Re: set From when replying

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 11:03:46AM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:58:29PM GMT, Will Yardley wrote: > > > > So; I need to set the From when replying to the address which the > > > original message was To. > > > Do

Re: set From when replying

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:58:29PM GMT, Will Yardley wrote: > > So; I need to set the From when replying to the address which the > > original message was To. > Does setting $reverse_name true and defining a regex in $alternates > to match the address pattern(s) work for you?

Re: set From when replying

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:18:43PM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org wrote: > So; I need to set the From when replying to the address which the > original message was To. Does setting $reverse_name true and defining a regex in $alternates to match the address pattern(s) work for you? w

Re: set From when replying

googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org wrote: > I'm sure this has been asked before, and it is even likely that at one > time I knew the answer. But I'm getting old, and the world is > enshittifying at a pace that makes me lose my mind :( > > So; I need to set the From whe

set From when replying

I'm sure this has been asked before, and it is even likely that at one time I knew the answer. But I'm getting old, and the world is enshittifying at a pace that makes me lose my mind :( So; I need to set the From when replying to the address which the original message was To. More prec

Re: Quoting character when replying

On 2021/02/14 23:40, Cameron Simpson wrote: [format=flowed] is quite conservations, to minimise the implementation burden. And that frugality is likely where the inflexibility about ">" comes from. I think it's to avoid ambiguity. A line that starts with "> " could have been quoted that way

Re: Quoting character when replying

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 07:10:08PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: Hmm. Beginning to think this is presentation. What are your mutt flow settings? I've got this: set reflow_text=yes set reflow_wrap=-4 set text_flowed=yes set text_flowed=yes # Added by ama @ 2019/02/03

Re: Quoting character when replying

On 15Feb2021 05:56, Angel M Alganza wrote: >On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:40:16PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: >>Aye. I use format=flowed all the time; there's stuff in the wiki about >>settings to go with it, for example to make composition easy. > >I see. :-) Oddly enough, your quotations appear

Re: Quoting character when replying

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:40:16PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote: Aye. I use format=flowed all the time; there's stuff in the wiki about settings to go with it, for example to make composition easy. I see. :-) Oddly enough, your quotations appear with the leading > without the space, while mi

Re: Quoting character when replying

On 15Feb2021 05:20, Angel M Alganza wrote: >On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 07:36:34PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: >>You can read a bit more about it at >>, but you'll want to do more >>research if you intend to compose format=flowed emails. > >Thank you, I'm going

Re: Quoting character when replying

mber now I started using it to make things nicer for myself while doing mail in my Zipit Z2 (All-in-One Wi-Fi Messenger), running OpenWRT, in which I only have a 52 (IMS) characters wide console. From that link you gave me: "If $reflow_space_quotes is unset, mutt will still add one trailing

Re: Quoting character when replying

On 14Feb2021 19:36, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: >On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:55:35AM +0100, Angel M Alganza wrote: >>At some point I must had done something that changed that behaviour >>to prepend it with just the greater sign (>) without the following >>space. > >It looks like you have enabled $te

Re: Quoting character when replying

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:55:35AM +0100, Angel M Alganza wrote: At some point I must had done something that changed that behaviour to prepend it with just the greater sign (>) without the following space. It looks like you have enabled $text_flowed. That overrides the value of $indent_strin

Re: Quoting character when replying

12021/01/04 09:31.78 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Angel M Alganza ಬರೆದರು: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:06:18AM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote: > > >You can edit/reset the indent_string variable, which should fix it :) > > Yes, I have already tried that before. In my .muttrc file I have: > > # set indent_string=">

Re: Quoting character when replying

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:06:18AM +, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote: You can edit/reset the indent_string variable, which should fix it :) Yes, I have already tried that before. In my .muttrc file I have: # set indent_string="> " Since it is commented out, I think it's de default. When I try re

Re: Quoting character when replying

or a very long time, I had mutt to prepend quoted text from emails I > was replying to with the greater than sign followed by an space, which > was great. At some point I must had done something that changed that > behaviour to prepend it with just the greater sign (>) without the >

Quoting character when replying

Hello, Speaking about ways to improve the email experience, I've realized there is a little thing that is bugging me for some time already and I haven't been able to find the solution for. For a very long time, I had mutt to prepend quoted text from emails I was replying to with t

Replying to lists and aliases

I've noticed that when I reply to a mailing list post that I have an alias for, instead of say 'Mutt Users ' being used in the To: header when I receive the reply, it has used only the email address. I'm using this example format: alias mutt-users Mutt Users Which is automated with a bash scri

Re: Configure quote-level when replying

uld work. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 09:31:51AM -0600, Sam Burk wrote: > Hello, first time posting to the mutt mailing list. > > Is there a way to configure mutt to only quote the message I'm replying to? > That is, just the first quoting level? > > I searched through the mutt

Configure quote-level when replying

Hello, first time posting to the mutt mailing list. Is there a way to configure mutt to only quote the message I'm replying to? That is, just the first quoting level? I searched through the muttrc manpage to no avail, so I set up a vim mapping to remove any secondary quoting levels whe

keep Fcc/Bcc when replying

Hello all This is probably trivial, however I could not find the appropriate section in the manual. I have a message that I sent and which may include Cc, Bcc and Fcc headers. Ho do I reply, including all Cc + Fcc + Bcc recipients? seems to work only * for Cc * when the message is not from my

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

On 2014-10-13, Derek Martin wrote: > - edit_headers This is what I do now to solve my problem. -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

Hi Chris On 2014-10-16, Chris Bannister wrote: > Oooops, sorry, I meant shift-l, i.e: "L" Ok ;-) No it doesn't. See my previous post. -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 06:01:24PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote: > Hi Chris > > On 2014-10-14, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > try CTRL-L > > Does it do what you want? > > Hmmm. From the manual, CTRL-L is used to refresh the screen. > What do I miss here? Oooops, sorry, I meant shift-l, i.e: "L" --

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

To: field, the author expects that you have some action to > take (including replying), whereas Cc: is for keeping people in the > loop who are not intended to take any action. This makes sense. Nevertheless I often want the behaviour I described because all recipients ``have to take action&#

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

field, the author expects that you have some action to take (including replying), whereas Cc: is for keeping people in the loop who are not intended to take any action. http://lifehacker.com/5990422/know-the-difference-between-to-and-cc-in-an-email I believe Mutt tries to preserve the sense o

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

Hi Chris On 2014-10-14, Chris Bannister wrote: > try CTRL-L > Does it do what you want? Hmmm. From the manual, CTRL-L is used to refresh the screen. What do I miss here? -- Greetings Elias

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

Hi there On 2014-10-13, Derek Martin wrote: > I think your question is a little vague to get good answers Yes, this is it. So let me precise it. I don't talk about mailing lists but messages that come from one person to many. Suppose I've got the following simplified header where 'ME' is m

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:20:36PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote: > Hi all > > I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: > field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is > this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. try CTRL-L Does it do what you want? --

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

in the headers To me it sounds like you are talking about replying to a mailing list, but in any case Mutt has a bunch of settings that control the behavior you're looking for. They (may) include: - reply_to - ignore_list_reply_to - metoo - alternates - ask_cc - ask_bcc - edit_hea

Re: Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

Greetings! *** Elias Diem [2014-10-13 21:24]: >I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: >field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is >this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. I think that article is good for explaining of preferred behaviour To/

Group replying: set To: instead of Cc:

Hi all I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To: field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive. -- Greetings Elias

Re: Disable To/Cc/Subject prompts when replying, but not when creating

* Chris Down on Tuesday, July 15, 2014 at 11:45:26 +0800 > Is there some way to disable the prompts for To/Cc/Subject when replying > to a message, but still have them appear when creating a new one? Try: set fast_reply=yes -- theatre - books - texts - movies Black Trash Productions a

Re: Disable To/Cc/Subject prompts when replying, but not when creating

* On 14 Jul 2014, Chris Down wrote: > Hello, > > Is there some way to disable the prompts for To/Cc/Subject when replying > to a message, but still have them appear when creating a new one? > > Thanks. :-) Not directly, but you can probably construct a macro that plugs in ENT

Disable To/Cc/Subject prompts when replying, but not when creating

Hello, Is there some way to disable the prompts for To/Cc/Subject when replying to a message, but still have them appear when creating a new one? Thanks. :-)

Re: How does matt detect no change when replying to a message?

On 07Dec2012 18:40, Chris Green wrote: | On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:28:12AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: | > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:22:32PM +, Chris Green wrote: | > >How does mutt detect no change to the temporary file when one hits | > >R[eply] but then makes no change to the file? | >

Re: How does matt detect no change when replying to a message?

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:40:59PM +, Chris Green wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:28:12AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:22:32PM +, Chris Green wrote: > > >How does mutt detect no change to the temporary file when one hits > > >R[eply] but then makes no chan

Re: How does matt detect no change when replying to a message?

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:40:59PM +, Chris Green wrote: Thank you, I sort of want the opposite, a way to fool mutt into thinking the file *hasn't* been modified. I'm editing the file via a wrapper script and that always changes the modification time even if the file hasn't actually changed.

Re: How does matt detect no change when replying to a message?

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:28:12AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:22:32PM +, Chris Green wrote: > >How does mutt detect no change to the temporary file when one hits > >R[eply] but then makes no change to the file? > > Yes, if the modification time on the file is unc

Re: How does matt detect no change when replying to a message?

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 06:22:32PM +, Chris Green wrote: How does mutt detect no change to the temporary file when one hits R[eply] but then makes no change to the file? Yes, if the modification time on the file is unchanged. See $abort_unmodified to change this behavior.

How does matt detect no change when replying to a message?

How does mutt detect no change to the temporary file when one hits R[eply] but then makes no change to the file? -- Chris Green

Re: Default subject "Re: your mail" when replying to empty-subject e-mails

* On 21 Nov 2012, Marcelo Laia wrote: > On 21/11/12 at 07:00pm, David Champion wrote: > > > > You could create a personal translation, I guess. > > Have any idea how to do? Only roughly (I haven't done it): create your own mutt.po file, override the right message in it, compile it with msgfmt,

Re: Default subject "Re: your mail" when replying to empty-subject e-mails

On 21/11/12 at 07:00pm, David Champion wrote: > > You could create a personal translation, I guess. > Have any idea how to do? -- Marcelo Brasil (Brazil, for English Speakers) Linux user number 487797

Re: Default subject "Re: your mail" when replying to empty-subject e-mails

* On 21 Nov 2012, E. Prom wrote: > 2012/11/21 Will Yardley : > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:41:02AM +0100, E. Prom wrote: > >> > >> When replying to an e-mail with an empty subject, the subject of the > >> answer is set to "Re: your mail". > >

Re: Default subject "Re: your mail" when replying to empty-subject e-mails

2012/11/21 Will Yardley : > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:41:02AM +0100, E. Prom wrote: >> >> When replying to an e-mail with an empty subject, the subject of the >> answer is set to "Re: your mail". > > I thought it was configurable, but didn't find anyth

Re: Default subject "Re: your mail" when replying to empty-subject e-mails

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:41:02AM +0100, E. Prom wrote: > > When replying to an e-mail with an empty subject, the subject of the > answer is set to "Re: your mail". I thought it was configurable, but didn't find anything from a quick search in TFM. Also, it looks like i

Default subject "Re: your mail" when replying to empty-subject e-mails

Hi, When replying to an e-mail with an empty subject, the subject of the answer is set to "Re: your mail". I would like to customize/localize it, but it does not seem to be an option. Have I missed something? (No, I would prefer keeping using Debian's binaries ;-)

Re: Wrapping non-wrapped e-mail when replying [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

0n Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:51:32PM -0500, David Champion wrote: >* On 27 Apr 2011, Trey Sizemore wrote: >> I'd like to find out how to wrap long lines in e-mails that I'm replying >> to. My mutt is setup to automatically wrap lines when I compose,

Re: Wrapping non-wrapped e-mail when replying [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

0n Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:51:32PM -0500, David Champion wrote: >* On 27 Apr 2011, Trey Sizemore wrote: >> I'd like to find out how to wrap long lines in e-mails that I'm replying >> to. My mutt is setup to automatically wrap lines when I compose,

Re: Wrapping non-wrapped e-mail when replying

* On 27 Apr 2011, Trey Sizemore wrote: > I'd like to find out how to wrap long lines in e-mails that I'm replying > to. My mutt is setup to automatically wrap lines when I compose, but > I'd like to be able to also lap long lines in e-mails when I reply. Besides vi

Re: Wrapping non-wrapped e-mail when replying

On Apr 27, 2011 at 07:07 PM +0200, Marco Giusti wrote: Take a try with this line. First reply to this email, move the cursor to this line an press consecutively Vgq. V select the whole line while gq wraps it. `gqq` also wraps the currently selected line. Might be faster than `Vgq`, though th

Re: Wrapping non-wrapped e-mail when replying

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:59:04AM -0400, Trey Sizemore wrote: > I'd like to find out how to wrap long lines in e-mails that I'm replying > to. My mutt is setup to automatically wrap lines when I compose, but > I'd like to be able to also lap long lines in e-mails w

Re: Wrapping non-wrapped e-mail when replying

On Wed Apr 27, 2011 06:22PM, Remco Rijnders wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:59:04AM -0400, Trey Sizemore wrote: > >I'd like to find out how to wrap long lines in e-mails that I'm replying > >to. My mutt is setup to automatically wrap lines when I compose, > >

Re: Wrapping non-wrapped e-mail when replying

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:59:04AM -0400, Trey Sizemore wrote: I'd like to find out how to wrap long lines in e-mails that I'm replying to. My mutt is setup to automatically wrap lines when I compose, but I'd like to be able to also lap long lines in e-mails when I reply. I h

Wrapping non-wrapped e-mail when replying

I'd like to find out how to wrap long lines in e-mails that I'm replying to. My mutt is setup to automatically wrap lines when I compose, but I'd like to be able to also lap long lines in e-mails when I reply. I have googled and see that with Vim as the editor, 'gq' i

Re: set "sender profile" when replying depending on received message

On 31.Jan.11 07:26 -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > alternates name-.*@domain > set reverse_name Thanks a lot, that is exactly what I want.

Re: set "sender profile" when replying depending on received message

itrary and nowhere configured, filtering is done by pattern matching. You can use a regexp to specify which addresses you consider to be "you," and then make Mutt use the same address when replying: alternates name-.*@domain set reverse_name me

set "sender profile" when replying depending on received message

Hi all, I got stuck, while trying to get the following to work: . I am able to receive mails by local_part filtering, this means, name-topic1@domain, name-topic2@domain, ... are automatically forwarded to name@domain . Now when I reply to a mail I have received e.g. on the add

Replying to oneself

Suppose you're sending email back and forth between two of your addresses. j...@joe.com sends email at j...@joe.com. When joe2 replies, the reply goes to joe2 because alternates is set to joe[...@joe\.com. If reply_self was set, the reply would go to joe1 as expected. But reply_self = no is usefu

Re: Quote headers of incoming message when replying?

Gary Johnson schrieb am 07.04.2010 um 15:33:28 (-0700) > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:33:28 -0700 > From: Gary Johnson > To: Mutt Users > Subject: Re: Quote headers of incoming message when replying? > > On 2010-04-07, Michael Ludwig wrote: > > Mutt allows you to edit

Re: Quote headers of incoming message when replying?

editor so you > can quote them in your reply, like in the following example? > > http://markmail.org/message/vkqs2bvt7ovzhnnt You can include the weeded headers by executing :set header before replying to the message. If you want all headers to be included, also execute :unset weed Regards, Gary

Re: Quote headers of incoming message when replying?

Andreas Kneib schrieb am 07.04.2010 um 21:41:20 (+0200) [Re: Quote headers of incoming message when replying?]: > * Michael Ludwig schrieb am Mittwoch, den 07. April 2010: > > Is there a way to have Mutt copy the headers of the incoming message > > (ideally, just a selection) alon

Re: Quote headers of incoming message when replying?

* Michael Ludwig schrieb am Mittwoch, den 07. April 2010: > Mutt allows you to edit the headers of the mail you're composing through > setting edit_headers = yes. > > Is there a way to have Mutt copy the headers of the incoming message > (ideally, just a selection) along with the body to your edi

Quote headers of incoming message when replying?

Mutt allows you to edit the headers of the mail you're composing through setting edit_headers = yes. Is there a way to have Mutt copy the headers of the incoming message (ideally, just a selection) along with the body to your editor so you can quote them in your reply, like in the following exampl

Re: Setting the To: header when replying.

* hsan...@gmail.com [2010-01-15 23:57]: >A few weeks ago everytime I replied a message by pressing r on the index or >pager views the To: header field was correctly set to the same address in the >original message From: header. > >Now everytime I reply an email the To: header in the reply is set

Re: Setting the To: header when replying.

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:10:12AM +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote: > * Horacio Sanson [2010-01-15 10:40]: > > > >A few weeks ago everytime I replied a message by pressing r on the index or > >pager views the To: header field was correctly set to the same address in the > >original message From: header

Re: Setting the To: header when replying.

* Horacio Sanson [2010-01-15 10:40]: A few weeks ago everytime I replied a message by pressing r on the index or pager views the To: header field was correctly set to the same address in the original message From: header. Now everytime I reply an email the To: header in the reply is set to the

Setting the To: header when replying.

et move=no # Do not move read mail from the spool to the mbox set delete=yes # Purge deleted messages without asking #set edit_headers # Allow me to edit headers when composing set fast_reply # Skip initial prompts when replying set use_from # Needed to enable reverse_name set rev

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Michael Williams wrote: > You're forgetting "I don't want to bother changing the reply and my > recipient (and I) do not correspond in English". Mutt now supports internationalization, so for this purpose the developers could replace "Re: your mail" with _("Re: you

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009, Michael Williams wrote: > Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that mutt I have no problem with that default, but the subject "Re: your mail" looks like a spam. -- regards, GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 20

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:03:08PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: > Doing any more than that to address the very narrow case of "I don't > want to bother changing the reply but I don't like the default", just > seems to me like overkill. You're forgetting "I don't want to bother changing the reply a

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On 2009-11-02, Noah Sheppard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:46:12PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: > > Further, if you're going to be picky about the subject, it should > > really reflect the subject of the message, not be just some generic > > equivalent of "you forgot the subject". It hardly

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

* Noah Sheppard [11-02-09 17:15]: > I think the point of having a configurable default is so that we don't > have to change it when prompted. I'd rather not have to type > "Re: my custom non-subject reply subject" or whatever every time I reply > to a message which had no subject. ... > By tha

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On 17:13 Mon 02 Nov , Noah Sheppard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:46:12PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: > > On 2009-11-02, Michael Williams wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:49:38PM -0400, Monte Stevens wrote: > > > > > Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Monday, November 2 at 05:13 PM, quoth Noah Sheppard: > I think the point of having a configurable default is so that we > don't have to change it when prompted. I'd rather not have to type > "Re: my custom non-subject reply subject" or whateve

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:46:12PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2009-11-02, Michael Williams wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:49:38PM -0400, Monte Stevens wrote: > > > > Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that > > > > [..] > > > You can edit the source "send.c" fi

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On 2009-11-02, Michael Williams wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:49:38PM -0400, Monte Stevens wrote: > > > Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that > > > mutt uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to > > >

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:49:38PM -0400, Monte Stevens wrote: > > Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that > > mutt uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to > > something less, er, passive aggressive -- or something in an

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:27:14PM +, Michael Williams wrote: > Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that mutt > uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to something > less, er, passive aggressive -- or something in another language

Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank subject

Hi, Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that mutt uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to something less, er, passive aggressive -- or something in another language? Apologies if this is a FAQ, but it's rather difficult to Google, an

Re: accent problem replying mails

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, April 4 at 02:40 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex: > >0n Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:21:53PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > >>>in the .muttrc I have tried with different carset options: >>>- set charset="iso-8859-1" >>>- set charset="

Re: accent problem replying mails

0n Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:21:53PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: >>in the .muttrc I have tried with different carset options: >>- set charset="iso-8859-1" >>- set charset="utf-8" >>- and with charset not defined. mmm ... i have set in my $HOME/.mutt/settings set charset=//

Re: accent problem replying mails [SOLVED]

thanks :) I have solved the problem. The problem was that I was moving from another computer and I had imported all home. In the old machine the locale was: lang=es...@euro LANGUAGE=es_ES:es:en_GB:en LC_CTYPE="es...@euro" LC_NUMERIC="es...@euro" LC_TIME="es...@euro" LC_COLLATE="es...@euro" LC_MONE

Re: accent problem replying mails

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, April 3 at 09:24 AM, quoth Roger Casaponsa: >letter in the original mail -->> letter when editing a reply >ó -->> ó >ò -->> ò >à -->> "à " (with a space) >' -->> â<80><99> H. Those look like UTF-8 characters that are being misunderst

Re: accent problem replying mails

On Fri, 03 Apr 2009, Roger Casaponsa wrote: > I think that es...@euro is the same that es_ES.ISO8859-15 because when > I choose wich locales I want this is displayed like: es...@euro > ISO-8859-15 If it was related to vim, you may test when replying with vim by typing :set fenc this sh

Re: accent problem replying mails

hello, thanks for the fast reply :) >>but when I reply it, in the editor, they are changed to rares >>characters. > > "rares"? You mean "invalid" or "incorrect" characters? sorry my english is not so good... with rare I mean invalid and incorrect. Here is some examples. letter in the original ma

Re: accent problem replying mails

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, April 2 at 06:54 PM, quoth Roger Casaponsa: >When I recieve an email with some accents it is displayed correct Good! >but when I reply it, in the editor, they are changed to rares >characters. "rares"? You mean "invalid" or "incorrect

accent problem replying mails

Hello, I have a problem of locales and charsets or one of those. When I recieve an email with some accents it is displayed correct but when I reply it, in the editor, they are changed to rares characters. But when i'm editing the mail I can use accents correct and send it correct. It only happens

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, March 23 at 08:40 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin: >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >0x080cb71f in safe_strdup () >(gdb) backtrace >#0 0x080cb71f in safe_strdup () >#1 0x080b4d6a in rfc822_cpy_adr_real () >

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:34:09PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * Joshua Tinnin wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:18:30AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > >> On Wednesday, March 11 at 10:36 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin: > > >> >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > >> >0x080cb71

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

On 08Mar2009 23:07, Kyle Wheeler wrote: | On Friday, March 6 at 08:18 PM, quoth John J. Foster: | >Hey Kyle - I've only been running on a Mac since January (former | >Gentoo user). But I've not changed my environment, knowingly, to effect | >this and my locale shows: | | Huh - well, maybe it doe

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

On 06Mar2009 15:44, Kyle Wheeler wrote: | Step 1 of establishing a UTF-8 environment is getting a terminal | program that supports it. Most of them do these days, but you need to | run them with the right flags. For example, xterm supports UTF-8, but | requires a bunch of flags to enable it, so

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

Hi, * Joshua Tinnin wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:18:30AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Wednesday, March 11 at 10:36 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin: >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >0x080cb71f in safe_strdup () >(gdb) backtrace >#0 0x080cb71f in safe_strdup () >#1 0x080b

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:42:13AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Thursday, March 19 at 09:19 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin: > >Any ideas? > > Unfortunately, no... I think you need to take that to the > mutt-...@mutt.org list. OK, well I appreciate the effort. I'll also try the freebsd lists. - jt

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, March 19 at 09:19 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin: >Any ideas? Unfortunately, no... I think you need to take that to the mutt-...@mutt.org list. ~Kyle - -- I know that there are people who do not love their fellow man, and I hate people like

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

;ve said so far, this crash happens when you tell > > mutt to quit. But this backtrace looks *completely* wrong for > > quitting. It looks like mutt crashed while attempting to send a > > message while viewing a message. Specifically, it crashed while > > attempting to copy

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

nd a > message while viewing a message. Specifically, it crashed while > attempting to copy the value of the $from variable. No, I said that Mutt crashed when quitting or replying to some messages. This is a crash when I try to reply. > I assume that, when run inside the debugger, mutt cr

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, March 11 at 10:36 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin: >Here it is: > >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >0x080cb71f in safe_strdup () >(gdb) backtrace >#0 0x080cb71f in safe_strdup () >#1 0x080b4d6a in rfc822_cpy_adr_real () >#2

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:44:00PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Monday, March 9 at 11:47 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin: ... > > OK, this is what I get: > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > 0x080b2746 in ?? () > > (gdb) backtrace > > #0 0x080b2746 in ?? () > > Yuck. H

Re: Mutt crashing on exit or replying (sometimes)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, March 9 at 11:47 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin: > I should reiterate: this only happens through one of my mutt rc > files. I use two others which have no issues, but I can't see any > differences between them which might cause this. Okay... wh

  1   2   3   4   >