Re: LWN

2001-12-06 Thread Cedric Duval
* Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12/07/01 01:27]: > * Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 06. 2001 22:23]: > > > > In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noticing PGP errors, (2) doesn't > > support rules like "always encrypt mail to so-and-so" and (3) replies to > > encrypted messa

Re: LWN

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Clark
* Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 06. 2001 22:23]: > > In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noticing PGP errors, (2) doesn't > support rules like "always encrypt mail to so-and-so" and (3) replies to > encrypted messages with quoted, unencrypted bodies by default (a > *serious*

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Clark
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 06. 2001 06:06]: > % me wonder why the author(s) of Mutt didn't go ahead and add in support > % for clear signing that's on par with its PGP/MIME ease of use. > > Well, it is; just set $pgp_create_traditional and you're now doing it the > old way instead of t

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Clark
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 05. 2001 23:40]: > > Flamewars aside, if you ever have to use Windows, TheBat! is actually > > an exceptional MUA. (unless one wanted to use Mutt with Cygwin(sp?).) > > i have heard that becky! is pretty good and can read PGP/Mime i think, Yes, TheBat! an

mutt via rxvt/gnome-terminal -- push ignored sometimes

2001-12-06 Thread Ben Compton
Hey all, I've encountered a weird problem -- I'm setting up xbuffy to launch new terminals, and those terminals to open up mutt pointing at a specific mailbox sometimes, though, when you pass the mutt command off to the terminal (in my case I tried using rxvt and gnome-terminal) sometimes the

Re: displaying name of attachment in title bar

2001-12-06 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, On Thu, 06 Dec 2001 Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether: > Well I am not sure what you call that information bar above the > pager. But would it not be useful if the names of the > attachments of the current email were listed there - > or is there another view in mutt that may ac

Re: LWN

2001-12-06 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, In particular, evolution (1) is bad at noticing PGP errors, (2) doesn't support rules like "always encrypt mail to so-and-so" and (3) replies to encrypted messages with quoted, unencrypted bodies by default (a *serious* security hole that it shares with Mutt). Why does he mention (3) as a

Re: the trouble with charset Windows-1252

2001-12-06 Thread Michael Wagner
On Thursday, 06. Dec. 2001, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote: > However, I have two problems with this approach: > > 1. I can't save the change. >If I move the message with overridden charset into another folder, it >returns to the original state. > > 2. It doesn't scale. >I'm subscribed to a

Re: Searching big gobs of e-mail

2001-12-06 Thread Eric Kidd
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 14:54, Robert R. Wal wrote: > You can also give messages weight based on all obnoxious criteria and > limit, tag, or delete them based on their weight. Nice! Evolution is pretty deficient at scoring, which I consider to be a highly desirable feature. > It can give you pret

Re: the trouble with charset Windows-1252

2001-12-06 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
Hello, On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 06:02:53PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Right, that's what the excellent programs iconv and recode are for, I also suffer from the same problem. In such cases, I don't use any external programs; instead, I "v"iew-attachments, "^E"dit-type, and override the cha

Re: scripting/batchmode

2001-12-06 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:12:14PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > Hallo, > > I want mutt to move some mails from one archive folder to another > (compressed) one. Since this lasts some time on my old computer, I > want to do it via a cron job. Setting up a muttrc to do it, is no > problem, but

Re: Can mutt access USENET?

2001-12-06 Thread Dan Boger
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:43:32PM +0100, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote: > On Dec/06/2001, Jun Liu wrote: > > > just wondering, :) > > Not natively. There's a patch somewhere, but the "official" > mutt can't. the patch I use is the vvv patch, linked from the mutt homepage (http://www.mutt.org

Re: Can mutt access USENET?

2001-12-06 Thread Will Yardley
Jun Liu wrote: > just wondering, :) > > Any help is highly appreciated. only if patched for nntp. some of the links from http://mutt.org/links.html: http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/#nntp http://www.albedo.art.pl/~kbryd/mutt/ http://www.ing.umu.se/~connor/programs/mutt.html -- Wil

Re: Can mutt access USENET?

2001-12-06 Thread Roberto Suarez Soto
On Dec/06/2001, Jun Liu wrote: > just wondering, :) Not natively. There's a patch somewhere, but the "official" mutt can't. -- Roberto Suarez Soto · [EMAIL PROTECTED] · Friends are relatives you make for yourself. Corgo/Lugo/Galicia/Spain ·

Can mutt access USENET?

