Re: Redirect all mail from one domain to the same u...@otherdomain?

jeff_homeip a écrit : > --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Victor Duchovni > wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 09:50:16PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote: >> >>> I am trying to figure out the best way to map one domain to > another with >>> the same users...precisely the behavior I am trying to a

Re: reject_unverified_sender vs greylisting

João Miguel Neves a écrit : > Charles Marcus escreveu: >> On 2/8/2009, João Miguel Neves (joao.ne...@intraneia.com) wrote: >> >>> I recently enabled reject_unverified_sender in my postfix configuration, >>> but it seems like it fails when the server against which the sender is >>> verified uses

hijacked NXDOMAIN (Re: DNS lookups not working?)

jan gestre a écrit : > [snip] >>> I have this same problem that I was not able to solve for almost a >>> week now. I posted too on various mailing lists including this (mail >>> from gmail and yahoo are blocked), some suggested to install a caching >>> nameserver but obviously in your case it doesn

Re: No reason not to use reject_unverified sender (was Re: reject_unverified_sender vs greylisting)

João Miguel Neves a écrit : > Charles Marcus escreveu: >> Here's a link informing why indiscriminate use of SAV is bad, and what >> it should be used for: >> >> http://www.backscatterer.org/?target=sendercallouts > OK, I've finished reading and analyzing that text. My conclusion is that > there's n

Re: No reason not to use reject_unverified sender (was Re: reject_unverified_sender vs greylisting)

Paweł Leśniak a écrit : > [snip] > Well, to be honest, I believe you did. If you will do many checks to the > same server (have on mind large ISPs with many domains) with different > emails, then probably your server will get blacklisted to send email > from postmaster@ (at least). If you want expl

Re: No reason not to use reject_unverified sender (was Re: reject_unverified_sender vs greylisting)

João Miguel Neves a écrit : > OK, I'll take that into consideration if I re-enable SAV. > if you re-enable SAV, do as much checks as you can. the minimum is zen.spamhaus.org. but you can also use spamcop. it would also be good to do it after greylisting, but this means your GL server need to re

Re: No reason not to use reject_unverified sender (was Re: reject_unverified_sender vs greylisting)

Paweł Leśniak a écrit : > [snip] >> let me fork a little: SAV on _header_ addresses is plain dumb: >> >> Dec 15 11:25:33 imlil postmx/smtpd[23878]: NOQUEUE: warn: RCPT from >> chlothar.bnv-bamberg.de[217.146.130.193]: Transaction logged: >> PTR=chlothar.bnv-bamberg.de; from= >> to= proto=ESMTP helo

Re: Redirect all mail from one domain to the same u...@otherdomain?

jeff_homeip a écrit : > [snip] > > that creates some complications...and might be too difficult > a script and a Makefile... or sql as below: > but why not use wildcard virtual aliases? You noted below that they break > recipient > validations. Do you mean that smtp_recipient_restrictions won

Re: How to allow mails from some other servers to pass: reject_sender_login_mismatch

an...@iguanait.com a écrit : > Hi, > > i'm trying to slow down and block backscater mails and i try to use: > reject_sender_login_mismatch and smtpd_sender_login_maps. > > I have some questions about how to pass this restriction for some cases. > The situation is this: > > We have some other ser

Re: Create additional sub-folders postfix/courier

Gabriel Tartaglia a écrit : > Hi all > > I have a mail server which is courier, postfix, amavisd, using Postgres > db and virtual mailboxes which I administer through postfixadmin. > > I want to be able to add a set of default folders to all mailboxes > created such as Possible Spam and some othe

Re: No reason not to use reject_unverified sender (was Re: reject_unverified_sender vs greylisting)

Paweł Leśniak a écrit : > mouss pisze: >> João Miguel Neves a écrit : >> >>> OK, I'll take that into consideration if I re-enable SAV. >>> >>> >> >> >> if you re-enable SAV, do as much checks as you can. the minimum is >&

Re: Redirect all mail from one domain to the same u...@otherdomain?

