks. > > Cheers > Tony > > _______ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listin

Re: /etc/hosts and resolving IPs for multi-homed boxes

2000-10-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
shd2. > > Cheers > Tony > -=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=- > Tony Nugent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Systems Administrator, RHCE > GrowZone OnLine (a project of) GrowZone Development Network > POBox 475 Toowoomba Oueensland Australia 4350Ph: 07 4637 8322

Re: /etc/hosts and resolving IPs for multi-homed boxes

2000-10-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
Tony Nugent wrote: > Geez, it must have come across that I don't know what I'm doing. :) Sorry, the use of hosts made me think it was a beginner question. Having seen your name so many times I should have known better... > However, I am having to deal with weird situations where DNS might > be u

Re: PINE license.

2000-10-20 Thread Matt Fahrner
; -- Julie. > > ___ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list -- - Matt Fahrner

Re: PINE license.

2000-10-20 Thread Matt Fahrner
nature is offensive. > > Jean Francois Martinez > > _______ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list --

Re: PINE license.

2000-10-20 Thread Matt Fahrner
our own peices, or move to a supported platform :-). > > ___ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list -- -------

Re: PINE license.

2000-10-20 Thread Matt Fahrner
L? - Matt Alan Shutko wrote: > > Matt Fahrner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I completely agree *if* possible. If anything will be Open Source's > > downfall it will be these sorts of forks and inablility to share the > > sandbox

redhat-devel definition

2000-10-23 Thread Matt Fahrner
point me to a URL that says so)? What I'm also not sure is if people are objecting to the content of some requests just out of principle or because it really is inhibiting the usefulness of the list. - Matt -- ------

Re: pb with vacation (2nd Edition ;) )

2000-10-24 Thread Matt Fahrner
script of session follows - > 554 5.3.0 "|/usr/bin/vacation idaho"... unknown mailer error 1 > > > what's this Reason 1 ??? > > Michel. > -- - Matt Fahrner

[Fwd: Re: Pine GPL and "forks"]

2000-10-27 Thread Matt Fahrner
e: Pine GPL and "forks" Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 20:04:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Lori Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Matt Fahrner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Lori Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matt First I'll address the security fixes. We take Pine security vulnerabilities very

Re: bashing /bin/sh

2000-11-07 Thread Matt Fahrner
Yes it tries to mimic the startup behavior, but that doesn't mean it limits its own functionality strictly to the POSIX bourne shell subset. I think Alan's comment that there should be a /bin/sh that behaves strictly to POSIX compliance has some merits, particularly to force coders to write portab

Re: bashing /bin/sh

2000-11-08 Thread Matt Fahrner
divisiveness in the industry, which I think this would. - Matt -- ----- Matt Fahrner2 South Park St. Manager of Networking Willis House Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse

Re: bashing /bin/sh

2000-11-08 Thread Matt Fahrner
en though I'm "old"). Just wait, someday even though Linux is great stuff they'll be calling what you grew up with and built "crap" too. It will happen. Some generation will be talking about all the old "Linux squares" who prefer that proprietary old

Re: bashing /bin/sh

2000-11-09 Thread Matt Fahrner
k the later would be far more simple than the former. That is of course if anyone cares, because outside Thilo (who brought it up in the first place) no one seems to have much interest in the idea. - Matt -- -----

Multi-interface problem

2000-12-14 Thread Matt Fahrner
red since they don't show up against the correct interface/MAC combination. The only guess I have is something to do with interface naming confusion (which I vaguely remember reading about somewhere) or a kernel bug. Any guesses, advice, etc? Thanks, - Matt -

Re: Multi-interface problem

2000-12-21 Thread Matt Fahrner
ket came in on "eth1". Note it only shows outbound (we don't see anything coming in for the wrong address which makes some sense). Anyone seen this or a fix. It looks like a major bug to me. Thanks, - Matt Matt Fahrner wrote: > > You're probab

Re: Multi-interface problem

2000-12-21 Thread Matt Fahrner
ackets:1810 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:207 errors:21 dropped:0 overruns:4 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 Interrupt:28 Base address:0xf000 Thanks, - Matt Matt Fahrner wrote: > > Ok, well I have more info

Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7

2001-01-23 Thread Matt Fahrner
; Finally I would like to see better access control through RSBAC and the like i > Linux. The omnipotence of root and the fact far too many programs need to run > as root is a structural security problem in Unix. > > JFM > > __

Re: RAD tool from Borland

2001-02-14 Thread Matt Fahrner
; Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ > > Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my disposition. > > ___ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lis

Re: RAD tool from Borland

2001-02-15 Thread Matt Fahrner
Is it really in the thousands? I thought these tools were in the $300 to $500 range... Maybe I just haven't looked carefully lately. - Matt Thomas Dodd wrote: > > Matt Fahrner wrote: > > > > A little late but... > > > > I think t

(no subject)

2001-02-18 Thread Matt . Fahrner
) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:35:47 -0500 From: Matt Fahrner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Burlington Coat Factory X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RAD tool from Borl

[Fwd: RE: [Fwd: Re: RAD tool from Borland]]

2001-02-19 Thread Matt Fahrner
thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. Original Message Subject: Re: RAD tool from Borland Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:42:49 -0500 From

Re: System Type

2001-02-20 Thread Matt Fahrner
___ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list -- - Matt Fahrner2 South Park St. Manager of Networking

Re: FTP wont work, please help!

2001-02-22 Thread Matt Fahrner
for me, for my disposition. > > ___ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list -- - Matt Fah

Re: Thread-local storage

2001-04-26 Thread Matt Fahrner
Terry > > ___ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list -- - Matt Fahrner

Re: Thread-local storage

2001-05-07 Thread Matt Fahrner
I have to call pthread_key_create() to create > the variable and pthread_set/getspecific() to access it. > > I was hoping g++ supported this extension as well. > > If I do use pthread_key_create(), does my main() thread also get its own > copy of the data, or only threads created by

Re: Thread-local storage

2001-05-07 Thread Matt Fahrner
Sorry, I didn't mean for this response to go to the entire group... - Matt Matt Fahrner wrote: > > Sorry I never responded (been buried). Unfortunately past the fact that > you can do "thread_specific()" I don't know much about what'

Why AnotherLevel support dropped from 7.2?

2002-01-02 Thread Matt Fahrner
and the learning curve for our users is more than we want to take on right now. We can and will modify the Xclients script but it's too bad when changes get made like this that effect the greater end user community. - Matt -- -----

Re: Why AnotherLevel support dropped from 7.2?

2002-01-04 Thread Matt Fahrner
OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ > > Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my > disposition. > > ___ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list -- --

Re: Better File systems? Was Re: XFS - here's the solution

2002-04-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
; Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ > > Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my > disposition. > > == > If you don't like being told you're wrong, > be right! > > ___

Re: Better File systems? Was Re: XFS - here's the solution

2002-04-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
ntelligent > computing. > > I'm guessing that all of this is unfamillar to you. I lament that. That > old quote is true, I think, the one that says that those who for get the > past - or who never learned it - are condemned to repeat it... > > Regards, > Richard > &

Re: Alternative file systems? Was Re: Better File systems?

2002-04-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
in recent > days. > > Anybody want to give this a try? I think it'd be a real service. Maybe > just reply with a summary of your personal favorite? > > Thanks much, > Richard > > -- > Richard Troy, Chief Scientist > Science Tools Corporation > [EMAIL PROTE

Not using Swap?

2002-08-30 Thread Matt Fahrner
writing from) seem to use swap judiciously. Any clues would be appreciated. Thanks, - Matt -- --------- Matt Fahrner2 South Park St. Manager of Networking

Re: Not using Swap?

2002-09-04 Thread Matt Fahrner
90% of the memory is used with 0% of swap. Don't know what's up, but it's really weird. Thanks for the responses though. - Matt Timothy Writer wrote: > P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>On Friday 30 August 2002 07:42 pm, Timoth

8.1 - Where is "genhdlist"?

