On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 12:26:02AM +0200, J Horacio MG wrote:
> Notice though, that netscape was by far the widiest voted mailreader.
> That's surely due to mutt being command line based.
mutt is not commandline based. Ok, you can send a mail via the
commandline if you must, but you can be sure
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 09:28:42PM +0200, Christian Stigen Larsen wrote:
> I tried installing mutt and pgp5i, but I had
> some small problems using it with mutt, it
> didn't work very well since you have to use pgpk
> instead of pgp -k now.. Is tehre any "trick" with
> this ?
Well, PGP5 has a dif
Thus spake Hal Burgiss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Notice though, that netscape was by far the widiest voted mailreader.
> > That's surely due to mutt being command line based.
> When ignorance is bliss ...
Can you give me reasons why to use mutt instead of Outlook Express,
that I can tell my frien
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 10:52:55AM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Can you give me reasons why to use mutt instead of Outlook Express,
> that I can tell my friends here?
* Faster.
* Smaller.
* Doesn't crash.
* Colorful
* Can properly encrypt mail
* Does all and even more than what OE does
* Not
Hi,
can the pager decode rot13?
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
PGP signature
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 11:54:11AM +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
> Hi,
> can the pager decode rot13?
Dunno. Who needs that?
When in doubt, replace the interanl pager which can...
--
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
To err is human.
To forgive is beyond the sco
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 12:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 11:54:11AM +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > Hi,
> > can the pager decode rot13?
> Dunno. Who needs that?
> When in doubt, replace the interanl pager which can...
Sometimes spoilers are rot13 coded.
--
(sorry for the loss of the subject yesterday)
Ok I explain again
(Liviu Daia was near the solution
I need the pipe function but in command line mode and not when using mutt normally)
Currently I do
mutt -s "hello" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what yo
Christian --
...and then Christian Stigen Larsen said...
% I tried installing mutt and pgp5i, but I had
% some small problems using it with mutt, it
% didn't work very well since you have to use pgpk
% instead of pgp -k now.. Is tehre any "trick" with
% this ?
Mutt is pgp5-, pgp2-, and gpg-capab
Horacio --
...and then J Horacio MG said...
%
% Notice though, that netscape was by far the widiest voted mailreader.
Actually, I saw PINE out ahead at something like 26%, while
Communicator was only at 22% or so...
% That's surely due to mutt being command line based.
Yeah. Thank Heavens ;
Didier --
...and then didier said...
%
% Currently I do
%
% mutt -s "hello" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deja.com/ ==--
% Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
:-D
--
David Thorburn-Gundlach * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to l
On 1999-07-15 07:38:53 -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Still, it's an interesting concept... Perhaps the public keys of
> each subscriber could be registered with the list management software,
> which would use a much less bogus private key to decrypt (in batch mode
> without human interv
I'm attempting to create a Mutt configuration that will have two sets of PGP
Keys. One Key will be for one of my users in my address book, and the other
Key will be for all other users. The Key for all other users is set as the
default, and I'm trying to set a pgp-hook up for the one special use
Quoting Saku Ytti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 01:26:02PM +0300:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 12:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 11:54:11AM +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > can the pager decode rot13?
> > Dunno. Who needs that?
> > When
I have two questions:
1. Can I configure Mutt to filter my mail upon opening a mailbox?
2. How can I use Mutt's PGP integration on a message that contains a PGP
header, that doesn't follow Mutt's attachment convention? Friends who use
other readers sometimes like to put the message in the
Christian Stigen Larsen sent off:
> Also another question: Is it possible to encrypt an e-mail and send it to a
> mailinglist, having all the recipients being able to decrypt it ?
People have sent you answers, but it depends on the politics of the list.
Unfortunately in some countries encry
Hi...
I have just downloaded mutt 0.96.3. Compiled it successfully with PGP 5i.
I put this on my ~/.muttrc:
set pgp_autosign
set pgp_replysign
set pgp_sign_as="0x3C452459"
source ~/.mutt_pgp5rc
~/.mutt_pgp5rc is the same as pgp5.rc file found on mutt's source contrib
directory.
Whenever I try
At 10:07 AM EDT on July 15 Adam J Henry sent off:
> 1. Can I configure Mutt to filter my mail upon opening a mailbox?
Do you mean scoring? Yes. If you mean limiting the view like with
limit, I suppose you could make a macro to change to the mailbox and
execute the limit command.
> 2. How can
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 11:18:45AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > "Alex, I´m honest -- Outlook is very good and totally fits my
> > needs... so - why do you use mutt?"
>
> * to show my individuality
> * because I can randomize my signatures with it
> * because I'd like to be able to read my
Hello,
I use mutt in command line mode to send mail.
I would like not to send the mail directly but to print it on the standard output in a
way to pipe it to another program
Can anyone help ?
bye
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 09:16:24PM +0700, m4v3r1ck wrote:
> set pgp_sign_as="0x3C452459"
I don't need that for PGP to work.
Try a username instead!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
Freedom to be an idiot is part of freedom in general.
PGP signature
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 10:15:40AM -0700, wrote:
> I use mutt in command line mode to send mail.
> I would like not to send the mail directly but to print it on the
> standard output in a way to pipe it to another program
Why ?
If you want to send attachments from the commandline try mpack
Fellow Mutt-fans:
I want to be able to PGP encrypt and send mail
to a recipient from the command line.
In .muttrc I've
set pgp_autoencrypt
I try:
mutt -s "hi there" [EMAIL PROTECTED] < plain_textfile
This doesn't work, the plain_textfile arrives as plain
text instead of PGP e
Hi...
Just noticed that mutt 0.96.3i adds User-Agent header to outgoing message.
