could
server the purpose of a "real" address book, as well (oh well, abook
can do this too, but in this case I mean GUI-software), so that I
could save phonennumbers, addresses, email addresses, URLs and whatnot
in an easily usable software.
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | &l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Armin Wolfermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [15.10.2002 07:14]:
>> When I open abook in vim-folder, and compose a mail to some address
>> selected from there (press 'm' when th
.*' to get all the other threads visible again. They do
get visible, but they are uncollapsed -- just contrary to what I want.
[1]: 1.5.1i.CVS
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/> | <0x1410081E>
-BEGIN PGP
ng
#
So, if the mail you are sending contains "blah" in it's address,
your From-header is changed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". By the way, why there's
'' (" ; ") after the my_hdr command?
> will it match all of the following :
>
> [EMAIL
ro for jumping directly to !.
IMHO, it's just that this symlink in my $MAILDIR makes it easier to
comprehend the whole $MAILDIR. Dunno why, but this is how I feel. :-)
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/> | <0x1410081E>
"This
khowl ekhowl 25 Sep 26 06:50 \
/usr/local/bin/pgpewrap -> ../stow/mutt/bin/pgpewrap
Whether you got something missing from your Mutt or this executable
was added in version later than 1.3.28i. I leave that to the more
educated persons than myself.
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[E
x27;.
At least for finnish keyboards (and german, too?) the ''
is a bit too hard, so I decided to rebind this action to '?' so my
Mutt would act more like Vim.
Oh yeah, what an email from me again... I apologize, sometimes
something takes over in me and I'll write
e way -- by all means, place your signature on top of your
mails! But please, remember to use correct signature delimiter ("-- ",
that is "dash-dash-space")! O:-)
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/> | <0x1410081E>
-BEGIN PG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> having seen NO traffic for 3 days, have to wonder, ?? Is the list down?
Seems to be working fine here... anyone else?
- --
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:00:11PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote..
>> #!/bin/sh
>> #
>> # $Id: addspam.sh,v 1.5 2002/08/11 07:48:09 ekhowl Exp $
>
> This looks like a pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> When one does get through, I've been submitting it by hitting S in
>>> the index, which pipes it to spamassassin -d.
>> Why
ipt. ;-)
I also apologize for making this mail this long. Anyway, this is how
I handle every spam that SA or my other feeble filters doesn't catch.
Not too much trouble and "enough automation", IMO. Works for me.
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9X7Z5AtEARxQQCB4RAtGWAKC6mVBS24fW3f2VifL8BX/kvW3uSACeIR/y
roUGrhZjbz3fE/2tqGuRHm0=
=wUh5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
>> This friend I had this email discussion, mentioned that his Mutt
>> was compiled on, I quote: 'SUN platform'.
>
> Heh. I bet you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, August 3, 2002 at 4:43:48 PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed
I wonder why Mutt changes charset from ISO-8859-1 t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
>> Morning.
>
> Hiya!
Hello, David! :-)
> 1) mutt 1.4 and earlier required a patch (Aaron(?) wrote an early
> one and then Dale wrote the one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [I Cc'd this message to mutt-users, too - I think this belongs there
>> instead of mutt-dev]
>
> Maybe, but it'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joakim Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 03:07:08PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> Do you have any idea why clearsigning an email with signature brakes the
>> signature delimiter? It always changes fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> [$pgp_create_traditional]
> well - strongly deprecated, perhaps, but since there are only a few
> MUAs which have good PGP/MIME support (none of them very co
-Level: header? Is this possible
> at all?
Sounds a bit complicated, but I wouldn't be surprised if it would be
possible. But honestly, I don't know. I haven't had the need to use
these values, because all I care is ``X-Spam-Flag: Yes''.
Any input and information
ticed, that it has some things, that I'm not
so fond of - for example, it messes up the signature delimiter
completely. Or should I just sign all of my mails with "new-style" PGP
message format? I haven't studied how differently Mutt handles PGP
messages in 1.5.1.CVS than in st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-21-02 07:33]:
>> what is pita :-)
>
> ~> wtf pita
> PITA: pain in the ass
Pita is also the bread that *should* be used in kebabs. ;-
/usr/bin/mutt_dotlock -> /usr/local/bin/mutt_dotlock
This doesn't tell much. Here's the real permissions:
- -rwxr-sr-x1 ekhowl mail 35k Jun 27 18:33
/usr/local/stow/mutt/bin/mutt_dotlock
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEG
as been asked quite a many times; mutt-users archive would've
given you the answer: no. It would require Mutt parsing all of your
mailboxes everytime and that would be heavy as hell. Think of a
mailboxes with thousands of mails...
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://e
mains changed, for the life of the session.
I learned this lesson only recently; you have to specify global
send-hook, as well. Something like this:
send-hook . 'my_hdr From: 1st address <1st@address>'
send-hook blah 'my_hdr From: Malcolm Herbert <[EM
This did the job - it never occured to me to press C-t. How do
I get the help screen from To: prompt, by the way? ;-) I'd really like
to know what other keys I could hit while on that prompt...
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
>> One thing that annoys me a great deal is, that AFAIK you can't, for
>> example, forward/bounce emails with abook. At least I can't find
>>
t I can't find
anything somehow related to it, but this:
m send mail with mutt
Is there any way to forward emails with abook's address database? Well,
it's not a BIG deal, but kinda annoying for me to keep two different
address databases simultaneously...
- --
And my personal problem is, that I read information about anything way
too seldom. And that's why I make people annoyed on public forums,
because I might ask some question which would've been answered by a
quick glange to FM.
But I'm teaching myself. Oh, and others are too. :-)
-
ty thorough lists of keyservers there.
- --
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9E3ULAtEARxQQCB4RAvR0AJ0bKCIPKQ/noEhjE9nTY5wudQTq+gCghSWE
IefBJlDaEvwmsPImahHzgXc=
=DdPW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
al/stow/ with 'make install'. Then I get
myself to /usr/local/stow and say:
stow
And it creates the appropriate symlinks. If I want to uninstall it, I
simply say:
stow -D
And the symlinks are gone. This serves the purpose for me, at least.
- --
Jussi Ekholm --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Ian Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 12:39:11PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> I've set Procmail to sort every mailing list into a different folder,
>> thus mutt-users goes to =mutt-users.
pace:]+[a-zA-Z]*[>%|:#{}]"
I dunno, but also the '*' after could be possibly removed... although,
I've seen people using quite horrific " JE >>" quoting style... so,
maybe the '*' has to stay there after all...
Just my two cents and my "I-got-
ks.
Shouldn't that be plain obvious with that first send-hook, that *only*
add sig.foo to mails going to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Why on earth do I need
send-hook to define, that I don't want to use sig.foo in every other
mail, as well?
þ Mutt 1.5.1i (2002-05-02)
--
Jussi Ekholm -- [
uot;public" address in Usenet and
mailing lists.
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
msg28755/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
abook, but for no avail. This is actually the only
thing why I'm still keeping both, aliases and abook.addressbook...
--
Jussi Ekholm -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://erppimaa.cjb.net/
msg28754/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
>> This thing has happened for me twice or thrice already, so now I decided
>> to ask what's going on. I am subscribed to this list, but on some
>> occasions (the two or three incidents
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
>> This is probably a stupid question, but I'll ask it anyway because it
>> has been bothering me since I first subscribed to mutt-user. ;-)
>
> Not stupid :-)
Yeah! Didn't someone
the email I got (last time today):
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from Jussi Ekholm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your submission to the list has been forwarded to the list owner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for approval because you do not seem
Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
>> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads,
>> only the first message. Is there any work-around for this? Would be nice
>>
just guessing, but I guessed it right: it marks the
tagged articles (un)read...
What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads,
only the first message. Is there any work-around for this? Would be nice
to be able to mark a big bunch of (non-interesting) mails read quickly
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GMT does not change in the summer. GMT is GMT all year round. That's
> why it's "Greenwich Mean Time" and not "Greenwich Most-of-the Time".
LOL!
