the latter for its great filtering. I too have had
stability problems with Pan, but compiling from source fixed that for me.
--
Warren Post
https://warrenpost.wordpress.com/
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
oogle Gropes user and would prefer not to see more
of this, try:
http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
--
Warren Post
https://warrenpost.wordpress.com/
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
My tests were run in python 2.6.5.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I'm having trouble understanding when variables are added to
namespaces. I thought I understood it, but my nested function
examples below have me very confused.
In each test function below I have an x variable (so "x" is in the
namespace of each test function). I also have a nested function in
e
On Nov 29, 11:09 am, Christian Heimes wrote:
> The feature is available in Python 3.x:
>
> >>> a, b, *c = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> >>> a, b, c
> (1, 2, [3, 4, 5])
> >>> a, *b, c = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> >>> a, b, c
>
> (1, [2, 3, 4], 5)
Interesting... especially the recognition of how both ends work with
the "a,
Is there a reason that this is fine:
>>> def f(a,b,c):
... return a+b+c
...
>>> f(1, *(2,3))
6
but the code below is not?
>>> x = (3, 4)
>>> (1, 2, *x) == (1, 2, 3, 4)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
invalid syntax: , line 1, pos 8
Why does it only work when unpackin
ot;, as a Python keyword, is a here to stay: Love it or leave it.
-> Likewise ditto for the GIL: if you truly need Python concurrency
within a single process, then use a Python implementation other than
CPython.
Season's greetings to all! Peace.
Cheers,
Warren
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
standalone keyword " as ". It seems to me
that it should be possible to unambiguously separate the two without
ambiguity or undue complication of the parser.
So, assuming I now wish to propose a corrective PEP to remedy this
situation for Python 3.1 and beyond, what is the best way to get started
on such a proposal?
Cheers,
Warren
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
'll put this more bluntly: Warren's messages to date
> egregiously break the flow of discussion.
>
> Warren, in the interest of sane discussion in these forums, please:
>
> * preserve attribution lines on quoted material so we can see who
> wrote what.
>
> * use the conve
on, I recognize that there will be ancillary casualties in
every major battle.
Though I may whine incessantly about all of our pre-2.5
log-file/documents being one such casualty (your various accusations
notwithstanding, we did indeed patch our own code as soon as the
deprecation warnings appeared
> I still would have to call your management of the problem considerably
> into question - your expertise at writing mathematical software may
> not be in question, but your skills and producing and managing a
> software product are. You have nobody at your organization, which
> sells a product tha
> Yet Another Python Troll (the ivory tower reference, as well as the
> abrupt shift from complaining about keywords to multiprocessing), I
> have to point out that Python does add new keywords, it has done so in
> the past, and there was a considerable amount of warning, including an
> automated d
e indeed the optimal solution to certain problems,
and those problems are still not solvable with CPython 3.0.
Is it too much to hold out hope for a native Pythonic solution to the
multithreading performance issues inside of the CPython VM itself? Only
time will tell... but time is rapidly running out.
Warren
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
thon
will easily transcend the limitations of its flagship implementation (if
or to the extent that such an implementation cannot keep pace with the
times). That's all well and good -- it may even end up being the next
great leap forward for the language. I believe Guido has even said as
much himself.
Warren
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ut an "as" keyword. I do sincerely hope I am
wrong about this, but it is seems quite possible that C/Python's glory
days are now behind us.
And if so, then thank you all for so many wonderful years of effort and
participation! C/Python has had a great run, and Python syntax, i
> Because it can be used at the import statement to let the imported
thing
> be known under another name?
> Something like:
>
> >>> import xml.etree.ElementTree as ET
Yes, but that syntax worked fine for years without "as" actually having
to be a keyword. There must be something more going on h
preserve compatibility with existing third-party scripts &
infrastructure which routinely rely upon "as" as an object method.
Sigh.)
Cheers,
Warren
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
done much more easily from
Python than from C (e.g. data organization, U.I. survey/present tasks,
rarely used transformations, ad hoc scripting experiments, etc.).
