On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 02:35:30PM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:13:52PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
> - if the mailing list does mess with msgid, it absolutely must do it
> consistently for all copies of the message.
For existing software that
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:13:52PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> > > Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing
> > > mails have the same beauti
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:13:52PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
> > > Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing
> > > mails have the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
> > The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
> > should care in the slight
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> > Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
> > the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
>
> The unfathomable thing about this question
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 01:05:09PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:33:06AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> > side note: using quotes around the template screws things up, that is,
> > set message_id_format=""
> > vs
> > set message_id_format=
> >
> > results in a broken m
Thanks everyone for the replies and discussion, something to ponder.
Всем спасибо за ответы и дискуссию, есть над чем поразмышлять.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:33:06AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
side note: using quotes around the template screws things up, that is,
set message_id_format=""
vs
set message_id_format=
results in a broken message-id with the quotes inside the angle brackets
(Message-ID: <"xyz">)
That shouldn't
On 09Apr2024 07:11, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 9 Apr 2024 07:32 +1000, from c...@cskk.id.au (Cameron Simpson):
_Or_ you could "set sendmail=" to a script of your own to add a
message-id
header - that is what mutt uses to deliver the message to a mail system -
you could add a header there then
Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 07Apr2024 13:19, Ебрашка wrote:
> > Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
> > the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
> > For example Message-Id: <43265...@example.com> consisting of random
> > digits and domain name
>
> I think
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:25:56AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:33:55AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> > If so that feature may not be working correctly...
>
> That is the old format for the mutt version I'm using. The new format
> looks like
>
>
>
> Thought you were on
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:33:55AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> > I think some people mentioned some minor threading issues with the new
> > format?
>
> Is that so? I don't recall noticing anything about that... I'd love a
> pointer to some details, if anyone has that.
It's possible that it was
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails
> have the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
Talk about bikeshedding :-)
--
Ian
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:33:55AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:05:06AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
> > > should care in the slightest
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:05:06AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> > The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
> > should care in the slightest what your message ID looks like.
>
> That's totally true, but I still
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
> should care in the slightest what your message ID looks like.
That's totally true, but I still like the classic Mutt message-id
format. Maybe it's just nostalgia, but
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
> the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
should care in the slightest what your message ID lo
On 9 Apr 2024 07:32 +1000, from c...@cskk.id.au (Cameron Simpson):
> You could (a) turn on "set edit_headers=yes" so the headers are visible in
> your message and (b) have your editor startup make one?
This is what I do in order to have a UUID message-ID, which Mutt
doesn't support natively.
> _
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
> the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
> For example Message-Id: <43265...@example.com> consisting of random
> digits and domain name
There was a long debate
On 07Apr2024 13:19, Ебрашка wrote:
Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
For example Message-Id: <43265...@example.com> consisting of random
digits and domain name
I think it would be enough to supply your own mess
On 07Apr2024 18:23, Anton Sharonov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 09:23:07AM -0600, Charles Cazabon via Mutt-users wrote:
There's a good reason for that; it help to ensure uniqueness, which
prevents
problems with threading. By limiting itself to only digits, Yandex's IDs are
much more likely
On 7 Apr 2024 18:23 +0200, from anton.sharo...@gmail.com (Anton Sharonov):
>>> For example Message-Id: <43265...@example.com> consisting of random
>>> digits and domain name
>>
>> There's a good reason for that; it help to ensure uniqueness, which prevents
>> problems with threading. By limiting
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 09:23:07AM -0600, Charles Cazabon via Mutt-users wrote:
> Ебрашка wrote:
> > my mails have Message-ID: . Question, what
> > should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have the same beautiful
> > message-ID as Yandex mail?
>
> My first question would be, why do y
Ебрашка wrote:
> my mails have Message-ID: . Question, what
> should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have the same beautiful
> message-ID as Yandex mail?
