And from Google’s point of view, this spam-fighting service to the public might even have the terrible consequence that Gmail be forced to accommodate even more users. An awful result for Google.
Peter > On 11 Jun 2017, at 6:35 pm, Peter <pe...@pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > > On 11/06/17 19:01, Dominic Raferd wrote: >> I certainly assumed the same when designing my system, which takes a >> range of measures to minimise such emails - both spam/virus blocking of >> its own, and reacting swiftly to any messages received back from Gmail. > > The thing you need to be aware of is that it is impossible for you to > actually stop all mail that google might consider SPAM. Even if you run > really strict SPAM filtering and you can find everything that google's > own filters would find, there is still the issue of the "Spam" button in > gmail. What can happen is a user may recognize a message that slipped > past your filters as SPAM and flag it, and then google would assume that > you're the source. An end user might flag legitimate ham as spam by > accident and they don't think much of it. Heck there are even users out > there that use the Spam button as a "delete" button! > > So at the end of the day, it doesn't matter how aggressive you are, > there is at least some chance that google will flag your server as a > source of SPAM. > > > Peter
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
