ectly, and that I did not
forgot a domain.
It could look so in the email header:
TLS-Fingerprint-Check: PASSED
--
Best regards,
Peter Bauer
Linux & UNIX developper
check fails.
--
Best regards,
Peter Bauer
Linux & UNIX developper
@mx-50:~# postconf -d | grep ignore_mx_lookup_error
ignore_mx_lookup_error = no
root@mx-50:~# postconf -n | grep ignore_mx_lookup_error
root@mx-50:~# [no Output]
How can i turn this off?
TIA, Peter
ion phase than in the later data transfer?
Any help is welcome!
Cheers,
Peter
t?
I found header_checks, but maybe there is a simpler comand where I can reuse the sender_access file?
Cheers,
Peter
Gesendet: Samstag, 22. Februar 2014 um 21:11 Uhr
Von: "Wolfgang Zeikat"
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: Problem with filtering GMX emails in sen
years the mails only
contained advertisement and since I only use them as forwarders for emails from
legacy contacts I don't think I need an "upgrade your account" email every few
weeks.
Thanks for all the help,
Peter
Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. Februar 2014 um 14:41 Uhr
Von: "Wolfg
elivery; but it seems odd that they happen even though the
server is pretty idle.
Any ideas please?
Thanks,
Peter Smith
standard way of doing
alias domains on postfix? (It should be some kind of "standard
use-case" after all, shouldn't it? Google Mail let you define alias
domains on Google Apps, and that simply works.)
Thanks in advance for any hints,
Peter
abused.
Cheers,
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `-http://www.debian.org/
tor that could be abused.
>
> Correlation does not imply causation. A false premise, yields false
> conclusion.
Good thing it was guarded with a conditional :)
Cheers,
Peter
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Peter Palfrader
is that I can not seem to route the message to
this secondary smtpd instance. I can not use transport_maps because it
is consulted by the transport daemon, and I can not assign a second
transport daemon to talk to the second smtpd instance.
Is there a way to do this at all?
Thanks
Peter
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Peter Rabbitson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to protect a specific local address by defining a very low
>> message_size_limit applicable only to this particular address.
>
> Not possible in general. Only possible if
nded behavior, or is this an omission? I am using stock
Debian Postfix 2.5.5-1.1
Thanks
Peter
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Peter Rabbitson:
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
>> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> * Peter Rabbitson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I need to protect a specific local address by defi
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Peter Rabbitson:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I encountered a weird behavior with Postfix when specifying
>> smtp:localhost as a transport destination. After long debugging, tcpdump
>> revealed that postfix directly asks for 'localhost.',
>>
}
# Call sendmail to reinject the message into Postfix
$SENDMAIL -i "$@" , relay=disclaimer, delay=1, status=bo
unced (Command died with status 1: "/etc/postfix/disclaimer")
I'm using opensuse, therefore I don't have installed SELinux
Thanks for any advice
BR
Peter
it imapd: Connection, ip=[:::127.0.0.1]
> ..
> ...
> Oct 22 17:20:21 testmonit postfix/pipe[15355]: 32CDE65B2C:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=disclaimer, delay=1, status=bo
> unced (Command died with status 1: "/etc/postfix/disclaimer")
>
> I&
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-postfix-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jevos, Peter
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:56 AM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: RE: Altermime and postfix - permission denied, Command died
> with status
ilter=disclaimer: to
work only for outgoing emails , into which smtpd process?
Thanks
Br
peter
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-postfix-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jevos, Peter
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 2:43 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: RE: Altermime and postfix - permission denied, Command died
> with status
> -Original Message-
> From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:01 PM
> To: Jevos, Peter
> Cc: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: Postfix - altermime - amavis - Too many hops
>
> Jevos, Peter a écrit :
> > Dear all
> >
> >> Jevos, Peter a écrit :
> >>> Dear all
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to ask you a question.
> >>>
> >>> In my master.cf is:
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>> ##disclaimer
> >>> disc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-postfix-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Martinec
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 6:24 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Postfix - altermime - amavis - Too many hops
>
> Peter,
ECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mail_id: TADAgZUVA4wW, Hits: -,
2410 ms
Oct 25 00:38:04 testmonit postfix/smtp[5651]: 2169165B4F:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=18, s
tatus=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=14560-05, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250
Ok: queued as 92E8E65B56)
.
