On 4/8/13 7:23 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 4/8/2013 7:20 AM, Tore Anderson wrote:
BTW. It is AIUI quite possible with MAP to provision a "whole" IPv4
address or even a prefix to the subscriber, thus also taking away the
need for [srcport-restricted] NAPT44 in the CPE.
The problem is NAPT44 in the
On 4/12/13 3:41 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 4/11/13, Oliver Garraux wrote:
Agreed; but it would seem that unstoppable forces have been set into
motion by ICANN, to cause it to happen, regardless of whether it is
beneficial to the community, and regardless of any objections from the
public...
Yes
On 4/25/13 6:24 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Ok, here's a stupid question[1], which I'd know the answer to if I ran bigger
networks:
Does anyone know how much IPv4 space is allocated *specifically* to cater
to the fact that HTTPS requires a dedicated IP per DNS name?
It doesn't, or doesn't if if you
On 4/25/13 9:27 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Apr 26, 2013, at 00:19 , joel jaeggli wrote:
On 4/25/13 6:24 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Ok, here's a stupid question[1], which I'd know the answer to if I ran bigger
networks:
Does anyone know how much IPv4 space is allocated *specif
On 4/25/13 10:16 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:49:03PM -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 04/25/2013 07:27 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
AWS stands out as a complete laggard in this area.
Heh... that's why I put all kinds of question marks and hedges :)
That's disappointing about aws
On 4/24/13 1:55 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Geoff Huston wrote:
However, personally I find it a little hard to place a high
probability on Tony's projected exhaustion date of August this year.
I also have to qualify that by noting that while I think that a
runout of the
On 4/26/13 1:49 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Apr 23, 2013, at 5:36 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
I'm looking at an IP-KVM. I don't need anything high res as I only
need to see Linux consoles, BIOS, and RAID. What I am looking for:
Non-Java client that runs on Linux (or a WebUI that will deploy a
dece
On 4/28/13 3:46 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
-- for example: large Cable providers getting together and agreeing to
implement a 100ms RTT latency penalty for IPv4
we do not see intentionally damaging our customers as a big sales
feature. but we think all our competitors should do so.
This business
On 4/30/13 8:23 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
On 30.04.2013 17:07, Chris Boyd wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits
(Disregarding
a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said network)
2) Prefix filter - Don't be a party (at le
On 5/2/13 3:54 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Hang on -- University of New Orleans's AS is 23666?
http://bgp.he.net/AS26333
Looks like "SISTELINDO-AS-ID PT Sistelindo Mitralintas":
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=as23666
?
- ferg
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Paul Ferguson wrot
On 5/20/13 2:45 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 04:42:23PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 5/19/13 4:27 PM, Ben wrote:
Do you actually need stateful filtering? A lot of people seem to think
that it's important, when really they're accomplishing little from it,
you can block ports
On 12/9/11 18:22 , Keegan Holley wrote:
>>
>>
>>> assumption that writable SNMP was a bad idea but have never actually
>> tried
>>> it. I was curious what others were using, netconf or just scripted
>> logins.
>>> I'm also fighting a losing battle to convince people that netconf isn't
>>> evil. I
On 12/10/11 17:48 , Barry Shein wrote:
>
>>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>>> business the way they would like?
>
> This sniping elicited by the above seems inappropriate and
> unprofessio
On 12/10/11 21:42 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 12/10/11 17:48 , Barry Shein wrote:
>>
>>>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>>>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>>>> business the way th
Netflix uses CDNs for content delivery and the platform runs in EC2. What would
peering with them achieve?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2011, at 18:06, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> Which leads to a question to be asked...
>
> Is netflix willing to peer directly with ISP / NSP's ?
>
> Regards.
>
s to akamai and level3
>> Faisal
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>>
>>> Netflix uses CDNs for content delivery and the platform runs in EC2. What
>>> would peering with them achieve?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>
On 12/12/11 02:05 , Leigh Porter wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Vitkovsky, Adam
>> [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com] Sent: 12 December 2011 09:19 To:
>> Eric Parsonage; valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: RE: Sad IPv4 story?
>>
>>> and models that doesn't take "we m
On 12/14/11 18:46 , Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>> Fyi, I just was rejected from arin for an ipv4 allocation. I demonstrated I
>> own ~100k ipv4 addresses today.
