Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Alan Pevec's message of 2016-03-22 20:19:44 +0100: The release team discussed this at the summit and agreed that it didn't really matter. The only folks seeing the auto-generated versions are those doing CD from git, and they should not be mixing different

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] HowTo: Compose a local bundle file

Hi wangzhh, I've just sent to the review a draft of documentation about bundles. It can be found here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296929/ Plese, contact me if you have any questions. Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. Skype: dark_harlequine1 2016-03-24 2:24 GMT+03:

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] issue of ResourceGroup in Heat template

Rabi, Good point. I suppose, that the root cause of it is gap in our documentation. Unfortunately I can not find any clear description what's the differences or how it should work (especially with examples) in our documentation. [1] May be we need to improve it by adding more examples ? [1] htt

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Generate atomic images using diskimage-builder

Hi I have also been talking with diskimage-builder cores and they suggested we better start with the element on magnum. So I moved the change here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296719/ About diskimage-size, I'll dig a bit more on it. It can be for two causes: 1. To generate the fedora-atomi

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] OpenStack Trove meeting minutes (2016-03-23)

- Original Message - > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 07:52:10PM +, Amrith Kumar wrote: > > The meeting bot died during the meeting and therefore the logs on eavesdrop > > are useless. So I've had to get "Old-Fashioned-Logs(tm)". > > > > Action Items: > > > > #action [all] If you have a p

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] issue of ResourceGroup in Heat template

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:39:01AM -0400, Rabi Mishra wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:25:57PM +0300, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > > >Hello, > > >It looks similar on issue, which was discussed here [1] > > >I suppose, that the root cause is incorrect using get_attr for your > > >cas

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] issue of ResourceGroup in Heat template

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:05:17PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 23/03/16 13:35, Steven Hardy wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:25:57PM +0300, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > >>Hello, > >>It looks similar on issue, which was discussed here [1] > >>I suppose, that the root cause is incorrect

Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

Anita Kuno wrote: [...] So some items that have been raised thus far: - permissions: having a bot on gerrit with +2 +A is something we would like to avoid - "unsanctioned" bots (bots not in infra config files) in channels shared by multiple teams (meeting channels, the -dev channel) - forming a d

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Cinder-Nova API meeting

Hi All, As it was discussed several times on this mailing list there is room for improvements regarding the Cinder-Nova interaction. To fix these issues we would like to create a cross-project spec to capture the problems and ways to solve them. The current activity is captured on this etherpad

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] About snapshot Rollback?

Hi all: We are condering add a fucntion rollback_snapshot when we use backup. In the end user's scenario. If a vm fails, we hope that we can use snapshot to to recovery the volume's data. Beacuse it can quickly recovery our vm. But if we use the remote data to recovery. We will spend mor

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [vote] Managing bug backports to Mitaka branch

Hey Steve, Thanks for dropping this round - I was occupied during the meeting and wanted to be sure what I was asked to vote on! It seems like it's not a big deal after all, also considering it's standard practice it's a no brainer. +1 Cheers, -Paul On 24/03/16 03:55, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote

[openstack-dev] [chef] ec2-api cookbook

Hi, team! If you remember, we've created a cookbook for ec2-api service. After last discussion I’ve refactored it, have added specs. The final version is located on cloudscaling github: https://github.com/cloudscaling/cookbook-openstack-ec2. How do we proceed to integrate our cookbook to your pr

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Cross-repository testing

Hi all! We want to enable proper testing for Nailgun (fuel-web) extensions. We want to implement a script which will clone all required repos for test and actually run the tests. The script will be placed in openstack/fuel-web [0] repo and should work locally and also on openstack CI (gate jobs).

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Block subtractive schema changes

I think this makes sense (helps us spot things which could impact upgrade). Hi Glance Team, I have registered a blueprint [1] for blocking subtractive schema changes. Cinder and Nova are already supporting blocking of subtractive schema operations. Would like to add similar support here. Ple

Re: [openstack-dev] Launch of an instance from a bootable volume fails on Xen env

Hi, Has this been resolved? Is anyone working on this issue? I had traced down the effect and found a possible solution, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1560965 If you're just trying to start via Horizon, changing /srv/www/openstack-dashboard/openstack_dashboard/dashboards/proj

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Wiping node's disks on delete