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux user number 2
N (whoa,
three "with"'s in a row, $$ JACKPOT $$!)? Is it some sort of standard
for some mailbox format or what? I'd really want to know, so bear with
me...
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
msg28417/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
out that example of yours. Although, according to the
logic of it I'm going to see one directory and a folder for spam in the
mailbox view in browser, which I probably wouldn't want to...
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cj
that what are you talking about? :-) I mean,
this whole Subject-header shown in *browser*. Isn't browser the "thing",
when you navigate mailboxes? I don't see how there can be Subject-header
shown there. Still, this drew my attention... do you care to explain
this a bit further, s
Radek Spacil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On [04/05/02] 12:36, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> Mike Schiraldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Okay, grab Rob Reid's post package.
>> Hmm, what's this package and where it is located?
>
> http://www.as
Emacs, because 'M-x auto-fill-mode' doesn't
start wrapping lines. Or, then the wrong thing is me -- should I
somehow configure auto-fill-mode through 'customize' or something?
It just doesn't wrap the lines...
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux
'set pager=w3m'
Any ideas why Mutt is telling me, that display-hook is an unknown
command (or something to that sort)? I'm using 1.5.0.CVS, and your
way to handle URL's seemed very nice and I'd really like to take
advantage of this in case of Freshmeat'
tion `--eval'
So, is there any way to use this option with emacsclient? Just for the
record; I can't handle any Elisp, so I can't handle any of that -- by
myself, at least. :-)
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/
es the line length. I'm such a
controllive person... :-)
--
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU/Linux user number 269376
http://erppimaa.cjb.net/~ekhowl/ | ICQ UIN: 156057281
ekh on IRCnet | GnuPG Public Key ID: 1410081E
msg27769/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
d and dizzy at the moment, and
my thoughts are pretty slow tonight...
> Oh, and of course I also sign just to keep Rob from forging my email.
> :)
LOL!
It was scary, now wasn't it?:-)
> still haven't fixed the sig rotation script.
Once you have, could you let me know -- I'd be
ed? If it does, is it lsigned or signed for export?
Because I have a *lots* of keys now, which I can view ith --list-keys
option for gpg... and I'm not so experienced yet, that I could tell
if they are signed or not.
Sorry, if the answer is self-evident and the question's s
Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alas! Jussi Ekholm spake thus:
>> And to point out -- 'sed s/her/his/g'. ;-)
>
> You're a guy? Oooops! Sorry.
> Your name just sounds so feminine.
Hehe, no problem. :-) And I could take the lower l
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And this demonstrates exactly why you ought to sign all of your
> messages, ESPECIALLY if it's to a public list. Had Jussi been in the
> habit of signing all her messages, people would have noticed that this
> message wasn&#x
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nah, on second thought I don't think I ever will. In fact, I can't stand
> the thought of having to sign all my messages! I'm deleting gnupg as we
> speak!
>
> Oh yeah, and I hate everybody on this list. You'r
Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 09:31:06PM +0200:
>> Yes, I know. At least this proves, that I managed to upset people
>> with my child walk of PGP signatures (I agree, I should've selected
>> more appropri
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I didn't say I'm not going to use it. I will, that's for sure.
Nah, on second thought I don't think I ever will. In fact, I can't stand
the thought of having to sign all my messages! I'm deleting gnupg as w
you more, no. I just wanted to make my point (somewhat) clear,
as well. As you know and as I mentioned, PGP is a new thing for me, so
it would be foolish to start pretending that I already knew everything
about it, as this is not the case. Man oh man, how my original question
grew a thread of a
Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alas! Jussi Ekholm spake thus:
>> But yeah - what is so bad in PGP signed mails in mailing lists?
>
> There is nothing wrong -- the people who say it is wrong are simply
> heretics.
>
> Oh, you _didn'
Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-24 13:01:00 +0200]:
>> But yeah - what is so bad in PGP signed mails in mailing lists?
>
> If you didn't want to start a flamewar, I'm fear, you asked the wrong
was unable to get it working in Mutt.
But yeah - what is so bad in PGP signed mails in mailing lists?