>> My customers use over 10 million bogon / squat space ip addresses today,
>> and I have
On 12/15/11 13:43 , Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:36:32PM -0800, David Conrad
> wrote:
>> ARIN's job (well, beyond the world travel, publishing comic books, handing
>> out raffle prizes, etc.) is to allocate and register addresses according to
>> community
On 12/15/11 14:12 , Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> We know rather alot about the original posters' business, it has ~34
>> million wireless subscribers in north america. I think it's safe to
>> assume that adequate d
On 12/17/11 00:14 , Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Friday, December 16, 2011 05:02:33 AM Joe Malcolm wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time, UUNET did the opposite by setting
>> origin to unknown for peer routes, in an attempt to
>> prefer customer routes over peer routes. We moved to
>> local preference shortly th
I haven't done wireless in downtown palo alto, only metro-e however.
Given your proximity to 345 hamilton (under 1000 feet most likely) I
would think at&t would be in a position to offer fairly high-rate dsl,
On 12/16/11 10:24 , Darren Bolding wrote:
> Apologies if this is not the most appropriat
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:18 AM, jacob miller wrote:
> Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites.
>
> Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to
> this.
It's one data point of many.
Depending on the speed test site, the protocols it uses, where th
On 12/23/11 11:16 , Joel Maslak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:18 AM, jacob miller wrote:
>
>> Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites.
>>
>> Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to
>> this.
>
> It'
On 12/24/11 15:33 , Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Karl Auer wrote:
>
>>> Not necessarily. You can use ARP and DHCPv6 and you don't have
>>> to waste time and power for DAD.
>
>> IPv6 does not do ARP, it does ND.
>
> First of all, ND use is optional and, if ND is used, RA
> must be used.
>
> It means t
On Dec 27, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Glen Kent wrote:
> I had assumed that nodes derive their link local address from the
> Route Advertisements. They derive their least significant 64 bytes
> from their MACs and the most significant 64 from the prefix announced
> in the RAs.
No, link local addresses ar
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Livingood, Jason
wrote:
> If you want to understand the issue in detail, check out the report from
> MIT this year, written by Steve Bauer and available at
> http://mitas.csail.mit.edu/papers/Bauer_Clark_Lehr_Broadband_Speed_Measurem
> ents.pdf.
They should have
On Dec 29, 2011, at 7:00 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
> The real-world case for host routing (IMHO) is a server with a public
> interface, an administrative interface, and possibly a third path for
> data backups (maybe four if it's VMware/VMotion too). Unless the
> non-public interfaces are flat subnet
On 12/30/11 08:47 , Kevin Loch wrote:
> It is very common to have different "routers" (routers, firewalls or
> load balancers) on the same vlan with different functions in hosting
> environments. It is also sometimes necessary to have multiple default
> gateways on the same vlan for load balancin
On 12/28/11 07:30 , Ryan Malayter wrote:
> Except nowhere in there is the prefix length for the test indicated,
> and the exact halving of forwarding rate for IPv6 leads one to believe
> that there are two TCAM lookups for IPv6 (hence 64-bit prefix lookups)
> versus one for IPv4.
A cam (assuming
On 1/6/12 12:31 , Bonald wrote:
> Hi,
> We need to purchase some switch that support 1gbit QinQ.
> Any suggestions ? We need to connect 9 schools together in layer2.
> All 9 schools have 1gb link from our provider, provider gaves us 5 vlan to
> work with.
> We have around 35 vlan in-house.
>
> We
d with big
stateful translation systems either nat44 or nat64.
If you like a formal slot on the agenda, please reach out to me. If you
simply have an interest in this area let me know and we'll see if we can
fit your topic in the plan.
Thanks
joel
On 1/13/12 11:19 , -Hammer- wrote:
> OK, So I'm doing a lot of reading lately on Nexus as we are about to get
> into the 7k/5k game and of course a lot of the marketing revolves around
> VPC. Every time I see it referenced, I keep remembering a reasonably
> reliable Nortel implementation called Spl
On 1/15/12 09:56 , Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Abdullah Al-Malki (a.almalki1402) writes:
>> Hi fellows,
>> I am supporting a big service provider and sometimes I face this problem.