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: > > I have no objections against clearing bios boot partition, but could > you describe scenario, how non-efi system will boot with valid > BIOS_grub and wiped boot code in MBR > I thoroughly agree that it's impossible to boot without stag

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] proactive backporting

On 03/23/2016 05:52 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hey folks, > > some update on proactive backporting for neutron, and a call for action > from subteam leaders. > > As you probably know, lately we started to backport a lot of bug fixes > in latest stable branch (liberty atm) + became more system

Re: [openstack-dev] [jacket] Introduction to jacket, a new project

Hi Ghanshyam, Thank you for your sugesstions, and I agree with your opinion that the service outside OpenStack is better. In fact I am considering what API Jacket will offer. It is better to offer the OpenStack API directly. But there will be a question how to modify as little code as possible

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Block subtractive schema changes

On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 10:45 +, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: > I think this makes sense (helps us spot things which could impact upgrade). > > >Hi Glance Team, > > > >I have registered a blueprint [1] for blocking subtractive schema changes. > >Cinder and Nova are already supporting blocking of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Block subtractive schema changes

On 24/03/16 05:42 +, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: Hi Glance Team, I have registered a blueprint [1] for blocking subtractive schema changes. Cinder and Nova are already supporting blocking of subtractive schema operations. Would like to add similar support here. Please let me know your opin

Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

Thanks for the posting because it tells me that there is a way to have bots contributed to infra (which I didn't know). I have experimented with some bots, mostly against gerrit and trying to use the rather lightweight Launchpad API. The one bot that I still operate looks at gerrit and periodic

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova] Messaging: everything can talk to everything, and that is a bad thing

On 22/03/16 17:20 -0400, Adam Young wrote: On 03/22/2016 09:15 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 21/03/16 21:43 -0400, Adam Young wrote: I had a good discussion with the Nova folks in IRC today. My goal was to understand what could talk to what, and the short according to da

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

2016-03-24 2:21 GMT+01:00 Robert Collins : > Trunk will rapidly exceed mitaka's versions, leading to no confusion too. That's the case now, RC1 tags are reachable from both branches and master has more patches, generating higher .devN part. But once RC2 and final tags are pushed, generated version

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova][stable][sr-iov] Status of physical_device_mappings

> -Original Message- > From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:01 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova][stable][sr-iov] Status of > physical_device_mappings > > +tags for stable and nova > > Hi V

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Block subtractive schema changes

-Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: 24 March 2016 17:21 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Block subtractive schema changes On 24/03/16 05:42 +, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: >Hi Glanc

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] proactive backporting

Rossella Sblendido wrote: On 03/23/2016 05:52 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hey folks, some update on proactive backporting for neutron, and a call for action from subteam leaders. As you probably know, lately we started to backport a lot of bug fixes in latest stable branch (liberty atm) + b

[openstack-dev] Extending API via Plugins

Hi wangzhh, we had several discussions about having plugins for API, for example we could branch CF Broker API to the plugin instead of having it as part of murano. Unfortunately we didn't found many use-cases at that time, so we didn't proceed further from just talking about that. Can you share

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro

- Original Message - > From: "Kai Qiang Wu" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 10:54:13 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting > single/multiple OS distro > > HI Steve, > > Some points to

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Generate atomic images usingdiskimage-builder

- Original Message - > From: "Kai Qiang Wu" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:10:30 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Generate atomic images > usingdiskimage-builder > > 1) ＋1 diskimage-builder maybe

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] Fwd: Fedora Atomic Two Week Delayed

Just an FYI for folks trying to follow the two-weekly Fedora Atomic update cycle. -Steve - Forwarded Message - > From: "Adam Miller" > To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" , > rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org, > atomic-de...@projectatomic.io, atomic-annou...@projectatomic.io > Sent: Wednesday, March

Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

On 23/03/16 16:27 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: Bots are very handy for doing repetitive tasks, we agree on that. Bots also require permissions to execute certain actions, require maintenance to ensure they operate as expected and do create output which is music to some and noise to others. Said outp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][heat] Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Doug Wiegley > wrote: >> Migration script has been submitted, v1 is not going anywhere from >> stable/liberty or stable/mitaka, so it’s about to disappear from master. >> >> I’m thinking in this order: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

Excerpts from Ihar Hrachyshka's message of 2016-03-24 08:44:35 +0100: > Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from Alan Pevec's message of 2016-03-22 20:19:44 +0100: > >>> The release team discussed this at the summit and agreed that it didn't > >>> really matter. The only folks seeing the auto-g

