On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:18:21PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> One thing I didn't see revisited was your subscription problem. Are you
> now subscribed? Do you want to be?
I've figured it out now. Worked fine from the new address.
> When you bounce a message, mutt takes the message as it was re
Dominik --
...and then Dominik Vogt said...
%
% On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:18:21PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > One thing I didn't see revisited was your subscription problem. Are you
% > now subscribed? Do you want to be?
%
% I've figured it out now. Worked fine from the new address.
Yay!
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 05:58 -0500]:
> % > with the Message-ID: regenerated on your system, too.
> %
> % Does that mean that mutt won't be able to sort it into the correct
> % thread?
>
> I don't think the References: are tossed, but it's a new message and so
> it should get
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:12:33PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 05:58 -0500]:
> > % > with the Message-ID: regenerated on your system, too.
> > %
> > % Does that mean that mutt won't be able to sort it into the correct
> > % thread?
> >
> > I don'
I can't see these letters, they are replaced by a "?". Does anyone
know where I have to fix this?
Thanks in advance,
Manuel
--
I can't see these letters, they are replaced by a "?". Does anyone
know where I have to fix this?
Thanks in advance,
Manuel
--
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Manuel Hendel wrote:
> I can't see these letters, they are replaced by a "?". Does anyone
> know where I have to fix this?
Does exporting the LANG variable (in ~/.bash_profile) fix this?
Eg:
export LANG=de_DE
...or something like that. See /usr/lib/locale for more locale
Try searching the archives for Umlaut
--lpr
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Lee J. Moore wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Manuel Hendel wrote:
>
> > I can't see these letters, they are replaced by a "?". Does anyone
> > know where I have to fix this?
>
> Does exporting the LANG variable (in ~/.bash_profile
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:08:47PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 09:37:03PM -0400, Daniel J Peng wrote:
> | I just installed Debian woody with Mutt 1.3.28i, and I've discovered a
> | puzzling behavior that wasn't in the Mutt that came with Mandrake 8.0
> | nor any o
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 12:46:29PM +0100, Lee J. Moore wrote:
> Does exporting the LANG variable (in ~/.bash_profile) fix this?
>
> Eg:
>
> export LANG=de_DE
>
> ...or something like that. See /usr/lib/locale for more locale
> values.
No it's getting more worse. I did a export LANG=de_DE befo
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:07:45PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> Try searching the archives for Umlaut
Thanks, I found the right answers. It's working now.
manuel
--
The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even
touched. They must be felt.
* Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 13:33 +0200]:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:12:33PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 05:58 -0500]:
> > > % > with the Message-ID: regenerated on your system, too.
> > > %
> > > % Does that mean that mutt
* Manuel Hendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-15-02 07:38]:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:07:45PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> > Try searching the archives for Umlaut
>
> Thanks, I found the right answers. It's working now.
It would really be nice for the other lurkers in the list for you to
post the solu
Hi,
* Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-14 03:11:36 +0200] wrote:
> Problem :
> Sometimes a message received via a mailing list, but doesn't
> mention the list in any of the recipient headers. (eg a member
> bounced an off-list reply back to the list) Mutt's list-reply
> function do
Hi,
* Derrick 'dman' Hudson [02-07-15 00:52:25 +0200] wrote:
[...]
> Yeah, I was afraid it wasn't possible right now.
Someone posted a patch to mutt-dev introducing a new modell
to handle sorting. Maybe...
> What is the formal method for submitting a feature
> request, along with some ideas o
Hi,
* Manuel Hendel [02-07-15 14:39:58 +0200] wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:07:45PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> > Try searching the archives for Umlaut
> Thanks, I found the right answers. It's working now.
Sure, it has to. Your mail now contains a subject of:
Subject: Re: problems with
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 08:21:27AM -0400, Daniel J Peng wrote:
| On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:08:47PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| > On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 09:37:03PM -0400, Daniel J Peng wrote:
| > | I just installed Debian woody with Mutt 1.3.28i, and I've discovered a
| > | puzzling beh
I use Cygwin Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-05) on Win2000 and just
got messages from two people with a short text message
saying "Your password is 12zxjkjl123kjl12jz". But the
size of each of the messages, according to Mutt, was 65k.
After viewing the message with the default viewer (only),
my virus prote
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:56:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> According to F-Secure Web site, this is a virus that exploits
> a flaw in Internet Explorer, and by extension mail readers
> that use it, such as Outlook. No surprise there! The only
> surprise to me is that 250k infected file
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:22:02PM +0100, Dave Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:56:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > According to F-Secure Web site, this is a virus that exploits
> > a flaw in Internet Explorer, and by extension mail readers
> > that use it, such as Outlook. No su
On Mon,Jul15,2002at04:56:04PM+0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
> I use Cygwin Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-05) on Win2000 and just
> got messages from two people with a short text message
> saying "Your password is 12zxjkjl123kjl12jz". But the
> size of each of the messages, according to Mutt, was 65k.
> After
I just posted this to comp.mail.mutt but I don't think all that many people
read the newsgroup, especially the developers.
