On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:09:55PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
:
:I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
:after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
:to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
:index skips deleted mess
On 2000-03-13 20:03:37 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
Just a reminder: There is a mutt-announce mailing list.
The last mail there announced 1.0pre3 :-{
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:16:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
>
> That's good news! I've had to hack the configure script of previous
> releases (0.95.4 and 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library
> on my HP-UX 10.20 system. Is this still necessa
John P. Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> In poking around the mutt manual, I discovered that a) opening mutt
> with the -y switch opens the directory browser with (apparently)
> updated N indicator. Alternatively, pressing the tab key while in the
> directory browser will do
On 2000-03-14 10:15:41 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> Just a reminder: There is a mutt-announce mailing list.
Thanks, I know.
> The last mail there announced 1.0pre3 :-{
The last mail I sent there announced 1.0.1.
Additionally, I have intentionally announced the public
1.1 betas to mutt-us
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 12:15:37AM -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
(SNIP)
> message as deleted, and moves my current select to message #38. As far
> as I know, there is no mechanism within Mutt to remember your previous
> selection; thus there's no way to automagically jump from message #38
> back to
Hi,
I am afraid this might be a FAQ, but all I could find was a detailed
description of how to do it with pine, so here is my question:
How can you search for mails in different folders (eg search through
all the mailboxes you have in ~/Mail/)?
Regards,
Chris
--
christian molls
student of laws
Christian R Molls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 14 Mar 2000:
> How can you search for mails in different folders (eg search through
> all the mailboxes you have in ~/Mail/)?
You can't do this with Mutt. You need to use maybe something like
grep from the command line, or the grepmail program.
> Sure. The problem has to do with the expansion of the $< macro. For
> the HP-UX make, $< is evaluated only for inference rules. For GNU make,
> $< is evaluated for both target and inference rules. At least one of
> mutt's Makefiles (I don't remember offhand which one) has a target rule
> t
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:35:56PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:16:18PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:33:06AM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> Sorry about that. I didn't see th
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 12:33:25PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> John P. Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
>
> > Over the next couple days, I intend to try some XWindow biff-like
> > clients and see how that goes.
>
> Keep in mind that some of the biff-style utilities will co
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 08:07:39AM -0500, Mike Markowski wrote:
> Can you recommend any that don't conflict? I'm using xbiff, which
> definitely does.
Check out gbuffy by Brandon Long:
http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/gbuffy/
--
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.
I am using pgp5 on a Linux box. I am not a large user of pgp right now,
because I basically don't have the time to fiddle with it.. have one
question for now. I notice that many signed messages have something of a
very short key. I have fiddled with pgp enough in the past to realize
that you c
I just got PGP (v. 6.5.2) back on my Linux box, and seem to have
forgotten how it's supposed to work.
If I write a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask to encrypt and sign it, I get a
prompt for the key ID of '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Pressing the return gets me a
list of the public keys in my public key
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 07:38:16AM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I am using pgp5 on a Linux box. I am not a large user of pgp right now,
> because I basically don't have the time to fiddle with it.. have one
> question for now. I notice that many signed messages have something of a
> very shor
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 10:27:43AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I use slang-1.4.0 -- the latest. Right now I'm trying to build PGP-6.5.1,
> the guy who made the hpux/aix patch is a moron. I had to give patch the
> filenames by hand... -- does GNUpg work on your HP-UX box?
I don't know about
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 11:35:53AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Sure. The problem has to do with the expansion of the $< macro. For
> That was in m4/Makefile.*, and it's has been fixed for a while now.
That's good to hear, too. It appears that the fix may be only in the
development branch
On Tuesday, 14 March 2000 at 11:35, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> > Sure. The problem has to do with the expansion of the $< macro. For
> > the HP-UX make, $< is evaluated only for inference rules. For GNU make,
> > $< is evaluated for both target and inference rules. At least one of
> > mutt's Ma
> > That was in m4/Makefile.*, and it's has been fixed for a while now.
>
> That's good to hear, too. It appears that the fix may be only in the
> development branch though, as mutt-1.0-us/m4/Makefile still has the
> "sed ... $< ..." lines.
That's right, I think this wasn't backfixed for 1.0
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I am using pgp5 on a Linux box. I am not a large user of pgp right now,
> because I basically don't have the time to fiddle with it.. have one
> question for now. I notice that many signed messages have something of a
> very short key. I have fiddle
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> does GNUpg work on your HP-UX box?
It runs fine here, on HP-UX 10.20. I don't remember having to do more
than the usual contortions to build on HP-UX.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | t
Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I/usr/include/curses_colr"
> LIBS="$LIBS -lcur_colr"
I have done this myself, and while the resulting Mutt does build, I
found that the color support does not work. I haven't tried it lately,
though. Do you get correct col
Dear group,
Is there any way to tell mutt to inform me if new
mail has arrived? At the moment I am using xbiff
for that purpose but I would like to get rid of it.
Tehanks in advance.