2003-01-06 Thread Matt Fahrner
be appreciated. Note I've asked the kickstart list with no response... Thanks, - Matt -- --------- Matt Fahrner2 South Park St. Manager of Networking Willis

Re: my last two cents on how questions should be handled

2003-02-06 Thread Matt Fahrner
dable. Sign up now <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com> -- ----- Matt Fahrner2 South Park St. Manager of Networking Willis House Burlington Coat Factory Wa

[Fwd: Updated Fedora Core test release: Severn]

2003-09-25 Thread Matt Fahrner
h off the support of the little guy to other "open source" people and then have their developers/support concentrate on core business, like servers. Am I reading this right? - Matt -- --------- Matt Fahrner

Re: (summary) Re: MASSIVE headaches with new >100 GIDs in RH6.0

1999-08-30 Thread Matt Fahrner
ort general Unix standard that I've seen. Though the RedHat/Linux world may want to be progressive, such progressiveness shouldn't be in a vacuum of the rest of the Unix world. Some of us have large heterogeneous environments to support. Ugh. Matt Fahrner Manager of Networking Bur

Patching RPMs

1999-09-21 Thread Matt Fahrner
I haven't done as much research as I probably should before putting this out but... We're wondering if there is a way to patch up RPMs? No, not source RPMs but rather the binary installable format. Here's the problem: We cookie cutter build our Linux boxes for our stores (eventually 5 each multi

Re: Patching RPMs

1999-09-21 Thread Matt Fahrner
Jon Carnes wrote: > > A simpler solution is to use disk imaging. If you are truly making > all the boxes with the same technology then a disk image of the > current best-of will due the trick. Then you can send around a new > CD every week with the new image. Just use a boot disk and then > DD

Re: Patching RPMs

1999-09-21 Thread Matt Fahrner
"Andrew E. Mileski" wrote: > Probably not going to work as well as you hope, but if you want to > experiment, use rsync as it is the easiest and a standard RH package. > > Syncing remotely can be as easy as > rsync remote.rsyncserver.com::module/remotefile localfile > as always there are many

Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman

1999-12-06 Thread Matt Fahrner
nefit them. However I do object to a "demand" as opposed to a request since it really is a good way to drive wedges. After all we're all working for the same thing, we should work together and drop petty squabbles. Matt Fahrner Manager of Networking Burlington Coat Factory Wa

Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman

1999-12-07 Thread Matt Fahrner
> I still remember my disappointment in 1995 when I got an Aix station > and noticed that in many areas its software was inferior to Linux's. It's true that many of the other Unixes were and still are inferior to Linux, but having used them in production situations they were often more than suffi

Re: Anaconda, Corel and feeling discriminated

2000-02-11 Thread Matt Fahrner
> To be honest, I'd find it to be a major PITA if every > machine I installed had to okay through a ppp config post install I don't think that's really what they're getting at. You don't need to make everything get configured at install time, just give an option so that it can, or better yet, a G

NFS problems

2000-02-14 Thread Matt Fahrner
fault NFS server is. On the same note we're wondering if we should use one over the other (kernel vs. daemon)? Note we also get complaints about NFS version 3 not being found (which is the Solaris default and will revert to 2 if not available). Thanks, Matt Fahrner Manager of Networking Burling

Re: synchronization between processes (not threads)

2000-03-14 Thread Matt Fahrner
Yes a "semaphore" is very portable (at least within Unix environments). You can also use "flock()" on a file. Another trick is just to create and destroy a file as a sort of gate condition. - Matt Alan Cox wrote: > > > pthread_mutex_, but this is for threads. Do I u

Re: synchronization between processes (not threads)

2000-03-14 Thread Matt Fahrner
Julie wrote: > Both of the file-based mechanisms can fail if the two > processes are pounding on a non-local filesystem. > > They also tend to be DOG SLOW. Agreed. The "semaphore" is the way to go. Of course unless you're trying to synchronize across multiple systems it wouldn't make sense to

Re: synchronization between processes (not threads)

2000-03-15 Thread Matt Fahrner
Just to be clear, I was *not* advocating the use of files as a semaphore. I'm just saying its one of your alternatives. Sometimes you just gotta do what you gotta do (for example from a bourne shell program). Not that I'm trying to get anyone to use this method (I wouldn't) but unless you're flail

Re: Fork and Pipe

2000-03-21 Thread Matt Fahrner
There's an example below. As far as sending signals go you'd either have to do it through your own proprietary messages through the pipes or you can signal out of band using "kill()" and "signal()" calls. There is no inherent OS method of signaling through a pipe it

