> The above quoting is all I can see of your problem.
>
> I have no idea how to try to help.
>
> (web fora are not useful discussion tools.)
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
you mean you can't see all th
On 7/14/05, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
> Absolutely - couldn't agree more. From a JDS point of view, we're very
> aware of the discussions going on, although we may not have been the
> most active or vocal over the last couple of months.
>
> We've got a team going inside Sun to
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
2) utilities should only be written (enhanced) to the long options part
of the CLIP specification in "logical groups". (i.e., a group of
related utilities should be consistent in their use or non-use of long
options).
Or in their use of other option syntaxes, like the
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, John Martinez wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Sunil wrote:
>
> > have you considered providing gnu like long options and/or
> > compatibility for star? it will be perfect if there was only one
> > tar utility and all gnu programs with gnu options for /usr/bin/tar
> > do
I try to blank this dvd+rw created in XP and it refused to blank it with these
errors:
--
scsidev: '2,1,0'
scsibus: 2 target: 1 lun: 0
Warning: Using USCSI interface.
Warning: Volume management is running, medialess managed drives are invisible.
SCSI buffer size: 57344
Cdrecord-Pro
Sunil wrote:
Ok, I ruled out the fat32 by moving the distfiles to "/". I get the same
symptoms still.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The above quoting is all I can see
Jörg Schilling wrote:
> The main features of GNU tar is compliance problems.
> I recommend to avoid GNU tar whereever possible.
>
> You cannot replace /usr/bin/tar with a program that
> does not implement
> the features os /usr/bin/tar without creating hard to
> track down problems.
You're righ
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 20:40, John Martinez wrote:
> Am I the only one that doesn't like the --something-or-other options
> of GNU related software? Please don't do this to Solaris!
A couple years ago we had a very long, very painful discussion about
this topic under the name of "CLIP".
Opinions
i will openly admit: i have a strong bias towards the Sun compilers,
and i am not ashamed. :-)
for a very simple reason: they generate faster code, both on
UltraSPARC and on AMD, especially SunStudio 10. and they track the
language Standard much more closely, and they force you to write
portable co
Ok, I ruled out the fat32 by moving the distfiles to "/". I get the same
symptoms still.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 7/14/05, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
> Absolutely - couldn't agree more. From a JDS point of view, we're very
> aware of the discussions going on, although we may not have been the
> most active or vocal over the last couple of months.
>
> We've got a team going inside Sun to
On Jul 14, 2005, at 9:51 PM, Rich Teer wrote:
John wrote:
Am I the only one that doesn't like the --something-or-other options
of GNU related software? Please don't do this to Solaris!
No, you're not alone!
What's worse than adding double hyphened long options? Also require
no hyphen
thanks shawn! yes, all the options worth supporting (and which create problems
with sun's /usr/sbin/tar) are already there. Now only if there are aliases for
"-bz" -> "-j", "-o" -> "--no-same-owner". I think this program is perfect.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
John wrote:
> Am I the only one that doesn't like the --something-or-other options
> of GNU related software? Please don't do this to Solaris!
No, you're not alone!
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group
On 7/14/05, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So we probably need to think what infrastructure we can share, and what
> > it makes sense to split out. For example, I think there's a huge amount
> > of value in having a [EMAIL PROTECTED], but may make sense
> > to have jds/gnome-discuss an
On 7/14/05, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Last time i built DBUS (about 9 months ago or so), it sort of worked,
> > emphasis on "sort of". AFACS, HAL is in a pretty incipient stage, and,
> > to my knowledge, there's been very little (if any) Solaris work done.
> > there's a big empty
Hey,
> So we probably need to think what infrastructure we can share, and what
> it makes sense to split out. For example, I think there's a huge amount
> of value in having a [EMAIL PROTECTED], but may make sense
> to have jds/gnome-discuss and kde-discuss.
Point being, I'd much rather see us a
Hey,
> http://www.freedesktop.org/
>
> They are trying to define and implement a common infrastructure for
> UNIX desktops (DBUS and HAL are just some of them, there's an entire
> list there).
>
> How about we start looking at this, because both GNOME and KDE4 will
> implement this architecture
> Am I the only one that doesn't like the
> --something-or-other options
> of GNU related software? Please don't do this to
> Solaris!
I am going to flip here...nobody is doing this to Solaris, but to distros that
come out of OS...:)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Hi.
http://www.freedesktop.org/
They are trying to define and implement a common infrastructure for
UNIX desktops (DBUS and HAL are just some of them, there's an entire
list there).