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > [snip] > > This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other > alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a second map. > I don't think so. I used this. I don't remember the details, but the idea is that you can often get rid of flow c

Re: Create additional sub-folders postfix/courier

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > And a last betterer/simpler way to do it. > > SELECT > if(INSTR(maildir,'+'),concat(left(maildir,instr(maildir,'+')-1),'/Maildir/.',right(maildir,length(maildir)-instr(maildir,'+'))),CONCAT(maildir,'Maildir/')) > from mailbox where username ='%s' and active='1' > >

Re: Create additional sub-folders postfix/courier

Victor Duchovni a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:24:25PM +0100, mouss wrote: > >> post...@corwyn.net a ?crit : >>> And a last betterer/simpler way to do it. >>> >>> SELECT >>> if(INSTR(maildir,'+'),concat(left(maildir,instr(maildi

Re: postfix logs, spams and bounce messages

ddaas a écrit : > I did the modification and it seems it work better. Since that > modification I got no message rejected from yahoo. > > 1. Could you please explain to me why should the RBL checks be done > before Sender Address Verification? And why it is not advisable to do > SAV at all? > > 2

Re: postfix logs, spams and bounce messages

Justin Piszcz a écrit : > > > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote: > >> You are doing Sender Address Verification (reject_unverified_sender) >> before doing RBL checks. Fix this. Do the RBL checks first, and consider >> not doing SAV at all, but if you do use it, do SAV *last*. >> > >>

Re: recipient_delimiter and virtual users

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > > > OK, so I've become intrigued with recipient delimiters. > > My users are currently stored in a mysql database, 'postfix'. The table > format is as postfixadmin sets it up, so in the username is the user > email address u...@example.com > > Before I started t

Re: recipient_delimiter and virtual users

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > [snip] > > So while recipient_delimited works "out of the box" it doesn't quite do > what I want (hence why I provided not only what wasn't working, but a > detailed explanation of what I wanted to solve.) > but you didn't talk about folders in your post, did you?

Re: rbl clients.

Rik a écrit : > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 14:07 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:02:03PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote: >> >>> Please see below my smtpd_recipient_restrictions. On my rbl client list I >>> have multiple entries, but not sure how many of them actually maintained. I

Re: virtual_alias_maps against local_recipient_maps

jakjr a écrit : > Hello, > > I am using virtual_alias_maps to implement a simple mailing list. > > l...@example.com, after virtual_alias_maps is aliased to > us...@example.com and us...@example.com. > > local_recipient_maps prevents the reception of unknown users and, in > my case, disabled user

Re: Problem with sending email to multiple recipients

sim085 a écrit : > Hi, > > I have a little problem when sending emails to multiple recipients. I do not > know if the problem is with Postfix, however some people on other forums > suggested that I could find an option in Postfix to help me solve this > problem. > > My problem is as follows: >

Re: Question about smptd_sender_logins_map and allow to use only for several domains?

an...@iguanait.com a écrit : > Hi, > > i have a question about using smtpd_sender_logins_map, > reject_sender_login_mismatch and check_client_access. > > I set smtpd_sender_logins_map and set these rules in sender > restrictions: > > smtpd_sender_restrictions = > permit_mynetworks, >

Re: About filtering mail with mailq

deconya a écrit : > Hi > > Im new postfix and Im learning how to use. My first problem is about the > spam because in my server are incoming mails with my domain but using > bad adresses and making copy to the aol.com domain. Im > making: > > #postqueue -p | grep ' Feb @aol.c

Re: More main.cf cleanup

Charles Marcus a écrit : > On 2/13/2009, Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) wrote: >>> I'm thinking it would be better to move the check_client_access check to >>> smtpd_client_restrictions, and the check_sender_access check to >>> smtpd_sender_restrictions, so I'd then have: > >> No,

