On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:33:55AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:05:06AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: > > > The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone) > > > should care in the slightest what your message ID looks like. > > > > That's totally true, but I still like the classic Mutt message-id > > format. > > Did you set your message ID format accordingly, then? Because the > message I'm replying to carries this: > > Message-ID: <20240409150506.ga47...@aura.veggiechinese.net> > > If so that feature may not be working correctly...
That is the old format for the mutt version I'm using. The new format looks like <zhqwnyqym6ino...@hostname.example.com> Thought you were on that long thread about this when it changed a while back, but maybe remembering wrong. w