Outbound is clear
Thanks
peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mail_id: CFw7kTVI3lGN, Hits:
-, 3383 ms
Oct 27 10:09:43 testmonit postfix/smtp[20511]: 4626B65B53:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=14, status=sent (250
2.6.0 Ok
, id=14551-06, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 Ok: queued as
9F8F665B56)
Oct 27 10:09:43 testmonit postfix/qmgr[20436]: 4626B65B53: removed
Oct 27 10:09:43 testmonit postfix/pipe[20517]: 9F8F665B56:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=maildrop, delay=1, status=sent (test.biz)
Oct 27 10:09:43 testmonit postfix/qmgr[20436]: 9F8F665B56: removed
Thank you
Br
peter
a's and it comes from
history.
I only need to know what happened and who was sender and recipient,
similar like a mailq report
>From the qshape I can see only sender or recipient domains
Thanks
Br
peter
> > Hi
> >
> > I'd like to ask you if it is possible to somehow manage active queue
> >
> > For example from the qshape program I can see that there is some
> mails
> > in the active queue.
> >
> > How can I examine them or delete only special mails from the active
> > queue
> >
> > I cannot examin
> Jevos, Peter wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to ask you if it is possible to somehow manage active
> queue
> >>>
> >>> For example from the qshape program I can see that there is some
> >> mails
> >>&g
On 29/10/21 2:53 pm, Peter wrote:
On 28/10/21 9:39 pm, richard lucassen wrote:
Hello list,
Anyone here who wrote a shell script that deletes messages older than X
days from the hold queue?
It's just a one-liner with postqueue -j and a bit of perl:
postqueue -j | perl -MJSON -MData::D
r any help,
--
Peter
On Thu, Dec 16 2021, raf wrote:
> It's just a guess, but maybe the problem is ECDSA.
> If you add an RSA key as well, it might work.
Good guess, thank you! Now it works.
Cheers,
--
Peter
Can we get postscreen support in collate.pl? In other words have it
group postscreen log entries with the rest of the log entries for a
connection, or just show postscreen log entries when postscreen defers
the connection?
Peter Ajamian
Hi,
is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than
the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to
main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output of postconf
regardless of whether a reload/restart of the service was performed.
Peter
ph case or
"condor_config_val [daemon]" [1] in case of HTCondor.
Peter
[0] https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/configuration/ceph-conf/#commands
[1]
https://htcondor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/man-pages/condor_config_val.html
On 06.01.23 17:33, Wietse Venema wrote:
Peter Wienemann:
On 06.01.23 13:15, Wietse Venema wrote:
is there a way to dump the effective postfix configuration rather than
the one specified in main.cf/master.cf? It seems that changes to
main.cf/master.cf have an immediate impact on the output of
aster[58283]: reload -- version 3.5.17, configuration /etc/postfix
postfix/master[58283]: warning: service smtp: ignoring inet_interfaces
change
postfix/master[58283]: warning: to change inet_interfaces, stop and
start Postfix
---
Peter
Hi AllI finally found some information and I admit I am wondering how to get all the features I want working. I saw a response that suggested that recipient_restrictions will only work when the email goes through the smtpd daemon since the reject_unverified_recipient setting is found in the smtpd_r
Hi AllI am trying to figure out how to get this working. I run Mailman through Postfix. The Mailman aliases are in alias_maps. I find that when I set up a transport map in Postfix to have Postfix forward the emails through another email gateway, the aliases in alias_maps are bypassed so mailman wil
From: header and envelope sender and
re-signing with DKIM, only because I suspect that there are servers that
will enforce the DMARC policy but don't recognize ARC.
Peter
On 23/03/20 11:14 am, Peter wrote:
On 23/03/20 11:09 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:03:
I have zero interest in making your documentation "politically correct"
that is an agenda of evil wrapped in a delusion of not offending and this discussion could not possibly end soon enough.
On 2020-06-08 17:43:19, stse+post...@rootsland.net wrote:
On Mo, Jun 08, 2020 at 07:52:34 +0200, Cla
ject
Here's my 'make makefiles' command:
make makefiles shared=yes CCARGS='-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_TLS
-DDEF_SERVER_SASL_TYPE=\"dovecot\" -DOPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT -I/usr/local/include/sasl'
AUXLIBS="-lssl -lcrypto -L/usr/local/lib -lsasl2"
Thanks,
Peter
--
Peter Lindgren
On 2020-09-21 20.39, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 08:09:41PM +0200, Peter Lindgren wrote:
I build postfix 3.5.7 from source on OpenBSD 6.7. I seem to have problem
with the certificate I generated. They work fine with Dovecot, though.
