Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 12:40]:
>> So, is it really necessary to create ~/.forward in order to use
>> Procmail, or is it just Exim, who notices if there's Procmail in
>> use?
>
> I don't know Exim, but it can obviously configured to use an MDA/LDA
> to do the actual delivery. Grep for procmail in Exim's configuration
> files.

Indeed, this is what my /etc/exim/exim.conf contains about Procmail;

-snip-

# This transport is used for procmail
procmail_pipe:
 command = "/usr/bin/procmail -d ${local_part}"
# This director runs procmail for users who have a .procmailrc file
procmail:
 transport = procmail_pipe
 require_files = ${local_part}:+${home}:+${home}/.procmailrc:+/usr/bin/procmail

-snip-

So, Exim is using Procmail automaticly for incoming mail. That's nice,
I think. Or, at least I didn't have to do anything to get Procmail
working, so I think it's very nice. ;-)

>> I only have ~/.procmailrc, which calls for another file, which is the
>> recipe file itself.
>
> Why is that?

Well, I'm sort of everything-has-to-be-neat guy. :-) ~/.procmailrc
only contains some variable definitions. ~/.procmail/rc.mailsort,
on the other hand, sorts the incoming mail to correct mailboxes and
kills the spam from the known addresses (I still haven't tried
SpamAssasin, NoSpam or my own "spam sniffer" recipes). I just think,
that it's more clear that way. For me, that is, of course.

-- 
Jussi Ekholm,               "Everything is so fine it could be
a little, ill flower         don't let your mind take you in misery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]          all the feelings you're not so much pleased
http://ekhowl.goa-head.org   they're just to take you to sweet harmony"

Reply via email to