ve
> > the holy ratio. Even web pages could use
> > javascript footers to send back upstream an
> > equivalent amount of data to what was
> > downloaded.
> >
> > Once and for all, we could put an end to
> > the ceaseless bickering about ratios, as
> > e
I'd stay clear of the 34s
On Jan 18, 2013 11:56 PM, "Julien Goodwin" wrote:
> Another (somewhat cheaper) Juniper option if you meet its limits is the
> EX[34]200's which now do GRE in hardware:
>
>
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.1/topics/concept/gre-tunnel-services.html
>
> On 19
Congrats! How does 240Ghz react to atmospheric conditions other than "clear
skys?"
On May 17, 2013 4:17 AM, "Eugen Leitl" wrote:
>
> Fraunhofer:
>
> http://www.iaf.fraunhofer.de/de/news-medien/pressemitteilungen/presse-2013-05-16.html
>
> Google Translate:
>
> New world record in data transmissio
of
> >the world" torrent, but it's not like you sneeze and the link goes down.
> >(And if you have more than 50 mm/h sustained, you've got a much, much
> >bigger problem :-)
> >
> >Grüße, Carsten
> >
>
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
attenuation in a
> vacuum.. ;)
>
> Look up vortex beams. These guys should hook up with the vortex guys.
> They were getting like 40bits to hertz using oam.
>
>
> Sent from my Mobile Device.
>
>
> ---- Original message
> From: Phil Fagan
> Date
Well put.
On May 17, 2013 1:54 PM, "John Starta" wrote:
> On May 17, 2013, at 8:24 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:22 -0700, "Scott Weeks" said:
> >
> >> You haven't been here long have you...
> >>
> >> He DOES NOT need a 260 word signature (see below!) to make
Not noise!
On May 19, 2013 10:20 AM, "Nick Khamis" wrote:
> On 5/19/13, Zachary Giles wrote:
> > I had two Dell R3xx 1U servers with Quad Gige Cards in them and a few
> small
> > BGP connections for a few year. They were running CentOS 5 + Quagga with
> a
> > bunch of stuff turned off. Worked ex
rts etc without it.
> >
> > I believe PCI compliance requires it, other things like it probably do
> too.
>
> There'd be very few PCI compliant sites if PCI required stateful
> firewalling
> in core routers.
>
> - Matt
>
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
in, are you certain the folks at DHS were aware
> their
> > machine(s) were engaged in a DoS attack?
> >
> > You can find zombies in the oddest places...
> >
> > Regards,
> > -drc
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
What hung the box? Core dump? Filled up var?
On May 23, 2013 11:57 AM, "Grant Ridder" wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Has anyone ever seen Mailman revert to an old user list? This morning we
> had out lists VM pounded on from India and hung the box. After blocking
> the ip on our firewall and rebooti
Stupid questionthere's not a live stream for 58 is there?
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Jeff Hartley wrote:
> Re-posting for those having difficulties:
>
> tinyurl.com/nanog58-slides
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
awesome, thanks!
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2013-06-03, at 11:14, Phil Fagan wrote:
>
> > Stupid questionthere's not a live stream for 58 is there?
>
> There's a grey icon in the agenda for sessions that are being streamed,
>
day morning, a Newcomers Lunch, and then General Sessions
> beginning in the early afternoon. The program will conclude with the
> Peering Track and then a social on Wednesday night.
>
> Looking forward to seeing everyone in The Big Easy!
>
> Regards,
> -Dave Temkin
> Chair, NANOG Program Committee
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
> What we are looking to do is replace our traditional ISDN DS3 equipped
> for voice using an STM-1/OC3 backbone and our own put together linux
> box. Again, this will be used for voice signaling...
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Nick.
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
Nick are you trying to run these codecs on linux?
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Michael Loftis wrote:
> Most modern gear can go all the way to individual DS0's in a single
> card without a MUX of any kind. OC3/STM-1 is only like 155mbit.
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:
Any ASA sme's out there?
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
Thank you
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 6:36 AM, Phil Fagan wrote:
>
> > Any ASA sme's out there?
>
> Suggest you check on the cisco-nsp list.
>
>
sa-tool-that-watches-the-512107983
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my Mobile Device.
> >>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> BaconZombie
>
> LOAD "*",8,1
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
And a basic front-end and your in business!!
On Jun 12, 2013 6:15 PM, "Scott Weeks" wrote:
>
>
> --- eyeronic.des...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Mike Hale
>
> >> Splunk
>
> It would make sense. It's a friggin' sick syslog analyzer. Expensive
> as hell, but awesome.