I compiled mutt starting with this:
# CFLAGS="-DNO_XMAILER" ./configure
The default X-Mailer is gone. How to accomplish the same thing for
User-Agent header?
TIA
PGP signature
Hi David!
On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, David DeSimone wrote:
> Wilhelm Wienemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > make keymap_defs.h
> >
> > Thanks, it works very well!
>
> I don't suppose anyone is interested in the problem of why the
> keymap-defs.h file wasn't built automatically?
1. May
On Thu, Jul 15 1999, at 21:16 +0700, m4v3r1ck wrote:
>Whenever I try to sign a message, I get this:
>-u option requires a userid argument
This may be due to a bug in 0.96.3i, which Thomas Roessler has issued a
patch for on the "mutt-dev" list (after all, we're talking about the
development bran
Rob Reid [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> At 10:07 AM EDT on July 15 Adam J Henry sent off:
> > 1. Can I configure Mutt to filter my mail upon opening a mailbox?
>
> Do you mean scoring? Yes. If you mean limiting the view like with
> limit, I suppose you could make a macro to change to the mailbox
On Fri, Jul 16 1999, at 00:13 +0700, m4v3r1ck wrote:
>Just noticed that mutt 0.96.3i adds User-Agent header to outgoing message.
"X-Mailer:" has been superceded by "User-Agent:", in compliance with
some more recent IETF draft.
Marco
> > > > make keymap_defs.h
> > >
> > > Thanks, it works very well!
> >
> > I don't suppose anyone is interested in the problem of why the
> > keymap-defs.h file wasn't built automatically?
It's a bug in Makefile.am.
--- cvs/mutt/Makefile.amWed Jun 9 13:53:14 1999
+++ src/mutt/Make
Alexander Langer [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Can you give me reasons why to use mutt instead of Outlook Express,
> that I can tell my friends here?
- standard compliance (if they care; if they don't you have another lecture
to give them ;)
- very accessible remotely on slow modem lines -- read
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 03:02:54PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> A lot of the pro-Pine comments were "I can use it with telnet", which
> obviously is not something just Pine has (duh). So if it's just inertia
> (and we care), then maybe some advocacy needs to be done.
Is there a support graphic
Holger Eitzenberger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Most *nix's come with pine installed by default. If you get a telnet
> account somewhere you get pine, if you login to your uni account you
> most likely will see pine. Reason? Maybe it has to do with pines
> limited possibilities to configure (e
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 03:02:54PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Holger Eitzenberger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ...So if it's just inertia
> (and we care), then maybe some advocacy needs to be done.
If it's advocacy you want, release pre-compiled binaries for W32 and/or
DOS. PC hackers will
John Franklin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Is there a support graphic a la "Netscape NOW!" that people could put
> on their home pages? I didn't see anything on the mutt.org site.
> Then again, I didn't see ANY graphics on the mutt.org site.
>
> 88x31 seems to be a common size for such things, bu
John Franklin [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Is there a support graphic a la "Netscape NOW!" that people could put
> on their home pages? I didn't see anything on the mutt.org site.
> Then again, I didn't see ANY graphics on the mutt.org site.
Sven has one on his site, so does Brandon Long; I dunn
Thanks to the ones who answered,
I tried using cat as the $sendmail in muttrc but it didn't work
So as my mailserver is qmail, I sent the message to a false user and get it back from
his mailbox
It works for what I wanted, so...
Thanks to everybody !
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 04:26:33PM -0400, John Franklin wrote:
>
> Is there a support graphic a la "Netscape NOW!" that people could put
> on their home pages? I didn't see anything on the mutt.org site.
> Then again, I didn't see ANY graphics on the mutt.org site.
>
> 88x31 seems to be a commo
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got some stuff like this on the web page -- it seems to me that people
> need to first hear about Mutt and be curious enough to look into it, and
> when that happens they will go to the web page.
Why is it so important that Mutt be #1 on a Slash
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Why is it so important that Mutt be #1 on a Slashdot poll?
> Just curious.
It isn't at all. Mostly we were talking about people using other mailers
(like Pine) not because they liked the features the most but out of
inertia. As I said, *if we care*
Holger Eitzenberger zei Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 02:07:03AM +0200 dat:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 04:26:33PM -0400, John Franklin wrote:
> >
> > Is there a support graphic a la "Netscape NOW!" that people could put
> > on their home pages? I didn't see anything on the mutt.org site.
> > Then again,
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 04:49:04PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> I get the impression, though, that a lot of "the faithful" don't read /.
> much since the s/n ratio got so bad. Most of the comments seem to be
> newbies. The informal survey of mail headers done a while back by someone
> on this
Yo, d00d!
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
%
% Why is it so important that Mutt be #1 on a Slashdot poll?
% Just curious.
BECAUSE MUTT RULZ, d00d!!!
:-D
--
David Thorburn-Gundlach * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play
Stasinos Konstantopoulos [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 04:26:33PM -0400, John Franklin wrote:
> > > Then again, I didn't see ANY graphics on the mutt.org site.
>
> IMHO that's one of the great things about the site as well as mutt
> itself. I visit the page for the inform
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 10:41:53PM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Yo, d00d!
> ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
> % * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> % Why is it so important that Mutt be #1 on a Slashdot poll?
> % Just curious.
> BECAUSE MUTT RULZ, d00d!!!
Yes, but p
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 08:57:16PM +0200, Marco Goetze wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16 1999, at 00:13 +0700, m4v3r1ck wrote:
> >Just noticed that mutt 0.96.3i adds User-Agent header to outgoing message.
> "X-Mailer:" has been superceded by "User-Agent:", in compliance with
> some more recent IETF draft.
45 matches
Mail list logo