Cheers,
Warren
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ay's
web apps wouldn't exist without safe forms of untrusted eval/exec (Javascript
anyone?). Such dogma is appropriate when dealing with the CPython VM, but not
as a general principle.
"Rocket fuel may be dangerous, but you ain't shooting the moon without it!"
Cheers,
Wa
above approach is NOT secure since
object attributes can still be accessed...
So is there an equally convenient yet secure alternative available for
parsing strings containing Python data structure definitions?
Thanks in advance for any pointers!
Cheers,
Warren
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
d"< instruction count was significantly higher for C++. I expect any sort
> of C++ objects you used to implement Python structures will be slower
> than the equivalent in C. So even if writing it in C++ would reduce
> the overhead for deleting from a list, I expect you would lose a lot
> more.
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
--
Warren Myers
http://warrenmyers.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I'm running python 2.5.1 and it seems that SimpleXmlRpcServer is not
setup to support the base datetime module in the same way xmlrpclib
has been with "use_datetime". I see that someone (Virgil Dupras) has
recently submitted a fix to address this, but I don't want to patch my
python distro. I wan
> OK, if you crawl the stack I will seek you out and hit you with a big
> stick. Does that affect your decision-making?
How big a stick? :)
> Seriously, crawling the stack introduces the potential for disaster in
> your program, since there is no guarantee that the calling code will
> provide the
convincing argument yet on why crawling the stack is considered
bad? I kind of hoped to come out of this with a convincing argument
that would stick with me...
On Feb 25, 12:30 pm, Ian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-02-25, Russell Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
&
> How about a dictionary indexed by by the thread name.
Ok... a functional implementation doing precisely that is at the
bottom of this (using thread.get_ident), but making it possible to
hand around this info cleanly seems a bit convoluted. Have I made it
more complicated than I need to? There
> That is just madness.
What specifically makes it madness? Is it because sys._frame is "for
internal and specialized purposes only"? :)
> The incoming ip address is available to the request handler, see the
> SocketServer docs
I know... that is exactly where I get the address, just in a mad wa
Argh... the code wrapped... I thought I made it narrow enough. Here
is the same code (sorry), but now actually pasteable.
---
import SimpleXMLRPCServer, xmlrpclib, threading, sys
def GetCallerNameAndArgs(StackDepth = 1):
"""This function returns a tuple (a,b) where:
a = The name of the ca
I've got a case where I would like to know exactly what IP address a
client made an RPC request from. This info needs to be known inside
the RPC function. I also want to make sure that the IP address
obtained is definitely the correct one for the client being served by
the immediate function call
/me no longer wishes to know about your dreams.
WMM
On Feb 12, 2008 4:56 PM, Steven D'Aprano
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:05:59 -0800, castironpi wrote:
>
> > What is dream hardware for the Python interpreter?
>
> I'm not sure that the Python interpreter actually does dream
A Cray?
What are you trying to do? "dream" hardware is a very wide question.
WMM
On Feb 12, 2008 1:05 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is dream hardware for the Python interpreter?
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
--
http://warrenmyers.com
"God may not play
The Python byte-code files are already pretty dense, so compressing them
further is unlikely to work if you try to put them in a zip.
WMM
On Feb 7, 2008 11:39 AM, Furkan Kuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been developing an application in C++ that embeds Python
> interpreter.
>
> While we're at it, do any of these debuggers implement a good way to
> debug multi-threaded Python programs?
Wing now has multi-threaded debugging.
I'm a big Wing (pro) fan. To be fair, when I undertook my huge IDE
evaluation undertaking it was approx 2 years ago... at the time as far
as what
Both are very good responses... thanks! I had forgotten the ease of
"monkey-patching" in python and the Stream class is certainly cleaner
than the way I had been doing it.
On Oct 3, 3:15 am, Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Warren wrote:
> > All I'
I was just setting up some logging in a make script and decided to
give the built-in logging module a go, but I just found out that the
base StreamHandler always puts a newline at the end of each log.