Re: More main.cf cleanup

Charles Marcus a écrit : > On 2/13/2009 3:42 PM, mouss wrote: >> you can do this >> >> smtpd_sender_restrictions = >> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/moved-employees, > > Ah! I never even considered I could put check_recipient_access under > smtpd_sen

Re: DSN: Improper sequence of commands in postfix 2.5.4

Eddy Beliveau a écrit : > Message original > Sujet : Re: DSN: Improper sequence of commands in postfix 2.5.4 > De : wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) > Pour : Eddy Beliveau > Copie à : postfix-users@postfix.org > Date : 2009-02-13 12:19 > >> Eddy Beliveau: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm

Re: More main.cf cleanup

Charles Marcus a écrit : > On 2/13/2009 4:23 PM, mouss wrote: >>>> smtpd_sender_restrictions = >>>> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/moved-employees, > >>> Ah! I never even considered I could put check_recipient_access under >>&g

Re: relay through smtps

gianluca...@interfree.it a écrit : > hi > > Is it possible relay mail trhough smstps under postfix? > you mean forward mail to a remote smtps server? not with postfix alone. you can use stunnel: http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2007-03/1350.html

Re: Yahoo and spams

ddaas a écrit : > Hello everybody ! > > We have a lot of clients that have yahoo e-mails. > Yahoo accept e-mail from our server but by default sort them as spams. > What could it be? Does anyone know what does yahoo like or dislike? > They don't have words related to spams, they are not advertisme

Re: Yahoo and spams

ddaas a écrit : > Hi, thanks. > One more question: I have virtual hosting on my server. This means > that the reverse dns of the server ip is ns1.mydomain.com and the EHLO > hostname is mail.maindomain.com > Could this be a problem? I mean the server tries to reverse the ip and > it doesn't get w

Re: Problem with sending email to multiple recipients

sim085 a écrit : > hi mouss, > Please don't top post. put your replies after the text you reply to. > Thank you very much for your answer. I did have a feeling the problem was > with the catch-all-email setting and was wondering if anyone uses this > setting with mail se

Re: Relaying question

Joseph Mays a écrit : >> What service is it, and why are they not allowing you to relay? > > The spam filtering servers are local servers on our system. It's not an > offsite service out in the world. The relaying denied messages are > coming from the postfix daemons on the cluster, not from the f

Re: Outbound mail filtering as spam?

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > > > > Currently running postfix with amavisd and spam assassin. I'm now > cleverly using recipient_delimiter and amavisd so that amavisd flags > spam as user+s...@example.com > > WAY cool feature BTW, now I don't have to set filters up for each user. > Thanks for

Re: Trying to set up Amavis, getting "missing transport type field" error.

James Homuth a écrit : > I'm pretty sure I missed something, but I'm not finding exactly what it is. > When I try to start up Postfix after configuring it to use Amavis for > content filtering, I get: > Feb 14 11:12:14 nova postfix/postfix-script[27804]: starting the Postfix > mail system

Re: (solved) Trying to set up Amavis, getting "missing transport type field" error.

James Homuth a écrit : > > > -Original Message- > From: James Homuth [mailto:ja...@the-jdh.com] > Sent: February 14, 2009 3:43 PM > To: 'mouss+nob...@netoyen.net' > Subject: RE: Trying to set up Amavis, getting "missing transport type field" &

Re: Question about smptd_sender_logins_map and allow to use

Ali Nebi a écrit : > Hi, thanks for the reply. > > Sorry i didn't understand what you meant here: > >>> restrictions: >>> >>> smtpd_sender_restrictions = >>> permit_mynetworks, >>> permit_sasl_authenticated, >>> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/access, >> if this map

Re: Question about smptd_sender_logins_map and allow to use

Ali Nebi a écrit : > [snip] > > smtpd_client_restrictions = > permit_mynetworks, > permit_sasl_authenticated, > check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access, you are "sharing" this map (for client, sender, and recipient). better use "dedicated" maps (access_client, access_

