* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 05:58 -0500]: > % > with the Message-ID: regenerated on your system, too. > % > % Does that mean that mutt won't be able to sort it into the correct > % thread? > > I don't think the References: are tossed, but it's a new message and so > it should get a new Message-ID: and so it changes.
The MID header is left unchanged, mutt adds: Resent-From: Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:08:43 +0200 Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-To: Nicolas Rachinsky <nicolas> > % continue to use 'bounce' since the list of Received: headers is > % getting too long with this mail server. > > That's really odd. Your mail server should let a message go through a > million hops if it has to. What about the [admittedly absurd] case of > someone at the tail of a long UUCP connection because he doesn't have > access to a real ISP yet? What about the [slightly less] absurd case of > mail out of a company that allows SMTP mail but strictly enforces some > sort of heirarchical mail server path to better track down offenders? No, not a million. I can't remeber the (default)limit at the moment, but I think it's somwhere between 15 and 200. Nicolas