My first question would be, why do you care what the Message-ID: field
contents look like? Virtually no-one will ever look at i
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 08:13:15PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> Derek Martin wrote on Mon, 25 Oct 2021
> at 19:00:12 EDT in <20211025230012.gc9...@bladeshadow.org>:
>
> > Cost? I see no cost, other than the time needed to physically check
>
> My Oct. 7 email, to which you replied, enumerated
Derek Martin wrote on Mon, 25 Oct 2021
at 19:00:12 EDT in <20211025230012.gc9...@bladeshadow.org>:
> Cost? I see no cost, other than the time needed to physically check
My Oct. 7 email, to which you replied, enumerated several costs that I
perceived.
That you go on to state that you perceive n
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 11:52:02PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote on Thu, 7 Oct 2021
> at 23:32:00 EDT in :
>
> > Any email client (including mobile email clients) worth its salt is
> > going to wrap the subject line (at least in the email view, if not
> > in the index view),
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 06:50:24PM +1100, raf wrote:
> My advice is, don't worry about the default.
> If you don't like it, just change it.
>
> "man muttrc" and look for "forward_format".
>
> I think you want something like this in your ~/.muttrc:
>
> set forward_format = "Fwd: %s"
>
> or:
My advice is, don't worry about the default.
If you don't like it, just change it.
"man muttrc" and look for "forward_format".
I think you want something like this in your ~/.muttrc:
set forward_format = "Fwd: %s"
or:
set forward_format = "FW: %s"
They are both common patterns.
And they
So, in my opinion, communication is most effective if the recipient easily
comprehends what is conveyed to him/her. I suspect most recipients of our
e-mails do not know much about mutt except that you likely get it from a place
other than a breeder.
So, [mutt-users@mutt.org: Email Subject] make
12021/06/39 09:94.47 ನಲ್ಲಿ, John Hawkinson ಬರೆದರು:
> ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote on Thu, 7 Oct 2021
> at 23:32:00 EDT in :
>
> > Any email client (including mobile email clients) worth its salt is
> > going to wrap the subject line (at least in the email view, if not
> > in the index view), so that sho
ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote on Thu, 7 Oct 2021
at 23:32:00 EDT in :
> Any email client (including mobile email clients) worth its salt is
> going to wrap the subject line (at least in the email view, if not
> in the index view), so that shouldn't really be an issue, right?
My principal concern is with
12021/06/39 09:52.97 ನಲ್ಲಿ, John Hawkinson ಬರೆದರು:
> I'd object to the proposal to add the "FW: " characters to the default. Space
> is at a premium in modern Subject lines, especially with the prevalence of
> mobile devices that have limited screen real estate, and cutting out 3
> characters i
I'd object to the proposal to add the "FW: " characters to the default.
Space is at a premium in modern Subject lines, especially with the
prevalence of mobile devices that have limited screen real estate, and
cutting out 3 characters is very undesirable. I think it's pretty clear
from context that
12021/06/39 09:27.23 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users
ಬರೆದರು:
> When I foward my mutt-composed email, I have something like the following,
> which I believe is the default behaviour:
>
> [mutt-users@mutt.org: Email subject]
>
> which I think is very nice because it gives the recipient an id
* David J. Weller-Fahy [2018-04-25 21:38 -0400]:
I've been dealing with an error whenever mutt starts for a few years
now, and finally decided to ask how others have fixed the issue.
#v+
folder-hook . "set record=^"
#v-
Sigh... apparently inspiration required that I send an email to a mailing
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 20:27:47 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * pecon...@mesanetworks.net [11-22-13 20:10]:
> >
> > When I'm reading incoming mail in Mutt, I can save the email to a
> > different folder by pressing the 's' key. When I do this, Mutt offers a
> > suggestion of a folder name.
* pecon...@mesanetworks.net [11-22-13 20:10]:
>
> When I'm reading incoming mail in Mutt, I can save the email to a
> different folder by pressing the 's' key. When I do this, Mutt offers a
> suggestion of a folder name. This suggestion seems to be the "From:"
> header. What is the actual logi
Incoming from Andre Klärner:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:54:34PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > I like to keep date stamped copies of old mutt configs in my ~/mutt.