Re: SMTP relay only

Rocco Scappatura a écrit : > Hello, > > I need to setup a mail server for outgoing email only. I clearly would > like to restrict access to my networks only. > > Moreover, I would like to permit only to some envelope senders to relay > email trhough a such MTA. And no other envelope sender should

Re: SMTP relay only

Victor Duchovni a écrit : > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 03:20:55PM +0100, mouss wrote: > >>> Finally I would like to deny message delivery to my mail server.. It >>> should suffice to unset "relay_domains" or it is too restrictive doing >>> so? >>>

Re: spams from live.com

bharathan kailath a écrit : > hi > is there anyway i can prevent spams from live.com > with internal filters of postfix use a content filter (spamassassin, ... etc).

Re: Requeue if DNS server is down

Erik Paulsen Skaalerud a écrit : > Hi. > > Does postfix hold mails in queue if it cant contact any DNS server? > We just lost our fibre link (including all DNS resolution) and it > seems like many of our internal users get a 450 error with "Recipient > address rejected: Domain not found". > If y

Re: Postfix + Maildrop

sim085 a écrit : > [snip] > Thank you for your reply. I do have the courier authmysqlrc file set up > however it is located at /etc/courier/ not /etc/authlib/. The location is system dependent. if your courier (imap, pop, webmail) works, it's ok. > In my opinion this > file is set up properly si

Re: RDNS question

David Cottle a écrit : > In my postfix mail log I see a lot of unknown against servers. > do not hijack threads. please ask again by posting a new message instead of replying to an unrelated one. use the "compose" button, not the "reply" button. > I know DNS works as SPF records lookup properly

Re: RDNS question

David Cottle a écrit : > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 18/02/2009, at 10:57, "Jan P. Kessler" wrote: > >> David Cottle schrieb: >>> In my postfix mail log I see a lot of unknown against servers. >> >> postfix uses the verified hostname, as explained at >> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.htm

Re: Postfix + Maildrop

Simon Aquilina a écrit : >[snip] >> >> > >> > Enterting the command maildrop -V 4 -d sysad...@mydomain.com < 1 return >> > the following: >> > base 1: No such file or directory. >> >> well, you asked it to read from a file named "1". use "< /dev/null" >> instead. > > I did as you suggested and th

Re: Postfix + Maildrop

sim085 a écrit : > > Oki, I can answer this question myself. If I execute the command maildrop -V > 4 sysadmin < /dev/null from the directory where .mailfilter exists then I > get the error "mailfilter file isn't a regular file". Executing the same > command from any other location will give me th

Re: emails get bounced with "Invalid 'From' header:" message

emailjohndavid a écrit : > Hello, > I am running postfix mail_version = 2.5.5 under ubuntu 8.10 server. I have > a static IP and a domain name pointed to the IP. I also have reverse IP > lookup setup for mail.myrealdomainnamehere.com to avoid being treated as a > SPAM server. (my IP and real dom

Re: How catch-all works?

Jason Voorhees a écrit : > Hi people: > > I'm trying to set up a catch-all feature in my Postfix server based on > LDAP. Here's my scenario: > > - Mail Accounts with VirtualMailAccount object class > - Alias with VirtualAlias object class > > How can I tell Postfix to look for users/alias and re

Re: Best way to set up an open relay postfix

Rich a écrit : > I used the term "open relay" because unfortunately for you, you can't arbitrarily redefine common terms. "open relay" is a relay that can be used by anybody from anywhere, including all the spammers and abusers. what you want is called an MSA, for "Mail Submission Agent". only y

Re: Postfix + Maildrop

Simon Aquilina a écrit : >> >> 1- reinstall the "maildrop" package (not "courier-maildrop") >> 2- once this is done, run the following commands: >> >> maildrop -v > > GDBM extensions enabled. > Courier Authentication Library extension enabled. that's good. > Maildir quota extension enabled. > >