Re: RedHAt's SU the mother of all trojan horses

2000-03-27 Thread Matt Fahrner
> It is unfortunate that RedHat's SU keeps the same environment and > specially the same PATH as this leaves the user open to a trivial > attack This only is a problem if you "su" from someone else's account, something a good administrator should be wary of. Otherwise "." should either be at the

Re: Certification

2000-04-06 Thread Matt Fahrner
Nothing personal toward those who are certified, but personally I hate certifications because: a) They cost money that people (I) have better uses for. b) They cost time that people have better uses for (I know I prefer to have a life). c) They aren't necessarily a guarantee of anything (jus

Re: Certification

2000-04-06 Thread Matt Fahrner
> -When you were young I guess your employer asked what certifiaction > you had except that he called it an engineer degree. Actually I was self taught with the addition of a few courses here and there. I got in by being able to demonstrate my knowledge in an interview. This brings up part of m

Re: Telnet program

2000-05-02 Thread Matt Fahrner
27;t trivial. Worse, if you really want to speak telnet protocol (you can get away with a bare TCP stream usually, but you have to ignore the extra garbage) then you'll have to dig up the protocol specs. So, what are you really after? It might help if you explain why you need to use telne

Re: Telnet program

2000-05-03 Thread Matt Fahrner
Ok then, the best I can do is give some pseudo-code: - Program starts. - Create two pipes with pipe() calls. - fork() - Child chooses one pipe and dup2()'s the read end over descriptor 0 (stdin) - Child takes other pipe and dup2()'s the write end over descriptor 1 (stdout)

Re: fork/execve

2000-05-03 Thread Matt Fahrner
It's probably not killed by inetd but rather it may be doing a "write()" against the closed socket and getting a SIGPIPE signal. If this is the case you'll need to set up a signal handler to catch or ignore this signal otherwise the process will die. I don't believe inetd does anything if the sock

Re: Telnet program. It really works!!!!!

2000-05-08 Thread Matt Fahrner
t window > displays all hidden characters of the telnet output. > > Login: c/r > Passwd: c/r > c/r > $ > > Thanks again for your help. > > John > > - Original Message - > From: Matt Fahrner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Matt Fahrner
This can happen if you "su" to root using a user id that is separate from root but uses the same home directory. For instance instead of sharing root we give out individual root. For instance mine reads: rootmf:x:0:0:Super Matt Fahrner:/home/matt:/bin/csh If I "su

[Redhat-devel-list] NIS/YP RPC problem

2000-06-23 Thread Matt Fahrner
Hi, We have a a NIS/YP problem that somebody may have a possible suggestion on what we do (other than ignore it, which I'm afraid is probably the answer). We're trying to use a Linux box as our NIS master, this replacing a Sun Solaris server for the same purpose. After much hacking we took the M

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] Re: NIS/YP RPC problem

2000-06-26 Thread Matt Fahrner
Thank you. We'll go to the latest version. We need to shut this up so that the rest of the administration staff won't panic. Thanks again Thorsten and Johannes. - Matt Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > We have a a NIS/Y

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] How do I change the hostid for a Linuxsystem?

2000-06-28 Thread Matt Fahrner
ght is this, If Linus dies, and all Linux development is 100% to > the indivual companies, what happens to the portability and unity? Or is this > not an issue? > > thanks > jb > > > Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:16:33 -0400 > > From: Matt Fahrner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] How do I change the hostid for a Linuxsystem?

2000-06-28 Thread Matt Fahrner
The quoted message on the end of my last message wasn't the original message I was trying to quote, though it was an interesting argument internally about Linux in regards to one of our few dissenters. Sorry about that... - Matt __

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] How do I change the hostid for a Linuxsystem?