How about we start looking at this, because both GNOME and KDE4 will
implement this architecture (or so it is plan
On 7/14/05, Sunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> have you considered providing gnu like long options and/or compatibility for
> star? it will be perfect if there was only one tar utility and all gnu
> programs with gnu options for /usr/bin/tar don't just die on solaris.
>
> I can try doing this ma
On Jul 14, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Sunil wrote:
have you considered providing gnu like long options and/or
compatibility for star? it will be perfect if there was only one
tar utility and all gnu programs with gnu options for /usr/bin/tar
don't just die on solaris.
I can try doing this mapping
have you considered providing gnu like long options and/or compatibility for
star? it will be perfect if there was only one tar utility and all gnu programs
with gnu options for /usr/bin/tar don't just die on solaris.
I can try doing this mapping if you point me to source of star.
This message p
On 7/14/05, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/14/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The main features of GNU tar is compliance problems.
> > I recommend to avoid GNU tar whereever possible.
> >
> > You cannot replace /usr/bin/tar with a program that does not implement
>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:39:13AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> It seems that there are two basic "reasons":
>
> - Sun CC as well as GNU CC heavily use built in functions
> for floating point support. Of course these builtins are
> incompatible :-(
Some of these are for C99 s
On 7/14/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main features of GNU tar is compliance problems.
> I recommend to avoid GNU tar whereever possible.
>
> You cannot replace /usr/bin/tar with a program that does not implement
> the features os /usr/bin/tar without creating hard to track
On 7/14/05, Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn wrote:
> > ... I see a similar trend in Linux attempting to be birthed even now:
> > http://www.componentizedlinux.org/. The idea of a similar project
> > being birthed for OpenSolaris is an exciting thing to me...
>
> I second that, bi
Jake Hamby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another symlink that we might discuss changing is /usr/bin/tar to point to
> /usr/sfw/bin/gtar instead of /usr/sbin/tar. The main feature of GNU tar not
> present in Solaris tar is built-in support for .tar.gz and .tar.bz2 archives
> using the -z and -j
Seongbae Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >It is currently impossible to create a 100% Sun compatible libm.
>
> Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why?
>
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > libm not only depends on ANSI C-99 but on undocumented hidden
> > behavior
In recent messages, James Dickens and Shawn Walker wrote about the need
to cooperatively create a standards base that all groups can agree on
and can build on.
Shawn wrote:
> ... I see a similar trend in Linux attempting to be birthed even now:
> http://www.componentizedlinux.org/. The idea of a s
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please give a full reference.
> >
> > POSIX.
>
> That isn't a full reference with version number, but it was enough
> to get me started.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/make.html
> > Well in contraty to GNU make, Sun make
Mainly, it as to do with availability of
libraries/headers on Solaris
This might be a good time to kick off an "ARC-like" discussion of how
sharable things - such as reusable FOSS components - *should* be structured
to allow for maximal reuse at minimal effort and risk.
It is also a good time
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:26:17PM -0700, Jake Hamby wrote:
> are enabled). While you may argue that Linux developers are at
> fault for using bash-specific features in their scripts, it's like
I wouldn't argue it, because it's a fact. It's fine for Linux to
assume GNU features in /bin/sh. It'
Danek Duvall wrote:
> > I vote for changing the default shell to a better
> one.
>
> Ah, but then the question is, which one. You might
> choose ksh over bash
> for various reasons, others might prefer tcsh, and
> some of us know that zsh
> is the One True Shell. If nothing else, the bourne
> s
I agree with Shawn's observation that documentation should live wherever
it is useful. I may not have been clear about that in my initial
suggestion. I just think it would also be good to have a location where
people can go and scan an index of all of the documenatation on the
site. As I've tho
1. Is 'synsys' in /etc/nodename and /etc/hosts mis-typed ? Should be 'sunsys', right?
2. Post 'ifconfig -a' output
3. Can you ping your router and DNS IP?
ping 192.168.0.1
ping 205.252.144.126
4. Any other machine with different OS on the same network that is able to access internet?
If
I have the following configuration and files setting, but cannot access internet
Anyone can help me to solve?
Server Name = sunsys
Domain Name = home.com
TCP/IP address = 192.168.0.3
Router IP = 192.168.0.1
IP Range = 192.168.0.2 至 192.168.0.51
DNS IP = 205.252.144.126, 205.252.144.118
under /etc
Joerg Schilling wrote:
It is currently impossible to create a 100% Sun compatible libm.
Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why?
Joerg Schilling wrote:
libm not only depends on ANSI C-99 but on undocumented hidden
behavior of Studio 10.
