* Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 13:33 +0200]: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:12:33PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 05:58 -0500]: > > > % > with the Message-ID: regenerated on your system, too. > > > % > > > % Does that mean that mutt won't be able to sort it into the correct > > > % thread? > > > > > > I don't think the References: are tossed, but it's a new message and so > > > it should get a new Message-ID: and so it changes. > > > > The MID header is left unchanged, mutt adds: > > Resent-From: Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:08:43 +0200 > > Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Resent-To: Nicolas Rachinsky <nicolas> > > Okay, if the Resent-To: header should have been added, something > must have gone wrong. This are the headers of one of my bounced > messages (bounced to [EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > ---------------------------- snip -------------------------- > ---------------------------- snip -------------------------- > > No Resent-To: header anywhere. Any good explanation for taht?
I just tried. Either Puretec or gmx removes them. If I bounce to a local address (touching only localhost), they stay, if I bounce via puretec and GMX, they are removed. I'm sorry, but at the moment I've n time to investigate further. Nicolas
