Heyaaa!!!
i'm using open-hook with .gz (compressed mboxes), but now i need use
open-hook with tar.gz (compressed maildirs)
i try put into my muttrc:
open-hook \\.tar.gz$ "mkdir %t.pokus; tar xpfz %f -C %t.pokus; mv
%t.pokus/.[a-zA-Z0-9]* %t"
which is fine for maildir starting with . (dot) - IMA
Charles Jie wrote:
> I'd like to make the index_format show number (or existence) of
> attachment in message, but failed to find a way.
you can do this fairly well with this patch:
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt/#attach
w
I'd like to make the index_format show number (or existence) of attachment in
message, but failed to find a way.
It is usual to see a mark of attachment in GUI MUA's, isn't it? Could
mutt do it?
charlie
On Jan 10, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
> % The only thing I'm really needing still is a decent way to watch the IN
> % boxes for incoming mail. I'd really like to find a decent console/curses
> % biff program, but I haven't seen any. mutt -y really d
Dale --
...and then Dale Woolridge said...
%
% On 13-Jan-2002 18:49 David T-G wrote:
% |
% | I take it you want to be sure that the dates are accurate and not from
% | startup, right? This is a common problem for headers and such (good old
% | uptime) and the answer is usually to put the parse
Hi List,
I just moved from 1.3.22 up to 1.3.25. Now, when I sign or encrypt a
mail I get this:
[--End of PGP output--]
?
[--The following data is signed--]
?
content of message
sig
[--End of signed data--]
What are the ? doing there? More importantly, how do I get rid of
them?
Regards,
Dallam
On 13-Jan-2002 18:49 David T-G wrote:
|
| I take it you want to be sure that the dates are accurate and not from
| startup, right? This is a common problem for headers and such (good old
| uptime) and the answer is usually to put the parsed half in single quotes
| to prevent mutt from executing
Deon --
First, please do not include the whole digest in your posting; that was
over a thousand lines of nothing as far as I could tell. In fact, It
doesn't even seem to have been a related question but an entirely new
one!
Second, you should know that the mutt-users address is @mutt.org instea
David --
...and then David Collantes said...
%
% Hi there!
Hello!
%
% I am using the compressed folder patch on Mutt and I love it. My question, from the
subject, I would liketo be able
% to open, save and do all folder function on the compressed folders without the need
to type the extens
Dale --
...and then Dale Woolridge said...
%
% I've created a patch which allows the use of printf-style sequences
% in the mailbox parameter of the mbox-hook command. My motivation for
Interesting!
...
% Mostly I didn't like the few other options I considered: restarting mutt;
% using sourc
Hi Nick,
Nick Wilson wrote:
> Anyway, Could someone let me know if the pgp key is still functioning on
> this?
gpg: Signature made Son 13 Jan 2002 23:47:52 CET using DSA key ID
36BA2F9A
gpg: requesting key 36BA2F9A from wwwkeys.pgp.net ...
gpg: key 36BA2F9A: public key imported
gpg: Total numbe
David Collantes wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I am using the compressed folder patch on Mutt and I love it. My question, from the
>subject, I would liketo be able
> to open, save and do all folder function on the compressed folders without the need
>to type the extension, such as
> =test.gz, for exam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks
I've had a bit of a disaster over the last 24hrs and have had to
reinstall my system (that'll teach me not to mess with the kernel after
a few beers!)
Anyway, Could someone let me know if the pgp key is still functioning on
this?
Thanks ver
Hi there!
I am using the compressed folder patch on Mutt and I love it. My question, from the
subject, I would liketo be able
to open, save and do all folder function on the compressed folders without the need to
type the extension, such as
=test.gz, for example. Is that possible? Tips anyone?
I accidentally sent this note as Michael Elkins (.muttrc config problem).
Sorry for the confusion.
pete
--- Begin Message ---
I'd like to select (tag) multiple messages and have them each saved to
whatever filename they would have matched if selected individually.
Currently, they all go to the
I'd like to select (tag) multiple messages and have them each saved to
whatever filename they would have matched if selected individually.
Currently, they all go to the same file. Is there an existing feature
for doing this?
pete
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 12:58:54AM +0100, Cristian wrote:
> This Email is signed the same way as described above. So you can try
> to verify it with whatever you use.
I don't know about PGP/Outlook, but I just tried (piping your email direct
into GPG), and got this:
gpg: CRC error; 947beb - dc3
Hi everyone
This question might seem very trivial, but it needs to be asked: How does
one
if they get a whole lot of messages (ie. more than 400) move messages
according to most recent into a particular folder?
Thanking you in advance for your invaluable assistance.
Regards
Deon
CELL: +27 73
* Willy Sutrisno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-13 23:10]:
> * Im Eunjea ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I don't use mandrake but I tried with "locales-id-2.3.1.2-4mdk.i586.rpm"
> > package from mandrake 8.1.
>
> Yep, I am confirmed that I did install locales-id.
