Hi Eric, * Eric S. Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12/06/01 10:24]: > At 10:17 AM 12/6/2001 -0500, David T-G wrote: > >% system called camram ( http://harvee.billerica.ma.us/~esj/camram.html) > >and > >% its based on proof of work postage stamps and opportunistic digital > > > >This is interesting. There was a proposal a while back for automatic > >encryption that used a few headers to automatically ask for or advertise > >a key and it made PGP a lot more manageable by making it automatic. > > > >I can't for the life of me remember what it was, but it was either in > >this list or another. If you're interested I can dig it up to provide > >you the reference for your work.
> that would be wonderful! Even if I reinvent the wheel, I still want to > know the intellectual ancestors of the ideas so I can make sure I'm on the > right track. It would also be really swell if I could interest someone on > the mutt team would be to develop camram functionality for Mutt. This might be what you're searching for: http://groups.google.fr/groups?hl=fr&threadm=20010812181047.A21083%40lacebark.ntu.edu.au&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3D%2522herbivore%2Band%2Bmutt%2522%26hl%3Dfr (sorry for the long line) Also see the reply from Jacques Distler. There might be some drawback. -- Cedric