> -
well, so much for that
>
> randy
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
Yeah, I can't imagine there is any real magic there...mystical protocol not
seen over transport.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, david raistrick wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Phil Fagan wrote:
>
> I've always wondered about thatwould you know that the Huawei
;>
> >> Scary
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > Do you think Huawei has a magic ability to transmit data without you
> noticing?
> >
> > If you don't want to use Hauwei because they stole code or did other
> nasty things, I'm right there with you. If you believe a router can somehow
> magically duplicate info and transport it back to China (ignoring CT/CU's
> inability to have congestion free links), I think you are confused.
> >
> > --
> > TTFN,
> > patrick
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
s through that
> mechanism not in syslog, not in the currently logged in user table, perhaps
> the process(es) hidden from view.
>
> Do we really trust Cisco and Juniper more than Hueawei? :)
>
> --
>Leo Bicknell - bickn...@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at ht
lly added flows (hundreds per
> > second),
> > and would be deployable in a production network (fails in bypass mode).
> Are
> > there any
> > COTS devices I should be looking at? Or is the market for this all under
> > the table to
> > pro-censorship governments?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Eric
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
(fails in bypass mode).
> Are
> > there any
> > COTS devices I should be looking at? Or is the market for this all under
> > the table to
> > pro-censorship governments?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Eric
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
I would assume something FreeBSD based might be best
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
> I really like the idea of a stripe of linux boxes doing the heavy lifting.
> Any suggestions on platforms, card types, and chip types that might be
> better purposed at proces
k
out PF_RING.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
> > I would assume something FreeBSD based might be best
>
> Meh... personal choice. I prefer Linux, mostly because I know it best
> and most netw
vectors
> > which get surreptitiously added to the other DPI terms unbeknownst to the
> > owner and sent back to the attacker. That's enormously powerful. All it
> > takes
> > is sufficient money and motivation. Is this speculative? Of course -- I'm
> > not
> > a spook. Is it possible? You bet.
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
or
> so
> > of
> > > being added.
> >
> > What's the actual application for this mechanism?
> >
> > ---
> > Roland Dobbins // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
> >
&
--
> > Roland Dobbins // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
> >
> > Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
> >
> >-- John Milton
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
have no particular reason to
> look
> and, some might argue, lots of reasons not to want to know.
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
> j...@baylink.com
> Designer The Things I Think RFC
> 2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land
> Rover DII
> St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647
> 1274
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
; > From: trapperjohn...@gmail.com
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> >
> > Why is it so difficult? Hiding communications is an intriguing subject -
> My
> > ears perked up a bit at the Multics remark - Morse is something that
> > probably never would have even crossed my mind.
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
oast-to-coast is going to cost you a few appendages. You may land
> > a lambda for a reasonable price depending on the endpoints, you'll need
> > an established carrier with DWDM gear on both ends.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
w.presidio.com/>
> > 3250 W. Commercial Blvd Suite 360, Oakland Park, FL 33309
> > D: 954.703.1490 | C: 954.298.1697 | F: 407.284.6681 |
> frei...@presidio.com
> > CCIE 23812, CISSP 107125, HP MASE, TPCSE 2265
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/18/13 9:20 AM,
that's just another barrier to entry. A little Google-fu could
> probably source a paper dealing with its implementation, at least.
>
> I doubt it would be easy, but if the motivation exists, the required
> test bed is easily assembled, and the information is available. Not
> li
what is bad? Is the config sane?
>
> I would be happy to compile any information I find, as well as our
> sanitized internal conclusions. On and off list responses welcome.
>
> If there is another vendor anyone would suggest, please add them to the
> list with similarly asked questions.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Blake
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
y. It also causes nausea…
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,
>
> ** **
>
> Blake
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Phil Fagan [mailto:philfa...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:08 PM
> *To:* Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List
> *Cc:* NANOG (nanog@nanog.or
one who can code a working config from scratch based on the
> old config, not someone who's going to sit there scratching his head,
> running useless packet captures, and being silent when we ask
> questions. *sigh*
>
> /rant off
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Phil Faga
t;> wrote:
> >>> On Jun 20, 2013, at 01:30 , Grant Ridder
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Yelp is evidently also affected
> >>> Not from here.
> >> Patrick:
> >> $ dig NS yelp.com @8.8.8.8 +short
> >> ns1620.ztomy.com.
> >> ns2620.ztomy.com.
>
> --
> -JH
>
>
>
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
This is the Internet! :-)
>
> - ferg
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Phil Fagan wrote:
>
> > Is there an organization that coordinates outages like this amongst the
> > industry?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> &g
, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>
>> I'm sure that folks in the ICANN SSAC will be talking about this
>> subject well in to the future once a postmortem is completed. Also,
>> perhaps even the DNS-OARC community.
