On 06.01.23 20:02, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 01:45:48PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:

Most changes in main.cf require a reload to become effective but there
are some exceptions requiring a restart, e. g. a change of
inet_interfaces.

That is incorrect. If inet_interfaces is changed, then a "postfix
reload" (not restart) is required because the master daemon is a
long-running process.

The documentation of inet_interfaces says otherwise, my recollection is
that master(8) does not attempt to rebind inet sockets on "reload":

     src/master/master_ent.c: /*
     src/master/master_ent.c:  * XXX We cannot change the inet_interfaces 
setting for a running master
     src/master/master_ent.c:  * process. Listening sockets are inherited by 
child processes so that
     src/master/master_ent.c:  * closing and reopening those sockets in the 
master does not work.
     src/master/master_ent.c:  *
     src/master/master_ent.c:  * Another problem is that library routines still 
cache results that are
     src/master/master_ent.c:  * based on the old inet_interfaces setting. It 
is too much trouble to
     src/master/master_ent.c:  * recompute everything.
     src/master/master_ent.c:  *
     src/master/master_ent.c:  * In order to keep our data structures 
consistent we ignore changes in
     src/master/master_ent.c:  * inet_interfaces settings, and issue a warning 
instead.
     src/master/master_ent.c:  */

If one really wants to change the IP address and/or number of listen
endpoints, a restart is required.

This also matches the warnings in the logs. After a reload following a change of inet_interfaces the logs contain the following warning:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
postfix/master[58283]: reload -- version 3.5.17, configuration /etc/postfix
postfix/master[58283]: warning: service smtp: ignoring inet_interfaces change postfix/master[58283]: warning: to change inet_interfaces, stop and start Postfix
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter

Reply via email to