Eric Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB mail > file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0. NFS? What type(s) of file locking? Differences in "mutt -v" output? > I don't know if you would consider this a show stopper but it was > enough for me to back out 1.1.9 and go back to 1.0. It would be incredible if such a slow-down escaped the notice of any of the developers. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer | PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE! Brendan Cully
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE! Thomas Roessler
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE! Gero Treuner
- Pleasr try: pgp6.rc. Thomas Roessler
- Re: Pleasr try: pgp6.rc. Alex Lane
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE! Martin Schröder
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE! Thomas Roessler
- I liked the old "weed" behavior (was [Announce] ... Eric Boehm
- Re: I liked the old "weed" behavior (was [A... Thomas Roessler
- Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0 (was Re: [Annou... Eric Boehm
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0 (was R... David DeSimone
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0 (w... Eric Boehm
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.... Brendan Cully
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mut... Eric Boehm
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower tha... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower tha... Lars Hecking
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.... David DeSimone
- File locking (was: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x ... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: File locking (was: Mutt 1.1.9 ab... David DeSimone
- Re: File locking (was: Mutt 1.1.... Vincent Lefevre