Hi, * Dhruva B. Reddy [02-07-16 00:28:52 +0200] wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 at 00:14:48 +0200, Rocco Rutte soliloquized thusly:
> > Good. And: how did you reply to the message? Your mail > > shows neither an In-Reply-To: nor a References: header, > > i.e. it breaks threading which mutt usally (generallly?) > > _not_ does. > Interesting. On this list, I do not include the > 'In-Reply-To:' field unless I hit 'g'. I will remember > this. You can also do: subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then you can hit 'L'. You might be interested in reading the manual (look for ``Handling Mailing Lists''). Right after sending the mail I remembered that I once had problems with David's mails which I received without References: but with In-Reply-To: (allthough others received it correctly). It still may be my mailpath. bye, Rocco
