Hi,
* Chengqi(Lars) Song wrote:
I found that "L" works without "lists" or "subscribe" in .muttrc. When
I use "L" the target address becomes "To: mutt-users@mutt.org",
amazing. What's the effect of "lists" and "subscribe" then? I noticed
that after adding them, there will be a tag 'L' in front o
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Ionel Mugurel Ciobica wrote:
On 2-12-2008, at 19h 09'34", Chengqi(Lars) Song wrote about
"Replying a mail in a mail list"
Hi,
When I'm replying a mail in a mail list, for example, a mail in
mutt-users@mutt.org from [EMAIL PROTECTED], the default target is
"To: [
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 at 21:01:31 +0800, Chengqi(Lars) Song wrote:
> Thanks your for your help. I found that "L" works without "lists" or
> "subscribe" in .muttrc. When I use "L" the target address becomes "To:
> mutt-users@mutt.org", amazing. What's the effect of "lists" and
> "subscribe" then? I n
* Chengqi(Lars) Song on Tuesday, December 02, 2008 at 19:09:34 +0800
> When I'm replying a mail in a mail list, for example, a mail in
> mutt-users@mutt.org from [EMAIL PROTECTED], the default target is
>
> "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]",
>
> how to changed it to the following?
>
> "To: [EMAIL PRO
Thanks your for your help. I found that "L" works without "lists" or
"subscribe" in .muttrc. When I use "L" the target address becomes "To:
mutt-users@mutt.org", amazing. What's the effect of "lists" and
"subscribe" then? I noticed that after adding them, there will be a tag
'L' in front of all mai
On 2-12-2008, at 12h 18'00", Ionel Mugurel Ciobica wrote about "Re: Replying a
mail in a mail list"
>
> If you declare it as a mail list you can use `L' instead of `r' to
> replay.
>
I ment to reply. Sorry.
Ionel
On 2-12-2008, at 19h 09'34", Chengqi(Lars) Song wrote about "Replying a mail
in a mail list"
> Hi,
>
> When I'm replying a mail in a mail list, for example, a mail in
> mutt-users@mutt.org from [EMAIL PROTECTED], the default target is
>
> "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]",
>
> how to changed it to
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 27 at 06:10 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
>> The only "parsing" that the pattern parser needs to do is break up
>> the user-input string into "logical parts" of the form (~i EXPR),
>> (~s EXPR), etc., and then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, August 27 at 06:10 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
> The only "parsing" that the pattern parser needs to do is break up
> the user-input string into "logical parts" of the form (~i EXPR),
> (~s EXPR), etc., and then each corresponding part can
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 26 at 11:46 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
>>> Skip the escaping, and just use quotes:
>>>
>>> mutt -e "push '~i "$MID"'" $@
>>>
>>> AFAIK quote characters aren't allowed in Message-IDs.
>>
>> That's probabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, August 26 at 11:46 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
>> Skip the escaping, and just use quotes:
>>
>> mutt -e "push '~i "$MID"'" $@
>>
>> AFAIK quote characters aren't allowed in Message-IDs.
>
> That's probably true, but quotes don't work. Start
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday, August 26 at 10:32 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> * Kyle Wheeler on Sunday, August
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, August 26 at 10:32 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * Kyle Wheeler on Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 16:41:53 -0500
>>> function reply() {
>>> MID=$1; shift;
>>
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Kyle Wheeler on Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 16:41:53 -0500
>> function reply() {
>> MID=$1; shift;
> mutt -e "push '~i $MID'" $@
>> }
Thanks, everyone. One minor annoyance is when Message-IDs have special
charac
* Kyle Wheeler on Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 16:41:53 -0500
> On Sunday, August 24 at 05:17 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
>> function reply() {
>> MID=$1; shift;
>> mutt -e "push 'l ~h $MIDg'" $@
>> }
>
> Strictly speaking, you may want to use the function names rather than
> the keys themselves, e
On 24Aug2008 16:41, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sunday, August 24 at 05:17 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
| >function reply() {
| >MID=$1; shift;
| >mutt -e "push 'l ~h $MIDg'" $@
| >}
|
| Strictly speaking, you may want to use the function names rather than
| the keys themselve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, August 24 at 05:17 PM, quoth Shreevatsa R:
>function reply() {
>MID=$1; shift;
>mutt -e "push 'l ~h $MIDg'" $@
>}
Strictly speaking, you may want to use the function names rather than
the keys themselves, even though it makes the m
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Michael Kjorling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24 Aug 2008 15:25 -0400, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shreevatsa R):
>> Is it possible to reply to a specific message (specified by its
>> Message-ID, say) from the command line?
