On 25 March 2016 at 08:23, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> wrote: >
> Right I'm not convinced it's more than the ~15 or 20 of us that work on OSA > and care about upgrading and catching regressions early. However, Doug and I just uncovered a concern on IRC: having PyPI be ahead of master for more than very short periods seems like a poor idea. When we tag a final release on a branch, without master being higher than that final release, folk running things installed from master, will now be 'upgradable' to whats on PyPI, even though thats older from a human perspective. So, I think we do need some aggressive means to bump master up past the versions reserved for a stable branch, at the stable branches creation. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hpe.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev