Hello there, mutt users
I've translated the mutt potfile to Portuguese (Brazil), and will soon
make it avaiable for everyone. For now, the potfile is being revised by
the LIE-BR (linux Internationalization Effort / Brazil) team.
To the developers, thanks for this excellent mail program.
--
Ja
Hello, All!
Is there any version of mutt for win95, win3.1 or ms-dos?
I used to work with mutt on the Linux PC. And I want
to work with it on the Windows PC also.
Thanks!
WBR & WBW, Vitaly Repin.
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 13:27 +0400, Vitaly A. Repin wrote:
>Is there any version of mutt for win95, win3.1 or ms-dos?
No.
>I used to work with mutt on the Linux PC. And I want
>to work with it on the Windows PC also.
That's the price you pay for forsaking the Forces of the Good by
joining the
Hi,
I am interested in a way to call a my_hdr command when replying, which is based on the
original headers of the message to which I am replying to, but without quoting these
headers.
For example, I have several email addresses which are aliased to one central account.
I would like email co
on Jun 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in a way to call a my_hdr command when replying, which is based on
>the original headers of the message to which I am replying to, but without quoting
>these headers.
>
> For example, I have several email addresses which are aliased
Quoting Marco Goetze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 12:26:37PM +0200:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 13:27 +0400, Vitaly A. Repin wrote:
> >Is there any version of mutt for win95, win3.1 or ms-dos?
>
> No.
No?
> >I used to work with mutt on the Linux PC. And I want
> >to work with i
Hello, Marco!
15-Jun-99 12:26 you wrote:
> >Is there any version of mutt for win95, win3.1 or ms-dos?
>
> No.
>
> >I used to work with mutt on the Linux PC. And I want
> >to work with it on the Windows PC also.
>
> That's the price you pay for forsaking the Forces of the Good by
> joining the ra
Hi,
I don't know if any of you have already received replies where the
equivalent of 'Re:' is *prepended* to the subject. For example :
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5
Subject: Test -REPONSE
In this situation, changing reply_regexp doesn't help, as mutt uses this
regular expression to find the *
Hello out there,
could someone please tell me if there is a limit on the size of
mailboxes (mbox style)? I have a quite large mbox (~13 MB) with nearly
4000 mails in it, and it grows by about 200 a day.
Can I continue this, or will I have to change to MH ('Where have all
the inodes gone, short t
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 03:09:03PM +0200, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> Hello out there,
>
> could someone please tell me if there is a limit on the size of
> mailboxes (mbox style)? I have a quite large mbox (~13 MB) with nearly
> 4000 mails in it, and it grows by about 200 a day.
>
> Can I contin
On 06/15/1999 (12:26:37), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 13:27 +0400, Vitaly A. Repin wrote:
> >Is there any version of mutt for win95, win3.1 or ms-dos?
>
> No.
There isn't? Brandon Long's mutt page provides patches
and documentation for how to get mutt to bu
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Version: mutt-0.95.6i
Running "mutt -z -f maildir/" on an empty maildir doesn't cause mutt to
exit, the way it does with an empty mailbox. Is that a bug?
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 12:51:14PM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> % the Status: header into the message. This is a lot of work to have Mutt
> % perform, in order to reflect the status change immediately, and I bet
> % you wouldn't like it.
>
> Unless it's a small mailbox, I'm betti
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 09:13 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>On 06/15/1999 (12:26:37), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 13:27 +0400, Vitaly A. Repin wrote:
>>>Is there any version of mutt for win95, win3.1 or ms-dos?
>>No.
>There isn't? Brandon Long's mutt page provides patches
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
> > 5. Is it possible to skip the fcc question when sending mail? (do you
> > want to save this message?).
> This is a bug, but you can alleviate it with
>
> unset confirmcreate confirmappend
This was changed a while back so that fcc would honor the value of the
confirmcreate and confirmappe
On 06/15/99 Marco Goetze uttered the following other thing:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 09:13 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >On 06/15/1999 (12:26:37), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 13:27 +0400, Vitaly A. Repin wrote:
> >>>Is there any version of mutt for win95, win3.1 or ms-
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=TdkiTnkLhLQllcMS; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
I am trying to set my machine up as follows:
Mail to be forwarded from my hub to my local box (Linux + qmail), qmail
delivering to my ~/Maildir but procmail filtering into Maildir format
subdirs of ~/Maildir.
When I start mutt, I want it to open up my "inbox", which currently is
Maildir's standa
Vitaly A. Repin [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Or, in other words, there are no problem to port mutt under
> ms windows or ms dos, but "it is the question of religion", isn't it?
Try time. Most of the people who develop Mutt avoid MS whenever possible,
they have little or no desire to waste time w
Mark E. Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 15 Jun 1999:
> ~/Maildir but it still opens /var/spool/mail/mark by default
What does your MAIL environment variable contain? Eg. on my system it
points to ~/Mail/INBOX (which is a Maildir-style folder) and I have no
problems with the setup, Mut
David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ! echo $SHELL
This gives me /bin/tcsh, but Mutt still uses /bin/sh as the shell for
non-interactive commands.
The shell that Mutt uses is the "exec shell". This is a configure
option:
--with-exec-shell=SHELLSpecify alternate sh
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Mark E. Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mail to be forwarded from my hub to my local box (Linux + qmail), qmail
> delivering to my ~/Maildir but procmail filtering into Maildir format
> subdirs of ~/Maildir.
I don't think you quite understand what a maildir is. It has three
subdirectorie
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 04:35:38PM -0400, Mark E. Drummond wrote:
> When I start mutt, I want it to open up my "inbox", which currently is
> Maildir's standard ~/Maildir/new/, a directory, not a file. I cannot
> figure out what needs to be set to do this. I have my $folder set to
> ~/Maildir but i
While translating the manual to Spanish, I've found I cannot possibly
translate "quadoption". Could anyone give me a clear definition of it,
please?
TIA
--
Horacio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Valencia - ESPAÑA
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=FilwpOHBrTVNlmJ3; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
J Horacio MG wrote:
>
> While translating the manual to Spanish, I've found I cannot possibly
> translate "quadoption". Could anyone give me a clear definition of it,
> please?
Hi,
Quadoption, at least as far as Mutt is concerned, means that the variable
in question has only 4 possible values
Jeremy Blosser dixit:
~>
~> It just indicates that the variable in question has four possible values,
~> as opposed to a boolean one, which only has two possible values.
~>
~> My wife the Spanish major suggests "cuatro-opcion". "Quadoption" isn't a
~> real word in English either.
That's what
Thanks to everyone who replied. I think I might have this down now. I
have MAIL=~/Maildir and $folder=~/Mail.
Now, I also have a "| preline procmail" in my .qmail so I am wondering
what path my mail is taking. When I fire up mutt, it shows me as being
in ~/Maildir and new messages are there. When
I've been using mutt for almost 2 years and I have *never* had it
delete anything I didn't tell it to.
I suggest you look for the problem in one of 2 places:
a) fetchmail and your invocation of it
b) somewhere between the keyboard and your chair
Sorry for your loss, but your "bug report" was le
33 matches
Mail list logo
