Hah!
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Warren Bailey < wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote: > The United States Constitution* > > *See Terms and Conditions for details, not all citizens apply, void where > prohibited, subject to change at any time. > > On 6/21/13 11:42 AM, "Phil Fagan" <philfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I guess the moral here is....don't do anything "wrong." > > > >:-D > > > > > >On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:31 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > >> > On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Phil Fagan <philfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I would think this is only an issue if they throw out the Fourth in > >> that when > >> >> they use that data collected "inadvertantly" to build a case a > >>against > >> you > >> >> they use no other data collected under a proper warrant. > >> > > >> > That statement ignores a longstanding legal principle known as "fruit > >>of > >> the poison tree". > >> > >> Howdy, > >> > >> In spite of what you may have seen on TV, law enforcement is not > >> required to ignore evidence of a crime which turns up during a lawful > >> search merely because it's evidence of a different crime. Fruit of the > >> poisonous tree applies when the original search for whatever it was > >> they were originally looking for is unlawful. Supposedly the FISA > >> court found the NSA's troll for terrorists to be lawful. Once that's > >> true, evidence of any crime may be lawfully introduced in court. > >> > >> > >> For a fun read, check out the Ilustrated Guide to Criminal Law: > >> http://lawcomic.net/guide/?p=18 > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Bill Herrin > >> > >> > >> -- > >> William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us > >> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> > >> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >Phil Fagan > >Denver, CO > >970-480-7618 > > -- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618