>> Sometimes I want to access my customer network and want to extract some
>> verification output "show commands" from a la
On 1/15/12 11:30 , Ken King wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
> up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile phones.
>
> we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office
> space.
>
> what are the thoughts these d
On 1/17/12 23:45 , Leigh Porter wrote:
>
>
> On 18 Jan 2012, at 05:06, "toor" wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I am wondering if anyone else has seen a large amount of DNS
>> queries coming from various IP ranges in China. I have been trying
>> to find a pattern in the attacks but so far I have come
at'll never actually get deployed? :)
>
> I wonder when Comcast and Verizon will get into an IPv6 advertising war.
> "v6... smhee-6! Ditch that cable modem and switch to Fios!"
LTE has V6 natively and it gets used today...
joel
> jms
>
By the same token, The mobile broadband network is not some also-ran adjunct to
the residential broadband service.
On Jan 18, 2012, at 16:45, "Justin M. Streiner" wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/12 15:56 , Justin M. Streiner wrote:
&
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Deric Kwok wrote:
> We are planning to have 3 x 1G bgp connections (full tables) eg: Path A, B, C
>
> Can I say that we have 3G output totally?
Sure.
> From my understanding, the bgp chooses the best path to route automatically
It doesn't. It typically chooses
On 1/21/12 11:38 , George Bonser wrote:
>> Not that I would not be a bit miffed if personal files disappeared,
>> but that's one of the risks associated with using a cloud service
>> for file storage. It could have been a fire, a virus erasing file,
>> bankruptcy, malicious insider damage... Does
vendors that specify a minimum distance for lx typically spec 2 meters.
even EX shouldn't spike the receiver at that distance as long as the max
RX is about +1.
On 1/25/12 11:26 , jon Heise wrote:
> we are moving a router between 2 data centers and we only have LX sfp's for
> connection, is ther
ing a noc-worker and getting things done from there.
>
> There are far better ways to skin this cat.
I don't think md5 is that great, but I absolutely wouldn't use a clear
text password if I'm going to use anything at all.
I don't think shared seceret management is dramatically harder than any
other form of of configuration management, modula rekeying requires
coordination with a third party and is therefore hard.
joel
On 1/27/12 14:53 , bas wrote:
> While I agree _again_!
>
> It does not explain why TOR boxes have little buffers and chassis box
> have many.
you need purportionally more buffer when you need to drain 16 x 10 gig
into 4 x 10Gig then when you're trying to drain 10Gb/s into 2 x 1Gb/s
there
On 1/27/12 15:01 , George Bonser wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From: bas Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012
>> 2:54 PM To: George Bonser Subject: Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was
>> Re: 10G switch recommendaton)
>>
>> While I agree _again_!
>>
>> It does not explain why TOR boxes have
On 1/27/12 15:40 , bas wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> On 1/27/12 14:53 , bas wrote:
>>> While I agree _again_!
>>>
>>> It does not explain why TOR boxes have little buffers and chassis box
>>>
On 1/27/12 06:13 , Eric Tykwinski wrote:
> The PS Vita still uses a proprietary memory card format, so it's not just
> download only.
> The best example of download only would be OnLive, which basically is a game
> system that only delivers on demand games.
Onlive isn't download at all. the games
On 1/27/12 02:35 , Tei wrote:
> Can internet in USA support that? Call of Duty 15 releases may 2014
> and 30 million gamers start downloading a 20 GB files. Would the
> internet collapse like a house of cards?.
Given the way the these things are staged, the pre-order/pre-load model
works pretty
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Ann Kwok wrote:
> We discover the routes is going to ISP A only even the bandwidth 100M is
> full
There are several ways to handle this is, if you have at least two
/24s of space.
Let's say you just have two /24s, both part of the same /23.
Option 1:
Announce
On 1/30/12 12:46 , Jim Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a Wireless bridge or Router that will
> support 600 wireless clients concurrently (mostly cell phones). I need it
> for a proof of concept.
an aruba controller and 8 dual radio aps.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks in adva
On 2/2/12 21:59 , Randy Bush wrote:
>>> The suits won, and many nerds either threw in with them or revealed
>>> their affinity for the easy life and gave up. Being principled and
>>> turning away dirty money or exercising the "fire the customer" clause
>>> tends to be disliked by corporate officers
On 2/5/12 17:20 , Glen Kent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Most routers today are basically IPv4 routers, with IPv6 thrown in.
