>
> >
> > maybe a better place would be the mysql folks. Theymight be able to tell
> > you if the default configuration under Linux is with threads ( server &
> > client ). And if there is a choice, how can one tell what one has.
> > If they cant tellwha
>
> maybe a better place would be the mysql folks. Theymight be able to tell
> you if the default configuration under Linux is with threads ( server &
> client ). And if there is a choice, how can one tell what one has.
> If they cant tellwhat u have, then maybe a build wou
maybe a better place would be the mysql folks. Theymight be able to tell
you if the default configuration under Linux is with threads ( server &
client ). And if there is a choice, how can one tell what one has.
If they cant tellwhat u have, then maybe a build would be good for your
stat
Hi All,
We are porting an application to Linux from Solaris that
is threaded and uses mysql. On Solaris we would link against the
thread safe/blessed libmysqlclient_r. None of the RedHat RPM's seem to
come with this library? Is it unnecessary under linux or do we
need to build our own
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Yannis Pavlidis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask your opinition about this:
>
>
>http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/full/manual_Problems.html#Communication_errors
I've encountered this same thing on my FreeBSD server. I believe MySQ
Hi,
I would like to ask your opinition about
this:
http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/full/manual_Problems.html#Communication_errors
It says that it might be related with Linux
Ethernet drivers and describes a way of telling whether it is true with my
drivers or no
Is what they
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Cristian Paslaru wrote:
>->> I'm currently needing mysql for building the caudium webserver
>->> package, and I am downloading the Rawhide .src.rpm to build in
>->> Red Hat 6.2.
>->>
>->> Are there any guidelines I sh
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
->> I'm currently needing mysql for building the caudium webserver
->> package, and I am downloading the Rawhide .src.rpm to build in
->> Red Hat 6.2.
->>
->> Are there any guidelines I should be aware of when
->&
I'm currently needing mysql for building the caudium webserver
package, and I am downloading the Rawhide .src.rpm to build in
Red Hat 6.2.
Are there any guidelines I should be aware of when
building? I've got RPM version 3.0.5 installed, and the rest of
the system is pretty much 6.2
To install PHP 4.0 i had to install mysql, but i'm
> using postgresql!
That should get fixed in the next snapshot. (The fix, which is already in
the tree, is to remove the "--with-mysql" from the configure invocation.)
Cheers,
Nalin
___
On Sun Jul 16 2000 at 14:27, Frank Heldt wrote:
> Another hint: you have php-ldap, php-imap and php-pgsql, so why not
> have a php-snmp ?
Yes, I'll second that most excellent suggestion (php-snmp)!
Cheers
Tony
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EM
I've finally found the time to look at the latest rawhide (2704)
and I must say that i'm impressed. After updating to rpm 4.0 from
rpm.org
nearly everything worked fine.
One small glitch: To install PHP 4.0 i had to install mysql, but i'm
using postgresql!
Another hint: yo
On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
>Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 18:20:46 -0400
>From: Matt Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: MySQL..
>
>It was either the day of or the day after, yea. But it didn't work
>until recently as it was
It was either the day of or the day after, yea. But it didn't work
until recently as it was miscompiled by g++. That's been fixed now,
though.
s/RedHat/Red Hat/g
Matt
On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 06:09:27PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> YEAH! RedHat is just TOO fast.
YEAH! RedHat is just TOO fast. Mysql is in rawhide allready. I
wonder if it was allready there when we were asking if it would
be included? ;o)
Knowing the RH guys, they probably added it the day it was GPL'd,
It is dated Jul 4, so... pretty close. ;o)
TTYL
--
Mike A. H
very microsoft-ish, MS
>invented it as a metaphor for clueless users. My Computer, My Documents,
>MySQL. And when proprietary software maker tells me it's 'mine' I don't
>believe him, be it Windows 95, or MySQL. As for cool DBMS names, the
>winner is Oracle, IMHO.
>
Joe Brenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Greg Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 5/07/00 at 17:49 Ivan Jager wrote:
> >
> > >What are the main differences between MySQL and postgresql? I would like
> > >to keep squid's
-ish, MS
invented it as a metaphor for clueless users. My Computer, My Documents,
MySQL. And when proprietary software maker tells me it's 'mine' I don't
believe him, be it Windows 95, or MySQL. As for cool DBMS names, the
winner is Oracle, IMHO.
Ok, this is all totally offtopic here
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Sorry to have been the one to start a DB holy war everyone. To
> be quite honest, I wanted MySQL to be included with RedHat simply
> because it is now GPL, and the name sounds way cooler. Try it:
>
> "My-Skwill" It soun
t sound as cool. We don't want
>> programs with uncool sounding names getting in the way of Linux
>> acceptance now do we? I mean, what exactly is a "Postgre"
>> anyways? Not a sense of one-ness like MySQL provides, thats for
>> sure!
>
>Yes, I'm a
7;t sound as cool. We don't want
> programs with uncool sounding names getting in the way of Linux
> acceptance now do we? I mean, what exactly is a "Postgre"
> anyways? Not a sense of one-ness like MySQL provides, thats for
> sure!
Yes, I'm acutely conscious of t
Well if anyone would look at rawhide(0704), you will see that mysql is
in there. I actually installed this version today. Nice work on
getting Xconfigurator to handle 4.0.1.