If you're linking against LibreSSL
At 17 October, 2020 Demi M. Obenour wrote:
> > Postfix is not an HTTP server handling tens to hundreds of thousands of
> > requests
> > per second, and does not benefit from the optimisations needed for those
> > kinds
> > of workloads. Premature optimisations that sacrifice robustness and
>
At 26 October, 2020 Ron Wheeler wrote:
> If you are very old, you will remember when networking was young and e-mail
> was sent over dial-up connections that connected only once or twice a day.
> The email system has to deal with the historical world where connections
> where not "always on" so a
Hi AllI am having a problem with bad email address listings so I am trying to implement the recipient address verification. Below are the relevant settings in my main.cf file. I notice though that although there are no errors in my log file, I can't find a verify_cache.db file anywhere. How do I
tenticate with the
remote smtp server of my provider and I have not found a way to signal
that I am sending using my alternate identity.
Is there any way, I can have a setup equivalent to that in Thunderbird?
Authenticate using the main account name (main email address) but using
the alternate identity as origin?
Peter
On 05.03.21 13:47, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 05/03/2021 12:40, Peter White wrote:
...I tried using said alternate identity by using mutt an simply changing
the "From" header. It kind of works but seems to leak my real email
address, because the "Return-Path" still points
the email incase the receipt
certificate is untrusted or self signed?
Many thanks
Michael Peter
when
sending emails to them.
This makes me more confused..
Please advise your opinion..
Many thanks
Michael Peter
> Michael Peter:
>> This makes me more confused..
>> Please advise your opinion..
> Please post your configration as requested in the welcome message.
> wietse
I have posted my configuration as per your request.. and i summarize my
questions again as follow
I have
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 06:16:10PM +0300, Michael Peter wrote:
>
>> I have configured postfix to check CAfile which contains only Godaddy
>> root
>> certificate as follow for outgoing emails.
>>
>> smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/certs/go-daddy-root-ca.crt
>
> Wh
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 07:21:32PM +0300, Michael Peter wrote:
>
>> > What version of Postfix are you using?
>>
>> postfix/master[7500]: reload -- version 2.6.6, configuration
>> /etc/postfix
>
> That's nearly seven years old. When you enable th
is in the queue and it is OK to
Overwrite with a list of new adresses ?
Regards
Peter Sørensen/University of Southern Denmark
Email: mas...@sdu.dk
Hi,
Would it be possible to make a query from 2 tables in the mysql lookup
Specifying this in additional_conditions ?
Regards
Peter Sørensen/University of Southern Denmark
email: mas...@sdu.dk
question. I have seen than one of the attributes to get is
queue_id
I really would like that but my queue_id is of course empty in this state.
Is it possible to get the queue_id in an SMTPD access policy request ?
Best regards
Peter Sørensen/University of Southern Denmark
email: mas...@sdu.dk
I have followed various sets of instructions, most recently this one:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Postfix. As far as I can tell saslauthd is
working:
testsaslauthd -u testuser -p testpassword
0: OK "Success.”
Postgres, however, fails to authenticate the user:
Jun 14 10:44:38 fs1 postfix/s
Thanks for the extra pair of eyes. It was the typo in the smtp.conf file name
that was preventing it from working. All fixed now.
—
Regards,
Peter Farr
pe...@home4now.ca
On Jun 15, 2016, at 1:07 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> First off, note that your $Subject is wrong. You said "smtp
HI All
I am using postfix to perform LDAP lookups on an Active Directory Server.
My ldap-users is below. I have noticed that the samaccountname lookup is
case sensitive so that when a user sends an email, it creates a Maildir for
the recipient with the samaccountname of the user. How can I turn the
Thanks for helping me to understand the problem. I will work with saving
the sAMAccountName values in Active Directory in lower-case.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> > On Nov 7, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Peter Fraser
> wrote:
> >
> > I am using
il.com[88.198.11.51]:25: TLSv1.2 with cipher
ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)
What I'm doing wrong?