There is a comment in the code that says "The record is then written
to the stream with a trailin
Hello,
Let's say I have a function with a variable number of arguments (please ignore
syntax errors):
def myfunc(a,b,c,d,...):
and I have a tuple whose contents I want to pass to the function. The number
of elements in the tuple will not always be the same.
T = A,B,C,D,...
Is there a way th
Hey Josiah,
I just spent a couple hours with your example, and it explains a lot. Some
of your interactive session got garbled, so am reposting your
merged_namespace example, with tweaks:
#-
def merged_namespace(*ns):
try:
__builti
Josiah Carlson wrote:
> >>> foo = type(foo)(foo.func_code, d, foo.func_name, foo.func_defaults,
> foo.func_closure)
Wow! I've never seen that, before. Is there documentation for `type(n)(...)`
somewhere? I did find a very useful "Decorator for Binding Constants, by
Raymond Hettinger", that uses t
Alia Khouri Write
> I have been waiting for this ages and it's finally happened! Python
> meet Live, Live meet Python!
Wow. This is very cool; thanks for the announcement!
> I rushed to update http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonInMusic but lo
Thanks for this link, as well. Very useful.
--
> Yes. Python doesn't have restartable exceptions. Perhaps you would like
> to take a look at CL or Smalltalk?
>
> Jean-Paul
Hmmm, I wonder if anyone suggest to Philippe Petit, as stepped out 110
stories off the ground, that perhaps he would like to take a look at a
different tightrope?
Oddly
Am still trying to hook a NameError exception and continue to run. After a
few more hours of searching the web and pouring over Martelli's book, the
closest I've come is:
>>> import sys
>>> def new_exit(arg=0):
... print 'new_exit called'
... #old_exit(arg)
...
>>> def hook(type, value, tb
ack unhandled
NameError exceptions, so that they unwind the stack normally?
This is intended for production code.
Many thanks!
Warren
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
': .' means ': ...' (its an outlook thing)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Roland Puntaier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Warren, can you please restate your point.
Hey Roland, where were you a few days ago ;-) I think most suggestions were
valid, in their own context. Only yesterday, was I finally able to get it in
perspective, so here goes:
There are two idioms
> "Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> || Warren Stringer wanted to call the functions just for the side effects
> | without interest in the return values. So building a list of return
> | values which
> Anyway, the code below defines a simple "callable" list; it just calls
> each contained item in turn. Don't bother to use [:], it won't work.
>
> py> class CallableList(list):
> ... def __call__(self):
> ... for item in self:
> ... item()
> ...
> py> def a(): print "a"
> ...
> py> d
Oops, forgot to cut and paste the point, to this:
> > - there is no Python error for "you
> > cannot do this with this object, but you can do it with other objects
> > of the same type".
>
> Yes there is:
>
> #
> def yo(): print "yo"
> def no(): print blah
> yo()
> no()
Andre Engels wrote:
> > I am not insisting on anything. I use ``c[:]()`` as shorthand way of
> saying
> > "c() for c in d where d is a container"
> >
> > Having c() support containers seems obvious to me. It jibes with duck
> > typing. Perhaps the title of this thread should have been: "Why don't
>
Gabriel wrote:
> I begin to think you are some kind of Eliza experiment with Python
> pseudo-knowledge injected.
Tell me more about your feelings that I am an Eliza experiment with Python
with pseudo knowledge injected.
Thanks for the code example.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyt
Thanks, Dakz for taking the time to reply:
> This discussion has gone in more circles than Earth has gone 'round
> the Sun, but it seems you should consider the following:
Yes, I've been feeling a bit dizzy
> 1) Sequences and functions serve fundamentally different purposes in
> Python. One is f
> > [Please quit saying "a container" if you mean lists and tuples.
> > "A container" is way too general. There most probably _are_
> > containers for which c() does not fail.]
>
> One example of such a container is any folderish content in Zope:
> subscripting gets you the contained pages, calli
> And that your
> insisting on ``c[:]()`` instead of just ``c()`` seems to indicate you want
> a change that is quite surprising. It would mean that a slice of a list
> returns an other type with the __call__ method implemented.