2001-12-06 Thread Jun Liu
just wondering, :) Any help is highly appreciated. /Jun

scripting/batchmode

2001-12-06 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
Hallo, I want mutt to move some mails from one archive folder to another (compressed) one. Since this lasts some time on my old computer, I want to do it via a cron job. Setting up a muttrc to do it, is no problem, but cron mails me the output of mutt which is a bit strange, because it's not appr

Re: Checking new mail - The Solution

2001-12-06 Thread Curt W. Zirzow
* Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:14:22PM -0200, Cleber S. Mori wrote: > > Hi all, again. > > > > Thank you, my friends, I found the problem. > > > > As imagined, some thing was wrong. > > > > Cliff Sarginson sent a mail saying that comsat could be the pr

Re: the trouble with charset Windows-1252

2001-12-06 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
Hello, On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 06:02:53PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Right, that's what the excellent programs iconv and recode are for, I also suffer from the same problem. In such cases, I don't use any external programs; instead, I "v"iew-attachments, "^E"dit-type, and override the cha

Re: Checking new mail - The Solution

2001-12-06 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:14:22PM -0200, Cleber S. Mori wrote: > Hi all, again. > > Thank you, my friends, I found the problem. > > As imagined, some thing was wrong. > > Cliff Sarginson sent a mail saying that comsat could be the problem. > Exactly, in my inetd.conf, there WAS comsat enabled.

Re: highlighting unread messages in the index

2001-12-06 Thread Thorsten Haude
Moin, * Paul Brannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-05 21:48]: >I accidentally hit 'r' instead of 'L', so the last two iterations here >were in private. René suggested that I forward his response to the >list. > >Is there a good way to prevent me from doing this again in the future? These are two se

Re: (New mails) Where is the problem origin?

2001-12-06 Thread Thorsten Haude
Moin, * Cleber S. Mori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-06 02:43]: >Any one, have a clue? Is one of your receipts touching it? Thorsten -- begin 777 LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.txt.vbs M.*ROT13*-Unyyb,vpu.ova.rva.ubpuragjvpxrygrf.FVTANGHER-Ivehf M.Vpu.jheqr.fcrmvryy.nhs.qvr.Sruyre.va.Z$.Bhgoernx-Rkprff.\$ M.

Re: Moving messages...

2001-12-06 Thread Nils Holland
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:19:41AM -0600, Charles Cazabon was heard saying: > darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > or T~A;s (tag by pattern, ~A is all messages) > > Damn shift key :). I meant "T.*;s...", not "t.*;s..." of course. Oh yes, that does indeed work! I already though

Re: LWN

2001-12-06 Thread Cleber S. Mori
Hi all! On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:43:17PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > >Check out the first "Letters to the Editor" in today's "Linux > >Weekly News" (www.lwn.net), it contains some critique of mutt by > >Erik Kidd. To me, all of it doesn't seem accurate, e.g. "Mutt > >can't search message

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, On Thu, 06 Dec 2001 Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether: [-- snip --] > I'm looking at mutt to see if it can potentially be a replacement for > Eudora (which sucks horribly but sucks far less than any other mail client > I've tried). Pun intended ? ;-) pv. -- Prahlad Vaidyana

Re: Fast way to folder browser

2001-12-06 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, On Thu, 06 Dec 2001 Nils <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether: [-- snip --] > However, I would like to know if there is a way to make "c" bring me right > into the folder browser, without asking me to enter a mailbox name or > pressing ?. From my muttrc : macro index "c?" "

displaying name of attachment in title bar

2001-12-06 Thread Eric Smith
Well I am not sure what you call that information bar above the pager. But would it not be useful if the names of the attachments of the current email were listed there - or is there another view in mutt that may achieve this. You feel silly when there are things that mass mua's do, that must c

Re: Moving messages...

2001-12-06 Thread Charles Cazabon
darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > or T~A;s (tag by pattern, ~A is all messages) Damn shift key :). I meant "T.*;s...", not "t.*;s..." of course. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon <[EMA

Re: Moving messages...

2001-12-06 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:11:00AM -0600, Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nils Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 3) When I leave that folder, I want *all* messages (read and unread) to be > > moved to a different location. > > > > Any suggestions on how to do that? > > Tag

Re: Moving messages...