> They are however designed keeping IPv4 in mind.
>
> With IPv6 growing, if we were to design a native IPv6 router, with
> IPv4 functionality thrown in, then is it possible to design a
On 2/6/12 06:48 , Glen Kent wrote:
> One example that comes to my mind is that a few existing routers
> cant do line rate routing for IPv6 traffic as long as the netmask is
> < 65.
I'm sorry that's bs. It's trivial to partition a cam in order to do
/128s in a single lookup. that's actually the w
On 2/8/12 08:59 , keith tokash wrote:
>
> Hi,
I've done it either way, I prefer to put the v6 peers in a different
group than the v4 peers so that I can group the policies at the group
rather than neighbor level.
> I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if
> any, benefit th
On 2/11/12 19:34 , Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
> yes, domain names that cannot be typed in with any keyboard/charset on
> any computer out there, excellent idea, devide and conquerer, i wonder
> who came up with that idiotic plan again, probably the ITU or one of
> their infiltrants in icann.
If it'
On 2/15/12 20:14 , Mario Eirea wrote:
> This is my guess too, i guess there is some bleed over from their antenna
> arrays.
Even the most directional sector antenna in the world has a back lobe...
and there there's the clients...
there's no magic bullet you simply can't do it all in one ap with
On 2/15/12 21:04 , Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. wrote:
> How widespread would you say the use of IS-IS is?
>
> Even more as to which routing protocols are used, not just in ISPs, what
> percent would you give to the various ones. In other words X percent of
> organizations use OSPS, Y percent use EIGRP,
On 2/16/12 05:03 , Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire
> http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/
>
> "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so
> quickly that human traders can't even react, no fewer than 18,52
On 2/17/12 06:18 , Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
> actually most west european countries have laws against having your
> employees lift up stuff heavier than 20 kilos :P
>
> you generally don't have insurance on your network-dude to handle such
> things *grin* if it drops on his foot, you're screwed.
On 2/17/12 11:47 , Kiriki Delany wrote:
> Why not just simultaneously settle all trades at the same time? Once every
> minute, or every 5 minutes, or per day?
>
> There are many solutions to the problem. I'm sure those that can take
> advantage of the latency don't want the solution.
Ask yourse
I think you just volunteered.
--
Joel Esler
On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Mark Kent wrote:
> I got 29 NANOG Digest messages in the past 24 hours.
>
> Where are those people who have time to complain about the noise on
> this list? Did they all leave? Is anyone else willin
On 2/20/12 08:54 , Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>> Speaking of that sort of thing, I'd really LOVE if there were a device about
>> the size of a netbook that could be hooked up to otherwise headless machines
>> in colos that would give you keyboard, vid
On 2/20/12 09:55 , Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:51:59AM -0800, Joel jaeggli
> wrote:
>> Things with legacy ports on them are on the way out. given an ipmi
>> manager that doesn't suck there should be no reason to connect to th
On 2/20/12 09:57 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Tei wrote:
>> I am a mere user, so I all this stuff sounds to me like giberish.
>>
>> The right solution is to capture the request to these DNS servers, and
>> send to a custom server with a static message "warning.h
On 2/22/12 07:50 , Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
>
>>> PC LOAD LETTER?!?!?!?!?
>>
>> PC LOAD LETTER is not the issue.
>>
>> One country that insists on using different paper sizes to everyone else,
>> but also happens to set a lot of hardware and softwar
I've never had problems setting up multiple VLANs on a link between
Cisco, HP, Dell switches, IBM mainframes, VMWare servers, 3COM/Nortel,
Polycom Phones, Linux servers, etc. If both ends supported 802.1q, it
just worked, if the admin read the manual for both pieces of gear and
knew how to trouble
On 3/9/12 20:42 , Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sander wrote:
>>
>>> Splitting the allocation can be done for many reasons. There are
>>> known cases where one LIR operates multiple separate networks,
>>> each with a separate routing polic
On 3/9/12 22:02 , George Bonser wrote:
> An ISP that has been given a /32 or larger allocation from PA space
> and might have 10,000 customers each assigned their own /48 could
> instantly more than double the size of the IPv6 routing table if they
> disaggregated that /32.