[openstack-dev] [nova] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

We have another mitaka-rc-potential bug [1] due to a regression when detaching SR-IOV interfaces in the libvirt driver. There were two NFV CIs that ran on the original change [2]. Both failed with the same devstack setup error [3][4]. So it sucks that we have a regression, it sucks that no one

Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2016-03-24 09:12:36 -0400: > On 23/03/16 16:27 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: > >Bots are very handy for doing repetitive tasks, we agree on that. > > > >Bots also require permissions to execute certain actions, require > >maintenance to ensure they operate as ex

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Update domain network xml on live migration

Hi, On Live Migration, I want to update the domain.xml with the required network interface definition for the target node. For code, please see the prototype [2] I'm reaching our for feedback about the right way to implement this! Use Cases/Problem: = #1 Live Migration with Neut

[openstack-dev] [containers][horizon][magnum-ui] - Stable version for Liberty?

Hi all, I have a question about magnum-ui plugin for Horizon. I see that there is a tarball for Stable/Liberty version, but it is very simple, just Index views, any "create" action. But I see a lot of work in master branch for this project, but is not compatible with Horizon Liberty. My questi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Cross-repository testing

On 2016-03-24 11:44:16 +0100 (+0100), Sylwester Brzeczkowski wrote: > We want to enable proper testing for Nailgun (fuel-web) extensions. We want > to implement a script which will clone all required repos for test and > actually run the tests. > > The script will be placed in openstack/fuel-web [

Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

> -Original Message- > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:13 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other > > On 23/03/16 16:27 -0400, Anita

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] issue of ResourceGroup in Heat template

On 24/03/16 01:39, Rabi Mishra wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:25:57PM +0300, Sergey Kraynev wrote: Hello, It looks similar on issue, which was discussed here [1] I suppose, that the root cause is incorrect using get_attr for your case. Probably you got "list" instead of "

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:22:34PM -0700, melanie witt wrote: > On Mar 23, 2016, at 16:56, melanie witt wrote: > > > I may have found a workaround for the scroll jumping after reading through > > the upstream issue comments [1]: use the "Slow" setting in the preferences > > for Render. Click th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][heat] Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

> -Original Message- > From: Assaf Muller [mailto:as...@redhat.com] > Sent: March-24-16 9:24 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][heat] Removing LBaaS v1 - > are weready? > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Cinder-Nova API meeting

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:01:28AM +, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: > Hi All, > > As it was discussed several times on this mailing list there is room for > improvements regarding the Cinder-Nova interaction. To fix these issues we > would like to create a cross-project spec to capture the problems a

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] issue of ResourceGroup in Heat template

On 24/03/16 04:29, Steven Hardy wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:39:01AM -0400, Rabi Mishra wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:25:57PM +0300, Sergey Kraynev wrote: Hello, It looks similar on issue, which was discussed here [1] I suppose, that the root cause is incorrect using get_at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][heat] Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

> On Mar 24, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Assaf Muller [mailto:as...@redhat.com] >> Sent: March-24-16 9:24 AM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][heat] Removing

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Issue with validation and preview due to get_attr==None

Zane, I like you idea. As example we may discuss some steps for it during summit session (if it need). Also I have another question, which probably came in your heads a lot of times: Can we somekind improve our existing approach for validation? we do validation twice - before create and during it.

[openstack-dev] [StoryBoard] A few new things StoryBoard does these days

Hi, all, We've been working on StoryBoard (https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/dashboard/stories) for a while, but haven't really updated the list; here's a roundup. New things in storyboard over the last few months: Notification: * storyboard.openstack.org sends email notifications! Final

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:37:52AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/14/2016 10:24 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Davanum Srinivas > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > > > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50 > > To:

Re: [openstack-dev] Deleting a cluster in Sahara SQL/PyMYSQL Error

Id recommend filing a bug in Launchpad against Sahara for that. Can you reproduce it ? On 03/23/2016 07:10 PM, Jerico Revote wrote: Hello, When trying to delete a cluster in sahara, I'm getting the following error: code 500 and message 'Internal Server Error' 2016-03-23 17:25:21.651 18827