--
Jussi Ekholm | A Elbereth Gilthoniel, silivren penna míriel
i Adanedhel| o menel aglar elenath! Na-chaered palan-díriel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| o galadhremmin e
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just wondering if it looks ok now? At least the test message I sent
> to myself gave a positive result...
>
> I am *very* sorry to post these "test messages" on a public, and high
> traffic mailing list; my excus
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I suggest you make use of one of the many sample files to be found on the
>> web. The links at mutt.org will take you to several, or a simple Google
>> search will turn up do
Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm said on Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 11:48:28PM +0200:
>> Umm... as I saw my mail posted here, Mutt told me that "the following
>> data is signed" and all the other PGP stuff. So - am I doing it correctly
>>
Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using CVS Mutt 1.5.0i, and I was just recently introduced to PGP
> and now I'd like to assign Mutt to sign all of my outgoing mails with
> my personal key... I've read the manual, I've read PGP man p
pgp_sign_command=""
Any insight on this, very stupid, question (I guess :P)?
--
Jussi Ekholm | A Elbereth Gilthoniel, silivren penna míriel
i Adanedhel| o menel aglar elenath! Na-chaered palan-díriel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| o galadhremmin ennorath, Fanu
set sort_aux=date-sent
So, could it be, that you have typed 'date-sen_d_'? Nevertheless, works
fine with me, so I have not much of a clue why this doesn't work with
you. My only idea is, that you have typoed 'date-sent' to 'date-send'.
--
Jussi Ekholm
could someone perhaps
> clarify it for me?
I really don't know the difference, either - I've just always used
subscribe. And indeed - could someone point out the differences
between 'lists' and 'subscribe'?
--
Jussi Ekholm, "Everything is so fine it
IL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;%s'
> 19:30 [rene@clerc:~] $
When I put the following entry in my ~/.urlview and called urlview
(C-b), it complained something about quotes and told me to put
a string EXPERT in the file. When I put it, things worked out fine.
What's the deal with this?
--
Jussi Ekholm,
telligent spam spotter; I add the spammer's
address to ~/.procmail/rc.mailsort manually. That's about it. :-)
--
Jussi Ekholm, "Everything is so fine it could be
a little, ill flower don't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] all the
rts the mail just
the way it should! :-)
This went way off-topic, so... maybe we should continue our discussion
(if there's anything left to do so :-) in private?
--
Jussi Ekholm, "Everything is so fine it could be
a little, ill flower don't let your mind t
Dairy Wall Limey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> So, is it really necessary to create ~/.forward in order to use
>> Procmail, or is it just Exim, who notices if there's Procmail in use?
>
> if exim uses procmail as its LDA, no .forward is nee
#x27; as determined by the
> address of the alias
I take it, that this was directed to the original poster, the one
who made the question. I know these, but still a symlink "inbox"
in my maildir somehow feels more home. It may be faster to type
'c !', but I'm conservativ
Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 12:40]:
>> So, is it really necessary to create ~/.forward in order to use
>> Procmail, or is it just Exim, who notices if there's Procmail in
>> use?
>
> I don
tself.
So, is it really necessary to create ~/.forward in order to use
Procmail, or is it just Exim, who notices if there's Procmail in
use?
--
Jussi Ekholm, "Everything is so fine it could be
a little, ill flower don't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PR
cters) - makes replying a pain.
René already told you one way to do it, but I thought I'd share
my way of doing it, as well. So, I've created symbolic link
inbox in my maildir, which points to mail spool. I find it quite
convenient and clear. YMMV.
--
Jussi Ekholm, &
ise, huh? ;-)
Well, seriously - I like Mutt. I like Mutt a lot. Actually, I haven't
tried many other MUAs, because I have been so overly happy with Mutt.
Glad to try other agents, of course. If it's for console, that is.
X software is not for me. :-)
--
Jussi Ekholm, "E
of how I am able to fix this.
This isn't a serious trouble or nuisance or anything, but I'd still
like Mutt to work like an angel. :-) So, thanks in advance for any
insight. I'd appreciate it.
--
Jussi Ekholm, "Everything is so fine it could be
a little, il
78 matches
Mail list logo