>
> The problem here i
On 3/10/12 08:05 , Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Sure, if you can find a datacenter that's capable of handling all the
> traffic, and has staff who are able to provide efficient remote hands for
> huge racks of extremely powerful servers .. and are possibly also open to
> cross subsidizing the co
they aren't.
The actors causing the most impact on the size of my fib are by in large
on this mailing list...
joel
On 3/11/12 08:48 , Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 9 Mar 2012, at 10:02 , Jeff Wheeler wrote:
>
>> The way we are headed right now, it is likely that the IPv6
>> address space being issued today will look like "the swamp" in a
>> few short years, and we will regret repeating this obvious
>> mista
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Only if you don't properly quote/escape the arguments you are passing.
You're using your OS wrong if you are quoting/escaping the arguments.
You do not need a shell involved to use fork() + exec() + wait(), as
the shell is not involved (assu
On 3/13/12 23:22 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
> NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
> CIDR: 100.64.0.0/10
> OriginAS:
> NetName:SHARED-ADDRESS-SPACE-RFCTBD-IANA-RESERVED
Already updated my martians acl and deployed it internally...
On 3/13/12 23:29 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 3/13/12 23:22 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
>> CIDR: 100.64.0.0/10
>> OriginAS:
>> NetName:SHARED-ADDRESS-SPACE-RFCTBD-IANA-RESERVED
>
> Already update
On 3/14/12 00:06 , Frank Habicht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/14/2012 9:42 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> On 3/13/12 23:29 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
>>> On 3/13/12 23:22 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>>> NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
>>>> CIDR:
On 3/12/12 08:56 , Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2012, at 16:21 , Leigh Porter wrote:
>
>>> Grass-roots, bottom-up policy process + Need for multihoming +
>>> Got tired of waiting = IPv6 PI
>
>> A perfect summation.
>
> Except that it didn't happen in that order. When ARIN approved PI
On 3/23/12 14:47 , valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:53:45 +0100, Eugen Leitl said:
>> http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/122989-1-5-billion-the-cost-of-cutting-london-toyko-latency-by-60ms
>
> Lower latency is good...
>
>> The massive drop in latency is expected to supercha
On 3/23/12 19:45 , Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>>> The massive drop in latency is expected to supercharge algorithmic stock
>>> market trading, where a difference of a few milliseconds can gain (or
>>> lose)
>>> millions of dollars.
>>
>> But it should be illegal to run
On 3/24/12 01:32 , George Bonser wrote:
>> If they could armor the cable sufficiently perhaps they could drill the
>> straigh line path through the Earth's crust (mantle and outer core) and
>> do London-Tokyo in less than 10,000km.
Current record depth of a borehole is under 12,500 meters which is
On 3/27/12 23:21 , Roberts, Brent wrote:
> Is anyone running an E300 Series Chassis at the internet edge with multiple
> Full BGP feeds? 95th percent would be about 300 meg of traffic. BGP session
> count would be between 2 and 4 Peers.
> 6k internal Prefix count as it stands right now. Alternati
On 3/29/12 21:53 , Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Oliver Garraux wrote:
>> I was at Ubiquiti's conference. I don't disagree with what you're
>> saying. Ubiquiti's take on it seemed to be that 24 Ghz would likely
>> never be used to the extent that 2.4 / 5.8 is. They
On Mar 31, 2012, at 3:38 AM, Shahab Vahabzadeh wrote:
> As I look for maps we need at least 3 or 4 outdoor radio, I think in these
> networks the best solution is to have only one SSID in whole network to
> give mobility for the network, is this called ad-hoc? or it has an other
> name?
No, it's
On Apr 1, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Masataka Ohta
wrote:
> With 802.11, you can connect to an AP and, if the AP
> fails, you may be connected to another AP, but the
> transition takes considerable amount of time not
> tolerable for voice communication, which is why it
> is not called mobility.
True und
Depends on the duration and goals of your capture...