Re: How to tune these rules to be more effective?

an...@iguanait.com a écrit : > Hi again, > Please do not CC me. I tolerate being CC-ed when one replies to a post I send, but if I get a double copy of every post to the list, I won't feel happy. > what is your opinion for this configuration: > I already posted an example (15 Feb 2009, 15:06:2

Re: Change email headers

emailjohndavid a écrit : > How can I correct my email headers? (From Header) > > When I send emails from my server, from header is shown as below. > > From: johnda...@somedomainname.com (john david) > > This is strange because all the emails I received have the from header like > > From: "Jon

Re: Limit rate/concurrency to a given domain

Santiago Romero a écrit : > > Is there any way to verify seeing the logfile if a given message is > going throught a given transport (say "slow" in my master.cf) instead of > standard "smtp" transport? > > I'm not sure or I don't know how to check if the messages are being > delivered by the "slo

Re: Prevent vacation autoreply for recipient_delimiter?

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > > > > I'm currently using recipient_delimiter in main.cf and in amavisd.conf, > so that inbound spam (as determined by spamassassin) adds "+Spam" to the > recipient. I don't block any spam (it all gets delivered) so I don't > have to administer quarantined spam. >

Re: Your Email

Daniel C a écrit : >> A broken HTML encapsulator is eating all content inside <>, in your >> messages, can you post the headers and logs without going trhough >> the broken (cross-site scripting vulnerable, ...) HTML generator? >> >> This message is submitted via SMTP from outside. > > Well... The

Re: Prevent vacation autoreply for recipient_delimiter?

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > At 01:57 PM 2/21/2009, mouss wrote: >> post...@corwyn.net a écrit : >> Alternatively, change your delivery config so that mail to >> *+s...@yourdomain.example uses a different delivery mechanism, one that >> doesn't call your vacation

Re: Forward a copy of each mail to another smtp-server

Kai Szymanski a écrit : > Hi! > > Because i have to move from one server to another one (new hardware and > new provider) with all domains, i also have to move all emailaccounts to > the new server. Because i wan't to move "step by step" i have to think > about synchronisation of the email-account

Re: mail from restriction

Meshbah Uddin Ahmed a écrit : > hi, > > i am using postfix. i want to restrict my users that they cannot send > mail using other domain. Like my domain is- abc.com , > nobody of my users can send mail using yahoo.com/gmail > com. but have to receive mail fr

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > Mark Goodge wrote: >> KLaM Postmaster wrote: >>> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it >>> is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, >>> domain names etc. >>> If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is

Re: Prevent vacation autoreply for recipient_delimiter?

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > > > The problem still: users on vacation generate auto-response to incoming > email id'd as spam. I use a recipient_delimiter and amavisd/spamassassin > to flad incoming mail as spam with "+Spam". I'd really like to stop this > to avoid backscatter issues, be a good

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > /dev/rob0 wrote: >> On Sun February 22 2009 16:05:09 KLaM Postmaster wrote: >> >>> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if >>> it is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, >>> domain names etc. >>> If it open (tha

Re: Intercepting Bounced Backs

Chris Dos a écrit : >[snip] > > Well, the simple fact is that they want me to process the bounce backs and > not send the bounce back to the > user, but process it internally. Is there a way to do this without using > VERP? > you can use smtp_generic_maps to rewrite the sender address when ou

Re: Prevent vacation autoreply for recipient_delimiter?