Can you report them to us (via some wiki p
I got hold of iosnoop and invoked it with -v right after I started the song and
invoked untar of mozilla. There was a time I noted when ogg123 hung for nearly
5 seconds by simply using date commands. I took that timestamp and grepped in
iosnoop log. Here is a snippet of iosnoop output around tha
Joerg Schilling wrote:
It looks like to did not understand the problem.
SchilliX is already more than OpenSolaris, but the problem is SX. If the test
machines are installed with SX, they have too much software installed in order
to make expressive tests for OpenSolaris.
Tests that are only ba
On Thursday 14 July 2005 12:38, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> I just bought a Turion based laptop, HP ze2000e. Will try to install
> Solaris sometime next week. Has anyone had any experience with this
> machine? Any info will be greatly appreciated.
Should work, I would definitely get the latest buil
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 13:21, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:29, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > Smake warns about all illegal Makefile content. If you dowmload the latest
> >
> > illegal according to which standard document and versi
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Jim Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The build/test farm would be available to OpenSolaris developers, and will
provide access to various high-end and low-end Sparc, x64 and other
hardware platforms. We plan on making it better than what's currently
available elsewhere,
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:29, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Smake warns about all illegal Makefile content. If you dowmload the latest
>
> illegal according to which standard document and version ?
>
> Please give a full reference.
POSIX.
Well in contraty
On 7/14/05, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/14/05, ken mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> James,>> A good point you helped bring up is the repository of> the source code for Solaris/OpenSolaris in which all
> of the package maintainers can share - instead of> everyone (i.e. the Solaris/
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:29, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Smake warns about all illegal Makefile content. If you dowmload the latest
illegal according to which standard document and version ?
Please give a full reference.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolar
Sales of AMD's Opteron chips increased by a whopping 90%:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24624
Sr. Scott made a big bet on the Opteron chips b/4 Opteron was cool. Looks like
his company may get handsomely rewarded. Let's hope JDS on Solaris will have
the same kind of success on the Turio
On 7/14/05, ken mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James,
>
> A good point you helped bring up is the repository of
> the source code for Solaris/OpenSolaris in which all
> of the package maintainers can share - instead of
> everyone (i.e. the Solaris/OpenSolaris package
> providers) having their o
On 7/14/05, ken mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 7/14/05, ken mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >
> >> >> > --- Joerg Schilling> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > wrote:> >> > >> > > I hope that this short review will help to
> > > understand the problems of us>
On 7/14/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think I understand somewhat, but only because of assumptions. The
> > thing is, you already know all of the problems, so wouldn't it be
> > better for the community if you posted what they where s
Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 09:36:25PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > It is currently impossible to create a 100% Sun compatible libm.
>
> Why?
libm not only depends on ANSI C-99 but on undocumented hidden
behavior of Studio 10.
Even if all issues
Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I had to make a guess, the points below point out what problems you
> are having:
>
> * Specific hardware or device support is only available on Solaris
> Express, and not yet available to OpenSolaris
I would need to test on different HW too for this r
>http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=1194&tstart=0
>
>it seems that I probably should try the newest nevada build. However, since I
>don't expect the bu
ilt-in NIC to work with Solaris, will this still be a recommended option?
(I.e., does the nevada b
uild include JDS and lang
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 09:36:25PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> It is currently impossible to create a 100% Sun compatible libm.
Why?
--
Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!"
Solaris Kernel Team "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!"
___
I just bought a Turion based laptop, HP ze2000e. Will try to install Solaris
sometime next week. Has anyone had any experience with this machine? Any info
will be greatly appreciated.
Based on comments provided in another thread:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=1194&
Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 08:37:06PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > If you install SchilliX on a previously empty box, you get a useable
> > system. If you allow me to remove all files that are not part of
> > OpenSolaris, it will turn your box i
--- James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/14/05, ken mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Joerg Schilling
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I hope that this short review will help to
> > > understand the problems of us
> > > OpenSolaris developers.
> >
James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am publishing more and more compilable packages that allow to
> > auto-create
> > tar archives with binaries that may be installed. I am currently expecting
> > to be ready to publish all sources for SchilliX-0.3.
>
>
>
> So we should put on the list
On 7/14/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If they don't understand the problems of OpenSolaris, you may be true,
> but this is an OpenSolaris discussion list and for this reason,
> all people in this are interested to support OpenSolaris.
I was not suggesting otherwise.