I am not insisting on anything. I use ``c[:]()`` as shorthand way of
> Warren Stringer wrote:
>
> > `c[:]()` is unambiguous because:
> >
> > def c(): print 'yo'
> >
> > c() # works, but
> > c[:]() # causes:
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last)...
> > c[:]()
> Warren Stringer wrote:
>
> > As mentioned a while back, I'm now predisposed towards using `do(c)()`
> > because square brackets are hard with cell phones. The one mitigating
> factor
> > for more general use, outside of cell phones, is speed.
>
> The spee
issues, though you
> will of course get all sorts of opinions on c.l.py.
Oh well. Perhaps I can relax and actually write functioning code ;-)
What do you mean by 'c.l.py' ? The first thing that comes to mind is
'clippy' that helpful little agent in Word that helped pay for Simonyi's
trip into space.
Ching ching,
Warren
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
_call__ create any extra indirection? If yes,
then I presume that `do(c)()` would be slower the `c[:]()`. I am writing
rather amorphous code. This may speed it up.
4) I posit yes. Am I missing something? What idiom does would c[:]() break?
This correlates with whether `c[:]()` breaks the language d
> > I did not hijack another thread
>
> You really did. In the first message you sent, we see the following
> header:
>
> > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
Damn! I suck. Outlook as a newsreader sucks. I need to use something else.
> I retyped the code you posted in the first pos
> > What?!? I started this thread.
> >
> No you didn't. Your original post was a reply to a message whose subject
> line was 'Re: "is" and ==', and included the header
>
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You're right, thanks.
> >> I think the fundamental mistake you have made is to convince you
Quotes out of context with mistaken assumptions, now follow:
> So c[:]() -- or the more recent go(c)() -- executes all those
> behaviors.
>
> No it doesn't. See below.
> >
> > If c[:]() works, the so does this, using real world names
> >
> > orchestra[:].pickle()
> > orchestra[c
Wildemar Wildenburger wrote:
> This may be a nice
> idea for the Next Overwhelming Programming Escapade (Codename: NOPE)
> ...
> You may want to elaborate on the "new way to think about names". Maybe
> you have a point which I just don't see.
Is it considered pythonic to LOL?
Nietzsche would lov
> >> c[:] holds many behaviors that change dynamically.
> >
> > I've absolutely no clue what that sentence means. If c[:] does
> > behave differently than c, then somebody's done something
> > seriously weird and probably needs to be slapped around for
> > felonious overriding.
I'm still a bit ne
> How is it more expressive? In the context you're concerned
> with, c[:] is the exactly same thing as c. You seem to be
> worried about saving keystrokes, yet you use c[:] instead of c.
>
> It's like having an integer variable i and using ((i+0)*1)
> instead of i.
Nope, different.
c[:] holds
Perhaps a foot pedal? Hmmm
My two cellphones don't like underbars very much. And the shift key -- while
much easier -- still is cumbersome. If outlook didn't autocaps on me, this
message would be in all lowercase. In fact, when communicating with friends
from outlook, to their sms, I take the
> >
> > But that still isn't as simple or as direct as:
> >
> > c[:]()
>
> Why do you always use a _copy_ of c in your examples? As long
> as you're wishing, why not just
>
> c()
Oh hey Grant, yes, I misunderstood your question for a bit. I thought you
meant the difference between List compr
Hey Marc,
> > [d() for d in c]
>
> If you are using the list comprehension just for the side effect of
> calling `d` then consider this bad style. You are building a list of
> `None` objects just to have a "cool" one liner then.
Yep, you're right
> for func in funcs:
> func()
>
> Becaus
On Behalf Of Mikael Olofsson
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 1:52 AM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: c[:]()
>
> Warren Stringer wrote:
> > I want to call every object in a tupple, like so:
> > [snip examples]
> > Why? Because I want to make Python call
Hey Douglas,
Perhaps I was being too abstract? Here goes:
,---
| def selector():
|...
|return funcKey #get down get down
|
| def func():
|...
| funcSwitch = {}
| funcSwitch[funcKey] = func
| ...
| funcSwitch[selector()]()
even more intere
Oops! guess I should have tested my rather hasty complaint about executable
containers. This is nice:
def a(): return 'b'
def b(): print 'polly! wakey wakey'
c = {}
c['a'] = b
c[a()]() #works!
c[a()]() is a switch statement with an amorphous selector- very handy in its
own right. But, using a()
python list.
Cheers,
\~/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustan
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 4:14 PM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: c[:]()
>
> On May 30, 5:37 pm, "Warre
; [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian van den Broek
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 3:00 PM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: c[:]()
>
> Warren Stringer said unto the world upon 05/30/2007 05:31 PM:
> > Hmmm, this is for neither programmer nor computer; this is f
oster)
...
\~/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carsten Haese
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 12:55 PM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: c[:]()
>
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 11:48 -0700, Warren Stringer wrote:
> &g
# huh?
a
>>> [i() for i in c] # too long and ...huh?
a
b
[None,None]
#--
Why? Because I want to make Python calls from a cell phone.
Every keystroke is precious; even list comprehension is too much.
Is there something obvious that I'm mis
y project?
Perhaps a few lines of script to add CamelBack support, using an amplitude
increase for initial caps and maybe lingering on the initial phoneme for an
extra 100 milliseconds. So then, the above example would read:
"camel link dot set Parse Action between parens emit Link H T M L j
Hallo,
>>> import telnetlib
>>> l=telnetlib.Telnet('dbprod')
>>> l.interact()
telnet (dbprod)
Login:
Could anyone show how the above would be written using the twisted
framework? All I'm after is a more 'intelligent' interactive telnet
session (handles 'vi' etc..) rather than the full capabilit
Folks,
Sorry for asking you such a trivial question.!!! But i want to size up
all the buttons with the same size as the largest one in the interface.. And
thats why I am asking this question..
Regards,
Asrarahmed
Hi
Asrarahmed. I think, from yo
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rg] On Behalf Of Fredrik Lundh
> Sent: 20 October 2006 06:43
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: Tkinter--does anyone use it for sophisticated
> GUI development?
>
> Kevin Walzer wrote:
>
> > Comi
>
> Hi I'm writing a python script that creates directories from user
> input.
> Sometimes the user inputs characters that aren't valid
> characters for a
> file or directory name.
> Here are the characters that I consider to be valid characters...
>
> valid =
> ':./,^0123456789abcdefghijklmno
> break
> else:
> _DoThingsToTree(path[1:],value,item[path[0]],delete)
>
The '_' in front of DoThingsToTree shouldn't be there. That's what I get
for trimming off the '_' elsewhere after I pasted the code in.
Matt.
This email is confidential and
Hallo people,
I have the following code that implements a simple recursive tree like
structure.
The trouble is with the GetTreeBranch function, the print statement
prints a valid value but the return immediatley afterward doesn't return
anything.
Can anyone help me with why?
Thanks,
Matt.
Co
> On 17 Oct 2006 02:56:45 -0700, Lad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Dennis,
> > Thank you for your reply
> > You say:
> > >Pretend you are the computer/application/etc. How would YOU
> > > perform such a ranking?
> > That is what I do not know , how to perform such ranking.
> > Do you have any
Thanks, guys... this has all been very useful information.
The machine this is happening on is already running NTFS.
The good news is that we just discovered/remembered that there is a
write-caching option (in device manager -> HDD -> properties ->
Policies tab) available in XP. The note right b
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rg] On Behalf Of Giles Brown
> Sent: 11 October 2006 12:38
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: Bad Code (that works) help me re-write!
>
> Matthew Warren wrote:
>
I have the following piece of code, taken from a bigger module, that
even as I was writing I _knew_ there were better ways of doing it, using
a parser or somesuch at least, but learning how wasn't as fun as coding
it... And yes alarm bells went off when I found myself typing eval(),
and I'm sure th
I've got a case where I'm seeing text files that are either all null
characters, or are trailed with nulls due to interrupted file access
resulting from an electrical power interruption on the WinXP pc.