>>
>> I was told on the #mutt IRC channel tha
On 24 Aug 2008 15:25 -0400, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shreevatsa R):
> Is it possible to reply to a specific message (specified by its
> Message-ID, say) from the command line?
>
> I was told on the #mutt IRC channel that it is possible to write such
> a script using mutt -e ..., and that someone on t
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:51:08AM +0100, Eyolf Østrem wrote:
> On 04.03.2008 (15:34), Chris Bannister wrote:
> > So in your .muttrc do you have something like:
> >
> > set editor ="vim -u mutt-vimrc"
> >
> > or ...?
> >
> > The -u option skips all other initialisation, which would mean
> >
On 04.03.2008 (15:34), Chris Bannister wrote:
> So in your .muttrc do you have something like:
>
> set editor ="vim -u mutt-vimrc"
>
> or ...?
>
> The -u option skips all other initialisation, which would mean
> options like 'textwidth= ' would be lost.
Yes, something like that. I've been
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:51:32PM +0100, Eyolf Østrem wrote:
>
>
> On 27.02.2008 (17:37), Breen Mullins wrote:
> > Since my suggested mapping
> > map ,ds :.,/^-- $/-1dO
> >
> > only makes sense if I'm editing a mail, I pulled it from my .vimrc
> > and dropped it into ~/.vim/after/syntax/mail.vi
On 27.02.2008 (17:37), Breen Mullins wrote:
> Since my suggested mapping
> map ,ds :.,/^-- $/-1dO
>
> only makes sense if I'm editing a mail, I pulled it from my .vimrc
> and dropped it into ~/.vim/after/syntax/mail.vim .
For what it's worth, I have the following in my mutt-vimrc file:
imap ff
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 14:22 -0600]:
Comma repeats the last f/t/F/T operation in the opposite direction. I
don't know why you'd start macros with it either. :)
Well, that's a good point even if I rarely use the reverse-sense search.
Since my suggested mapping
ma
On 02/20/08, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2008-02-20, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 02/18/08, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > > A macro to remove all two-line things would be something like this:
> > >
> > > :%s/\n\n/\r/
> > >
> > > You can add it to your $editor setting (+%s/\n\n/\r/) or you
On 2008-02-20, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/18/08, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > A macro to remove all two-line things would be something like this:
> >
> > :%s/\n\n/\r/
> >
> > You can add it to your $editor setting (+%s/\n\n/\r/) or you can make
> > a key mapping out of it (map ,oe
On 02/18/08, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> A macro to remove all two-line things would be something like this:
>
> :%s/\n\n/\r/
>
> You can add it to your $editor setting (+%s/\n\n/\r/) or you can make
> a key mapping out of it (map ,oe :%s/\n\n/\r/), whichever you
> prefer.
>
What I would like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, February 18 at 11:48 AM, quoth Breen Mullins:
>> For others who may want to try this, I had to make some changes to
>> get it to work.
>
> You changed my definition. I actually do type comma-d-s to trim the
> message. (All of my macros te
* Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 14:33 -0500]:
Wow, that is really slick.
But not original to me - I snarfed something similar a long time ago...
For others who may want to try this, I had to make some changes to get
it to work.
You changed my definition. I actually do type comma-d
On 02/18/08, Breen Mullins wrote:
> * Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 13:08 -0500]:
>
>> When replying to an email that you sent earlier, how would you go about
>> removing the previous signature?
>
> I use vim as my editor - I have a macro defined in vimrc
>
> map ,ds :.,/^-- $/-1dO
>
> (d
On 18 Feb 2008 19:05 +, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Kjorling):
> Run a message through this awk script before passing it to your
> editor. (Set $editor to a wrapper script.)