I'm doing some tricky things with send-hooks to set the From: and Reply-To:
fields based on the outgoing email address (mainly for mailing lists). This
works great, but it me
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:57:42AM -0500, Rich wrote:
> > According to F-Secure Web site, this is a virus that exploits
> > a flaw in Internet Explorer, and by extension mail readers
> > that use it, such as Outlook. No surprise there! The only
> > surprise to me is that 250k infected file which
Hi,
what's send_charset set to? I have
set send_charset=us-ascii:iso-8559-1:iso-8559-15:utf-8
so mutt will use the most minimal charset needed. Your mail is
us-ascii, so high chararcters are dropped.
Ciao,
Viktor
--
Viktor Rosenfeld
WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel
Eric --
...and then Eric Smith said...
%
% How would I set the default Fcc to the domain name of the
% recipient, omitting the tld part (.com or whatever).
% This would also be useful as a default save-hook.
You'd have to use DGC's fmtpipe patch and write a little script to handle
it. I have
Hi,
* Viktor Rosenfeld [02-07-15 21:11:57 +0200] wrote:
> Your mail is us-ascii, so high chararcters are dropped.
There aren't umlauts in the body, they appear in the header.
For the body someone just needs a character set and an
encoding. Headers may not contain 8bit characters but have
to be c
I've successfully switched from XIMIAN Evolution to mutt.
I would say - this is my _real_evolution :)
Thanks for all your help, folks !
Have a nice time,
- Ivo
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 03:56:11PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * eim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-14 15:14]:
> >I have three
Gregory Seidman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I'm doing some tricky things with send-hooks to set the From: and Reply-To:
> fields based on the outgoing email address (mainly for mailing lists). This
> works great, but it means I also need the following two lines:
>
> send-hook '.' 'unmy_hdr Re
hi there,
i'm getting pretty annoyed by the behavior of search-next; this is how i
use mutt pretty often, and it doesn't exactly help to make it easier:
starting in index:
~b pattern
pattern
at this moment, instead of just jumping to the next match, mutt prompts
me for the pattern. it's o
I just wanted to give another 1000 thumbs up for SpamAssassin. It
plain rocks. I was able to take everything out of my procmailrc
except for my list filters and stuff to /dev/null, and it really does
take care of everything. My procmailrc is a fraction of the size, and
so muich cleaner.
-Ken
On 07-15-2002 at 16:13 EDT, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just wanted to give another 1000 thumbs up for SpamAssassin. It
Hmmm, offtopic, I believe.
--
David Collantes - http://www.bus.ucf.edu/david/
College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida
"Success is ne
Don't forget to mention that it consumes less resources that way ,-)
--lpr
I'm on a list where most of the traffic consists of a paragraph or two
of text and an accompanying chart as an image attachment. I really
need to be able to see the image as I read the text, and it'd be nice
to be able to do that within Mutt. I haven't figured out how to get
the image to xv with
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002, David Collantes wrote:
> On 07-15-2002 at 16:13 EDT, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just wanted to give another 1000 thumbs up for SpamAssassin. It
>
> Hmmm, offtopic, I believe.
I don't think so. It's been a topic of much discussion on this list.
-Ken
Hello Thorsten,
On Thursday, July 11, 2002 at 11:24:36 PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Don 11 Jul 2002 23:06:04 CEST) --]
> gpg: Warnung: Sensible Daten könnten auf Platte ausgelagert werden.
> gpg: Unterschrift vom Son 09 Jun 2002 19:12:09 CEST, DSA Schl
Hi Ray,
On Monday, July 1, 2002 at 2:51:32 PM -0700, Ray wrote:
> One of the mailing lists that I am subscribed to has recently started
> rejecting all of my posts and complaining that attachments are not
> allowed. I'm just sending plain old text but presumably the mail list
> software doesn't
I use mutt 1.3.28 (the Debian package). When viewing the list of
messages in my 'sent' mailbox (where I copy my sent messages), it
displays the 'From:' line. This is not very useful, since I already
know that all messages in this mailbox are from me. This has been
happening ever since I switch
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:41:57PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote:
> I'm on a list where most of the traffic consists of a paragraph or two
> of text and an accompanying chart as an image attachment. I really
> need to be able to see the image as I read the text, and it'd be nice
> to be able to do that
On 07/15/02 14:55 -0600, Dhruva B. Reddy wrote:
> I use mutt 1.3.28 (the Debian package). When viewing the list of
> messages in my 'sent' mailbox (where I copy my sent messages), it
> displays the 'From:' line. This is not very useful, since I already
> know that all messages in this mailbox ar
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:56:04PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Thomas Baker, and lo! it spake thus:
> saying "Your password is 12zxjkjl123kjl12jz". But the
> size of each of the messages, according to Mutt, was 65k.
>
> that use it, such as Outlook. No surprise there! The only
> surprise to me
Hi,
* Alain Bench [02-07-15 23:15:53 +0200] wrote:
> On Thursday, July 11, 2002 at 11:24:36 PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> > I also see another error, where Mutt displays an empty line between
> > the (correct) GPG output and the marker: '[-- Ende der PGP-Ausgabe
> > --]' and won't verify th
John & Dhruva --
...and then John P Verel said...
