Paweł Leśniak a écrit : > [snip] > Well, to be honest, I believe you did. If you will do many checks to the > same server (have on mind large ISPs with many domains) with different > emails, then probably your server will get blacklisted to send email > from postmaster@ (at least). If you want explanation why, here it is: > SMTP session to do SAV check is naither an email from individual to > individual, nor message from receiver's system to sender. Of course it's > also not wanted by sender, so in any case - it's spam and your server > should be treated like any other spamming server. You hopefully > understand my point of view. You don't have to agree - it doesn't matter. > > Maybe this thread is a good reason to create BL containing servers doing > large amounts of SAV checks? I'd be very happy if I could use such BL to > reject emails from postmaster at those domains (and probably <> also). >
no reason to overreact. I am not seeing SAV abuse (but I am seeing backscatter and spam). let me fork a little: SAV on _header_ addresses is plain dumb: Dec 15 11:25:33 imlil postmx/smtpd[23878]: NOQUEUE: warn: RCPT from chlothar.bnv-bamberg.de[217.146.130.193]: Transaction logged: PTR=chlothar.bnv-bamberg.de; from=<spamch...@bnv-bamberg.de> to=<mo...@netoyen.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<bnv-bamberg.de> if you post to the spamassassin-users list, and you log transactions, you'll see such probes.