>
> Well, I used to do so a while ago, but by now I am using a git-repository
Sadly, I'm still working on my git-foo.
> for eac
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:54:34PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Brandon Sandrowicz:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:04:03PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > [ Btw, mutt will parse ~/.mutt/muttrc if ~/.muttrc doesn't exist. If
> > you dot-prefix your ~/mutt, then you could axe the need fo
Incoming from Brandon Sandrowicz:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:04:03PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > I'm surprised you'd put that in /etc/Muttrc.d; it's all world-
>
> Why would generic gpg commands being world-readable be an issue? Those
Yeah, sorry. I was confusing gnupg with mutt configs.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:04:03PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Chris Bannister:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:09:48AM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 07:33:16AM -0600, Dale A. Raby wrote:
> > >
> > > > set pgp_replyencrypt=yes
> > > > set pgp_timeout=1800
Incoming from Chris Bannister:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:09:48AM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 07:33:16AM -0600, Dale A. Raby wrote:
> >
> > > set pgp_replyencrypt=yes
> > > set pgp_timeout=1800
> > > set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from"
> >
> > I have none
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:09:48AM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 07:33:16AM -0600, Dale A. Raby wrote:
>
> > set pgp_replyencrypt=yes
> > set pgp_timeout=1800
> > set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from"
>
> I have none of this in my .muttrc and have pgp capability.
Well, there is almost certainly more than one way to do it...
Dale
--
"Think nobody intercepts email? Think again! Gnu Privacy Guard. Not
just for spies."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 07:33:16AM -0600, Dale A. Raby wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:37:54PM +0100, Andreas Hanke wrote:
> > Hello together,
> >
> > I have a question about PGP and mutt!
> >
> > gpg2 works fine on my system, I have already tested that.
> >
> > In my .muttrc I have that add
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:37:54PM +0100, Andreas Hanke wrote:
> Hello together,
>
> I have a question about PGP and mutt!
>
> gpg2 works fine on my system, I have already tested that.
>
> In my .muttrc I have that added:
>
> /opt/mutt-1.5.21/contrib/gpg.rc
So far as I am aware, you do not rea
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:23:43PM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
> The problem been solved by add "-a" to each attached files. Because I
> don't have permissions to upgrade mutt on the server. But all your
> advice are very useful for me.
This too, you can do, as long as you have enough space in your hom
Thanks All!
The problem been solved by add "-a" to each attached files. Because I
don't have permissions to upgrade mutt on the server. But all your
advice are very useful for me.
Thank you very much.
Zhang Qi
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Nathan Stratton Treadway
wrote:
> Nathan
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:35:05 +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
> My Mutt version is 1.4.2, buildin with Centos 5.4
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:22:43 -0400, Ed Blackman wrote:
> As others have indicated in their examples, you don't need to prefix
> each file with "-a". Use "--" to separate the list of at
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 03:28:47PM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
But I still have problems. That is: if I use -a $attachments, then
only attach one file, others will act as recipient. I should use -a
file1 -a file2 instead of -a file1 file2. Am I right?
As others have indicated in their examples, you
On Wed, May 12, 2010 8:51 am, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:50:20AM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
>> Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
>> different folders.
>> Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
>
> If I understand correctly, this is tri
Thank you Mr DM
But I still have problems. That is: if I use -a $attachments, then
only attach one file, others will act as recipient. I should use -a
file1 -a file2 instead of -a file1 file2. Am I right?
So I made a script can store all file names in one list and begins
with "-a", then use:
mutt
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:50:20AM +0800, Qi Zhang wrote:
> Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
> different folders.
> Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
If I understand correctly, this is trivial to do with mutt in a
script, unless your attachment f
My Mutt version is 1.4.2, buildin with Centos 5.4
If I use -a option, everything goes well. But I should write more bash
scripts on how many attaments for each receiver, with the file name
and email address.
Zhang Qi
2010/5/12 bill lam :
> Does your version of mutt support the "-a" option whic
Does your version of mutt support the "-a" option which will generate
proper mime-compliant header?
