On 25 March 2016 at 08:23, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> Right I'm not convinced it's more than the ~15 or 20 of us that work on OSA 
> and care about upgrading and catching regressions early.

However, Doug and I just uncovered a concern on IRC: having PyPI be
ahead of master for more than very short periods seems like a poor
idea.

When we tag a final release on a branch, without master being higher
than that final release, folk running things installed from master,
will now be 'upgradable' to whats on PyPI, even though thats older
from a human perspective.

So, I think we do need some aggressive means to bump master up past
the versions reserved for a stable branch, at the stable branches
creation.

-Rob



-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hpe.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to