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Joe Brenner wrote:
>
> >> PostgreSQ
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Joe Brenner wrote:
>> PostgreSQL is more of a full featured database, MySQL is fast and light
>> because its a "cut down" SQL server if you like
>>
>> For logging, MySQL would be more than sufficient in my limited database
>> opin
> MySQL, until very recently, wasn't really commited to open
> source, but they did a good job of convincing web kids that
> they were the good guys.
>
> Postgresql, on the other hand, is a serious database, a
> really professional quality tool, and it's been BSD
"Greg Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/07/00 at 17:49 Ivan Jager wrote:
>
> >What are the main differences between MySQL and postgresql? I would like
> >to keep squid's logs in a database to be able to make some queries and
> >all that. :
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 5/07/00 at 17:49 Ivan Jager wrote:
>What are the main differences between MySQL and postgresql? I would like
>to keep squid's logs in a database to be able to make some queries and
>all that. :)
>
>I was going to use postgres, b
Joe Brenner wrote:
> I don't know what to tell you outside of what I just said.
>
> Fans of MySQL love to talk about how it's "FAST!".
and its GPL :)
certainly MySQL has speed benifits over many databases, the
lack of features is what makes this possible, altho
Ivan Jager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Joe Brenner wrote:
> > It's not clear to me whether or not MySQL is a good choice
> > for "e-commerce", strictly speaking. It's a decent choice
> > for running a website like slashdot, where they have to
>
What are the main differences between MySQL and postgresql? I would like
to keep squid's logs in a database to be able to make some queries and
all that. :)
I was going to use postgres, but now that MySQL is Free it makes me
wonder...
What are the advantages/disadvantages of current versio
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
>
> >Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:24:10 +0100
> >From: Steven Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE:
Steven Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any info (howto's, guides etc) on MySQL? I think it could
> be pretty useful. Then again, a complete E-Commerce server howto would be
> mighty useful!
It's not clear to me whether or not MySQL is a good choice
f
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
>Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:24:10 +0100
>From: Steven Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: MySQL GPL'd... possible RH inclusion?
>
>Does anyone have an
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Alex Kanavin wrote:
>Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:25:04 +0400 (MSD)
>From: Alex Kanavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: RedHat Development Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: MySQL GPL'd... possible RH inclusion?
>
>On Wed, 5 Jul 200
Does anyone have any info (howto's, guides etc) on MySQL? I think it could
be pretty useful. Then again, a complete E-Commerce server howto would be
mighty useful!
Steve
Project Leader, Guven Linux
-Original Message-
From: Mike A. Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 July 20
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Tony Nugent wrote:
> The next release of redhat is looking way cool for features,
> especially if it has a 2.4.x kernel and XFree86-4.x...
I can't speak for Red Hat, but so far the only way to include them is
powertools, for adventurers. 2.4 kernel needs extensive testing in
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Joe Brenner wrote:
>> Now that MySQL is GPL'd, does anyone at RedHat want to comment on
>> the possibility of its inclusion in RedHat 6.3/7.0/whateverisnext?
>
>I figured that you must be confused (The MySQL people
>keep promising to GPL their *o
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Tony Nugent wrote:
>> Also, as a further suggestion, MySQL frontends for GNOME and KDE
>> would be nice, as well as the various modules to interface
>> them. Possible perl modules?
>
>Don't know about gnome/kde interfaces, but the default one
"Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that MySQL is GPL'd, does anyone at RedHat want to comment on
> the possibility of its inclusion in RedHat 6.3/7.0/whateverisnext?
I figured that you must be confused (The MySQL people
keep promising to GPL their
On Wed Jul 05 2000 at 00:43, "Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> Now that MySQL is GPL'd, does anyone at RedHat want to comment on
> the possibility of its inclusion in RedHat 6.3/7.0/whateverisnext?
Wow, really? Great! I hadn't heard... (I must be too busy lately
for my re
Now that MySQL is GPL'd, does anyone at RedHat want to comment on
the possibility of its inclusion in RedHat 6.3/7.0/whateverisnext?
MySQL and Postgresql are probably the two most used db's under
linux, and now that MySQL is GPL, it would be great if both were
included with RH...
I assume that many people would have heard about this by now...
=8<-- cut
http://linuxtoday.com/stories/16438.html
Security Advisory: Remote access vulnerability in all MySQL server versions
Feb 9, 2000, 06:40 UTC (3 Talkbacks) (Other stories by Robert van
On Mon Nov 01 1999 at 03:02, Tony Nugent wrote:
(I just love talking to myself :)
> I'm desperately looking for a .spec file (and possibly a set of
> patches) that will allow me to rebuild the mod_php-3 package (from
> rh61) to get it to use mysql rather than postgresql.
Not
I'm desperately looking for a .spec file (and possibly a set of
patches) that will allow me to rebuild the mod_php-3 package (from
rh61) to get it to use mysql rather than postgresql.
The docs for doing this at www.php.org are now out of date (it applies
to the php3 package from rh60), an
> Howto install mysql.src.rpm
> I typed rpm -ivh mysql.src.rpm and inserted --charset=big5 in the spec file
> as required to show DBCS, now what should I do to install or rebuild
> i386.rpm
rpm -ba mysql.spec or similar.
If you want to delude yourself, you could
rpm -ba mysql.spec --target i686
Howto install mysql.src.rpm
I typed rpm -ivh mysql.src.rpm and inserted --charset=big5 in the spec file
as required to show DBCS, now what should I do to install or rebuild
i386.rpm
TIA
Leo
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
45 matches
Mail list logo