%
% On 07/15/02 14:55 -0600, Dhruva B. Reddy wrote:
...
% > messages in my 'sent' mailbox (where I copy my sent messages), it
% > displays the 'From:' line. This is not very useful, since I already
...
% >
% I do what you're seeking with a fold
I tried this, along with:
reset alternates
and:
set alternates=""
in my local .muttrc file. But my 'sent' mailbox still shows the 'From:' line.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 at 16:39:43 -0500, David T-G soliloquized thusly:
> John & Dhruva --
>
> ...and then John P Verel said...
> %
> % On 07/15/02
This seems to do what I want. Thanks, John.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 at 17:26:23 -0400, John P Verel soliloquized thusly:
> On 07/15/02 14:55 -0600, Dhruva B. Reddy wrote:
> > I use mutt 1.3.28 (the Debian package). When viewing the list of
> > messages in my 'sent' mailbox (where I copy my sent mes
I spoke too soon--it works the same for me when I switch to the 'sent'
mailbox, but then I get the same behavior when I switch back to 'inbox',
i.e., it shows the 'To:' line.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 at 17:26:23 -0400, John P Verel soliloquized thusly:
> On 07/15/02 14:55 -0600, Dhruva B. Reddy wrote:
Hi,
* Dhruva B. Reddy [02-07-16 00:10:30 +0200] wrote:
> This seems to do what I want. Thanks, John.
Good. And: how did you reply to the message? Your mail shows
neither an In-Reply-To: nor a References: header, i.e. it
breaks threading which mutt usally (generallly?) _not_ does.
bye, Rocco
Michael Tatge sez:
} Gregory Seidman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
} > I'm doing some tricky things with send-hooks to set the From: and Reply-To:
} > fields based on the outgoing email address (mainly for mailing lists). This
} > works great, but it means I also need the following two lines:
} >
Dhruva --
You should always keep the list in the loop; you're more likely to get an
answer that way :-)
...and then Dhruva B. Reddy said...
%
% I tried this, along with:
%
% reset alternates
%
% and:
%
% set alternates=""
%
% in my local .muttrc file. But my 'sent' mailbox still shows the
For that message I hit 'r' (reply to sender). For this one I hit 'g'
(reply to all).
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 at 00:14:48 +0200, Rocco Rutte soliloquized thusly:
> Hi,
>
> * Dhruva B. Reddy [02-07-16 00:10:30 +0200] wrote:
> > This seems to do what I want. Thanks, John.
>
> Good. And: how did you
Hi,
* Dhruva B. Reddy [02-07-16 00:17:11 +0200] wrote:
> I spoke too soon--it works the same for me when I switch to the 'sent'
> mailbox, but then I get the same behavior when I switch back to 'inbox',
> i.e., it shows the 'To:' line.
Correct. You need two folder-hooks to do it. One for all
fol
Interesting. On this list, I do not include the 'In-Reply-To:' field
unless I hit 'g'. I will remember this.
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 at 00:14:48 +0200, Rocco Rutte soliloquized thusly:
> Hi,
>
> * Dhruva B. Reddy [02-07-16 00:10:30 +0200] wrote:
> > This seems to do what I want. Thanks, John.
>
As suggested by David, I set 'alternates' to my e-mail address and that
has the desired effect. Thank you all for your responses!
Dhruva
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 at 00:21:06 +0200, Rocco Rutte soliloquized thusly:
> Hi,
>
> * Dhruva B. Reddy [02-07-16 00:17:11 +0200] wrote:
> > I spoke too soon--it
Hi,
* Dhruva B. Reddy [02-07-16 00:28:52 +0200] wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 at 00:14:48 +0200, Rocco Rutte soliloquized thusly:
> > Good. And: how did you reply to the message? Your mail
> > shows neither an In-Reply-To: nor a References: header,
> > i.e. it breaks threading which mutt usally (
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 05:58:01AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
| % continue to use 'bounce' since the list of Received: headers is
| % getting too long with this mail server.
|
| That's really odd. Your mail server should let a message go through a
| million hops if it has to.
It's a crude, but e
--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Derrick 'dman' Hudson spake thus:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 05:58:01AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> It's a crude, but effective, loop detection mechanism (ment
Hi,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [02-07-16 03:34:04 +0200] wrote:
> Alas! Derrick 'dman' Hudson spake thus:
> > It's a crude, but effective, loop detection mechanism
> > (mentioned in RFC 821 as well). When the MTA sees what
> > it thinks is an excessive number of Received: headers it
> > figures a mail
Is there a way to bind a key that searches all the mdirs/ for related
messages? I've been searching up on that and can't find a thing. Has
anyone tried it?
--
Nelson D. Guerrero
On Friday, July 12, 2002 at 6:56:42 AM -0500, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
>%| From Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri Jul 31 00:32:50 1998
> The [yahoo2mbox.pl] script generated valid From_ lines for me
> (probably since I didn't try unmunging)
No, I get the same bad From_ separator
58 matches
Mail list logo