Sorry, I missed one pretty important detail. This is how you invoke
it:
awk -f awkfile OUTFILE=$outfname $infname
--
On 18 Feb 2008 13:08 -0500, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph):
> When replying to an email that you sent earlier, how would you go about
> removing the previous signature?
Run a message through this awk script before passing it to your
editor. (Set $editor to a wrapper script.)
** cut **
{if ($0 ~ /^
* Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 13:08 -0500]:
When replying to an email that you sent earlier, how would you go about
removing the previous signature?
I use vim as my editor - I have a macro defined in vimrc
map ,ds :.,/^-- $/-1dO
(ds for delete-to-sigdashes). It's not automatic, b
On 09Feb2008 07:34, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I really appreciate all the good ideas and have it display text now as
| well. Mutt really is a great tool but takes some getting used to, to
| make it really useful. Seems like the html dump should be by default
| for new users :)
The tricky
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:34:09AM -0500, Joseph wrote:
> I really appreciate all the good ideas and have it display text now as
> well. Mutt really is a great tool but takes some getting used to, to
> make it really useful. Seems like the html dump should be by default
> for new users :)
I've bee
On 02/07/08, Vladimir Marek wrote:
> > > Is there a way to reply to an html based email and have all the tags
> > > stripped out automatically?
> >
> > If you have
> > auto_view text/html
>
> And it's not limited to html. I do have MS Word convertor (antiword) and
> Open Office convertor (odt
> > Is there a way to reply to an html based email and have all the tags
> > stripped out automatically?
>
> If you have
> auto_view text/html
And it's not limited to html. I do have MS Word convertor (antiword) and
Open Office convertor (odtview) enabled. I usually even don't notice
that s
> Is there a way to reply to an html based email and have all the tags
> stripped out automatically?
If you have
auto_view text/html
in your .muttrc, mutt will decode the HTML when you read the message
and when you quote the message in a reply. If the mail does not start
out as a text/ht
* Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-07-08 09:41]:
> Is there a way to reply to an html based email and have all the tags
> stripped out automatically?
change the edit command to pipe the msg thru text2html to the editor.
--
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
ht
Kevin, et al --
...and then kevin lyda said...
%
...
%
% i find fmt to be more standard across unicies.
Actually, I've found the BSD fmt to be not equal to the GNU or [presumably
ATT, since it "works" in Solaris, but that's funny since SunOS harkens
back to BSD!] fmt, so the quick fix was to c
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 06:58:06PM -0400, Keith R. John Warno wrote:
>
> gqap in conjunction with 'comments' works well. But I'm curious: how do
> folks handle reformatting text with multiple levels of quoting?
For me, it just "works". I think vim recognized the message I'm editing
as an email
- On Tue, 01.Oct.2002, 09:12EDT, Ken Weingold uttered:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> >
> > I use gqap in vim. Thats for leaving the qotes at start of line.
>
> Oh, yeah. Q} will preserve quotes too, but I forgot that I have Q
> remapped to gq, since I had gotten used to t
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 07:38:35AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, kevin lyda wrote:
> > i find fmt to be more standard across unicies.
>
> that's arguable (fmt is likely to be installed, but like most Unix
> utilities would have version dependencies - par is a relative latec
On Tue, Oct 1, 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> I use gqap in vim. Thats for leaving the qotes at start of line.
Oh, yeah. Q} will preserve quotes too, but I forgot that I have Q
remapped to gq, since I had gotten used to the Q in vim 4 I think. Or
something like that. :)
-Ken
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
>
> "Or you can have vim do this reformatting automatically by applying
> patches 6.1.142 and 6.1.143 and adding this to your autocmd:
>
> set formatoptions+=a"
> (posted at vim.vim.org!)