2000-06-28 Thread Matt Fahrner
Yes, but it was generally considered evil for privacy reasons and is often disabled. It also is only in the newer chipsets so you couldn't guarantee it to be consistently available. - Matt Steve Bagdon wrote: > > Didn't Intel have a solution that's built-into the cpu chi

Netscape Communicator Issues

2000-07-05 Thread Matt Fahrner
to directly contact their engineering in regards to this even in a paid fashion. We'd use Mozilla, but it doesn't appear ready for prime time yet. Any help would be appreciated... Matt Fahrner Manager of Networking Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse ___

Re: Netscape Communicator Issues

2000-07-06 Thread Matt Fahrner
;s looking dubious that it's supported and perhaps Mozilla is the answer. Thanks for the response, - Matt Alex Kanavin wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Matt Fahrner wrote: > > > Any help would be appreciated... > > I think that Netscape engine

resolv.conf "sortlist" option not supported

2000-07-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
rfaces. It also makes RedHat effectively incompatible by default with other Unixes such as Sun and IRIX which do provide this functionality (Suns even sort by local interfaces by default period). I ask that RedHat reconsider this ill chosen decision to not make the resolver libraries with the -DRESOLVSORT

Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not supported

2000-07-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
PS: Thanks for the quick response. "Mark A. Bentley" wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Matt Fahrner wrote: > > There's a Bugzilla bug in, 1467, titled 'resolver(5) "sortlist" option > > missing' that was closed with an unacceptable resolution. The i

Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not supported

2000-07-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
This is what Sun does by default. It would be fine for this not to be the default if the "sortlist" option were recognized. Though the default sorting (per the RFC you sent) isn't necessarily in RedHat's hands, the setting of the sortlist compile flag for the resolver libraries. I would ideally l

Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not supported

2000-07-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
> As long as your nameservers shares a network with the client, it does > appear to sort correctly now. > > --Mark Hm... After re-reading this is it possible you're doing "sortlist" on the server side? The client side "sortlist" isn't supposed to care what net the server is on nor what order

Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not supported

2000-07-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
Thanks for the response and for submitting the patch... The sad thing is it looks like even Windows 98 handles this properly when RedHat doesn't. Kind of embarassing really. - Matt John DiMarco wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write: > >This Redhat choice is

Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not supported

2000-07-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
FYI - Mark found it wasn't working as he thought in 6.2. So, it is still a problem (*bug* in my opinion). Thanks for everyone's comments and looking into this... Now if only RedHat would comment. - Matt "Mark A. Bentley" wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Mark A. Bentley

Re: resolv.conf "sortlist" option not supported

2000-07-18 Thread Matt Fahrner
John DiMarco wrote: > Unfortunately, it's a fundamental problem with the Linux development > style. People tend to develop what they're interested in, not what's > needed by the people who use it for real work. As more and more > companies jump onto the Linux bandwagon, hopefully, some of the

Re: Upgrade distribution while system is running

2000-08-03 Thread Matt Fahrner
has to be through remote management. This would help facilitate this. Matt Fahrner Manager of Networking Burlington Coat Factory Pekka Savola wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Nitebirdz wrote: > > I've done it in a couple of cases, but I suppose it is wise to actually > > take t

Acrobat Color Flashing

2000-08-08 Thread Matt Fahrner
mmediately shift back to the messed up colors. Anybody else seen this? Matt Fahrner Manager of Networking Burlington Coat Factory begin:vcard n:Fahrner;Matt tel;pager:(603) 639-4142 tel;cell:(603) 381-3206 tel;fax:(603) 443-6190 tel;work:(603) 448-4100 xt 5150 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www

Re: Hi

2000-08-08 Thread Matt Fahrner
Does sound like DOS not Linux. I had similar messages when we exceded stack sizes within the DOS 64k memory limit. - Matt Mark Pruett wrote: > > What OS and compiler are you using? The last time I saw > these types of messages was with Borland compilers > on DOS/Windows

Re: Acrobat Color Flashing

2000-08-09 Thread Matt Fahrner
Hey, that did it for me too! Thank you *very* much! That'll make it more usable for our users. - Matt Alan Shutko wrote: > > Matt Fahrner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Has anyone had the problem and preferably found a fix for using the

Re: Acrobat Color Flashing

2000-08-09 Thread Matt Fahrner
I happen to disagree. We use them here quite a bit. I have no use for most people's "signatures" either, but I easily ignore them. - Matt "Mike A. Harris" wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Matt Fahrner wrote: > > >Date: Tue,

Re: Acrobat Color Flashing

2000-08-10 Thread Matt Fahrner
o anyone who is unhappy about my standard Messenger attachment. I can only hope any others who I have made unhappy will complain in a more diplomatic fashion. Matt Fahrner (Clueless) Manager of Networking Burlington Coat Factory "Mike A. Harris" wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Matt