Regards,
Marc van Dongen
--
Marc van Dongen, CS Dept | phone: +353 21 4903578
University College Cor
When reading an mh folder mutt 1.0.1 apparently loads every message,
and, when you quit, writes every message back to disk. (Is that true
for maildir too?) That's surely a bug, right? The whole point of
one-file-per-message formats is that you only touch the data you need
to, and leave the rest
Telsa Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> And the N for
> "new mail" is very intermittent on the listing of folders (for which
> I too have forgotten the correct name).
>
> There are one or two folders which never seem to show up as having
> new mail in them. They're listed in
Marc van Dongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 14 Mar 2000:
> Is there any way to tell mutt to inform me if new
> mail has arrived? At the moment I am using xbiff
> for that purpose but I would like to get rid of it.
Sure. List your incoming mailboxes with the "mailboxes" command in
your .mut
Scott Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When reading an mh folder mutt 1.0.1 apparently loads every message,
> and, when you quit, writes every message back to disk.
Well, the files have to be at least renamed, because mh requires the filenames
be contiguous integers. IIRC, the message flags
My previous question was :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm searching a solution to properly print messages with paragraphs in long single
>lines (in fact, like this one...).
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 03:35:40PM -0500, John P. Verel wrote:
>
> I use enscript with excellent results. Here's the entry from
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:03:37PM -0500, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> "Thomas" == Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless someone
Thomas> has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to be a release
Thomas> candid
Hi,
I have several folders, but in two of them no new mail is noticed (when
browsing thru folders with new mail or looking for folders marked with N
in the folderlist).
One of them is /home/rejo/mail/spam-usenet, although i seem to have set
up everything correct:
$ la mail/spam*
-rw---
| Well, the files have to be at least renamed, because mh requires the filenames
| be contiguous integers.
No it doesn't. They usually are not.
| IIRC, the message flags are also stored inside the
| files, so mutt would have to rewrite the files to change the read, replied,
| etc flags.
It s
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 12:01:12PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> Many of the text applications I've seen that have used color have used
> it in a way that I found either not useful, distracting or hideous.
I can certainly see how you would say that. But the nice thing about
mutt is it is extremel
super, do you think you can tell me something about it?
what command would I use to sign messages with a short signature
i use this all the time...
http://clug.chicago.il.us:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x60618246
/jgh
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 11:57:25AM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I/usr/include/curses_colr"
> > LIBS="$LIBS -lcur_colr"
>
> I have done this myself, and while the resulting Mutt does build, I
> found that the color supp
Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I/usr/include/curses_colr"
> > > LIBS="$LIBS -lcur_colr"
> >
> > I have done this myself, and while the resulting Mutt does build, I
> > found that the color support does not work. I haven't tried it lately,
> > though.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:03:37PM -0500, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> "Thomas" == Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless someone
Thomas> has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to be a release
Thomas> candid
* On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 08:20:16AM -0600, Alex Lane wrote:
> I just got PGP (v. 6.5.2) back on my Linux box, and seem to have
> forgotten how it's supposed to work.
>
> If I write a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask to encrypt and sign it, I get a
> prompt for the key ID of '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
Eric Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB mail
> file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0.
NFS? What type(s) of file locking? Differences in "mutt -v" output?
> I don't know if you would consider this a show stopper but it was
On 03/14/00, 09:36:28PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > David DeSimone posted a few days ago a very good reply in another thread
> which explains how Mutt detects new mail (for the usual mbox folders).
> Basically, it compares the "last accessed" and "last modified" times for
> a file. If "last
John P. Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 14 Mar 2000:
> How and when does mutt update the folder browser? Is it necessary to
> press tab twice to re-write the screen?
There's a function called check-new in the directory listing (and
Mailboxes) screen, but it's unbound by default. Bind it
What causes a "thread" of messages to break on occasion ?? Is the fault
of the sender or their e-mailer ??
What happens every once in a while is I can have a thread of messages
grouped together like they should be and then, for instance, the next
time my mail is checked, a new message that *shou
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 06:59:48PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> "David" == David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB
Eric> mail file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0.
David> NFS? What type(s) of file
I remember someone mentioning of wanting to convert their large
addressbook in Eudora to Mutt...I found this on freshmeat and some other
cool utils, by just searching for "mutt"
http://provo.doit.wisc.edu/~miner/eud2mbox/
--
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus t
At 21:11 -0500 14 Mar 2000, Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What causes a "thread" of messages to break on occasion ?? Is the fault
> of the sender or their e-mailer ??
>
> What happens every once in a while is I can have a thread of messages
> grouped together like they should be and
On Tuesday, 14 March 2000 at 21:23, Eric Boehm wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 06:59:48PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> > "David" == David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Eric> I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB
> Eric> mail file with 1451 mess
Hi,
Over the past few months I've seen the odd message on the list concerning the use of
certifcates with Mutt. I also remember someone posting about the use of OpenSSL and
potentially calling this from within Mutt. I was wondering whether anything further
has come of this and what the futur
Keeping in mind this is not a PGP mail list, I nonetheless would be
appreciative if anyone could explain why I get a signal 11 error when
running pgp 6.5.2. The mutt docs I've looked at distinguish pgp2 and
pgp5; is 6.5.2 a completely different animal?
I may be taking a oversimplified view of thi
47 matches
Mail list logo