> If you ha
On 7/14/05, ken mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:>> I hope that this short review will help to> understand the problems of us
> OpenSolaris developers.>> Jörg1. Standard Naming convention for community builtpackages.2. Directory for those packages.3. Agre
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 08:37:06PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> If you install SchilliX on a previously empty box, you get a useable
> system. If you allow me to remove all files that are not part of
> OpenSolaris, it will turn your box into a door stopper.
Are you claiming that it needs to b
Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/14/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you put Solaris Express on the test machines, there is zero help
> > for OpenSolaris from the test machines.
>
> I think many are puzzled by this statement, since Solaris Express is
If they don
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:39:32PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> SchilliX is already more than OpenSolaris, but the problem is SX. If
> the test machines are installed with SX, they have too much software
> installed in order to make expressive tests for OpenSolaris.
>
> Tests that are only base
On 7/14/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > Blastwave> > Pkgsrc> > SchillyX> > SunFreeware> > Sun
> >> > Currently all each group has to download and port each package they> > distribute; there is no sharing of code. All 4 groups strive to hav
On 7/14/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you put Solaris Express on the test machines, there is zero help
> for OpenSolaris from the test machines.
I think many are puzzled by this statement, since Solaris Express is
based off the OpenSolaris sources. So other than some librarie
On 7/14/05, Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:47:26AM -0500, James Dickens wrote:
>
> > easy to symlink from a community location even if you have to have one
> > version for packages compiled with gcc and another that are compiled with
> > Sun Studio, 2 is
fhi ... I got some feedback on this proposal on list, off list, and on
my blog. Thanks. We'll open this community next week and see where it goes.
Jim
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Hey, guys.
I'm getting a lot of calls regarding user groups, and some user groups
are already starting to crop up out th
Jasse Jansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It looks like to did not understand the problem.
> >
> > SchilliX is already more than OpenSolaris, but the problem is SX.
> > If the test
> > machines are installed with SX, they have too much software
> > installed in order
> > to make expressive
Peter C. Tribble wrote:
Dragan Cvetkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Well, apparently is SE with nv18 already out. Downloaded this
morning and
installed.
I've just looked and I can't see anything newer than build 16. How are you
getting to later builds?
There was a a bit of confusion on m
Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:55:31PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > Please think about a way that would help SchilliX.
>
> Even if your suggestion below were correct (which I doubt, considering
> the kind of test infrastructure we have internally
On Jul 14, 2005, at 7:39 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Blastwave has all of their own set of libraries, and Sun has
many of
their own in /usr/sfw even, Sunfreeware has their own, pkgsrc
has theirs,
and I imagine that gentoo/portaris has their own also.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:47:26AM -0500, James Dickens wrote:
> easy to symlink from a community location even if you have to have one
> version for packages compiled with gcc and another that are compiled with
> Sun Studio, 2 is still better 4 or 8.
This would only be the case for libraries
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:55:31PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Please think about a way that would help SchilliX.
Even if your suggestion below were correct (which I doubt, considering
the kind of test infrastructure we have internally today), I would
suggest that giving developers the abilit
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Blastwave has all of their own set of libraries, and Sun has many of
> > > their own in /usr/sfw even, Sunfreeware has their own, pkgsrc has theirs,
> > > and I imagine that gentoo/portaris has their own also...
> >
> > With OpenSolaris, there may be mo
>I'll try build 18. Is there anyone who is using Solaris now in a Thinkpad,
>and knows whether the
suspend modes work? Both to disk and to memory? With some tweaking or
out-of-the-box?
No, suspend does not work; while it's one of the things high on the
power team's list, there are other x8
On Thursday 14 July 2005 07:27 am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Originally, before Solaris turned into OpenSolaris, and when Sun was
> > adding to the Companion CD, the idea some in the community had was to
> > build upon it so we didn't duplicate and add what
I'll try build 18. Is there anyone who is using Solaris now in a Thinkpad, and
knows whether the suspend modes work? Both to disk and to memory? With some
tweaking or out-of-the-box?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss ma
There are basically 6 providers for Open Source software for
OpenSolaris/Solaris, from here on referred to as Solaris,
Blastwave
Pkgsrc
SchillyX
SunFreeware
Sun
Currently all each group has to download and port each
package they distribute; there is no sharing of code. All 4 gr
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Dragan Cvetkovic wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
I updated the links page:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/links/
Jim, it's a bit confusing to have Blastwave entry listed twice with the
same URL and the same title. Can the second on
I've always just copied Solaris Express Community release URL on the
OpenSolaris downloads page & edited it from:
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=7&PartDetailId=S
ol-Express_b16-x86-SP-G-B&TransactionId=try
To:
http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=7&Pa
Dragan Cvetkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>>Well, apparently is SE with nv18 already out. Downloaded this morning and
>>>installed.
