KLaM Postmaster a écrit : > Mark Goodge wrote: >> KLaM Postmaster wrote: >>> Is this mailing list closed (or fairly closed), I only ask because if it >>> is then there does not seem to any good reason to munge addresses, >>> domain names etc. >>> If it open (that is publicly readable) then there is. >> It's publicly archived in a number of places, and posts here will show >> up in a Google search. These are some of the archives, I'm sure there >> are others: >> >> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix >> http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org >> http://www.pubbs.net/postfix >> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users >> >> Mark > Thanks, looks like I have to keep munging. Now I need to either develop > or find a good munging script. >
note that you can't munge infos that are added after you post. for example: Received: from mail.klam.ca (mail.klam.ca [206.53.59.9]) ... when you munge, use "standard" example conventions: - for domains, use *.example.com, *.example.org, *.example.net or *.example. - for routable IPs, use 192.0.2.* - for private IPs, use one of the private IP classes (10.* should be enough...) And do that consistently. for example, don't replace "netoyen.net" with "example.net" but at the same time replace "mo...@netoyen.net" with "j...@bar.example", because this hides the fact that this user is from that domain... etc.
