On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 10:52:55AM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Can you give me reasons why to use mutt instead of Outlook Express,
> that I can tell my friends here?
* Faster.
* Smaller.
* Doesn't crash.
* Colorful
* Can properly encrypt mail
* Does all and even more than what OE does
* Not so buggy (security etc.)
* Free!
* Open Source
* System wide preferences!
> "Alex, I´m honest -- Outlook is very good and totally fits my
> needs... so - why do you use mutt?"
* to show my individuality
* because I can randomize my signatures with it
* because I'd like to be able to read my mail even when N$ crashes
* because I'd like to answer fast
* I'm a keyboard person
* I'd like to know that there is source I can use if things go amiss.
* Modularity
--
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: that there is no man
really clever who has not found that he is stupid.
PGP signature