--
Best regards,
Peter Bauer
Linux & UNIX developper
ges about the root key being
expired,
// you will need to update your keys. See
https://www.isc.org/bind-keys
//
dnssec-enable yes;
dnssec-validation auto;
dnssec-lookaside auto;
Is it
--except-interface=lo --interface=lxcbr0
--dhcp-leasefile=/var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.lxcbr0.leases
--dhcp-authoritative
I will check how to change the configuration of the LXC DNS server
that it resolves too DNSSEC or I will update my /etc/resolve.conf file
on the LXC guest system to ask directly my bind s
trict e-mail systems.
Thank in advance for any tips.
--
Peter.
В Ср, 10/12/2014 в 14:35 -0500, Wietse Venema пишет:
> Peter Volkov:
> > We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from
> > tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does
> > that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as:
>
s: OOF
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
List-Id:
Thanks in advance for any help,
--
Peter.
Hi!
В Вт, 16/12/2014 в 01:28 +0100, li...@rhsoft.net пишет:
> Am 16.12.2014 um 01:14 schrieb Peter Volkov:
> > always_add_missing_headers = yes
> > was added in main.cf, restarted server and postconf reports it is there.
> > According to documentation
> > http://www.
Hi, Wietse!
В Пн, 15/12/2014 в 20:24 -0500, Wietse Venema пишет:
> Wietse Venema:
> > li...@rhsoft.net:
> > > Am 16.12.2014 um 01:52 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > > > Peter Volkov:
> > > >> always_add_missing_headers = yes
> > > >> was a
Hello,
I am in the process of decommissioning my own personal email server which
is running on an antiquated version of CentOS and an old version of Postfix
(2.3.3) to a Debian 7 server running Postfix 2.9.6.
I've got a tool for copying the IMAP mailboxes from the old server to the
new server.
W
I've added some RBL client entries in my main.cf such that:
--- excerpt
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.dronebl.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net ,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net
end of excerpt -
anyone know a guide of how to setup multiple email
> instances of postfix?
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html
Peter
outdated, littered with mis-conceptions
or just plain wrong. I recommend you use the official docs and if you
have any questions or need clarification feel free to ask on the mailing
list or in #postfix on freenode IRC.
Peter
tead of directly to me. There are
others on the list who can help you with this better than I can.
Peter
domain.com is bcc to "manger" but
all emails comes from subdomain ie (sub.domain.com) is not forwarded to
"manager"
how can we configure postix to sender_bcc emails from domain and its
subdomain as well ?
Any ideas?
Michael Peter
rver (when the
primary server was down) ? or still the secondary server can send the
pending emails to the primary server even if permit_mynetworks in not
written in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
Thanks
Michael Peter
:
Return-Path:
From:
Because it seems that some times the "from address" mentioned in the log
file is different that the from header which is actually in the email
itself.
Thank you.
Peter Michael
> On 6/16/2015 10:16 AM, Michael Peter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have couple of questions regarding the permit_mynetworks option.
>
> It's generally better to control the scope of mynetworks rather than
> removing permit_mynetworks. Rather than the entire netwo
> On 6/16/2015 10:21 AM, Michael Peter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have question about postfix logfile (/var/log/maillog), Does The log
>> mention the "from email header" or the "return-path email header" in the
>> log file ?
>>
>> Ju
> On 6/16/2015 11:53 AM, Michael Peter wrote:
>>> On 6/16/2015 10:21 AM, Michael Peter wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have question about postfix logfile (/var/log/maillog), Does The log
>>>> mention the "from email header" or th
emails during receiving of emails, so how
come bounces and failed delivered notices are received from other email
servers ?
The reason i am asking for that in order to block some spam attacks on our
email mail server that using empty email senders
Thank you
Peter Michael
Hi,
How can force postfix to reject emails from mail servers which doesn't
have a reverse dns entry ?
and is this correct thing to do according to the standards?
Thank you.
Michael Peter
is says that 2.6.0 means undelivered error...
So i am confused if DSN=2.6.0 means that the email is accepted without
problems? and why the receipt mail server is giving 2.6.0INSTEAD of 2.0.0
?? why receipt server would give DSN2.6.0 ?
I appreciate your feedback.
Thanks
Michael Peter
go through content filter, then go through transport
maps ? or in this case the email will go through content filter and ignore
transport maps ?
Thank you
Michael Peter
the email (rec...@example2.com) must be
included in the virtual access list of my server ? or the email will be
rejected.
Thank you
Peter Michael
connections (not outgoing) ?
