Eric Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB mail
> file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0.

NFS?  What type(s) of file locking?  Differences in "mutt -v" output?

> I don't know if you would consider this a show stopper but it was
> enough for me to back out 1.1.9 and go back to 1.0.

It would be incredible if such a slow-down escaped the notice of any of
the developers.

-- 
David DeSimone   | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard  |  found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
UX WTEC Engineer |    PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D  AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44

Reply via email to