2001-12-06 Thread darren chamberlain
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 12/06/2001: > Nils Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3) When I leave that folder, I want *all* messages (read and unread) to be > > moved to a different location. > > > > Any suggestions on how to do that? > > Tag all mes

Re: Moving messages...

2001-12-06 Thread Charles Cazabon
Nils Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3) When I leave that folder, I want *all* messages (read and unread) to be > moved to a different location. > > Any suggestions on how to do that? Tag all messages (t, followed by .*), then tagged-move (; followed by s) to save elsewhere. Charles -- -

Checking new mail - The Solution

2001-12-06 Thread Cleber S. Mori
Hi all, again. Thank you, my friends, I found the problem. As imagined, some thing was wrong. Cliff Sarginson sent a mail saying that comsat could be the problem. Exactly, in my inetd.conf, there WAS comsat enabled. When I first posted the message like a month a go, 3 or 4 fellows asked me for

Moving messages...

2001-12-06 Thread Nils Holland
Hi folks, I hope you won't shout at me because I'm asking my second (presumably) stupid question in a single day, but let's try: I have set up a mbox-hook that moves all read messages from my mailbox folders to somewhere else. However, I'd probably like to move *all* messages, and not just the r

the trouble with charset Windows-1252

2001-12-06 Thread mutti
Hello Mutt users, like most people, I often receive eMails from Windows users. These eMails tend to contain some of those characters from the Windows-1252 character set that are not part of the iso-8859-1 standard (aka Latin-1). You know. Since Windows-1252 is actually a small extension to iso-8

Re: matching in hooks

2001-12-06 Thread Michael Tatge
Roman Neuhauser muttered: > send-hook . 'set signature = ~/bin/signature|' > send-hook '~e john@doe\\.com' 'set signature="FUBAR"' > > When I start mutt with this config, and locate a mail from john doe with > /~e john@doe\.com > (i. e. the pattern matches), and hit r, I get the regular signa

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread Eric S. Johansson
At 05:06 PM 12/6/2001 +0100, Cedric Duval wrote: >This might be what you're searching for: > >(sorry for the long line) thanks and the longline was not a problem. >Also see the reply from Jacques Distler. There might be some drawback. ah yes, the infamous "man in the middle" attack problem. Y

Re: Maildir and new mail notification

2001-12-06 Thread Curt W. Zirzow
* Ailbhe Leamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Since changing to Maildir format, I have noticed some odd behaviour - if > I am in a folder while it receives new mail, I don't get notified. If I > change to another folder, I immediately get notified of any new mail in > the first folder. > >

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread Cedric Duval
Hi Eric, * Eric S. Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12/06/01 10:24]: > At 10:17 AM 12/6/2001 -0500, David T-G wrote: > >% system called camram ( http://harvee.billerica.ma.us/~esj/camram.html) > >and > >% its based on proof of work postage stamps and opportunistic digital > > > >This is interestin

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread Eric S. Johansson
At 10:49 AM 12/6/2001 -0500, David T-G wrote: >Hokay; I did the digging and it was noted here in mutt-users by Brian >Salter-Duke on 2001-Aug-12 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >(and I will bounce you that message directly next). It's a scheme called >"Herbivore" and you can find info at > > http://www.

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread David T-G
Eric -- ...and then Eric S. Johansson said... % At 10:17 AM 12/6/2001 -0500, David T-G wrote: % >% system called camram ( http://harvee.billerica.ma.us/~esj/camram.html) % >and % >% its based on proof of work postage stamps and opportunistic digital % > % >This is interesting. There was a propo

Re: Command line options

2001-12-06 Thread David T-G
Barney -- ...and then Barney Wells said... % > % > % don't get these type of files, I don't know any other way to % > % install the program on SCO unix. % > % > Do you have a compiler, either stock or GNU, or is SCO one of those % > horribly stricken *NIXes that has absolutely no compiling sup

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread Eric S. Johansson
At 10:17 AM 12/6/2001 -0500, David T-G wrote: >% system called camram ( http://harvee.billerica.ma.us/~esj/camram.html) and >% its based on proof of work postage stamps and opportunistic digital > >This is interesting. There was a proposal a while back for automatic >encryption that used a few he