Thanks
Peter Michael
Thank you very much for your reply, please find my comments below.
> Michael Peter:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ]
>> Hi,
>>
>> master.cf
>> smtp inet n - - - 100 smtpd
>>
>> I understand that the def
question is how long the time that the stress behaviour continue to be
activated after current processes connections has decreased than the max
process connections limit
I have read he documentations and searched alot but i couldn't find an
answer...
Thank you.
Michael Peter
=DORX
^
I suppose this should be changed to "lmtp", shouldn't it?
Best regards,
Peter
Or in main.cf (obsolescent feature):
lmtp_assume_final = yes
Do "postfix reload" after changing the configuration.
Don't mes
ian_c@localhost
treasu...@y.org.au ron_g@localhost
atl...@p.id.au p...@p.id.au
zot...@p.id.au p...@p.id.au
--
Peter West
p...@pbw.id.au
“Why do you seek the living among the dead? He is not here, but has risen!”
$ to what a coleague tells me :-) --> s*$ then no
> warning, but both lines are not triggered. If i check for REGEXP it should
> be indeed s*$ I guess. But then it fails to trigger…
If the lines are not triggered with the corrected regexp, then the regexp is
not matching.
--
Peter West
p...@pbw.id.au
“Do you believe at last?”
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
And from Google’s point of view, this spam-fighting service to the public might
even have the terrible consequence that Gmail be forced to accommodate even
more users. An awful result for Google.
Peter
> On 11 Jun 2017, at 6:35 pm, Peter wrote:
>
> On 11/06/17 19:01, Dominic Raf
stop as root prior to the make upgrade command.
The binaries are not replaced, and in the maillog postfix logs 3.3.0 when I
start using postfix start.
Any pointers on where to start looking?
Thanks,
Peter
--
Peter Lindgren, Kazoku IT AB, Vasagatan 43A, 411 37 Göteborg
+46-703 39 39 40
peter.lindg
Hi All
We had an auditor to an internal pentest for our network. The result for our
Postfix box was (My Words) Although your SMTP server prevents relay in some
circumstances, it still allows email from an empty domain. I am aware that the
empty domain <> is needed for bounce messages. Is there a
rds
SI
From: Noel Jones
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 12:26 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Increasing Internal security
On 5/15/2019 11:24 AM, Peter Fraser wrote:
> Hi All
>
> We had an auditor to an internal pentest for our network. The result
> for our Postfix
Hi All,
My apologies if I sent the wrong question but I need your help.
I am using perl + postgres in an app am writing. However I am failing to
find a function to escape characters just like you use addslashes in php.
Do I have to use a regex expression to do that or there is a function to
use.
My apologies, was meant for another list.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 07, 2009 at 18:56 CET,
> Otandeka Simon Peter wrote:
>
> > My apologies if I sent the wrong question but I need your help.
> >
> > I am using p
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:08:31PM +0200, John Adams wrote:
> >2. The scripts will send 'important' and 'less important' emails. If
> >script is programmed to send 'important' ones,the copy of email
> >must be sent to a separate account that will archive all sent emails
> >(automatically BCC or som
t would be
a bad thing.
Can somebody point me in the right direction and hopefully not screw
this up?
--
Peter L. Berghold, Australian Cattle Dog Owner, Agility Fan, Foodie,
Salty Old Dog and Old School Unix Hacker.
Skype: cowdawg
"Those who fail to learn from history are condemned to repeat it"
is "autoresponder.dk" and testing with autoreply on
pe...@r12.dk.
I see the two warnings, and fear that the warnings are the cause for no
"recipients" in yaa?
Can i configure postfix to send the proper headers?
Thanks,
Peter Hansen
w that, maybe this is yaa specific..
I cant see why the recipient is pe...@autoresponder.dk (fake tld)
instead of pe...@r12.dk (the real email)?
Any help is appreciated
/ Peter
Den 26-04-2011 11:36, Michael Tokarev skrev:
26.04.2011 13:28, Peter L. Hansen wrote:
Hi List,
Iam having t
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 09:14:54AM +0200, Finzel, Heiko wrote:
> Hi, I'm currently having some trouble setting up an alias for the root user
> on several Redhat machines.
>
> Although I the alias was set using newaliases and postalias and although
> postmap -q is telling me the alias is ok, post
601 - 700 of 905 matches
Mail list logo