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] OpenVSwitch support

Hi, I'm in the process of building OPNFV style labs [1]. I'd prefer to manage these labs with openstack-ansible, but I will need things like OpenVSwitch. I know there was talk of supporting OVS in some fashion [2] but I'm wondering what the current status or thinking is. If it's desirable by the

[openstack-dev] [release][all][ptl][stable] requirements updates in stable/mitaka libraries

We have branched the openstack/requirements repository as the first step to unfreezing requirements changes in master. Creating the branch triggered the requirements update bot to propose changes to repositories with stable/mitaka branches that were out of sync relative to the point where we branch

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] OpenVSwitch support

I believe the OVS bits are being worked on, however I don't remember by whom and I don't know the current state of the work. Personally, I'd welcome the addition of other neutron plugin options and if you have time to work on any of those bits I'd be happy to help out where I can and review the

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] OpenVSwitch support

Michael Gugino and I were going to work on OVS and I believe we both got sidetracked. I¹ll echo Kevin¹s offer to help out where possible, but at the moment, I¹ve been tied up with other items. On 3/24/16, 11:55 AM, "Kevin Carter" wrote: >I believe the OVS bits are being worked on, however I don'

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

> So, if Delorean includes packages built from untagged commits in Nit clarification: let's call it RDO Trunk repository (Delorean is a tool, recently renamed https://github.com/openstack-packages/dlrn ) > multiple branches, placed in the same package repository where an > automated installation

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

Hi Zago, On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Zaro wrote: > There is a new web and android interface that's being developed by > guys at Google however it's not available on our version of Gerrit. I > think it probably won't be ready until Gerrit ver 2.13+ > > web interface (polymer+gerrit = polyg

Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

On 24/03/16 09:42 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2016-03-24 09:12:36 -0400: On 23/03/16 16:27 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: >Bots are very handy for doing repetitive tasks, we agree on that. > >Bots also require permissions to execute certain actions, require >m

[openstack-dev] [nova] NUMA + SR-IOV

Hi, folks. I want to start a discussion about NUMA + SR-IOV environment. I have a two-sockets server. It has two NUMA nodes and only one SR-IOV PCI device. This device is associated with the first NUMA node. I booted a set of VMs with SR-IOV support. Each of these VMs was booted on the first NUMA

Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

On 24/03/16 14:28 +, Amrith Kumar wrote: -Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:13 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

[openstack-dev] [nova] No spec approvals for new things until after the summit

This was discussed in the nova meeting today [1] but I need to make everyone aware of it here too. There will be no spec approvals for *new* things until after the summit. We've been carrying a large backlog of specs/blueprints/priorities for several releases now and need to start flushing som

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] NUMA + SR-IOV

On 03/24/2016 04:18 PM, Sergey Nikitin wrote: > > Hi, folks. > > I want to start a discussion about NUMA + SR-IOV environment. I have a > two-sockets server. It has two NUMA nodes and only one SR-IOV PCI > device. This device is associated with the first NUMA node. I booted a > set of VMs with SR

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] nova-specs review tracking etherpad

On 3/23/2016 4:14 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: I've started an etherpad [1] similar to what we had in mitaka. There are some useful review links in the top for open reviews and fast-approve re-proposals. I'm also trying to keep a list of how many things we're re-approving since that's our backlog

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] OpenVSwitch support

OK thanks everyone. I will put on my learnening hat and start digging into this. Thanks, Curtis. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Truman, Travis wrote: > Michael Gugino and I were going to work on OVS and I believe we both got > sidetracked. I¹ll echo Kevin¹s offer to help out where possible, b

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] NUMA + SR-IOV

> -Original Message- > From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 4:34 PM > To: Sergey Nikitin ; OpenStack Development Mailing > List (not for usage questions) > Cc: Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] NUMA + SR-IOV > > O

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Mitaka RC2 available

Due to release-critical issues spotted in Nova during RC1 testing, a new release candidate was created for Mitaka. You can find the RC2 source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/nova/nova-13.0.0.0rc2.tar.gz Unless new release-critical issues are found that warrant a last-minute re

[openstack-dev] [cinder][openstackclient] Required name option for volumes, snapshots and backups

Hi team, >From the Cinder point of view, both volumes, snapshots and backups APIs do not require name param. But python-openstackclient requires name param for these entities. I'm going to fix this inconsistency with patch [1]. Unfortunately, it's a bit more than changing required params to not r

Re: [openstack-dev] [containers][horizon][magnum-ui] - Stable version for Liberty?