Срд, 12 Май 2010, Qi Zhang писал(а):
> Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
> different folders.
> Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
> redirect mail a
Yes, because the attachments are generated by scripts then put into
different folders.
Each receiver has different amount of attachments.
redirect mail attachments to a single file is more easy than use "-a
file1 file2"
I plan to use mail -s "Subject" recei...@example.com < att.email (This
attachme
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
On 11.05.10,15:50, Qi Zhang wrote:
# code
uuencode file_name file_name > att.email
cat mail_message >> att.email
mutt -s "Subject" recei...@somewhere.net < att.email
with this script, I can send email with attachment very easy.
On 11.05.10,15:50, Qi Zhang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I meet with a problem sending emails with attachements by mutt.
> simplly like this:
>
> # code
> uuencode file_name file_name > att.email
>
> cat mail_message >> att.email
>
> mutt -s "Subject" recei...@somewhere.net < att.email
>
>
> with this
* Terry Johnson [02-06-10 19:43]:
> Is there a way to display pictures in mutt? I know its probably
> already been asked sorry for the repeat if so.
use mailcap and associate the type of picture with your favorite app.
--
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
h
PM
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: Question about fetching mail with through HTTPs
* Paul Grinberg [07-31-09 14:08]:
>
> I have the following challenge. Mailbox on Exchange 2003. The only way
> to access - HTTPS (no POP3 or IMAP).
>
> Does anyone have something similar? How do yo
downloaded previously. So it either does All,
or Unread.
Best,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org [mailto:owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org] On
Behalf Of Patrick Shanahan
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 2:19 PM
To: mutt-users@mutt.org
Subject: Re: Question about fetching mail with thr
* Paul Grinberg [07-31-09 14:08]:
>
> I have the following challenge. Mailbox on Exchange 2003. The only way
> to access - HTTPS (no POP3 or IMAP).
>
> Does anyone have something similar? How do you fetch mail from MS
> Exchange using HTTPS and mutt?
>
You might have a look at FetchYahoo.pl on
Hi,
I have the following challenge. Mailbox on Exchange 2003. The only way
to access - HTTPS (no POP3 or IMAP).
Does anyone have something similar? How do you fetch mail from MS
Exchange using HTTPS and mutt?
Best,
Paul
In the manual at www.mutt.org/doc/manual, there is no section 3.277.
But there is documantation of status_format in section 6.1 and it describes the
use of the question mark. The description of status_format in the man page also
describes the use of the question mark.
Thanks to all
--
Paul E Co
* On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 12:21PM -0700 Paul E Condon (pecon...@mesanetworks.net)
muttered:
> set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l&%4c?) %s"
>
> I don't understand the string inside parentheses. Where can
> I find an explanation? Question marks often invoke some sort
> of conditional
On 2009-02-02, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I'm puzzled by the default index_format which is, I think:
>
> set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l&%4c?) %s"
>
> I don't understand the string inside parentheses. Where can
> I find an explanation? Question marks often invoke some sort
> of c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, February 2 at 12:21 PM, quoth Paul E Condon:
>I'm puzzled by the default index_format which is, I think:
>
>set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l&%4c?) %s"
>
>I don't understand the string inside parentheses. Where can
>I find
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, February 2 at 11:05 AM, quoth Christian Brabandt:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> On Friday, January 30 at 03:26 PM, quoth Paul E Condon:
>>> What would be a save-hook that delivers equivalent logic to what
>>> is built in?
>
Hi Kyle!
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, January 30 at 03:26 PM, quoth Paul E Condon:
> > What would be a save-hook that delivers equivalent logic to what
> > is built in?
>
> There isn't one. To my knowledge, the target of a save-hook cannot
> depend on the matched patte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, January 30 at 03:26 PM, quoth Paul E Condon:
> When I use the 's' key to save an email to a different mailbox, mutt
> responds with a suggested mailbox name to which the email can be
> moved. This is based on the contents of headers lines
On Jan 14, 2008 2:31 PM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, that's not true of other editors. In vim, the working directory
> is unchanged from the directory I was in when I launched mutt.