I've just looked and I can't see anything newer than build 16. How are you
getting to later builds?
-Peter Tribble
MRC Rosalind Franklin Centre for Genomics Resea
One is Blast"wave" and the other is Blast"ware" but I agree. They are
very similar to the eye. Only one letter, actually. I'll change it.
Thanks
Jim
Dragan Cvetkovic wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
I updated the links page:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/links/
Jim, it'
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd go for the latest Solaris Nevada builds (they just a tad
more recent than Solaris express, w/ 16 vs 18)
Well, apparently is SE with nv18 already out. Downloaded this morning and
installed.
lokrum% cat /etc/release
>I have bought a Thinkpad T22 some time ago. It now runs Ubuntu linux, and
>I've not been able to c
onfigure suspend to RAM or suspend to disk.
>
>It has half of its 20GB HD for Ubuntu, and the other half is free. I'm
>wondering if I should inst
all Solaris x86 into it. But should I go with t
Hello
I have bought a Thinkpad T22 some time ago. It now runs Ubuntu linux, and I've
not been able to configure suspend to RAM or suspend to disk.
It has half of its 20GB HD for Ubuntu, and the other half is free. I'm
wondering if I should install Solaris x86 into it. But should I go with th
Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The real solution is not in offering up a software service but in
> developing a "grand unified software software" service that can act as
> a non-OS open source software base of operations for the OpenSolaris
> project. There is no reason that this can
Jim Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The build/test farm would be available to OpenSolaris developers, and will
> provide access to various high-end and low-end Sparc, x64 and other
> hardware platforms. We plan on making it better than what's currently
> available elsewhere, with help from the
Josip Gracin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your complaint would probably be more suited for Sun's Solaris support
> department. Once the community creates a fully-fledged
> OpenSolaris-based distribution, then we can all discuss whether /bin/sh
> is linked to /bin/bash.
I am not sure what you u
Jürgen Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I get terrible performance problems
> > some of the times(reported here in a separate thread
> > but didn't get much response from people, so assuming
> > that everyone
>
> everyone?
> Or noone?
>
> > is a getting a jittery USB mouse and skipping in xmm
Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And for the rest of us... http://www.lat-long.com/
Did I miss something?
I find only US-local entries.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Originally, before Solaris turned into OpenSolaris, and when Sun was adding
> to
> the Companion CD, the idea some in the community had was to build upon it so
> we didn't duplicate and add what was not there in hopes that it would
> eventually move int
Stefan Teleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > libxml2 and libxslt might be a little bit more problematic though. I
> > know as a JDS team we're pretty much over the barrel with whatever
> > version of the libraries that GNOME requires - and while Daniel Veillard
> > tries to stand by the ABI a
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
The same bug report also stated that:
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Ouch. Can we change the bug report please:
s/effected/affected/
?
Bye, Dragan
--
Dragan Cvetkovic,
To be or not to be is true. G. BooleNo it isn't. L. E. J. Bro
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
I updated the links page:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/links/
Jim, it's a bit confusing to have Blastwave entry listed twice with the
same URL and the same title. Can the second one be changed to "Blastwave
for PPC", or "Solaris for PPC effort" or
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Susan Weber wrote:
Exactly. I think we see the value of having documentation exist
throughout the OpenSolaris site. We want to try to provide a more
user-friendly experience by pulling it all together in someone so that
it is more navigatable. We may want to present gui
> cpu
> us sy wt id
> 1 2 0 97
cpu statistic looks ok, that doesn't look like the kernel doing PIO mode disk
transfers.
> extended device statistics
> r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device
> 0.5 320.30.8 722.4 1350.3 2.0 4209.3 6.2 100 100 c1d0
Intere
The same bug report also stated that:
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thursday 14 July 2005 12:21 am, Conor Svensson wrote:
> Would any of these laptops turning up be Acer Aspire 5020 series?
> (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6293571)
No, not yet. All the ones I know about are Acer Ferrari 4000s.
There's another vendor coming to marke
On Jul 14, 2005, at 9:21 AM, Conor Svensson wrote:
Would any of these laptops turning up be Acer Aspire 5020 series?
(http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6293571)
I found this line a bit down in the text:
Tested on Acer Aspire 5024wlmi (Note: v. similar spec to Acer F
Would any of these laptops turning up be Acer Aspire 5020 series?
(http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6293571)
Conor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan
DuBoff
Sent: 14 July 2005 07:36
To: Richard Elling; opensol
100 matches
Mail list logo
