Hi, * Dhruva B. Reddy [02-07-16 00:10:30 +0200] wrote: > This seems to do what I want. Thanks, John.
Good. And: how did you reply to the message? Your mail shows neither an In-Reply-To: nor a References: header, i.e. it breaks threading which mutt usally (generallly?) _not_ does. bye, Rocco