> $ rpm -qa | grep -i locales-id
> $
I've created a patch which allows the use of printf-style sequences
in the mailbox parameter of the mbox-hook command. My motivation for
this patch was to store/archive my mailing list messages to folders
based on date. I already had an fcc-save-hook like this:
fcc-save-hook '~C mutt-users.
> > > I thought I would write a filter for Pine users to be able to deal
> > > with PGP-MIME signed messages. It struck me that the concept should
> > > be fairly simple. I hacked together a quick shell script that does
> > > the following:
> > I have two filters which I use with procmail to ver
Hi mutt users,
This is my first post to this list. I switched from using Netscape Messanger
for the past 4 years to mutt very recently (2 weeks ago). I am quite happy
with it but as you can imagine, there some little things that I miss.
I read my mail via IMAP. There are 3 issues I see with the
On 13/01/02 mike ledoux did speaketh:
> That's strange... I just checked the man page on my system, and
> pgp_outlook_compat is listed. I built from source, and the 'outlook
> compatability' patch I applied definitely didn't touch the man pages.
On Debian, F1 is bound to zless /usr/share/doc/mu
* Im Eunjea ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't use mandrake but I tried with "locales-id-2.3.1.2-4mdk.i586.rpm"
> package from mandrake 8.1.
Yep, I am confirmed that I did install locales-id.
$ rpm -qa | grep -i locales-id
$ locale-id-2.3.1.2-4mdk
> result is:
> http://mutt.kldp.org/screenshot
* Willy Sutrisno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-13 21:13]:
> * Igor Pruchanskiy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > ./configure --enable-locales-fix \
> > --with-included-gettext \
> > --without-wc-funcs
> >
> > export LC_ALL=ru_RU.KOI8-R
>
> Im running mandrake in mu LinuxBox, and I ha
* Igor Pruchanskiy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ./configure --enable-locales-fix \
> --with-included-gettext \
> --without-wc-funcs
>
> export LC_ALL=ru_RU.KOI8-R
Im running mandrake in mu LinuxBox, and I have tried to do like you
said. I have changed my LC_ALL to Indonesian
Ben --
...and then Benjamin Smith said...
%
% (OT: When I reply to traditional PGP posting like this one, I get the
% signature data inserted into the reply, is there any way this can be
% avoided? TIA).
Unfortunately, that's part of what you get when one includes the
signature in the body, sin
Jim, et al --
...and then Alexander Skwar said...
%
% So sprach »Jim« am 2002-01-13 um 02:54:38 -0800 :
% > but I thought I'd ask if there's some sort of support
% > built into Mutt for gzip. I didn't see any mention of gzip in
%
% http://www.spinnaker.de/mutt/compressed/
%
% You can even use
Hi, all --
Since I'm a definite contributor, though I hope not terribly often, I
probably ought to chime in...
...and then Derek D. Martin said...
%
% At some point hitherto, Roman Neuhauser hath spake thusly:
..
% > mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
% >
So sprach »Jim« am 2002-01-13 um 02:54:38 -0800 :
> but I thought I'd ask if there's some sort of support
> built into Mutt for gzip. I didn't see any mention of gzip in
http://www.spinnaker.de/mutt/compressed/
You can even use bzip2 to compress the folders ;)
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote:
Sam, et al --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
%
...
% return code with "echo $?". When running Ispell from Mutt,
% however, you don't have this. You press 'i'. Nothing happens.
% You press 'i' again. Nothing happens. "Why isn't Ispell
% running?" you think. "What did I break? Were ther
* Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-13 02:54]:
> I've got a lot of mail in various folders, and have compressed
> them to save disk space. Now that I've got Mutt, it'll be
> a lot easier going through them than with my old mailer,
> but I thought I'd ask if there's some sort of support
> built int
I've got a lot of mail in various folders, and have compressed
them to save disk space. Now that I've got Mutt, it'll be
a lot easier going through them than with my old mailer,
but I thought I'd ask if there's some sort of support
built into Mutt for gzip. I didn't see any mention of gzip in
th
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:55:07PM -0500, Sam Carleton wrote:
> How does one implement an address book in mutt?
http://freshmeat.net/projects/muttaddressbook/
--
Christian Ordig
Germany
> I thought I would write a filter for Pine users to be able to deal
> with PGP-MIME signed messages. It struck me that the concept should
> be fairly simple. I hacked together a quick shell script that does
> the following:
I have two filters which I use with procmail to verify emails coming i
* Igor Pruchanskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-12 23:33]:
>
> While i do not know anything about Indonesian,
> I can tell you for sure that Mutt works great in Russian...
> Well, all menus are in Russian and Help appears to be in Russian also.
> While i do not use that every day, it is totally p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In pgp.c, in the function pgp_copy_checksig.
It returns -1, failure, on finding no pattern to match against, which
is contrary to the documentation (Which implies that mutt relies
solely on the exit code if the pgp_good_sign is absent. This makes
tra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> I thought I would write a filter for Pine users to be able to deal
> with PGP-MIME signed messages. It struck me that the concept should
> be fairly simple. I hacked together a quick shell script that do
38 matches
Mail list logo