1TB is 2.276 hours at 1Gb/s
If you need to capture it all and store it forever well sorry. If you
just need the flows and not the packets sampled netflow can reduce
youre requirements by many orders of magnitude, ultimately it really
depends
On 4/17/12 01:37 , Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
> I don't understand why a problem with a tunnel 'leaves a bad taste with
> IPv6'. Since when a badly configured DNS zone left people with a 'bad
> taste for DNS', or a badly configured switch left people with 'a bad
> taste for spanning tree' or '
we use cacti weathermap plugin, though obviously realtime has a
dependency on your sample interval. I'm presuming your definition
thereof isn't instantaneous monitoring of queue depth.
On 5/1/12 10:49 , Hank Disuko wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'll see if I can pull the correct OID and try it with the Dud
On 5/3/12 10:29 , Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Adam Atkinson"
>
>> Well, just the above seems like enough that you'd think there'd be more
>> (justified) grumbling that thanks to a choice made many many decades ago
>> it's harder to distinguish young or female spea
On 5/7/12 21:17 , Jo Rhett wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> On 3/27/12 23:21 , Roberts, Brent wrote:
>>> Is anyone running an E300 Series Chassis at the internet edge with
>>> multiple Full BGP feeds? 95th percent would be abo
On 5/25/12 07:35 , valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:25:35 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
>
>> The proper way to have a static IP address is not to pay mobile
>> operators but to run mobile IP or something like that on your
>> terminal.
>>
>> You can run your home agent at your h
On 5/25/12 15:12 , Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 5/25/12 3:08 PM, Adam wrote:
>>
>> You also have to implement additional filters to protect yourself from what
>> your client can advertise. I'm lucky enough to work for a major ISP with
>> pretty sophisticated filters built off the public route registr
On Jun 2, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Nabil Sharma wrote:
> Dear NANOG:
> I seek pricing on Comcast AS7922 paid peer at following commit level:
> 1G
> 10G
> 100G
> Please reply in private and I will sum up on list.
> Sincerely,
> Nabil
I'd suggest contact Comcast sales.
On Jun 3, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Joe Maimon wrote:
> www.arin.net works and worked for years. www.facebook.com stopped June 1.
>
> So IPv6 fixes the fragmentation and MTU issues of IPv4 by how exactly?
It doesn't fix the fragmentation issues. It assumes working PMTU.
For what it's worth, I also us
On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:01 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Any firewall/security device manufacturer that says it is will not get any
> business from me (or anyone else who considers their requirements
> properly before purchasing).
Unfortunately many technology people seem to have the idea, "If I don't
But a Cat 6 is one more isn't it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbVKWCpNFhY
--
Joel Esler
On Monday, June 4, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Eric Wieling wrote:
>
> I'm not looking for help, just thought this was hilarious.
>
> "Mark called in from XO he stated a tech was
On 6/5/12 07:52 , Green, Timothy wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> I'm a Security Manager of a large network, we are conducting a
> Pentest next month and the testers are demanding a complete network
> diagram of the entire network. We don't have a "complete" network
> diagram that shows everything and eve
On 6/7/12 20:53 , Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> It is like that supreme court judge who defined porn as "i know it
> when I see it"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobellis_v._Ohio
a case which is notable in this context for having four differing
majority opinions.
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:00
On Jun 9, 2012, at 1:06 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
> Should I really take them seriously?
Your call.
That said, the purpose of CVV is to stop *one* type of fraud - it's to stop a
skimmer from being able to do mail-order/internet-order with your card number.
The CVV is not on the magnetic strip, s
On 6/8/12 16:05 , Alec Muffett wrote:
>> Does anybody have a good URL explaining that idea? It's been
>> kicking around for many years. I've never seen a convincing
>> writeup.
>
> I've tried to do that in another mail - it's in the realms of
> philosophy more than strategy; like if you're a rea
On 6/10/12 00:25 , John Souvestre wrote:
> On 6/10/12, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>
>> How good does a password/phrase have to be in order to protect
>> against brute-force or dictionary attacks against the password
>> itself? ? Entropy in language. A typical english sen
e finer details of merchant handling of
gas cards I think it can stop now.
Thanks from all of us.
Joel
These are exploit kit teasers.
Black hole exploit kit specifically. I wouldn't click on any of the links in
there.
Anyone who would like to send me copies of these, I'll take.
--
Joel Esler
On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> I have a spam pit email ad
401 - 500 of 1185 matches
Mail list logo