Marcos, Great question. The current intent is to backport security fixes and critical bugs, and to focus on master for new feature development. Although we would love to expand scope to backport functionality, I’m not sure it’s realistic without an increased level of commitment from that group

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Alan Pevec wrote: Another example (not release:managed project but still) where we have this confusion is gnocchi: openstack/gnocchi > master $ python ./setup.py --version 2.0.1.dev61 openstack/gnocchi > stable/2.0 $ python ./setup.py --version 2.0.3.dev13 Sorry, I've neve

Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] ec2-api cookbook

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Anastasia Kravets wrote: > Hi, team! > > If you remember, we've created a cookbook for ec2-api service. After last > discussion I’ve refactored it, have added specs. > The final version is located on cloudscaling github: > https://github.com/cloudscaling/cookbook-

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

Excerpts from Alan Pevec's message of 2016-03-24 17:06:54 +0100: > > So, if Delorean includes packages built from untagged commits in > > Nit clarification: let's call it RDO Trunk repository (Delorean is a > tool, recently renamed https://github.com/openstack-packages/dlrn ) OK. > > > multiple

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-03-24 17:25:33 +: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Alan Pevec wrote: > > > Another example (not release:managed project but still) where we have > > this confusion is gnocchi: > > openstack/gnocchi > master $ python ./setup.py --version > > 2.0.1.dev61 > > open

Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] ec2-api cookbook

Samuel, Could you detail when your IRC meeting is, [1] indicates it's on Tuesdays. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/EC2API Regards Ronald On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Anastasia Kravets > wrote: > >> Hi, team! >> >> If

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Doug Hellmann wrote: [good explanation snipped] Thanks for the detailed explanation. As with so many of these bits of automation they come with a variety of compromises. After a while it starts to seem like maintaining those compromises becomes as important as solving the o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Push Type Driver implementation

I tried the doctorDriver again. This time I was successful! I'm still getting an error when listing the datasources though. I tried updating and installing my client, but no change. // Create the datasource $ openstack congress datasource create doctor doctor +-+

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-03-24 18:25:10 +: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > [good explanation snipped] > > Thanks for the detailed explanation. > > As with so many of these bits of automation they come with a variety > of compromises. After a while it starts

Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] ec2-api cookbook

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Ronald Bradford wrote: > Samuel, > > Could you detail when your IRC meeting is, [1] indicates it's on Tuesdays. > > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/EC2API > > Regards > > Ronald > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > >> On Thu

[openstack-dev] [QA] Request for design session ideas of Austin Summit

Hi We have a Design Summit next month, and now we are trying to get ideas for QA sessions. There is an etherpad for ideas and it is great if writing your ideas on the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-qa-summit-topics After getting ideas, we will arrange them into available slots

Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] ec2-api cookbook

Yes, I’ll try my best to join you this Monday! Thanks, Anastasia > On 24 Mar 2016, at 20:36, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Anastasia Kravets > wrote: > Hi, team! > > If you remember, we've created a cookbook for ec2-api service. After l

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Newton is open!

Hi Ironickers, We've successfully released ironic and all of its subprojects, and cut the stable/mitaka branch for those. Newton is now open for development! As a reminder, please propose sessions for the Austin summit here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-newton-summit And I've started

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Newton is open!

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:03:34PM -0700, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi Ironickers, > > We've successfully released ironic and all of its subprojects, and cut > the stable/mitaka branch for those. > > Newton is now open for development! > > As a reminder, please propose sessions for the Austin sum

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

Hey all, I'm nominating Julia Kreger (TheJulia in IRC) for ironic-core. She runs the Bifrost project, gives super valuable reviews, is beginning to lead the boot from volume efforts, and is clearly an expert in this space. All in favor say +1 :) // jim __

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

On 25 March 2016 at 01:11, Alan Pevec wrote: > 2016-03-24 2:21 GMT+01:00 Robert Collins : >> Trunk will rapidly exceed mitaka's versions, leading to no confusion too. > > That's the case now, RC1 tags are reachable from both branches and > master has more patches, generating higher .devN part. But

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

  -Original Message- From: Robert Collins Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: March 23, 2016 at 20:20:30 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

On 25 March 2016 at 07:25, Chris Dent wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > [good explanation snipped] > > Thanks for the detailed explanation. > > As with so many of these bits of automation they come with a variety > of compromises. After a while it starts to seem like maintaini