>
You're right.
After some tries, I found out that the mode I'm using with emacs when
composing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, January 14 at 09:58 AM, quoth Francis Moreau:
>First I'm using emacs to compose my email but I suspect the same is
>true for others editors.
>
>When working in a project directory, I sometimes need to write an
>email including some outpouts
Hello Kyle,
On Jan 13, 2008 9:58 PM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday, January 12 at 09:32 PM, quoth Francis Moreau:
> > Is it possible to specify a path for this variable which does not
> > exist and need to be created ?
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, January 12 at 09:32 PM, quoth Francis Moreau:
> Is it possible to specify a path for this variable which does not
> exist and need to be created ?
Nope.
> For example I'd like to do:
>
> set tmpdir = "./.mutt-tmp"
However, you CAN do t
Hello Kyle and Chris,
On Sunday, August 12, 2007 at 9:23:50 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> I *believe* [the folder-hook regexp will] match against
> /home/chris/Mail/france/meteo, but it's possible it might be only
> against =france/meteo (I doubt it though).
Both, in some way. A folder-hook
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:12:34PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote:
> Hello Kyle and Chris,
>
> On Sunday, August 12, 2007 at 9:23:50 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>
> > I *believe* [the folder-hook regexp will] match against
> > /home/chris/Mail/france/meteo, but it's possible it might be only
> > agains
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 09:23:50AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Sunday, August 12 at 04:21 PM, quoth Chris G:
> >So if I go to a folder whose full path is:-
> >
> >/home/chris/Mail/france/meteo
> >
> >... and in the line a the top of mutt I see:-
> >
> >=france/meteo
> >
> >Can the folde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, August 12 at 04:21 PM, quoth Chris G:
>So if I go to a folder whose full path is:-
>
>/home/chris/Mail/france/meteo
>
>... and in the line a the top of mutt I see:-
>
>=france/meteo
>
>Can the folder hook RE match on /home/chris/Mail
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 08:54:12AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Saturday, August 11 at 11:57 AM, quoth Chris G:
> >Do the commands hooked by folder-hook get executed as the selected
> >folder is opened, i.e. just before the folder index is displayed? Is
> >this the *only* time folder-hook gets e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, August 11 at 11:57 AM, quoth Chris G:
>Do the commands hooked by folder-hook get executed as the selected
>folder is opened, i.e. just before the folder index is displayed? Is
>this the *only* time folder-hook gets executed?
Yup.
>Is the
On Fri 18-Jan-2002 at 06:31:02AM -0600, John Perry wrote:
> Ive started running the latest version of Mutt and have noticed
> something odd. Whenever a PGP signed/encrypted message is displayed I
> get a ? between lines.
It's fixed for me in mutt-1.3.26 (just released).
--
Bruno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Michael Elkins wrote:
> FWIW, I have this same annoyance with Mutt's IMAP handling. It's
> damned near imposible to copy a message between folders on different
> servers or local without a bunch of typing. I've been talkign to s
FWIW, I have this same annoyance with Mutt's IMAP handling. It's damned
near imposible to copy a message between folders on different servers or
local without a bunch of typing. I've been talkign to some folks over on
IRC about this issue and I would welcome any comments. This was part of
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
> %
> % Okay, a bit of history. I'm currently a Pine user and I'm considering
> % switching to Mutt since I have need of useable and useful PGP/GPG
> % handling.
>
> Good for you! We love mutt here :-)
*lau
JT --
...and then JT said...
%
% Okay, a bit of history. I'm currently a Pine user and I'm considering
% switching to Mutt since I have need of useable and useful PGP/GPG
% handling.
Good for you! We love mutt here :-)
%
...
% Under pine, I can easily set up three mail collections as fol
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Krennmair said...