>>
>> Coordination? This is the Internet! :-)
>>
>
e tried
> coordinating a few
>
> brandon
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
t;
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;parsonstech.com.INNS
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> parsonstech.com.172800INNSns2617.ztomy.com.
> parsonstech.com.172800INNSns1617.ztomy.com.
>
> ;; Query time: 286 msec
> ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.
one of this is surprising.
>
> and dnssec did not save us. is there anything which could have?
>
> randy
>
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
gt;
> All protections afforded by the fourth amendment have essentially been
> thrown into the (rather large) bit bucket by the FISA court, when it comes
> to any bits which leave your premise.
>
> --
> Dan White
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
Good point; apparently the doctorine does protect against the case whereby
any collected data would have been found anway "with a court order."
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
>
> I would think th
I guess the moral here isdon't do anything "wrong."
:-D
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:31 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
> >> I would think this is only an i
Hah!
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Warren Bailey <
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
> The United States Constitution*
>
> *See Terms and Conditions for details, not all citizens apply, void where
> prohibited, subject to change at any time.
>
> On 6/21/
Are these private links or customer links? Why encrypt at that layer? I'm
looking for the niche usecase.
On Jun 24, 2013 1:57 PM, "Scott Weeks" wrote:
>
>
> - william.allen.simpson wrote: -
> And at $189,950 MSRP, obviously every ISP is dashing out the door
> for a pair for each and every
Transnational seems like a good place to start. It seems like a tough space
to break into ( no PUN intended).
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Phil Fagan wrote:
>
> > Are these private links or customer links? Why encryp
Since we're no longer trying to dodge the NSAwhy would one want to
encrypt transport? I think protected links are a great business model.
L3VPN encryption? Whats the best offering?
Well put Leo; defense-in-depth.
On Jun 25, 2013 6:57 PM, "Leo Bicknell" wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2013, at 6:34 PM, s...@wwcandt.com wrote:
>
> > I believe that if you encrypted your links sufficiently that it was
> > impossible to siphon the wanted data from your upstream the response
> would
> > be
s/?comments=1
>
> >
> > Sounds like a UDP replacement. If this is true, then OS-level support
> will
> > be needed. If they are on this, then it's the perfect opportunity to fix
> > some other problems with the Internet in general.
>
> I'm no genius, but
I took that as path agnostic.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
> > "In the presence of layer-3 load-balancers, a multiplexed transport has
> the
> > potential to allow the different data flo
A-M002 │ Phoenix, AZ 85040
> phone: 602.557.6746 │ fax: 602.557.6606 │ email: chad.r...@apollogrp.edu
>
>
>
> This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in
> error, please notify the sender and remove it from your system.
>
>
>
>
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
a temporary work-around
> until the adjustment could be made during a demand maintenance window to
> minimize disruption.
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
>
>> BGP Noob question here; but wouldn't Time Warner not recie
Everything else remaining equal...is there a standard or expectation for
DNS reliability?
98%
99%
99.5%
99.9%
99.99%
99.999%
Measured in queries completed vs. queries lost.
Whats the consensus?
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
m encounters a defect that breaks your
> announcements then although a well built anycast footprint might acheive
> 99.999, a poorly implemented management system that is less available and
> creates an outage would reduce the number.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Phil Fagan
Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Beavis wrote:
> I go with 99.999% given that you have a good number of DNS Servers
> (anycasted).
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
>
>> Everything e
Good reference; thank you.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
>
>> Everything else remaining equal...is there a standard or expectation for
>> DNS reliability?
>>
>> 98%
>&
e:
> On 9/13/2013 2:14 AM, Marco Davids (Prive) wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/13 03:53, Larry Sheldon wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/12/2013 3:25 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected.
>>>>
>>> A
d to announce that all of the recorded presentations from
>>> Monday at NANOG 59 in Phoenix have now been posted to Youtube.
>>>
>>
>> This is really neat.
>>
>
> I agree, it's great! My only nit with it is that the aspect ratio seems to
> be wrong.
>
SRX650 IDP caps at 1gb imix; BGP and OSPF in cluster won't be a
problem...but your running up against resource limits if you need to grow.
Juniper has a good write up on active active SRX deployments and offer 3gb
IDP imix on the 1400.
I would imagine this should be announced with the larger block owner.
On Jan 25, 2014 2:19 PM, "Drew Linsalata" wrote:
> Yeah, its been a while since I had to get involved in this. We have a
> customer with their own IPv4 allocation that wants us to announce a /27 for
> them. Back in "the day",
64 matches
Mail list logo
