On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:16:58 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do.
But is there an option to ask Mutt not to display garbage like
[-- La sortie PGP suit (heure courante : Tue Jan 8 00:13:02 2002) --]
gpg: Avertissement: l'utilisation de la mémo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Samuel Padgett hath spake thusly:
> Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hmmm... well, whenever I reply to a message, everything after
> > sigdashes is stripped from the message. It's possible that my editor
> >
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 14:40:36 -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > Occasionally, you run across a sig that's just damn cool, or otherwise
> > warrants comment. I can find no way to make mutt include the sig in
> > e-mail, temporarily
On Jan 08, Vincent Lefevre [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:16:58 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do.
>
> But is there an option to ask Mutt not to display garbage like
>
> [-- La sortie PGP suit (heure courante : Tue Jan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Vincent Lefevre hath spake thusly:
>
> The "s" in the index is sufficient for me if I want to know if a
> message is signed.
Perhaps, but it's not enough to tell you if the message was signed by
the person it clamed to be sig
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 17:39:17 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Regardless, if you turned off pgp_verify_sig, you would not see the
> "garbage" above, just the "s" in the index.
But I still see some lines because of the attachment. I would like
to see nothing.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECT
Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > The "s" in the index is sufficient for me if I want to know if a
> > message is signed.
>
> Perhaps, but it's not enough to tell you if the message was signed by
> the person it clamed to be signed by.
It changes from 's' to 'S' upon verific
On Jan 08, Vincent Lefevre [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 17:39:17 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > Regardless, if you turned off pgp_verify_sig, you would not see the
> > "garbage" above, just the "s" in the index.
>
> But I still see some lines because of the attachment. I
Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, that command didn't do much useful for me,
Did you try running it after loading post-mode?
> To turn it OFF, one would stick this in the appropriate place in
> their .emacs file:
>
> '(post-kill-quoted-sig nil)
That line alone does not do
Sorry if this is pointed out in the manual...I missed it.
For those who might not think about it (like me), do NOT save your
messages (using an mbox-hook) to a mailbox which matches the regular
expression used in the same hook. For example:
mbox-hook python-list python-list-save
This will dele
Actually, I tried the mbox-hook, cause I wanted to
compress the read messages in certain folders to one with
the same name except have the .gz extension.
Well, my messages didn't show up in my ~/Mail folder.
As it was a compressed file it was easy to find.
Basically it defaulted to saving it i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Justin R. Miller hath spake thusly:
> Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > The "s" in the index is sufficient for me if I want to know if a
> > > message is signed.
> >
> > Perhaps, but it's not enough to t
On Jan 07, Justin R. Miller [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > The "s" in the index is sufficient for me if I want to know if a
> > > message is signed.
> >
> > Perhaps, but it's not enough to tell you if the message was signed by
> > the person
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 18:31:13 -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> Perhaps, but it's not enough to tell you if the message was signed by
> the person it clamed to be signed by.
Anyway, I never verify signatures, as I don't need to (at least for
the moment).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to everyone who have responded with helpful hints. For those
keeping score:
At some point hitherto, Derek D. Martin hath spake thusly:
> - forwarded messages not included in quoting
The mentioned variables seem to have solved this one.
>
Derek D. Martin wrote:
>
> Mutt sucks much less (for me) today! =8^) I'd still really really
> like to see the pgp key selection stuff cleaned up, and I'd also
> really rather not have to hit P to have a traditional PGP message
> work.
do you use procmail?
i use this to accomplish that (i kno
I have a macro that deletes older messages in the current folder.
macro index T"~d>2w !~F"D"~T"
Does anyone have any idea how I might apply this to all my folders with
one blazingly fast keystroke?