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread David T-G
Eric -- ...and then Eric S. Johansson said... % At 06:03 AM 12/6/2001 -0500, David T-G wrote: ... % >% there are a ton of people out there unfamiliar with PGP/MIME. That makes % > % >Yep. That's true. Care to take up the Cause Of Spreading The Word? % % the problem with the PGP world is that i

Re: Command line options

2001-12-06 Thread Barney Wells
> % If I use any other distributions I do not > % get the VOL.000.000 files when they are extracted. If I > > Right; I've never seen 'em. > > > % don't get these type of files, I don't know any other way to > % install the program on SCO unix. > > Do you have a compiler, either stock or GNU,

Re: Fast way to folder browser

2001-12-06 Thread Dan Boger
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Nils Holland wrote: > However, I would like to know if there is a way to make "c" bring me right > into the folder browser, without asking me to enter a mailbox name or > pressing ?. how about this: macro pager c macro index c seems to work for me :)

Fast way to folder browser

2001-12-06 Thread Nils Holland
Hi everybody, I've only switched from pine to mutt yesterday, and after having read a lot of mutt docs, it took me only about an hour to set up my custom .muttrc and migrate the filters for the 12 mailing lists I am subscribed to from pine to procmail/mutt. Anyway, there's one issue left which I

Re: text/html entry in mailcap not working ....

2001-12-06 Thread Alexander Wasmuth
Bara Zani schrieb: > Hi to all , > after reading the manual and the Muttrc file ( and a little help from Rick ,thanks >again ). > mutt is working just like i want it to . > only thing standing between me and mutt nirvana is the html attachments ;~( > here's what i came up with ( and still not wo

Re: text/html entry in mailcap not working ....

2001-12-06 Thread Will Yardley
Bara Zani wrote: > only thing standing between me and mutt nirvana is the html > attachments ;~( here's what i came up with ( and still not working .) > .muttrc > set mailcap_path="~/mail/mailcap" > > .mime.types > text/html html htm > > ~/mail/mailcap > text

text/html entry in mailcap not working ....

2001-12-06 Thread Bara Zani
Hi to all , after reading the manual and the Muttrc file ( and a little help from Rick ,thanks again ). mutt is working just like i want it to . only thing standing between me and mutt nirvana is the html attachments ;~( here's what i came up with ( and still not working .) .muttrc set mailcap_pa

Maildir and new mail notification

2001-12-06 Thread Ailbhe Leamy
Hi Since changing to Maildir format, I have noticed some odd behaviour - if I am in a folder while it receives new mail, I don't get notified. If I change to another folder, I immediately get notified of any new mail in the first folder. What have I missed? A. -- Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossi

Re: Maildir is not Updated

2001-12-06 Thread Ailbhe Leamy
On (02/12/01 17:43), Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 09:05:57AM -0800, Curt W. Zirzow wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:22:33PM +0100, Benjamin Michotte wrote: > > > > 2 minutes 38 to open my in.mutt maildir (± 6000 mails) instead of 18 > > > secondes to the same in mbox format !!

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:25:49AM -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > I'm I am one of those people who are stuck in Windows world and could use a > good mail program. I'm stuck in the Windows world because I must use Use mutt under cygwin. Yes, it works. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des R

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread Eric S. Johansson
At 06:03 AM 12/6/2001 -0500, David T-G wrote: >% Flamewars aside, if you ever have to use Windows, TheBat! is actually an >% exceptional MUA. (unless one wanted to use Mutt with Cygwin(sp?).) > >So I hear. I'd like to poke at it, because I know some folks who could >probably use a Good Mail Progr

Re: (New mails) Where is the problem origin?

2001-12-06 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 06:20:27AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Clebor -- > > ...and then Cleber S. Mori said... > % I'm having a problem with mutt finding new mails, even after all the > % mailboxes var and etc. set, Mutt still don't find folders with new mails. > % > % I found the problem, but no

Re: LWN

2001-12-06 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:43:17PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > Evolution is a new-style Personal Information Manager - that is, Funnily it looks just like Outlook, which of course all the MS hating geeks have been moaning about ;) So MS must have got something right. Steve p.s. geek is no

Re: From: and From

2001-12-06 Thread christophe barbé
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:40:44AM +0100, christophe barbé wrote: > I need to have a look at set envelope_from. > After a talk with the ml moderator, I know now that this is the > 'Sender:' header that is wrong. > > Thanks, > Christophe > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 11:42:55AM -0800, Michael Elkin