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > [snip] >> >> 1- explain in _detail_ how mail reaches your vacation script. > > That presumes I know :-) but I'll give it a try. When a user is on > vacation, they have an table entry in mysql, and an additional alias > that is something like: > test#example@autor

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > [snip] >> > An alternative is to put up a decoy address. One for which email appears > to be accepted, but where it is dropped, I use what I call pseudo-traps here. they are only enabled from time to time. when they are enabled, I check the messages, and I use that

Re: upgrading amavisd

deconya a écrit : > Hi! > > Im upgrading a server with Postfix and in the part to upgrade the Amaisd > from 2.1.2 version to 2.6.1 it appears the next message when Im in the > debug part: > > Problem in Amavis::DB or Amavis::DB::SNMP code: Can't locate loadable > object for module BerkeleyDB in @

Re: mailbox_size_limit , quota + some other questions

Linux Advocate a écrit : > [snip] > so, that box can handle with postfix's default settings, 1 users? that's > nice to know. thanx. > we wont be going to that size. > the problem you will have is not on the postfix side. content filters and imap are more hungry. >> one has working recipient

Re: alias question

Leonardo Coelho a écrit : > The "postconf -n" log: http://rafb.net/p/JLbjbi42.html > > Debug Log: http://rafb.net/p/LDBCNL67.html > please: - use normal logging. do not enable verbose logging until asked. verbose logs take longer to "parse" - post the infos (logs and postconf -n) inline (here,

Re: ACL for outbound email

Joe Benson a écrit : > Does anyone know how to configure Postfix to only allow outgoing email > to a set list of email addresses? I would like to have anything going > out to an unlisted address to go to a local mailbox. > define "outgoing". is it mail from mynetworks? is it SASL authenticated ma

Re: Time-Out ability?

Sahil Tandon a écrit : > On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Aaron Abramson > wrote: > >> Is it possible to configure postfix with a threshold where if a >> certain user or IP address sends 1000 emails or more in an hour, they >> are blocked from sending email for a period of time? >> >> >> We occasiona

Re: Your Email

Daniel C a écrit : > What would be the best strategy? Create a new user and change postfix, amavis > and Courier-IMAP to use this user for message storing? No. do not the same user for different services: - keep the 'postfix' account for the postfix "server" - use amavis or vscan or whatever fo

Re: smtps and sent mail

gianluca...@interfree.it a écrit : > Hi > > First question, i have a mail server with postfix, dovecot, mailscanner > and fetchmail now one user has bought a certified email account on an > external internet provider. > He want to use internal server to sent email through his certified > account,

Re: smtps and sent mail

LuKreme a écrit : > > On 25-Feb-2009, at 16:25, gianluca...@interfree.it wrote: > >> ok, i have configured postfix to sent mail trhough the smtp of my >> internet service provider. Now one user have a certified email account >> and he wants to sent mail by my server trhough the smtps. >> I have s

Re: Rewriting addresses with no @domain & mailing lists

Karl O. Pinc a écrit : > Hello, > > I'm running a mailing list (using GNU > Mailman) and occasionally the > list receives mail having headers with > email addresses that have no @domain part. > (I don't know why, and it's out of my > hands in any case.) > When the list software resends the mail >

Re: Multiple Bcc: recipients and delivery after fetchmail

Zoltan Balogh a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote: >> On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 19:57 CET, >> Zoltan Balogh wrote: >> >>> On 2/26/09, Victor Duchovni wrote: >>> Note, this notion of "correctness" is not one of those pedantic types of "correctness"

Re: Question regarding this mailing list & privacy.

KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > > So far I am not seeing a lot of "funny" addresses, however I am seeing a > fair number for non-existent recipients fortunately the standard checks > handle those very well. > if the "non-existent recipients" aren't addresses that real people could mistype or gues

Re: /usr/sbin/sendmail requeue and address expansion

Charles Marcus a écrit : > On 2/26/2009 11:00 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote: >>> You need to disable it on one side, but then enable it on the other. >>> In addition to receive_override_options = no_address_mappings in >>> main.cf >>> >>> Add something like >>> -o receive_override_options= >>> >>> to the o