--
Michael Montagne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.boora.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Will Yardley hath spake thusly:
> Derek D. Martin wrote:
> >
> > Mutt sucks much less (for me) today! =8^) I'd still really really
> > like to see the pgp key selection stuff cleaned up, and I'd also
> > really rather not ha
Thanks. I checked my home dir, but they weren't there. I did finally
find them in ~/Mail (I use ~/mail). I used an '=' in front of the
mailbox names, but it was before the 'set folder="~/mail"' directive,
so perhaps that's why it didn't take.
Anyway, I apologize to the list for my previous mes
On 2002.01.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Michael Montagne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a macro that deletes older messages in the current folder.
> macro index T"~d>2w !~F"D"~T"
> Does anyone have any idea how I might apply this to all my folders with
> one blazingly fast keystroke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 07:53:52PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > Thanks to everyone who have responded with helpful hints. For those
> > keeping score:
> >
> > > - HTML ma
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 21:04:10 -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:27:29AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Me too. Now, this isn't a problem for me as using the editor (emacs
> > in my case) to do that is a better solution since I can unstrip the
> > signature (with Ctrl-_ i
Ok, I've been fighting this for awhile now and I'm getting
tired of it.
It was actually the reason that I joined his list anyway.
8o)
I can't send mail from mutt on my computer, and I'm not
sure why.
I know that my config files are ok, cause I can send mail
from mutt from my son's login, using
On 07/01/02 Nick Wilson did speaketh:
> * Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 17:44]:
>
> Sheesh I just came from kmail!
> Like most things Unix-ish there's a fair old learning curve, but sooo
> worth it!
Yup. Most things worth anything are worth learning.
Mike
--
Michael P.
I recently tried out mutt 1.3.25. This is my first look at the 1.3.*
series of mutt. One thing I noticed right away is that mutt is no
longer display accented characters correctly. On the index screen
they appear as question marks. When viewing the text of an email,
they appear as octal with a
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:31:35AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
> Hey people.
>
> I just wanted to share a sentiment. At work I'm playing with Evolution
> because of all of these nuts around me obsessed with M$
> Lookout!. IMHO, Evolution 1.0 is not "evolution" at all, it's more
> like a
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 07:17:06PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> Perhaps, but unless I misunderstand how mutt verifies the signature,
> even that isn't an indication that the mail was signed by the person
> the e-mail claims to be from. AFAIU, it is only an indication that
> the signature was v
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:15:57AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:16:58 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do.
>
> But is there an option to ask Mutt not to display garbage like
>
> [-- La sortie PGP suit (heure courante
Le 07/01/02 ? 22:57, Walt Mankowski écrivit:
> I recently tried out mutt 1.3.25. This is my first look at the 1.3.*
> series of mutt. One thing I noticed right away is that mutt is no
> longer display accented characters correctly. On the index screen
> they appear as question marks. When view
David Rock wrote:
>
> understand, Evolution has an Exchange connector piece that you can
> purchase, but I really want nothing to do with Evolution if I can help
> it (although *anything* is better than Lookout).
one interesting thing is that evolution DOES use PGP/Mime for
encryption... while i
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 08:59:04PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > > Mike L, if you have tricks for figuring out WHICH mozilla window the
> > > page will pop up in, I'd like to see that.
>
> Yeah, that'd do it, but I'd rather just leave one up and have it use
> the same one all the time. No
On 7-Jan-2002 19:53 Derek D. Martin wrote:
|
| Mutt sucks much less (for me) today! =8^) I'd still really really
| like to see the pgp key selection stuff cleaned up, and I'd also
Have a look at http://www.woolridge.org/mutt/ for a patch which will
probably address the issues you've r
* Samuel Padgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 08:39]:
> Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my
> > text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help.
>
> Some MUAs will display "a^Ha" (aa) as a bold "a".
* Knute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 08:39]:
> Ok, I've been fighting this for awhile now and I'm getting
> tired of it.
>
> It was actually the reason that I joined his list anyway.
> 8o)
>
> I can't send mail from mutt on my computer, and I'm not
> sure why.
>
> I know that my config files ar
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