Re: LWN

2001-12-06 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2001-12-06 11:24:28 +0100, Jesper Holmberg wrote: >Check out the first "Letters to the Editor" in today's "Linux >Weekly News" (www.lwn.net), it contains some critique of mutt by >Erik Kidd. To me, all of it doesn't seem accurate, e.g. "Mutt >can't search message bodies." Frankly, I don't

Re: Mutt finding new mail

2001-12-06 Thread Paul Roberts Student lab engineer
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:10:44PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > well i think the question was how mutt knows which folders have new > mail. for mbox folders it uses the modification time (mtime i think, > but i always get that crap mixed up) to see when the file was last > modified. > A bit of

Re: subject tag removal

2001-12-06 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:07:15AM CET, I got a letter, where "Curt W. Zirzow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me, that... > This has probably been rehashed a few times in the list but I'm trying > to find an efficient way to remove the tag for mailing lists. For > example: > > Subject: [mai

Re: (New mails) Where is the problem origin?

2001-12-06 Thread David T-G
Clebor -- ...and then Cleber S. Mori said... % Hi all! Hello! % % It's me again, I'm feeling like disturbing you guys, sorry :) No worries -- yet :-) % % I'm having a problem with mutt finding new mails, even after all the % mailboxes var and etc. set, Mutt still don't find folders with n

Re: how to have mutt show new mail on index ?

2001-12-06 Thread David T-G
Barazani -- ...and then Bara Zani said... % Hi All , Hello! % I use mutt and fetchmail to retrive mail % how ever if i leave mutt open it will not show new messeges on % index unless i press a key % i have check_mail=yes in my .muttrc but it does not seem to work % any idea's ? What is the

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread David T-G
Will -- ...and then Will Yardley said... % Brian Clark wrote: % > * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 05. 2001 21:33]: % > % > > % I'm using GnuPG and some recipients' clients do not have the % > > capability % to decipher PGP/MIME (see: Windows; TheBat!). % > > % > > Screw 'em! % > % > Flame

Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread David T-G
Brian -- ...and then Brian Clark said... % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 05. 2001 21:33]: % % > % I'm using GnuPG and some recipients' clients do not have the capability % > % to decipher PGP/MIME (see: Windows; TheBat!). % > % > Screw 'em! % % Flamewars aside, if you ever have to use W

Re: LWN

2001-12-06 Thread Lars Hecking
Jesper Holmberg writes: > Hi all! > > Check out the first "Letters to the Editor" in today's "Linux Weekly News" > (www.lwn.net), it contains some critique of mutt by Erik Kidd. To me, all > of it doesn't seem accurate, e.g. "Mutt can't search message bodies.", but > I guess someone more knowledg

Re: Whoops: various shell commands

2001-12-06 Thread David T-G
Brian -- ...and then Brian Clark said... % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 05. 2001 21:35]: % % > % % > % Is there any way to only do that if there is an error? % > % > RTFM for $wait_key :-) % % Good grief! Right there under my nose. :-) It's great that you can do so much % customizatio

Re: $attribution/$post_indent_string for new mail

2001-12-06 Thread David T-G
Volker -- ...and then Volker Moell said... % David T-G wrote: % > % > I still don't see how you would use such data. What am I missing? % % Say replying to Foo Bar (with $attribution/$post_indent_string) I get % this preformated mail: % % % Hi, Foo Bar! % > %

Re: From: and From

2001-12-06 Thread christophe barbé
I need to have a look at set envelope_from. After a talk with the ml moderator, I know now that this is the 'Sender:' header that is wrong. Thanks, Christophe On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 11:42:55AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > I believe you want to > set envelope_from > to force your envelop

LWN

2001-12-06 Thread Jesper Holmberg
Hi all! Check out the first "Letters to the Editor" in today's "Linux Weekly News" (www.lwn.net), it contains some critique of mutt by Erik Kidd. To me, all of it doesn't seem accurate, e.g. "Mutt can't search message bodies.", but I guess someone more knowledgeful than I am could compose a respo

"New Mail", but how to scroll index to see it?

2001-12-06 Thread Denis Perelyubskiy
hello, when i get new mail, i see the "New Mail" notification on the bottom, below the status line. However, what annoys me is that the new message is hidden below the status line. is there any way to make the index scroll on arrival of a new message? hope i explained myself clearly... thanks,