Re: Plus addressing not delivering to folder

Charles Marcus a écrit : > Hello, > > I'm sure this is something I'm totally missing but I have a system I'm > trying to get plus addressing working, and not having any luck. The > email is delivered, but just to the Inbox, not to the folder... > > I've got the recipient delimiter enabled in main

Re: whitelisting trusted addresses

Paul Hutchings a écrit : > I appreciate that it's hard to make up for the failings of other peoples > email/internet infrastructure, but I'm looking for options/suggestions > on how to deal with that old problem of "Blocking unwanted mail when the > occasional wanted mail has all the characteristic

Re: alias question

Leonardo Coelho a écrit : > Hey guys this is my postconf -n output: > > append_dot_mydomain = no > biff = no > config_directory = /etc/postfix > disable_vrfy_command = yes > inet_interfaces = 127.0.0.1, 10.1.1.107, 189.11.37.1xx > invalid_hostname_reject_code = 450 > local_transport = virtual ali

Re: local delivery, lmtp and aliases

Bernhard D Rohrer a écrit : > Hi guys > > I am using postfix and cyrus for a setup with multiple domains on one box > > postconf -n: > > alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases > alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases > append_dot_mydomain = no > biff = no > config_directory = /etc/postfix > delay_warning_ti

Re: Relay Access Denied when sending mail to an outside domain

Big Pizzle a écrit : > [snip] > 250-jupiter1.national.com > 250-PIPELINING > 250-SIZE 1024 > 250-ETRN > 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES > 250-8BITMIME > 250 DSN > look at the dovecot side (whether plaintext is allowed, which mechanisms are enabled, ... etc). anyway

Re: Relay Access Denied when sending mail to an outside domain

Big Pizzle a écrit : > [snip] > *I notice that it's attaching @xxx to whatever username I enter - could > that be (one of) the issue(s) at hand? * > you are using dovecot auth, so cyrus stuff is irrelevant. > [snip] > Here's a telnet output to port 25: > xxx:~# telnet xxx.yyy.com

Re: mysql lookup errors

kj a écrit : > Hi guys, > > I'm seeing this in the logs: > > Mar 2 18:18:05 web postfix/cleanup[27207]: warning: mysql query failed: > MySQL server has gone away > Mar 2 18:18:05 web postfix/cleanup[27207]: warning: D1D1A71029C: > virtual_alias_maps map lookup problem for donny_bra...@example.c

Re: Spam attacks

Paweł Leśniak a écrit : > W dniu 2009-03-03 18:41, Noel Jones pisze: >> Some legit "reminder" type services, some meeting notifications, and >> other legit mail might arrive with you as the sender. Maybe not best >> practices, but it's legit mail and such a policy will reject it. > Why would someo

Re: escape "^From "

LuKreme a écrit : > What controls escaping "From " in the body of a mail message if it's at > the start of a line? Since I've switched everyone over to Maildir, it > seems silly to do this anymore, but I can't find the setting. In fact, > I'm not even sure it's in postfix at all. look at what you

Re: Local mail listener

Daniel L. Miller a écrit : > Ok - now that I've fixed my idiotic routing errors (don't have two NIC's > on the same network unless you know what you're doing - which I clearly > don't!), I can get back to Postfix. > > From my prior configuration questions in ages past, I have been trying > to make

Re: Local mail listener

Daniel L. Miller a écrit : > [snip] > Mar 4 23:21:33 mailserver postfix/smtpd[20964]: warning: proxy > inet:192.168.0.10:225 rejected "DATA": "250 2.1.5 Ok" This is the thing to look at. did the proxy send "5xx 250 2.1.5 Ok"? > Mar 4 23:21:33 mailserver postfix/smtpd[20964]: warning: non-SMTP

Re: Spam attacks

Paweł Leśniak a écrit : > W dniu 2009-03-05 06:30, Mihira Fernando pisze: >> Have you ever tried sending an e-greeting to someone via >> 123greeting.com or >> some other similar site ? >> > You're definitely right - I didn't use that one before. > Look what I get in logs: > Mar 5 09:41:50 lola

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, no, Really!)