I don't use
On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
Thomas E. Dickey told:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, kevin lyda wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:09:47AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> > > > Not sure about vi, but vim has a wonderful method of
> >
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, kevin lyda wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:09:47AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> > > Not sure about vi, but vim has a wonderful method of wrapping text. A
> > > simple Q} will wrap the whole paragraph. Or Q will do for
> >
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:09:47AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> > Not sure about vi, but vim has a wonderful method of wrapping text. A
> > simple Q} will wrap the whole paragraph. Or Q will do for
> > Outhouse since it seems to make each paragraph
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002, Mike Jackson wrote:
> > If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar, and the
> > message is completely unwrapped, how do I "fix" that part which I quote?
> > I would like to be able to do this automatically.
>
> Not su
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002, Mike Jackson wrote:
> If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar, and the
> message is completely unwrapped, how do I "fix" that part which I quote?
> I would like to be able to do this automatically.
Not sure about vi, but vim has a wonderful method of wrappi
Mike Jackson wrote:
> If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar,
> and the message is completely unwrapped, how do I "fix"
> that part which I quote? I would like to be able to do
> this automatically.
I don't use vi but nearly every editor allows you to call
external p
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:55:08PM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
> Hello,
> I use mutt for reading messages and vi for composing/replying. I guess
> this is more related to vi, but since somebody here most likely has
> encountered the same problem here goes.
>
> If I receive a message from an outl
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:44:53AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
:
: On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 06:44:46PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
: >
: > Now if I can only figure out how to keep both entries and get Mutt to
: > let me select between the two methods...
:
: You can. Just put them in you mailcap in
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 06:44:46PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
> Thanks to you and John Iverson and Will Yardley for the responses.
> It turned out to be my mailcap entry. I had this:
>
> text/html; links %s; nametemplate=%s.html
>
> when I really needed this:
>
> text/html; links -d
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:36:43PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
:
: On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:06:12PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
: >
: > I receive several HTML messages that arrive as an attachment with no
: > plain text equivalent in the main message body or another attachment.
: > When I reply to
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:06:12PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
> I looked in the archives and couldn't find a specific answer this one.
> I receive several HTML messages that arrive as an attachment with no
> plain text equivalent in the main message body or another attachment.
> When I reply to thes
Eugene Lee wrote:
> I looked in the archives and couldn't find a specific answer this one.
> I receive several HTML messages that arrive as an attachment with no
> plain text equivalent in the main message body or another attachment.
> When I reply to these messages, how do I configure Mutt to co
* On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Eugene Lee wrote:
> I looked in the archives and couldn't find a specific answer
> this one. I receive several HTML messages that arrive as an
> attachment with no plain text equivalent in the main message
> body or another attachment. When I reply to these messages,
> ho
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-11 22:59 +0200]:
> I was just wondering if there is some configuration in mutt that makes it possible
>for you to reply to a message without actually "modifying" the original message (used
>when confirming mailinglists subscriptions), all I get now i
[ please wrap lines at something around 72 characters ]
Hi,
* Johan Svedberg [02-06-11 23:36:23 +0200] wrote:
> I was just wondering if there is some configuration in
> mutt that makes it possible for you to reply to a message
> without actually "modifying" the original message (used
> when conf
Johan --
...and then Johan Svedberg said...
%
% Hi!
Hello!
%
% I was just wondering if there is some configuration in mutt that makes it possible
for you to reply to a message without actually "modifying" the original message (used
when confirming mailinglists subscriptions), all I get now
* On 2002.04.18, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "mstevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just for the record: the complete solution to achieve an "Outlook-like" behavior
>(yuck) with mutt is
>
> set header
> set indent_string=""
> set attribution="- Original message -"
>
> It
On April 18, 2002, 12:36 PM, Michael Elkins wrote:
>
> mstevenson wrote:
> > Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
>
> set header
Just for the record: the complete solution to achieve an "Outlook-like" behavior
(yuck) with mutt is
set header
set inde
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:40:09PM -0700, mstevenson wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On April 18, 2002, 12:31 PM, David T-G wrote:
> > ...and then mstevenson said...
> > %
> > % Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
> > % In some special situations I'd like a reply
Hi David,
On April 18, 2002, 12:31 PM, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then mstevenson said...
> %
> % Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
> % In some special situations I'd like a reply to appear like a forward, yet
> % preserving the references (In-Reply-To:
mstevenson wrote:
> Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
set header
Matthew --
...and then mstevenson said...
%
% Hello,
Hi!
%
% Is it possible to include (quote) the headers for a message I'm replying to?
% In some special situations I'd like a reply to appear like a forward, yet
% preserving the references (In-Reply-To: and such). Something like
The only
Hi,
On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 Prahlad Vaidyanathan spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
Gak ! Sorry, I was doing some bad things with my macros, and that's why
it didn't work. Now everything is A-ok :-)
pv.
--
Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The finest eloquence is that which gets things do
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 01:51:55AM +, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
> Was looking for some way by which I could tag a bunch of messages, and
> reply to all of them in one edit window. ie.
>
> '' should run vim with all the tagged messages quoted
> one after another. Currently, I do this :
It
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 02:25:28PM +, Nelson D. Guerrero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I tried putting:
>set attribution:"* %n%d wrote on %L:"
>And all it did when replying was put:
>Wed Jul 11, Michael Elkins wrote on Michael Elkins:
Do you have the list address defined in
* On Wed Jul 11, Michael Elkins wrote:
-> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:21:49AM +, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
-> > This is prolly a stupid question, but I'm gonna throw it
-> > anyways. How do I, when replying to an email put the mailing list or
-> > mbox on the attribution?
->
-> If you fi
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:21:49AM +, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
> This is prolly a stupid question, but I'm gonna throw it
> anyways. How do I, when replying to an email put the mailing list or
> mbox on the attribution?
If you filter the mail for a particular mailing list into its own
On 03/02/01, 11:22:34AM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2001, John P. Verel wrote:
> > On 03/01/01, 09:45:10PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > > Dirk Laurie muttered:
> >
> > > > Is there a mutt function that lest me reply to the "From" address
> > > > even when "Reply-To" is provide
On Thu, Mar 1, 2001, John P. Verel wrote:
> On 03/01/01, 09:45:10PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > Dirk Laurie muttered:
>
> > > Is there a mutt function that lest me reply to the "From" address
> > > even when "Reply-To" is provided?
> >
> > For this purpose set ignore_list_reply_to. Maybe in
On 03/01/01, 09:45:10PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Dirk Laurie muttered:
> > Is there a mutt function that lest me reply to the "From" address
> > even when "Reply-To" is provided?
>
> For this purpose set ignore_list_reply_to. Maybe in combination with
> sent- or folder-hook.
Hey this is co
Dirk Laurie muttered:
> Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set.
> I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list.
> This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to
> the list only ("r") but not if I wish to reply to the sender on
* Dirk Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 09:43]:
> Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set.
> I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list.
> This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to
> the list only ("r") but not if I w
On 000530, at 15:27:11, Bob Bell wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:55:11PM +0300, Mikko Hnninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be
> > quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or anything like that.
>
> My thoughts e
Bob, et al --
...and then Bob Bell said...
%
% Is there any way to specify which message should be used to set
% the "References" field?
In my limited experience, mutt figures its Refs: and I-R-T: fields
from the first message in the tagged list, probably based on the current
sort order.
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 03:27:11PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
> My thoughts exactly. I'd tag all relevant messages, and then just
> hit ';g' or whatever over the message where I want the followups to
> appear. This would be a really nice feature, as my threading is
> currently getting messed up
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:55:11PM +0300, Mikko Hnninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be
> quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or anything like that.
> Maybe something like "if the current message is tagged, use that as
Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000:
> Is there any way to specify which message should be used to set
> the "References" field?
Not that I know of.
I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be
quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or any
Rob Reid wrote:
> Did you change this?:
>
> (defcustom post-signature-pattern "\\(--\\|Cheers,\\|^L\\)"
> "*Pattern signifying the beginning of signatures. It should not contain
> trailing whitespace (unless you know what you're doing ;-)."
Apparently this is what I had missed. Thanx Rob for
At 1:48 AM EDT on July 24 SBTM sent off:
> Rob Reid wrote:
> > And for emacs you can use post mode, available at
> >
> > http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/mutt/
>
> It works just fine when starting a new file or editing and existing
> file. The problem rises when I reply to an email in mutt. It de
Rob Reid wrote:
> And for emacs you can use post mode, available at
>
> http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/mutt/
Hello everyone,
Since I use emacs, and been looking for exactly what has been mentioned
in the previous post, I decided to download the post mode and use it. I
got the file put the lines
On 0, Holger Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >if (bol_fsearch (">--"))
>
> Actually there should be a space after the dashes:
>
> if (bol_fsearch (">-- "))
>
Yeah sorry. There was a space there, I got this from the mutt newsgroup, was
it from you ? For some reason I
At 3:22 PM EDT on July 21 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent off:
> On 0, Aris Mulyono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 01:18:49PM -0600, Steve Talley wrote:
> > > When replying to someone with a quoted ("> ") message, is it
> > > possible for mutt to automatically remove their signatu
On Jul 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>if (bol_fsearch (">--"))
Actually there should be a space after the dashes:
if (bol_fsearch (">-- "))
Regards,
Holger
On 0, Aris Mulyono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 01:18:49PM -0600, Steve Talley wrote:
> > When replying to someone with a quoted ("> ") message, is it
> > possible for mutt to automatically remove their signature (as
> > denoted with "-- ")?
>
> Assuming you use vi editor
On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 01:18:49PM -0600, Steve Talley wrote:
> When replying to someone with a quoted ("> ") message, is it
> possible for mutt to automatically remove their signature (as
> denoted with "-- ")?
Assuming you use vi editor,
Try this in .muttrc:
set editor ="vi +'/^[ ,\t]*> --/,/^-
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=2FkSFaIQeDFoAt0B; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
on Jun 11, Maciej Majchrowski wrote:
>
> When I've got a message where are some CC addressem (mine or not - doesn't matters)
> and I'm replying to it, I want mutt to ask me if I want to reply to CC users as well
>
r(eply): reply to sender only
g(roup reply): reply to all recipients. If you have
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 03:24:52PM +0200, Maciej Majchrowski wrote
> doesn't matters) and I'm replying to it, I want mutt to ask me if I
> want to reply to CC users as well
Hm, use 'r' to reply only to the to-line and 'g' (group reply) to
reply to all (to and cc).
Shade and sweet water!
Maciej Majchrowski writes:
>
> When I've got a message where are some CC addressem (mine or not - doesn't matters)
> and I'm replying to it, I want mutt to ask me if I want to reply to CC users as well
>
> It was the pine's feature which I've missed atfer switching to mutt.
In mutt, this is ca
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 15:34:46 +0200, Gerrit Holl wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 1999 at 11:39:10AM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote 19 lines To
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > If you like, I could make a patch for you with a new $reply_weed
> > configuration variable -- it would only take a few minutes.
I've had
On Mon, May 31, 1999 at 11:39:10AM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote 19 lines To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 11:39:10 +0200
> From: Byrial Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Replying with headers
>
> On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 15:
On Mon, May 31, 1999 at 13:32:34 -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
> At 5:39 AM EDT on May 31 Byrial Jensen sent off:
> > If you like, I could make a patch for you with a new $reply_weed
> > configuration variable -- it would only take a few minutes.
>
> Maybe it'd be easier to set editor to something like
At 5:39 AM EDT on May 31 Byrial Jensen sent off:
> On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 15:28:01 +0200, Gerrit Holl wrote:
> > I mean that if I reply, I see the specified headers by the
> > previous mail. I've "header" turned on now, but if I reply, I see
> > _all_ headers quoted, including the ones I ignored
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 15:28:01 +0200, Gerrit Holl wrote:
> I mean that if I reply, I see the specified headers by the previous mail. I've
> "header" turned on now, but if I reply, I see _all_
> headers quoted, including the ones I ignored. The ones I ignore are only
> ignored when reading mail..
Quoting our friend --> David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gerritt --
>
> ...and then Gerrit Holl said...
> % Hello all,
> % I've got a question about mutt and replying with headers. I want to see the
> % headers, but not all of them.
>
> Do you mean that you want to see the headers
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