%
% * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020111 16:28]:
% > Nicolas Rachinsky has written a patch to allow you to execute a macro
% > only if there are tagged messages and either eat a portion of or entirely
% > abort the macro if there aren't. You c
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020111 16:28]:
> Nicolas Rachinsky has written a patch to allow you to execute a macro
> only if there are tagged messages and either eat a portion of or entirely
> abort the macro if there aren't. You can get it from
>
> http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.h
On Freitag, 11. Jan. 2002 at 16:11:54, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> Currently, I'm letting my emails "time out" by adding a folder-hook like
> this one:
> folder-hook =mutt-users 'push T~r>w!~F\n\;s=archive/mutt-users\n\n'
>
> But there is one annoying thing I was unable to remove:
> when no mess
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Krennmair said...
%
% Hello!
Hi!
%
% Currently, I'm letting my emails "time out" by adding a folder-hook like
% this one:
% folder-hook =mutt-users 'push T~r>w!~F\n\;s=archive/mutt-users\n\n'
%
% But there is one annoying thing I was unable to remove:
% when n
I tried
text/html; w3m -dump -T text/html %s; copiousoutput
and even
text/html; cat %s; copiousoutput
And both acted the same. I removed all mutt config files in my home dir,
except .muttrc and ~/.mutt/.mailcap (attached) and have the same
problem.
Now, hopefully, someone can reproduce my probl
On 020103, at 12:49:22, Shawn wrote
> I have put the followign entry in my mailcap:
> text/html; w3m -dump -T text/html; copiousoutput
This works for me:
text/html; w3m -dump -T text/html %s; copiousoutput
^^
--
David Ellement
On 08/10/01 12:42 AM, Christian Ordig sat at the `puter and typed:
> > > ok ... might be quite slow, I never relly realized this because I have a
> > > quite fast connection ... so I am really happy with this. But I can
> > > believe having a modem and no local NNTPd might be a pain. I used leafno
> > ok ... might be quite slow, I never relly realized this because I have a
> > quite fast connection ... so I am really happy with this. But I can
> > believe having a modem and no local NNTPd might be a pain. I used leafnode
> > the days I still had a modem ... maybe this helps ;-))
> >
> No,
Louis LeBlanc [mutt-users] <07/08/01 18:56 -0400>:
> I REALLY don't care to start running my own nntp service, especially
> I'm the only one on my machine that would be using it. Sure, I could
> extend the expiration if I wanted, but . . .
I'd suggest using slrnpull + slrn then.
-sur
On 08/07/01 11:59 PM, Christian Ordig sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 10:54:25PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > When I connect to an nntp server, Mutt checks for new messages and new
> > newsgroups. Due to the nature of nntp, coupled with M1s 'who the hell
> > uses usenet
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 10:54:25PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> When I connect to an nntp server, Mutt checks for new messages and new
> newsgroups. Due to the nature of nntp, coupled with M1s 'who the hell
> uses usenet anyway' attitude (LOW priority), this can be a little
> slow.
.
.
.
> Does
Johannes Breu [mutt-users] <14/06/01 20:20 +0200>:
> I have no experience with mutt and hardly with Linux or Unix. How do I
> tell mutt to fetch the mail from the mail-server. Thanks,
Use fetchmail. If you are on a dialup or a LAN,
http://www.hserus.net/dlhowto.html may help
-sures
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 08:20:40PM +0200, Johannes Breu wrote:
> I have no experience with mutt and hardly with Linux or Unix. How do I
> tell mutt to fetch the mail from the mail-server. Thanks,
> Johannes
Here is what I either found in the mutt manual or in a sample .muttrc on the
mutt site.
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 11:00:34PM +0100, Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Saturday, December 16, 2000 (CS:6.50.351) 12:42:49 [PM] (-0600)
> Brian Minton [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote...
>
> > yes, but not completely, since at a later time, you can always produce your
> > public key at a later
On Saturday, December 16, 2000 (CS:6.50.351) 12:42:49 [PM] (-0600)
Brian Minton [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote...
> yes, but not completely, since at a later time, you can always produce your
> public key at a later time if necessary to prove that you did in fact write a
> given message, or that you d
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