LuKreme a écrit : > On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:18, Robert A. Ober wrote: >> Thanks to Brian and others for hanging in there with me! > > I think you owe everyone on this thread (which I was not part of, so no > self-interest) a beer. :) > I wasn't either, but I want a Franziskaner ;-p for OP: sasl

Re: Messages Are Refused

Carlos Williams a écrit : > Thanks for that info. Can someone also comment on this? I asked a > friend via email and this was his response to the same issue: > > ** > > "I used nslookup to verify the address your queue is showing, and it > does correspond to je.jfcom.m

Re: Question about how Postfix sends the EHLO/HELO

Noel Jones a écrit : > [snip] > Looking at the headers of the message you sent to the list: > > Received: from neskowin.linfield.edu (neskowin.linfield.edu > [192.147.171.21]) > by russian-caravan.cloud9.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 55D0AFD9F3 > for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:33:37 -0500 (EST) >

Re: Blocking email from own domain on From: header

Thomas Ledbetter a écrit : > > OK.. How about this one: > > I have had good luck blocking SPAM email which has a MAIL FROM: address > in my own domain, by blocking all email from my domain in an access map > on 'smtpd_sender_restrictions', and then listing 'permit_mynetworks' and > 'permit_sasl

Re: Postoffice with virtual mailbox and a Maildrop issue

Rocco Scappatura a écrit : > [snip] > Why the message is not delivered immediately to the virtual mailbox after > vacation filter? > because the domain is not listed as a virtual mailbox domain >>> # postmap -q t...@receiver.tld >>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-domain.cf >>> receiver.

Re: restricting who can be sent to.

Carver Banks a écrit : > Or so I thought..., that did restrict all mail to the internal recipients as > well. > > I need anyone in mydomain.com to be able to email anyone in mydomain.local, > but I need users on mydomain.local to only be allowed to email a few people > in mydomain.com, and none

Re: restricting who can be sent to.

mouss a écrit : > Carver Banks a écrit : >> Or so I thought..., that did restrict all mail to the internal recipients as >> well. >> >> I need anyone in mydomain.com to be able to email anyone in mydomain.local, >> but I need users on mydomain.local to only

Re: Plus addressing not delivering to folder

Charles Marcus a écrit : > On 3/6/2009 3:43 PM, LuKreme wrote: >> On 6-Mar-2009, at 12:27, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> Hmmm... I'm now wondering if ${extension} can somehow be used with the >>> virtual_mailbox_maps query to accomplish what I want? > >> Yes, but you need procmail (or, I assume, Maild

Re: Force authentication for own domains

Magnus Bäck a écrit : > On Saturday, March 07, 2009 at 13:40 CET, > "Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso" wrote: > >> I've a postfix server wich uses SASL + Mysql for authentication, my >> own domains are mostly listed in a mysql table on that database. Its >> working fine enough, but I want to made

Re: Plus addressing not delivering to folder

Noel Jones a écrit : > Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 3/7/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote: >>> if all extensions are acceptable (not very recommended), >> >> Ok, this caught my attention... >> >> Yes, I was planning on allowing any extension to be

Re: Variables for addresses in master.cf

Wietse Venema a écrit : > Daniel L. Miller: >> Does Postfix support variables (I suppose defined in main.cf) to be used >> for internet addresses in master.cf? Example: >> >> main.cf: >> inbound_interface = 192.168.0.10 >> outbound_interface = 192.168.0.11 >> >> master.cf: >> inbound_

Re: root delivery for monitoring services

Cameron Camp a écrit : > I have monitoring applications on boxes on the same subnet as a box I > want to use for mailing list notification using Postfix/mailman to > notify several users. An example is some box throwing an snmp trap, > where a notification would try to send to notification_l...@exa

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >