Agree'd in these "smaller" scenario's I just wonder if in a larger scale scenario, whatever that might look like, if its necessary. Whereby many organizations who provide "services" are effected. Perhaps the result of a State led campaign ....topic for another day.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgs...@gmail.com>wrote: > I am betting that Netsol doesn't need any more "coordination" at the > moment -- their phones are probably ringing off-the-hook. There are > still ~400 domains still pointing to the ztomy NS: > > > ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> @foohost parsonstech.com NS > ; (1 server found) > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 49064 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;parsonstech.com. IN NS > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > parsonstech.com. 172800 IN NS ns2617.ztomy.com. > parsonstech.com. 172800 IN NS ns1617.ztomy.com. > > ;; Query time: 286 msec > ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) > ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 20 19:16:25 2013 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 81 > > - ferg > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Phil Fagan <philfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I should caveat.....coordinate the "recovery" of. > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Brandon Butterworth > > <bran...@rd.bbc.co.uk>wrote: > > > >> > Is there an organization that coordinates outages like this amongst > the > >> > industry? > >> > >> No, usually they are surprise outages though Anonymous have tried > >> coordinating a few > >> > >> brandon > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Phil Fagan > > Denver, CO > > 970-480-7618 > > > > -- > "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson > fergdawgster(at)gmail.com > -- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618