In tracking it down, it seems that what is being interrupted is either
os.remove(), or os.renam
> >The trouble is, I havent got a clue where to start and would
> appreciate
> >a couple of pointers to get me going...
> >
>
> I'd suggest taking a look at Twisted, which contains a more complete
> telnet implementation (not as important for being able to launch vi),
> an ssh implementation (
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rg] On Behalf Of Gal Diskin
> Sent: 05 October 2006 16:01
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: building strings from variables
>
> Following a discussion with an associate at work about various ways to
> b
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rg] On Behalf Of Giovanni Bajo
> Sent: 04 October 2006 15:17
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: dictionary of list from a file
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > while(){
> > @info=split
> -> > Python 2.5 introduced a dictionary type with automatic
> > creation of values,
> > ala Perl:
> >
> > ===
> > from collections import defaultdict
> >
> > d = defaultdict(list)
> > for line in fl:
> > k, v = line.strip().split()
> > d[k].append(v
> [Matthew Warren]
>
> | Blame outlook and AutoCaps. If number were a number I would write
> |
> | print "There are",number,"ways to skin a "+furryanimal
>
> You see now that strikes me as a bit mixed up. Why not simply use?
>
> print "a"
> Duncan Booth wrote:
>
> > print "There are"+number+"ways to skin a"+furryanimal
> >
> > or at least something equivalent to it. If I try to make
> the same mistake
> > with a format string it jumps out to me as wrong:
> >
> > "There are%sways to skin a%s" % (number, furryanimal)
>
> Relate
> Also, having a variable of type str called 'number' seems
> perverse (and
> probably error prone), so I suspect I might need something like:
>
And not something I would normally do, but for hastily written contrived
examples I might :)
>print "There are "+str(number)+" ways to skin a "
>
> | Now, I started programming when I was 8 with BBC Basic.
>
> Hey, likewise! (Except I was 12 when it came out!)
I think it came out before I was 8, and I started out with print and
input. Not sure if that's 'real' programming - I don't think I graduated
to ifs and thens and gotos and gosubs
Ok, not really python focused, but it feels like the people here could
explain it for me :)
Now, I started programming when I was 8 with BBC Basic.
I never took any formal classes however, and I have never become an
expert programmer. I'm an average/hobbyist programmer with quite a few
languages
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rg] On Behalf Of Scott David Daniels
> Sent: 03 October 2006 18:11
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: Raw strings and escaping
>
> Matthew Warren wrote:
> >
Hi,
I use telnetlib in an app I am writing, and would like to add
functionality to it to support interactive terminal sessions , IE: be
able to 'vi' a file.
Currently it seems telnetlib isnt quite sophisticated enoguh to support
such a thing.
The trouble is, I havent got a clue where to start
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rg] On Behalf Of Matthew Warren
> Sent: 03 October 2006 16:07
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: RE: Escapeism
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> &
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rg] On Behalf Of Kay Schluehr
> Sent: 30 September 2006 18:02
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: Escapeism
>
> Sybren Stuvel wrote:
> > Kay Schluehr enlightened us with:
> > > Usually I struggle a
Hi,
I would expect this to work,
rawstring=r'some things\new things\some other things\'
But it fails as the last backslash escapes the single quote.
..although writing this I think I have solved my own problem. Is \' the
only thing escaped in a raw string so you can place ' in a raw string?
Alt
Apologies for repost. not sure what
happened.
This email is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete the email from your computer.
You should not copy the email, use it for any purpose or disclose its contents
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Hari SekhonSent: 29 September 2006 14:55To:
python-list@python.orgSubject: Re: Making sure script only runs
once instance at a time.
I'm not sure if that is a very old way of doing it, which is why I wa
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of paw
Sent: 29 September 2006 11:01
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Problems with Python 2.5 installer.
John Machin wrote:
> paw wrote:
> > I have ran the MSI installer for Python 2.5 several times at
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