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

On 25 March 2016 at 08:23, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > Right I'm not convinced it's more than the ~15 or 20 of us that work on OSA > and care about upgrading and catching regressions early. However, Doug and I just uncovered a concern on IRC: having PyPI be ahead of master for more than very short

[openstack-dev] [puppet] puppet-trove remove templated guestagent.conf

Right now puppet-trove can configure guestagent.conf in two ways. First via config options in the guestagent class and second via a templated file that taskmanager.pp handles by default [1]. I'd like to drop this behavior, but it's not backwards compatible so would like to discuss. First the templ

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

Big +1 from /me. Juila will be a great addition to the team. -Chris On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm nominating Julia Kreger (TheJulia in IRC) for ironic-core. She runs > the Bifrost project, gives super valuable reviews, is beginning to lead > the boo

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][all][ptl][stable] requirements updates in stable/mitaka libraries

I think this is reasonable to do; we may need to follow up on this depending on the result of the other thread about version mgmt-after-a-branch. -Rob On 25 March 2016 at 04:05, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We have branched the openstack/requirements repository as the first > step to unfreezing requir

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Component Leads Elections

Hi folks, I'd like to announce that we're running the Component Leads elections. Detailed information is available on wiki [0]. Component Lead: defines architecture of a particular module or component in Fuel, resolves technical disputes in their area of responsibility. All design specs that impa

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

I've worked with Julia on bifrost and she is amazing. She also was very helpful on debugging Ironic problems, and she has extensive knowledge of the system. Big +1 from me El 24/03/16 a las 20:34, Chris K escribió: Big +1 from /me. Juila will be a great addition to the team. -Chris On Thu, M

Re: [openstack-dev] [containers][horizon][magnum-ui] - Stable version for Liberty?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:17:09PM +, Adrian Otto wrote: > Marcos, > > Great question. The current intent is to backport security fixes and critical > bugs, and to focus on master for new feature development. Although we would > love to expand scope to backport functionality, I’m not sure it

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

On 2016-03-24 21:11:06 +0100 (+0100), Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: > I've worked with Julia on bifrost and she is amazing. She also was very > helpful on debugging Ironic problems, and she has extensive knowledge of the > system. > Big +1 from me Also, she's been a great source of Ironic knowledge we

Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:56:16AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Anita Kuno wrote: > >[...] > >So some items that have been raised thus far: > >- permissions: having a bot on gerrit with +2 +A is something we would > >like to avoid > >- "unsanctioned" bots (bots not in infra config files) in chann

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

+1 for me. Julia has been an awesome resource and person in the Ironic community :) John -Original Message- From: Jim Rollenhagen [mailto:j...@jimrollenhagen.com] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 12:09 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Juli

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Let's turn the question around: Why do you (or anyone) want to > package things that are not tagged as releasable by the contributors > creating them? What are those packages used for? I know Ubuntu provides similar trunk repositories [1] bu

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:02:47PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-03-23 14:46:16 -0700: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:14:35AM +1000, Lana Brindley wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > > > Hi Mike, and sorry I mis

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Component Leads Elections

Serg, Thanks for agreeing to officiate this cycle's component lead elections for us! -- Dmitry Borodaenko On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:55:57PM -0700, Serg Melikyan wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to announce that we're running the Component Leads elections. > Detailed information is available o

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

On 2016-03-25 08:28:16 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote: > However, Doug and I just uncovered a concern on IRC: having PyPI be > ahead of master for more than very short periods seems like a poor > idea. > > When we tag a final release on a branch, without master being higher > than that final

[openstack-dev] [kite] Seeking core reviewers

As part of the initiative to replace all legacy Oslo Incubator code in OpenStack with graduate libraries we are working through all projects. I have been unable to find any IRC contact information on the wiki or kite-core group in order to help with several reviews [1] for the project. Any assista

Re: [openstack-dev] [kite] Seeking core reviewers

-Original Message- From: Ronald Bradford Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: March 24, 2016 at 16:16:22 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:  [openstack-dev] [kite] Seeking core reviewers > As part of the initi

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after RC WAS Re: How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

  -Original Message- From: Jeremy Stanley Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: March 24, 2016 at 16:15:38 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [release] [pbr] semver on master branches after

  1   2   >